Wednesday, 23. August 2006, 14:32:38
It is often asked: How big is the Universe? Is it expanding?
The universe is expanding only in our perception.
The universe used to be a perfect sphere surrounding the Earth, and the Sun and all the heavens revolved around the Earth.
Then the Sun became the center of the universe, and the heavens, including the Earth, revolved around the Sun.
Telescopes added the idea that the Solar System revolves around a massive thing called a galaxy.
Then, some nebulosities were recognized to be galaxies, and the universe got really big. In the 1920s Edwin Hubble showed that the Milky Way was just one of a vast number of galaxies scattered throughout the universe.
They tried counting the galaxies to see if there were more in one direction than another. No luck.
Then they took a long long look into the deepest depths of the universe. They found thousands of more galaxies.
Since they can now see galaxies that are 13 billion years old, they want to conclude that the universe is 13 billion years old.
Again, they want to assume that we are at the center of the universe and so the light we see is coming from the 'edge' of the universe. They want to conclude that the universe is expanding (away from us at the center) in all directions.
Do you not find this laughable?
The Theory of Relativity, (or is it the Special Theory of Relativity?) states that nothing can go faster than light, and that no matter how fast you are traveling, you have a 'frame of reference,' and that if you measure the speed of light, it will always be the same constant. Light will have the same speed even if you are traveling at 90% of the speed of light, not 190%. These illogical conclusions are a result of the mathematical gymnastics that is used in these theories.
It is my opinion that gravity is faster than light, otherwise light would be able to escape from a black hole. I am very skeptical about the whole scenario. There is too much we don't know about time, gravity and electromagnetic energies under high acceleration and gravity. If gravity can decelerate light in some way and trap it in a black hole, then why can't gravity accelerate light that is passing very near but not into the event horizon? Why is the red shift considered to be only a measure of distance and not a measure of the effect of gravity?
How can the gravity of a galaxy create a 'galactic lens' that creates 4 images of a farther galaxy. If light from a far object can be bent toward a galaxy then why is there not an apparent ring of galaxies around the galactic lens rather than 4 images? Why 4 rather than 360? Light from the Sun is refracted into a circular image by the droplets of water in the air. This is because the droplets are spheres that refract the light in all directions. Is he gravity from a distant galaxy spherical? Or does the gravity strength reflect the disk shape or globular cluster shape of the galaxy? What gravity shape could produce 4 images of a further galaxy? Does this have something to do with the true nature of time?
Thanks for reading this far! Do you like these ramblings of mine?