Skip navigation.

Chris At Home

A Jawa American Living in Mindanao

Michelle Targeted Again

As usual, her Left critics are reduced to racist and sexual insults instead of attacking her positions directly. Apparently, Asian women are not allowed to have opinions in some circles.



The post was made by Alex Pareene, a professional blogger at Wonkette. Oddly, the comments call Michelle a hateful person instead of the piece of sh*t who implied she was a low-grade whore. More examples of racial tolerance are at the above link.

Update: More tolerance noted here. The phrase "dumb ass bitch" appears near an oral sex reference.

Update: Allah ain't happy.

KFC Gets Business From PETADhimmis Down Under

Comments

Anonymous 21. May 2006, 07:28

Blooper writes:

Ahh, the new Republicans, so sensitive to intolerance! Well dopey, check it out, it's called hypocrisy. Malkin has been on her Mohammad Cartoon Jihad kick for a while now. So apparently it's vitally important for democracy that cartoons (which are so offensive to a a religious group of people that it causes violent protest) be shoved down all our throats (After all, they're just cartoons for our Lord Jesus Christ's sakes!)

But when somebody makes offensive jokes towards her, it's like, totally different. No doubt because she made some complex moral reasoning weighing racist speech versus anti-religious imagery that she didn't let us in on, and not because she has a wildly inconsistent worldview that all Republicans don't not have.

Well y'know what, if Wonkette can't make racist sexist jokes about Michelle Malkin, the terrorists win.

I do love this argument that conservatives have become fond of lately- "Sure, in general we are pretty intolerant towards all non-whites, non-Christians, intellectuals, immigrants, dirty poor people, dirty French people, etc... But look at how intolerant all of them are towards us!" They then take the most outrageous liberal statement they can find, even if they have to scavenge for forum trolls and go through their anonymous hate mail, and then hold it up as the mainstream liberal view while ignoring anything approaching reasoned critique.

Hear that sound? That's the sound of democracy dying slowly and painfully. Thank you conservative punditry!

cbjohnso 21. May 2006, 07:58

That is your best excuse? Showing the Mohammed cartoons offended Muslims, so the Left should insult her gender, race, morality and sexual habits? It sounds pretty lame to me.

Why is it the Left feels so free to use such insults? Is it because they *know* they are truly tolerant so intolerance is somehow allowed? Why don't racist, bigoted, womanizing Conservatives use this language?

Keep in mind, Tony Snow is being roughed up for using the word "tar-baby" in its commonly understood sense. Compare and contrast, Blooper.

Anonymous 21. May 2006, 17:39

Blooper writes:

Compare and contrast

Malkin's stance on the Mohammed cartoons: Chastise the mainstream media for not showing them, call them cowards for not wanting to spread hate. Do not condemn the cartoons as offensive (which she didn't of course, because she is bigoted against Muslims, just like you obviously are) while making the argument they should not be censored (After all, such fine distinctions make conservative's heads explode).

Malkin's stance on personal attacks: Paints herself as a victim and martyrs herself for her acolytes, even though the actions she advocated (that all the MSM show the Mohammed cartoons) would have really put people in danger.

This would have been a consistent position: Simply ignore Wonkette, accepting that it's a joke that she makes herself vulnerable to with the positions she takes. Elevate herself above it. But that would take some class. And actually whining about it? Now that's a joke.

Racist, bigoted, womanizing Conservatives don't use this language anymore because it would make their racist bigoted policy position even more obvious. Liberals make jokes, we have to find humor in the horrible mess your leaders and pundits have made of politics in this country, at least until we spank your asses in the midterm elections.

cbjohnso 22. May 2006, 07:52

Cave in to intimidation? That seems to be your point. Toss the First Amendment at the first threat. Allow any group that claims offense at any statement (or cartoon) to censor the speech of all people everywhere in the world. While pictures of Mohammed are sold in Tehran, allow extremists to incite violence for depicting Mohammed in a European newspaper. That doesn't make sense to me.

Following your logic, Malkin had the right to show the cartoons because Muslim countries publish anti-semitic cartoons regularly. Following your logic, the Left will now be attacked because they attacked Malkin.

The only position that makes sense is to attack arguments, not people. It is difficult for me to believe that you want to defend statements that seem to call Malkin a Thai bar whore who does vagina tricks because she is a female Asian who disagrees with Left positions.

Chris
November 2009
S M T W T F S
October 2009December 2009
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30