An Era of Choice Begins in March

,

Choose your browser

It is a great time for PC users! After a considerable time, the European Commission and Microsoft have finally come to an agreement that will give Web surfers a proper choice of how they can experience the web. After March 17th 2010 European users of Windows whose default browser is Internet Explorer will be able to receive a Windows Update that shows a Choice Screen (sometimes known as a Ballot Screen) presenting the top 5 Web browsers along with links to install the browsers and to get more information about them.


These browsers, presented in a random order, are: Opera, Internet Explorer, Firefox, Chrome and Safari. In addition, 7 lesser known browsers: AOL Explorer, Maxthon, K-Meleon, Flock, Avant Browser, Sleipnir and Slim Browser, will be options that are available to users if they scroll the Choice Screen to the right -- a total of 12 choices.

This new avenue for consumer choice is a result of the European Commission's antitrust case against Microsoft in regards to a violation of Article 82 of the Treaty establishing the European Community. In the case, it was alleged that Microsoft was exploiting a dominant position in the operating system market to increase their share in the web browser market in a way that is not based on the real merits of the product.

Although some may consider the implications of this browser Choice Screen to be trivial, the unfortunate truth is that a very large segment of PC users out there simply are not aware that they have a choice in regards to what web browsers they can use. Even if they are aware that several browsers exist, they have little understanding of the differences are between competing browsers, or the benefits each may have over others. The vast majority of consumers are using one of the most critical pieces of software simply because that is what their operating system vendor includes, which has resulted in a massive bias in browser use. Microsoft has also made it extremely impractical for PC manufacturers to include competing browsers.

In the past, because of a large dominance of Internet Explorer, and because IE was not very standards compliant, this would lead Web developers to create sites that were optimized for IE, and that used browser-specific methods of implementing Web sites. If someone chose to use a different browser because it worked better for them, and it met their requirements better, it was not uncommon to have issues with Web pages appearing or functioning incorrectly. Modern Web sites are becoming ever more complex and sophisticated, and with our lives being increasingly dependent on the Web, it is also increasingly important that the functionality of Web sites remains consistent across platforms and browsers.

In 2007 Opera Software filed an antitrust complaint with the EU that Microsoft had illegally tied IE to Windows and that there is ongoing competitive harm from Microsoft's practices. Particularly in regards to new proprietary technologies that would reduce compatibility with open Internet standards and hinder competition. In February 2009, Mozilla, and then Google joined in to support the proceedings. The EU has many mechanisms to ensure that anti-competitive practices are kept in check so that businesses generally act in the best interest of the consumer. When the European Commission investigated the issue with Microsoft and Internet Explorer, it determined that Microsoft would be required to give users a fair and unbiased choice of which Web browser they would like to use.

In response, Microsoft attempted to create a unique version of Windows 7 - "Windows 7 E" that did not include Internet Explorer at all, but based on past such experiences with Windows Media Player it was obvious that this would not provide a solution adequate to address the concerns of the European Commission, so as it turns out there will be no "E" version of Windows 7, and instead, users of Windows XP, Windows Vista and Windows 7 will all be able to receive the same Browser Choice Screen Windows update.

Most should view the Choice Screen as great progress towards encouraging innovation in technology and the evolution of the Web. It will help to level the playing field for all browsers and will make it easy for users to select and install the browser of their choice. Also, because this Choice Screen will help to spread awareness of other browsers, it should ultimately make the use of the Web a better experience, regardless of which browser one uses.

In addition to now allowing a choice of browser, Microsoft will be required to allow PC manufacturers to bundle competing Web browsers with Windows. Microsoft now also must be more open with information regarding interoperability for their browser such that it is possible for competitors to allow their Web browsers to work well with certain Web applications where before it was nearly impossible to use a full degree of functionality without Internet Explorer.

