An Era of Choice Begins in March
By Joseph D. Lienjdlien. Wednesday, January 20, 2010 1:59:19 PM
It is a great time for PC users! After a considerable time, the European Commission and Microsoft have finally come to an agreement that will give Web surfers a proper choice of how they can experience the web. After March 17th 2010 European users of Windows whose default browser is Internet Explorer will be able to receive a Windows Update that shows a Choice Screen (sometimes known as a Ballot Screen) presenting the top 5 Web browsers along with links to install the browsers and to get more information about them.
These browsers, presented in a random order, are: Opera, Internet Explorer, Firefox, Chrome and Safari. In addition, 7 lesser known browsers: AOL Explorer, Maxthon, K-Meleon, Flock, Avant Browser, Sleipnir and Slim Browser, will be options that are available to users if they scroll the Choice Screen to the right -- a total of 12 choices.
This new avenue for consumer choice is a result of the European Commission's antitrust case against Microsoft in regards to a violation of Article 82 of the Treaty establishing the European Community. In the case, it was alleged that Microsoft was exploiting a dominant position in the operating system market to increase their share in the web browser market in a way that is not based on the real merits of the product.
Although some may consider the implications of this browser Choice Screen to be trivial, the unfortunate truth is that a very large segment of PC users out there simply are not aware that they have a choice in regards to what web browsers they can use. Even if they are aware that several browsers exist, they have little understanding of the differences are between competing browsers, or the benefits each may have over others. The vast majority of consumers are using one of the most critical pieces of software simply because that is what their operating system vendor includes, which has resulted in a massive bias in browser use. Microsoft has also made it extremely impractical for PC manufacturers to include competing browsers.
In the past, because of a large dominance of Internet Explorer, and because IE was not very standards compliant, this would lead Web developers to create sites that were optimized for IE, and that used browser-specific methods of implementing Web sites. If someone chose to use a different browser because it worked better for them, and it met their requirements better, it was not uncommon to have issues with Web pages appearing or functioning incorrectly. Modern Web sites are becoming ever more complex and sophisticated, and with our lives being increasingly dependent on the Web, it is also increasingly important that the functionality of Web sites remains consistent across platforms and browsers.
In 2007 Opera Software filed an antitrust complaint with the EU that Microsoft had illegally tied IE to Windows and that there is ongoing competitive harm from Microsoft's practices. Particularly in regards to new proprietary technologies that would reduce compatibility with open Internet standards and hinder competition. In February 2009, Mozilla, and then Google joined in to support the proceedings. The EU has many mechanisms to ensure that anti-competitive practices are kept in check so that businesses generally act in the best interest of the consumer. When the European Commission investigated the issue with Microsoft and Internet Explorer, it determined that Microsoft would be required to give users a fair and unbiased choice of which Web browser they would like to use.
In response, Microsoft attempted to create a unique version of Windows 7 - "Windows 7 E" that did not include Internet Explorer at all, but based on past such experiences with Windows Media Player it was obvious that this would not provide a solution adequate to address the concerns of the European Commission, so as it turns out there will be no "E" version of Windows 7, and instead, users of Windows XP, Windows Vista and Windows 7 will all be able to receive the same Browser Choice Screen Windows update.
Most should view the Choice Screen as great progress towards encouraging innovation in technology and the evolution of the Web. It will help to level the playing field for all browsers and will make it easy for users to select and install the browser of their choice. Also, because this Choice Screen will help to spread awareness of other browsers, it should ultimately make the use of the Web a better experience, regardless of which browser one uses.
In addition to now allowing a choice of browser, Microsoft will be required to allow PC manufacturers to bundle competing Web browsers with Windows. Microsoft now also must be more open with information regarding interoperability for their browser such that it is possible for competitors to allow their Web browsers to work well with certain Web applications where before it was nearly impossible to use a full degree of functionality without Internet Explorer.
The culmination of the investigation and the European Commission decision should be a great boon to consumer choice on the web, and the progression of standards and technology on the web that will greatly benefit developers, manufacturers and of course users of Internet technology -- a significant portion of the human population that is increasing at a rapid pace. When there is a step ahead in technology or society, it piques curiosity about what the next steps will be. Will this have a positive impact on the web? How might other types of software or other manufacturers be affected by decisions like this in the future?
