The Big Roundup
Saturday, August 5, 2006 5:14:26 PM
And it is 7 hours late. Sorry about that....
- What is the BBC's view of the current Middle Eastern conflict? They are worried about the terrorists, but not Israel. Saus calculates that 99% of the screen space is devoted to anti-Israel news, ignoring Israeli casualites and attacks against Israel. He has a screenshot to prove it.
- Gang of "youths" frequently attack church in Blackburn. The good news is that a mosque official calls the behavior, "disgraceful and disrespectful."
- Iranian-built Fajr-5 missiles hit farther into Israel, kill 3. 10 rockets hit Haifa, knocking out power there. Israel raids Tyre and wipes out a cell responsible for launching many rockets into Israel.
- Iran admitted to providing Zetzal-2 missiles to Hezbullah and pledges to provide surface to air missile systems as well. A senior Iranian cleric calls for arming Hezbullah, is already behind the times.
- CAIR says Americans support a Lebanese ceasefire, launches a "Not in America's Name" campaign.
- 2 suitcase bombs were found on German trains this week. One had Arabic writing inside. They were believed to originate in Beirut.
- RCP questions why Western leaders can' see the obvious:
You hear a lot of talk these days about the "clever" Iranians and what good "chess players" they are in the contest of international diplomacy. But the Iranian strategy is, in fact, crudely transparent and obviously morally bankrupt. Everyone can grasp this--yet our leaders keep falling into the Iranian traps.
Everyone knows that Iran is using Hezbollah's war in Lebanon to distract attention from its nuclear weapons program. The Iranians were given a July 5 deadline to suspend uranium enrichment or face "serious consequences." The contemptuous Iranians declared that they wouldn't reply for another six weeks, on August 22. Then Hezbollah--a wholly-owned subsidiary of Iran's Revolutionary Guards--initiated their war in Lebanon, and no one has paid attention to the Iranian nuclear program for the past three weeks. Now, finally, we are sending a new resolution to the UN Security Council--giving Iran until August 31 to agree to talks or face another months-long debate about whether we will impose sanctions against them.
I believe that Hezbullah did not expect the invasion of Lebanon so I dispute whether this notion of an Iranian distraction is correct. However, that does not mean that I disagree with the stupidity of ignoring the Iranian nuke program while everyone bargains for a ceasefire. - Clarity from the Times:
There will never be peace in the region as long as Hezbollah, backed by its sponsoring regimes in Iran and Syria, is allowed to threaten Israel militarily. A ceasefire that left Hezbollah claiming victory on the battlefield would hugely strengthen its fighters as well as those of Hamas, draining authority from the Lebanese Government and Mahmoud Abbas, the President of the Palestinian Authority, while unsettling further Western-friendly regimes in Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Egypt. Defeating Hezbollah, though, would strengthen the arm of those Arab leaders who see the benefit of an Israeli-Palestinian two-state solution while also curbing the regional influence of Tehran and Damascus.
- Victor Davis Hanson blames wounded Arab honor and pride for rise of Jihad:
For about the last half-century, globalization has passed most of the recalcitrant Middle East by -- economically, socially and politically. The result is that there are now few inventions and little science emanating from the Islamic world -- but a great deal of poverty, tyranny and violence. And rather than make the necessary structural changes that might end cultural impediments to progress and modernity -- such as tribalism, patriarchy, gender apartheid, polygamy, autocracy, statism and fundamentalism -- too many Middle Easterners have preferred to embrace the reactionary past and the cult of victimization.
...
Victimization turns out to be the real creed of the Middle East, uniting disparate Shiites, Sunnis, dictators, theocrats and terrorists. "They did it to us" offers an easy explanation of why Islamic states are now weak and offer little hope to millions of their poor, who, ironically, emigrate to the much pilloried West by the millions. - Victor DAvis Hanson (again) has a must-read:
But nevertheless it is still surreal to reread the fantasies of Chamberlain, Daladier, and Pope Pius, or the stump speeches by Charles Lindbergh (“Their [the Jews’] greatest danger to this country lies in their large ownership and influence in our motion pictures, our press, our radio, and our government”) or Father Coughlin (“Many people are beginning to wonder whom they should fear most — the Roosevelt-Churchill combination or the Hitler-Mussolini combination.”) — and it is even more baffling to consider that such men ever had any influence.