The culmination of the investigation and the European Commission decision should be a great boon to consumer choice on the web, and the progression of standards and technology on the web that will greatly benefit developers, manufacturers and of course users of Internet technology -- a significant portion of the human population that is increasing at a rapid pace. When there is a step ahead in technology or society, it piques curiosity about what the next steps will be. Will this have a positive impact on the web? How might other types of software or other manufacturers be affected by decisions like this in the future?

We would like to hear what others might have to think about the points brought up in this article, and what people from the community here think the impact might be. We are eager to read your comments.

Microsoft v. EU Internet Explorer Timeline
December 17, 2007 Opera files a complaint commencing a two-year anti-trust investigation.
January 17, 2009 The European Commission accuses Microsoft of illegally tying Internet Explorer to Windows.
February 9, 2009 Mozilla joins the anti-trust suit against Microsoft.
February 25, 2009 Google also joins the anti-trust case against Microsoft.
June 12, 2009 Microsoft offers to remove Internet Explorer from Windows. The Commission suggests a choice screen.
July 24, 2009 Microsoft agrees to the browser choice screen proposal.
October 7, 2009 Microsoft begins testing of the new browser choice screen for Europe.
December 16, 2009 The European Commission wraps up its investigation; Consumers now have the option to use an alternative browser with Windows.

How important is browser security to you?Mobile reception at the South Pole?

Comments

Ali GrotkowskiAliKira Wednesday, January 20, 2010 7:40:13 PM

It would be nice if this were available in North America too. However it is a very interesting development.

Joseph D. Lienjdlien Wednesday, January 20, 2010 7:49:22 PM

I agree - I believe that North Americans should also have this opportunity to become aware of superior alternatives. Perhaps some day!

ouzowtfouzoWTF Wednesday, January 20, 2010 7:58:12 PM

December 16, 2010
!?
I think it should be 2009 smile

Rafael Luikrafaelluik Wednesday, January 20, 2010 8:46:26 PM

yes
I would like it to be Worldwide!! smile
I would like to see the ballot in Linux, Mac and other OSs also! smile

Joseph D. Lienjdlien Wednesday, January 20, 2010 8:47:43 PM

Yes, corrected. Thanks.

IKoke Wednesday, January 20, 2010 9:14:39 PM

cheers

L2D2 Wednesday, January 20, 2010 9:33:27 PM

As a PC user who, since installing Opera, have experienced applications that do not support Opera, but are made to work with IE or Firefox, I would surely like to see this happen in the U.S. also.

When I first started using Opera, IE was still my default browser, and my Opera browser constantly crashed. Since making O my default browser, I have had very few crashes.

C'mon Microsoft, we want the options that Europe now has. I hate IE

Tamil Wednesday, January 20, 2010 10:03:49 PM

up

Daniel HendrycksDanielHendrycks Wednesday, January 20, 2010 10:13:44 PM

up

civitasster Wednesday, January 20, 2010 10:37:15 PM

As football. sing

NickTARF Wednesday, January 20, 2010 10:41:36 PM

I think this is a disgrace. I have never used Opera and I NEVER will. I have no love for MS (I'm a Mac user) but the idea that they should be FORCED into giving users a ballot screen is obscene and dangerous. Mozilla and Google have done a pretty good job of gaining market share WITHOUT government intervention. It is a testament to the petty and small minded developers behind Opera that they feel they need to recruit government to hold a gun to Microsoft's head to allow them to compete 'fairly'. IE is the worst browser around but I would sooner use it than Opera which, regardless of any features it may or may not have, is now piggybacking on the coercive power of the state.

If anyone in this world still believes in freedom at all, they WILL NOT use Opera. I hope you go out of business, its the LEAST that you deserve.

Rafael Luikrafaelluik Wednesday, January 20, 2010 10:43:20 PM

Originally posted by TARF:

If anyone in this world still believes in freedom at all, they WILL NOT use Opera. I hope you go out of business, its the LEAST that you deserve.

Originally posted by jdlien:

July 24, 2009 - Microsoft agrees to the browser choice screen proposal.

As you can see Microsoft had freedom to choice and agreed with the proposal, now the users have freedom to choice which web browser they want to use based in a list: no more M$ monopoly!