We would like to hear what others might have to think about the points brought up in this article, and what people from the community here think the impact might be. We are eager to read your comments.
| Microsoft v. EU Internet Explorer Timeline | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| December 17, 2007 | Opera files a complaint commencing a two-year anti-trust investigation. | ||
| January 17, 2009 | The European Commission accuses Microsoft of illegally tying Internet Explorer to Windows. | ||
| February 9, 2009 | Mozilla joins the anti-trust suit against Microsoft. | ||
| February 25, 2009 | Google also joins the anti-trust case against Microsoft. | ||
| June 12, 2009 | Microsoft offers to remove Internet Explorer from Windows. The Commission suggests a choice screen. | ||
| July 24, 2009 | Microsoft agrees to the browser choice screen proposal. | ||
| October 7, 2009 | Microsoft begins testing of the new browser choice screen for Europe. | ||
| December 16, 2009 | The European Commission wraps up its investigation; Consumers now have the option to use an alternative browser with Windows. | ||



1 2 Next »
Ali GrotkowskiAliKira # Wednesday, January 20, 2010 7:40:13 PM
Joseph D. Lienjdlien # Wednesday, January 20, 2010 7:49:22 PM
ouzowtfouzoWTF # Wednesday, January 20, 2010 7:58:12 PM
!?
I think it should be 2009
Rafael Luikrafaelluik # Wednesday, January 20, 2010 8:46:26 PM
I would like it to be Worldwide!!
I would like to see the ballot in Linux, Mac and other OSs also!
Joseph D. Lienjdlien # Wednesday, January 20, 2010 8:47:43 PM
IKoke # Wednesday, January 20, 2010 9:14:39 PM
L2D2 # Wednesday, January 20, 2010 9:33:27 PM
When I first started using Opera, IE was still my default browser, and my Opera browser constantly crashed. Since making O my default browser, I have had very few crashes.
C'mon Microsoft, we want the options that Europe now has. I hate IE
Tamil # Wednesday, January 20, 2010 10:03:49 PM
Daniel HendrycksDanielHendrycks # Wednesday, January 20, 2010 10:13:44 PM
civitasster # Wednesday, January 20, 2010 10:37:15 PM
NickTARF # Wednesday, January 20, 2010 10:41:36 PM
If anyone in this world still believes in freedom at all, they WILL NOT use Opera. I hope you go out of business, its the LEAST that you deserve.
Rafael Luikrafaelluik # Wednesday, January 20, 2010 10:43:20 PM
Originally posted by TARF:
Originally posted by jdlien:
As you can see Microsoft had freedom to choice and agreed with the proposal, now the users have freedom to choice which web browser they want to use based in a list: no more M$ monopoly!NickTARF # Wednesday, January 20, 2010 10:54:43 PM
Originally posted by rafaelluik:
People agree to anything when they have a gun to their head. Back when I used windows I didn't use IE. The fact is that Opera aren't doing as well as they want so they called the government in to help them out. Clearly Opera have no morals and think nothing of employing coercive force in the market place.
praetor87 # Wednesday, January 20, 2010 11:00:43 PM
Originally posted by TARF:
Looks like a bunch of firm "have no morals". Mozilla and Google join to this. After IE6 i don't know who "have no morals", but Microsoft is not in good mode in this topic. They have already forfeited their reputation in Europe.
lucideer # Wednesday, January 20, 2010 11:12:17 PM
5 IE Shells, some of which I've never heard of, and no sign of some browsers I have, like Seamonkey or Arora - does anyone know what the choices were based on? Usage?
BlueFalcon # Wednesday, January 20, 2010 11:18:13 PM
lucideer # Wednesday, January 20, 2010 11:19:02 PM
Originally posted by BlueFalcon:
I don't think so - you have to download them yourself on a Mac, there's no ballot.
Danieledarklink88 # Wednesday, January 20, 2010 11:38:15 PM
Originally posted by BlueFalcon:
well, it's a bit different....on macosx you CAN unistall safari or quick time witouth problems, on windows if you remove ie or windows media player, the system becomes unstable....in addition Webkit is able to score 100/100 on acid3 like our Presto.
That said, i'm happy for the ballot screen solution...I hope to see opera users growing!