Not any longer.
Our present generation too is on the brink of moral insanity. That has never been more evident than in the last three weeks, as the West has proven utterly unable to distinguish between an attacked democracy that seeks to strike back at terrorist combatants, and terrorist aggressors who seek to kill civilians. -
Krauthammer says Olmert should justify US support:
Hence Israel's rare opportunity to demonstrate what it can do for its great American patron. The defeat of Hezbollah would be a huge loss for Iran, both psychologically and strategically. Iran would lose its foothold in Lebanon. It would lose its major means to destabilize and inject itself into the heart of the Middle East. It would be shown to have vastly overreached in trying to establish itself as the regional superpower.
The United States has gone far out on a limb to allow Israel to win and for all this to happen. It has counted on Israel's ability to do the job. - Iraq the Model hammers the Arab media for trafficking in hate and distortion.
- Mark Stein on Qana, as a follow-up to the non-massacre at Jenin:
Just because you want to wipe Israel off the map doesn’t mean you can reliably identify which bit of the map it’s on. The other day Hezbollah did as they’ve done for weeks now: they fired a missile in the general direction of the Zionist Entity in hopes it would kill some civilians in Haifa, Tel Avia, wherever. Instead, it overshot and landed near Jenin. On the West Bank. In the Palestinian territories.
Fortunately no one was killed. Otherwise, the sight of Palestinian Muslims killed by Hezbollah Muslims might have flummoxed world opinion, albeit only for a nano-second. - The National Post gives an update on Qana, and is skeptical.

From here.









operamaxmuller # Saturday, August 5, 2006 10:23:59 PM
Gang of "youths" frequently attack church in Blackburn. The good news is that a mosque official calls the behavior, "disgraceful and disrespectful."
The BAD news is that the article refused to identify that the "gang of youths" were Muslim. I couldn't figure it out and had to read between the lines.
This is the power of Muslin Jihad: Political Correctness.
Goddam:
"ISLAMIC MUSLIMN GANG OF YOUTHS VANDALIZE CHURCH" should be the headline.
stupid stupid dimwit dhimminis
operamaxmuller # Sunday, August 6, 2006 3:28:12 AM
National Post
Published: Friday, August 04, 2006
But as is alleged to be the case at Qana, initial civilian-death claims -- Palestinians originally said hundreds had been killed -- were exaggerated. Even among the 52 non-combatants believed to have actually died in the fighting, later investigation revealed that many had perished, not at the hands of Israeli troops, but in the blasts of booby-traps set by Palestinian terrorists themselves to defend their hideouts,
-------------------------
Why are they saying "Palestinians"? People living in Lebanon should be referred to as Lebanese or Lebanese Hezbollah.
I checked wikipedia, there are 338,000 people of Palestinian derivation living in Lebanon. But I can't see why in a war with Hezbollah in Lebanon , the writer should refer to to them as Palestinian.
I'm reading the article again. I think it is badly written , the author meant to compare the previous history of Qana to the current event but all throughout the article each sentence is confusing as to which event he is referring to. The current event was 58 downscaled to 28 deaths. I have the feeling this was a archived new story hastily cobbled. He's got is right though but not clearly.
Anonymous # Monday, August 7, 2006 1:04:51 AM
Chriscbjohnso # Monday, August 7, 2006 2:11:09 PM
http://hughhewitt.townhall.com/g/47ca0c0c-369c-4b8e-bc0b-87226200b708
Someday, Opera will handle trackbacks well and I will know who links me
operamaxmuller # Monday, August 7, 2006 8:52:44 PM