NickTARF Wednesday, January 20, 2010 10:54:43 PM

Originally posted by rafaelluik:

July 24, 2009 - Microsoft agrees to the browser choice screen proposal.
As you see Microsoft had freedom to choice and agreed with the proposal, now the users have freedom to choice which web browser they want to use based in a list: no more MS monopoly!


People agree to anything when they have a gun to their head. Back when I used windows I didn't use IE. The fact is that Opera aren't doing as well as they want so they called the government in to help them out. Clearly Opera have no morals and think nothing of employing coercive force in the market place.

praetor87 Wednesday, January 20, 2010 11:00:43 PM

Almost the half of the line-up is trident based. :S I see, Redmond easily approved this. Probably they like it, because they don't need to worry about the features. They have many skinned clone. Opera is still unique.

Originally posted by TARF:

Clearly Opera have no morals and think nothing of employing coercive force in the market place.



Looks like a bunch of firm "have no morals". Mozilla and Google join to this. After IE6 i don't know who "have no morals", but Microsoft is not in good mode in this topic. They have already forfeited their reputation in Europe.

lucideer Wednesday, January 20, 2010 11:12:17 PM

I must say the 12 browser ballot is a lot better than I (probably most) expected. I do find the choice of browsers to go on it a little odd though (not necessarily bad - just odd).

5 IE Shells, some of which I've never heard of, and no sign of some browsers I have, like Seamonkey or Arora - does anyone know what the choices were based on? Usage?

BlueFalcon Wednesday, January 20, 2010 11:18:13 PM

Didn't this happen in Mac too? I mean, Safari comes as a default and pre-installed browser in all the macs

lucideer Wednesday, January 20, 2010 11:19:02 PM

Originally posted by BlueFalcon:

Didn't this happen in Mac too? I mean, Safari comes as a default and pre-installed browser in all the macs


I don't think so - you have to download them yourself on a Mac, there's no ballot.

Danieledarklink88 Wednesday, January 20, 2010 11:38:15 PM

Originally posted by BlueFalcon:

Didn't this happen in Mac too? I mean, Safari comes as a default and pre-installed browser in all the macs



well, it's a bit different....on macosx you CAN unistall safari or quick time witouth problems, on windows if you remove ie or windows media player, the system becomes unstable....in addition Webkit is able to score 100/100 on acid3 like our Presto.

That said, i'm happy for the ballot screen solution...I hope to see opera users growing!

BlueFalcon Wednesday, January 20, 2010 11:52:03 PM

Originally posted by darklink88:

well, it's a bit different....on macosx you CAN unistall safari or quick time witouth problems, on windows if you remove ie or windows media player, the system becomes unstable....in addition Webkit is able to score 100/100 on acid3 like our Presto.




I hadn't thought in that way, but your right. Thanks for the answers bigsmile

Charles SchlossChas4 Thursday, January 21, 2010 12:52:21 AM

Originally posted by AliKira:

It would be nice if this were available in North America too


+1

shaneh Thursday, January 21, 2010 1:18:31 AM

Nick ; Mozilla are just as happy to jump on the ballot screen bandwagon:
http://blog.lizardwrangler.com/tag/microsoft/

http://gizmodo.com/5383382/mozilla-whines-about-apple-being-first-in-microsofts-web-browser-ballot-screen

Opera just has the finances and organisation to actually do something about it and make it happen. All the browser makers plus the EU AND Microsoft agree to it.

techlawsam Thursday, January 21, 2010 1:46:36 AM

yes

TimothyElementalFire Thursday, January 21, 2010 2:03:21 AM

Stricty speaking, all this talk of "coercive force" does not phase me when I think of the viral marketing techniques employed Firefox and Chrome (the reason why they have at least 80% of their current share if you include collateral) - Opera ASA have chosen not to employ viral marketing techniques and I see no reason why people should be upset about this. If you don't have IE as a default, this update won't do anything (the article makes it clear the update only affects people who have IE set as their default browser). If you DO have IE as a default, then it's very possible you have no idea about the options available to you - I applaud this and agree that this would be very beneficial to the browser market as a whole, as it would encourage further developments and competition.