BlueFalcon # Wednesday, January 20, 2010 11:52:03 PM
Originally posted by darklink88:
I hadn't thought in that way, but your right. Thanks for the answers
Charles SchlossChas4 # Thursday, January 21, 2010 12:52:21 AM
Originally posted by AliKira:
+1
shaneh # Thursday, January 21, 2010 1:18:31 AM
http://blog.lizardwrangler.com/tag/microsoft/
http://gizmodo.com/5383382/mozilla-whines-about-apple-being-first-in-microsofts-web-browser-ballot-screen
Opera just has the finances and organisation to actually do something about it and make it happen. All the browser makers plus the EU AND Microsoft agree to it.
techlawsam # Thursday, January 21, 2010 1:46:36 AM
TimothyElementalFire # Thursday, January 21, 2010 2:03:21 AM
It's the lesser of two evils, as far as I'm concerned.
Hector Macias Ayalahectormacias # Thursday, January 21, 2010 2:10:56 AM
Originally posted by BlueFalcon:
Unfortunately Apple wasnt issued by Opera for not giving others a chance, as happened with MS.
kris TREAGUSkrzystoff # Thursday, January 21, 2010 3:55:47 AM
OSX most likely doesn't have five useable browsers to choose...
what other OSes are there worth mentioning -- Chromium ? :-)
kris TREAGUSkrzystoff # Thursday, January 21, 2010 4:05:09 AM
Microsoft included in Win7 something like this for Antiviral software, but I'd like to see an option for email, PIM, media player, video editor, image manager, compression tool, and office suite:
- after all, what cranial-thinking biped actually still uses Outlook Express??
- Media player/iTunes are fine for a few minutes but once you find all the other fantastic alternatives, it nigh-impossible to go back...
- far too many people are used rubbish inferior software simply because they don't know what else is available.
d4rkn1ght # Thursday, January 21, 2010 8:00:43 AM
Originally posted by AliKira:
+1
NicoHellbillyDeluxe # Thursday, January 21, 2010 8:33:41 AM
That's not completely right: WebKit is still there after uninstalling Safari because it's used to render Mac OS X's help pages, for example. So basically it's the same with removing IE and WMP with the tools, MS has given us. But the difference is, that Apple has no monopoly with their OS.
Nevertheless: On the one hand, I like the idea of a ballot screen very much, but on the other hand, I think that many average PC users will be overcharged by it. But then, how many average PC users install Windows on their own? The majority of PC users buy a pre-installed computer, which already has a browser on it, so they don't need to bother with this screen.
But all in all, it's good to have this ballot screen, because people will have to make up their minds and choose a browser. Even if most people will download IE (simply because they know it from before), they now see that there is an alternative to it.
And in the end, it's all about freedom of choice.
Danieldesic # Thursday, January 21, 2010 9:13:31 AM
While I think there is much debate about whether this ruling should be applied to Mac or even Linux, it would be nicer to see those systems voluntarily follow suite - if only to show their support for a fairer browser market.
Purdi # Thursday, January 21, 2010 9:22:28 AM
Originally posted by TARF:
Opera didn't force anyone to do anything. The ballot screen was Microsoft's proposal, and the EU agreed.
They have not. Firefox is proof that the market is broken, and Chrome still has fewer users than Opera despite Google using its online advertising monopoly to spam their browser everywhere.
As are Mozilla, Google and Apple. Why are you not whining about them? They all accepted the browser ballot proposed by Microsoft with open arms.
So to you, "freedom" is "being able to violate the law without consequences". Got it.
Originally posted by TARF:
Wrong. Opera is doing very well indeed. But again, why are you only whining about Opera? The hypocrisy is strong, I sense.
Purdi # Thursday, January 21, 2010 9:23:28 AM
Originally posted by BlueFalcon:
Apple does not have a monopoly in the PC market, unlike Microsoft.
Sami Serolaserola # Thursday, January 21, 2010 9:23:42 AM
Purdi # Thursday, January 21, 2010 9:24:21 AM
Originally posted by hectormacias:
What on earth are you talking about? What does Opera have to do with anything? Apple doesn't have a monopoly in the PC market either.
Joseph D. Lienjdlien # Thursday, January 21, 2010 9:29:19 AM
Originally posted by Nick:
Interesting argument as to how giving users a choice of browser somehow constitutes depriving them of their freedom.
The reason that Opera originally submitted the complaint to the EC wasn't because they were 'desperate', it was because Microsoft was employing illegal anticompetitive practices and refusing to disclose interoperability information that would allow fair competition. There was a great deal of industry support behind them. And of course, although we would like users to choose our browser, users are more than free to stick with IE or choose another browser of their preference.