It's the lesser of two evils, as far as I'm concerned.

Hector Macias Ayalahectormacias Thursday, January 21, 2010 2:10:56 AM

Originally posted by BlueFalcon:

Didn't this happen in Mac too? I mean, Safari comes as a default and pre-installed browser in all the macs



Unfortunately Apple wasnt issued by Opera for not giving others a chance, as happened with MS.

kris TREAGUSkrzystoff Thursday, January 21, 2010 3:55:47 AM

many Linux versions do come with such options at installation. there is no single preferred browser there -- they're all piss poor.

OSX most likely doesn't have five useable browsers to choose...

what other OSes are there worth mentioning -- Chromium ? :-)

kris TREAGUSkrzystoff Thursday, January 21, 2010 4:05:09 AM

I'd like to see these rolled out Worldwide.
Microsoft included in Win7 something like this for Antiviral software, but I'd like to see an option for email, PIM, media player, video editor, image manager, compression tool, and office suite:

- after all, what cranial-thinking biped actually still uses Outlook Express??
- Media player/iTunes are fine for a few minutes but once you find all the other fantastic alternatives, it nigh-impossible to go back...
- far too many people are used rubbish inferior software simply because they don't know what else is available.

d4rkn1ght Thursday, January 21, 2010 8:00:43 AM

Originally posted by AliKira:

It would be nice if this were available in North America too. However it is a very interesting development.


+1 yes

NicoHellbillyDeluxe Thursday, January 21, 2010 8:33:41 AM

@ Daniele Pellegrini:

That's not completely right: WebKit is still there after uninstalling Safari because it's used to render Mac OS X's help pages, for example. So basically it's the same with removing IE and WMP with the tools, MS has given us. But the difference is, that Apple has no monopoly with their OS.



Nevertheless: On the one hand, I like the idea of a ballot screen very much, but on the other hand, I think that many average PC users will be overcharged by it. But then, how many average PC users install Windows on their own? The majority of PC users buy a pre-installed computer, which already has a browser on it, so they don't need to bother with this screen.

But all in all, it's good to have this ballot screen, because people will have to make up their minds and choose a browser. Even if most people will download IE (simply because they know it from before), they now see that there is an alternative to it.

And in the end, it's all about freedom of choice.

Danieldesic Thursday, January 21, 2010 9:13:31 AM

This is probably a better outcome than I hoped for, but exactly what I wanted.

While I think there is much debate about whether this ruling should be applied to Mac or even Linux, it would be nicer to see those systems voluntarily follow suite - if only to show their support for a fairer browser market.

Purdi Thursday, January 21, 2010 9:22:28 AM

Originally posted by TARF:

the idea that they should be FORCED into giving users a ballot screen is obscene and dangerous


Opera didn't force anyone to do anything. The ballot screen was Microsoft's proposal, and the EU agreed.

Mozilla and Google have done a pretty good job of gaining market share WITHOUT government intervention.


They have not. Firefox is proof that the market is broken, and Chrome still has fewer users than Opera despite Google using its online advertising monopoly to spam their browser everywhere.

Opera which, regardless of any features it may or may not have, is now piggybacking on the coercive power of the state.


As are Mozilla, Google and Apple. Why are you not whining about them? They all accepted the browser ballot proposed by Microsoft with open arms.

If anyone in this world still believes in freedom at all, they WILL NOT use Opera. I hope you go out of business, its the LEAST that you deserve.


So to you, "freedom" is "being able to violate the law without consequences". Got it.

Originally posted by TARF:

The fact is that Opera aren't doing as well as they want so they called the government in to help them out.


Wrong. Opera is doing very well indeed. But again, why are you only whining about Opera? The hypocrisy is strong, I sense.

Purdi Thursday, January 21, 2010 9:23:28 AM

Originally posted by BlueFalcon:

Didn't this happen in Mac too? I mean, Safari comes as a default and pre-installed browser in all the macs


Apple does not have a monopoly in the PC market, unlike Microsoft.

Sami Serolaserola Thursday, January 21, 2010 9:23:42 AM

I have understood the main problem was to build the browser as inseparable part of OS in the first place. If Windows would use similar approach as Linux distributions, where all software are installed through package manager, then there would be no need for "Ballot Screen". On current Windows, if you could delete the shipped with browser (IE), then average users would have no way to install anything over network. Therefore this Ballot is indispensable, to avoid situation of having no browser at all.

Purdi Thursday, January 21, 2010 9:24:21 AM

Originally posted by hectormacias:

Unfortunately Apple wasnt issued by Opera for not giving others a chance, as happened with MS.


What on earth are you talking about? What does Opera have to do with anything? Apple doesn't have a monopoly in the PC market either.

Joseph D. Lienjdlien Thursday, January 21, 2010 9:29:19 AM

Originally posted by Nick:

If anyone in this world still believes in freedom at all, they WILL NOT use Opera. I hope you go out of business, its the LEAST that you deserve.



Interesting argument as to how giving users a choice of browser somehow constitutes depriving them of their freedom.

The reason that Opera originally submitted the complaint to the EC wasn't because they were 'desperate', it was because Microsoft was employing illegal anticompetitive practices and refusing to disclose interoperability information that would allow fair competition. There was a great deal of industry support behind them. And of course, although we would like users to choose our browser, users are more than free to stick with IE or choose another browser of their preference.


Originally posted by lucideer:

5 IE Shells, some of which I've never heard of, and no sign of some browsers I have, like Seamonkey or Arora - does anyone know what the choices were based on? Usage?


Yes lucideer, the choices are based on the top five, and then the next seven most popular browsers based on their market share. This information will be reviewed and updated every six months also, so it is possible that if one of the smaller browsers gets overtaken by what was formerly an even smaller one, it could get "bumped" off the list.

Originally posted by BlueFalcon:

Didn't this happen in Mac too? I mean, Safari comes as a default and pre-installed browser in all the macs


No, this will not likely happen on MacOS, because Apple does not have a monopoly in the operating system industry, and has not (as far as I know) used any anticompetitive practices to tie their browser to the OS in the way that Microsoft had.

Anthony Museatlantis FletcherMuseatlantis Thursday, January 21, 2010 11:11:09 AM

Great news for internet users its nice to be able to have such a wide choice in the browsers that we use. I think it may make internet explorer redundant but to be fair they deserve it for making bad internet browsers. I think Opera will benefit the most from this.

zoquete Thursday, January 21, 2010 12:58:20 PM

here could be some basic characteristic of every browser
like a tooltip or short description

zoquete Thursday, January 21, 2010 1:06:06 PM

1)Definitly there has to be Seamonkey.
2)there are two more places left

z@h3kZAHEK Thursday, January 21, 2010 3:20:01 PM

up

lucideer Thursday, January 21, 2010 3:47:51 PM

Originally posted by zoquete:

1)Definitly there has to be Seamonkey.


Absolutely. SeaMonkey is a great browser - it seems quite bizarre it's not there - especially given there's 5 IE shells, and only 2 gecko ones...

Joseph D. Lienjdlien Thursday, January 21, 2010 3:58:44 PM

Well, it's all about what has the market share in the European Economic Area. Apparently Seamonkey doesn't have quite as much as the other 12 browsers that are selected. Of course, if it catches on more, it could make an appearance within the next 5 years.

NickTARF Thursday, January 21, 2010 4:02:07 PM

Originally posted by jdlien:


Interesting argument as to how giving users a choice of browser somehow constitutes depriving them of their freedom.


1. Users have ALWAYS had a choice of browser. Just because people are stupid enough to use IE it doesn't mean the government needs to get involved.

2. What about Microsoft's freedom to do what it likes with its own property? If they want to ship a crap OS with a worse browser they ought to have every right to. This sets yet another worrying precedent on the global march to collectivism.