Originally posted by lucideer:
Yes lucideer, the choices are based on the top five, and then the next seven most popular browsers based on their market share. This information will be reviewed and updated every six months also, so it is possible that if one of the smaller browsers gets overtaken by what was formerly an even smaller one, it could get "bumped" off the list.
Originally posted by BlueFalcon:
No, this will not likely happen on MacOS, because Apple does not have a monopoly in the operating system industry, and has not (as far as I know) used any anticompetitive practices to tie their browser to the OS in the way that Microsoft had.
Anthony Museatlantis FletcherMuseatlantis # Thursday, January 21, 2010 11:11:09 AM
zoquete # Thursday, January 21, 2010 12:58:20 PM
like a tooltip or short description
zoquete # Thursday, January 21, 2010 1:06:06 PM
2)there are two more places left
z@h3kZAHEK # Thursday, January 21, 2010 3:20:01 PM
lucideer # Thursday, January 21, 2010 3:47:51 PM
Originally posted by zoquete:
Absolutely. SeaMonkey is a great browser - it seems quite bizarre it's not there - especially given there's 5 IE shells, and only 2 gecko ones...
Joseph D. Lienjdlien # Thursday, January 21, 2010 3:58:44 PM
NickTARF # Thursday, January 21, 2010 4:02:07 PM
Originally posted by jdlien:
1. Users have ALWAYS had a choice of browser. Just because people are stupid enough to use IE it doesn't mean the government needs to get involved.
2. What about Microsoft's freedom to do what it likes with its own property? If they want to ship a crap OS with a worse browser they ought to have every right to. This sets yet another worrying precedent on the global march to collectivism.
Originally posted by jdlien:
1. Those practices should not be illegal, that is a wider problem though. If you found it so hard to develop for Windows why didn't you just stop? If things were that bad, as mass developer exodus would have remedied things pretty quickly. If Opera had a marketing budget maybe someone would have actually noticed. If more people took charge of their lives instead of getting men with guns to help them out the world would be a better place.
Originally posted by jdlien:
I'm sure there was. That doesn't make it OK.
Originally posted by Purdi:
Their proposal when faced with coersive force. Kind of like a confession under torture...
Originally posted by Purdi:
WTF?
Originally posted by Purdi:
Stupid and immoral law.
I'd like to see your faces when somebody tries to pull this stunt on you. Hopefully people will ignore you.
lucideer # Thursday, January 21, 2010 4:56:36 PM
Originally posted by TARF:
Why? Any particular reason or just a blanket statement. Have you even bothered to read up on what "those practices" actually are?
Barraco Mármol Jerónimojerobarraco # Thursday, January 21, 2010 6:40:39 PM
is good to see "lesser known" browsers also, either way if you only allow for the know, how would you know about something new? wouldnt it b anticompetitive also?
good work ppl
Joseph D. Lienjdlien # Thursday, January 21, 2010 7:18:01 PM
Originally posted by Nick:
Modern civilization has what we call "laws" that govern the practices of the citizens and corporations that operate within the bounds of its governments. The phrase "The rights of your fist end where the rights of my nose begins" applies. (Were this not the case would that represent the global march to anarchy?)
The laws that you are questioning were created in the interest of protecting the consumer. I think most would argue that the EC generally does a good job of that, but feel free to do the research and publish something to indicate otherwise if you have a legitimate belief that that is the case.
NickTARF # Friday, January 22, 2010 9:23:10 AM
Originally posted by jdlien:
How come its OK for Opera to punch Microsoft in the face then?
Originally posted by jdlien:
Watch this space.
Sami Serolaserola # Friday, January 22, 2010 9:34:28 AM
Abhinavdecodedthought # Friday, January 22, 2010 10:15:34 AM
speedygonzales24 # Friday, January 22, 2010 6:33:09 PM
walterbugscout # Saturday, January 23, 2010 5:10:34 PM
masterofopera # Sunday, January 24, 2010 10:07:36 PM
+1 yep, for America too.
+1 for the rest of the world too. (wish)
Edit:
Why IE-shells? -> IE-shells = no REAL browser only IE-Ad-ons
-> 6 times Internet Explorer at the screen
Web: All detected as Internet Explorer!
Remove them and additionally include: SeaMonkey, Midori (& Lynx
Other actual NON-IE-browsers for Windows?