Originally posted by jdlien:

The reason that Opera originally submitted the complaint to the EC wasn't because they were 'desperate', it was because Microsoft was employing illegal anticompetitive practices and refusing to disclose interoperability information that would allow fair competition.


1. Those practices should not be illegal, that is a wider problem though. If you found it so hard to develop for Windows why didn't you just stop? If things were that bad, as mass developer exodus would have remedied things pretty quickly. If Opera had a marketing budget maybe someone would have actually noticed. If more people took charge of their lives instead of getting men with guns to help them out the world would be a better place.

Originally posted by jdlien:

There was a great deal of industry support behind them. And of course, although we would like users to choose our browser, users are more than free to stick with IE or choose another browser of their preference.


I'm sure there was. That doesn't make it OK.

Originally posted by Purdi:

The ballot screen was Microsoft's proposal, and the EU agreed.


Their proposal when faced with coersive force. Kind of like a confession under torture...

Originally posted by Purdi:

Firefox is proof that the market is broken


WTF?

Originally posted by Purdi:

So to you, "freedom" is "being able to violate the law without consequences". Got it.


Stupid and immoral law.

I'd like to see your faces when somebody tries to pull this stunt on you. Hopefully people will ignore you.

lucideer Thursday, January 21, 2010 4:56:36 PM

Originally posted by TARF:

Those practices should not be illegal


Why? Any particular reason or just a blanket statement. Have you even bothered to read up on what "those practices" actually are?

Barraco Mármol Jerónimojerobarraco Thursday, January 21, 2010 6:40:39 PM

i've used avant browser bigsmile
is good to see "lesser known" browsers also, either way if you only allow for the know, how would you know about something new? wouldnt it b anticompetitive also?

good work ppl

Joseph D. Lienjdlien Thursday, January 21, 2010 7:18:01 PM

Originally posted by Nick:

2. What about Microsoft's freedom to do what it likes with its own property?
...
This sets yet another worrying precedent on the global march to collectivism.


Modern civilization has what we call "laws" that govern the practices of the citizens and corporations that operate within the bounds of its governments. The phrase "The rights of your fist end where the rights of my nose begins" applies. (Were this not the case would that represent the global march to anarchy?)
The laws that you are questioning were created in the interest of protecting the consumer. I think most would argue that the EC generally does a good job of that, but feel free to do the research and publish something to indicate otherwise if you have a legitimate belief that that is the case.

NickTARF Friday, January 22, 2010 9:23:10 AM

Originally posted by jdlien:

The phrase "The rights of your fist end where the rights of my nose begins" applies


How come its OK for Opera to punch Microsoft in the face then?

Originally posted by jdlien:

feel free to do the research and publish something to indicate otherwise if you have a legitimate belief that that is the case


Watch this space.

Sami Serolaserola Friday, January 22, 2010 9:34:28 AM

@ Fellow EU citizens - Personally I like to live in democratic society where EU supervise the interests of all citizens (as users and as consumers as well). If you prefer to have a different system, which favors some sort of complete capitalist freedom, then I suggest you try to change the system in next election for European parliament.

Abhinavdecodedthought Friday, January 22, 2010 10:15:34 AM

up
star star star star star star/5

speedygonzales24 Friday, January 22, 2010 6:33:09 PM

I agree with EU yes

walterbugscout Saturday, January 23, 2010 5:10:34 PM

pirate

masterofopera Sunday, January 24, 2010 10:07:36 PM

up EU

+1 yep, for America too.
+1 for the rest of the world too. (wish)

Edit:
Why IE-shells? -> IE-shells = no REAL browser only IE-Ad-ons
-> 6 times Internet Explorer at the screen down !!
Web: All detected as Internet Explorer! sad

Remove them and additionally include: SeaMonkey, Midori (& Lynx bigsmile ).
Other actual NON-IE-browsers for Windows?

Write a comment

You must be logged in to write a comment. If you're not a registered member, please sign up.