A new era of browser speed

, , , , , ,

We are proud to announce a browser that we believe qualifies for the title of “The Fastest Browser on Earth”, Opera 10.50 beta. Our new Carakan JavaScript engine and Vega graphics library offer impressive performance. We are really excited about what we have done, and would like you to see why.

There are many ways you can measure browser speed so I have assembled some of the more popular tests. The graph below demonstrates that Opera 10.50 beta is faster than other browsers in most performance tests.


Browser speed is important. Developers are creating increasingly complex Web applications that make heavy use of JavaScript, so the purpose of speed optimization is to expand the possibilities for dynamic Web applications that run from the cloud. Choosing a faster browser can shave seconds off of each of the pages you load – which really adds up! So why wait when you don't have to?

How can you tell which browser is really the fastest? Below are the details of the tests performed, and how to try them yourself. Please post your results in the comments and see the results your computer gets.

Popular JavaScript and rendering performance tests

A number of tests can be used to benchmark Web browsers. Some that can be easily used are: Sunspider, Dromaeo, V8, and Peacekeeper.

You can try each of these tests simply by visiting the preceding links (with the browser you wish to test) and following the instructions.

These tests show common types of JavaScript operations; each tries to gauge the speed in a slightly different way, so the results and the relative difference between browsers can vary considerably. The real question, however, is whether these benchmarks will translate into a noticeable difference in the user experience of a browser in day-to-day use. It can be argued that some benchmarks actually translate into an improved experience, while having a browser that is heavily optimized for other tests can possibly make it slower in common scenarios. The real test will be the difference you see when visiting your favorite Web sites.

We ran four tests using a 2.33GHz Intel Core 2 Duo system with 4GB of RAM and an ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT, running Windows 7 32-bit. The browsers used were Opera 10.50 beta, Google Chrome 4.0.249.78, Mozilla Firefox 3.6 and Microsoft Internet Explorer 8. Here is a description of the tests and the results.

Sunspider is a JavaScript benchmark that tests only the core script language with a focus on the kinds of actual problems that developers solve with JavaScript today. It is a very popular way to compare JavaScript engines of Web browsers.

Opera 10.50 is clearly the fastest browser in Sunspider, and outperforms Google Chrome by a healthy margin.

Dromaeo is a test created by Mozilla, named after the Dromaeosaurs (meaning 'fast lizard'). It is currently considered a work in progress. It tests a subset of the tests that Sunspider uses, and it can also test DOM and CSS selector speed. We tested with the 'recommended' test that leaves out the CSS selector engine tests.

Opera excels and bests other browsers in Dromaeo. Internet Explorer 8 failed the Dromaeo test on our test platform each time we attempted running it, so we were not able to include a result for Microsoft's offering.

The V8 Benchmark Suite is made by Google for optimizing and showcasing the V8 JavaScript engine that is used in Chrome.

Opera performs very well on this test, but is behind Chrome, which was heavily optimized for this specific test.

Peacekeeper from FutureMark tests a number of aspects of browser performance, emphasizing the kinds of work browsers do in loading popular Web sites like YouTube, Facebook, and GMail. These tests are: Rendering, Social networking, Complex graphics, Data, DOM operations and Text parsing.

You can find more information about each test in Futuremark's Peacekeeper FAQ.

In Peacekeeper, Opera bests the competition in the Social networking and Text parsing tests, but trails slightly behind in some other tests. Opera 10.50 excels in Complex graphics, and is vastly faster than its closest competitors, but this is not normally taken into account because Internet Explorer 8 does not support it. With that test accounted for in the results, Opera is clearly superior, as can be seen in the graph below.

The results are quite intriguing. The new Carakan JavaScript engine has improved the performance of Opera to a point where it is definitely faster in most circumstances. In addition to the benchmarks here, our internal real-world test platform that automatically loads a series of actual highly popular pages from the Web shows that Opera is the new speed champion. And of course, on slower connections, Opera is the only browser that has Opera Turbo technology that allows you to compress Web pages before they are sent to your computer so you load pages much faster.

Browser performance will become an increasingly important factor in the experience of computing and it is important to continue to push the boundaries as developers create more demanding applications – so the race is far from over!

We believe that the improvements made in Opera are already offer a browsing experience that makes Opera the fastest browser on Earth, and the exciting part – we aren't finished yet. Opera 10.50 is merely in beta, and there may be performance improvements to come before Opera 10.50 is finalized. Feel free to try the Opera 10.50 beta for yourself and discover the speed that it offers.

Opera.com in Indonesian – An interview with the volunteersDownload Opera 10.50 beta for Windows

Comments

tomassplatch Thursday, February 11, 2010 8:22:48 AM

nice read! Opera rulezzz! up

NicoHellbillyDeluxe Thursday, February 11, 2010 8:25:31 AM

Finally, Opera is the fastest browser on earth again bigsmile.

Thank you for the informative article smile

JUICEDanieljuiced Thursday, February 11, 2010 8:40:07 AM

Joseph D. Lienjdlien Thursday, February 11, 2010 8:41:01 AM

THAT was fast! Thanks Daniel.

d4rkn1ght Thursday, February 11, 2010 8:59:12 AM

cheers

Tamil Thursday, February 11, 2010 9:08:46 AM

up

Anton TsigularovTheAtilla Thursday, February 11, 2010 9:13:34 AM

Hold on to your hats and do not attempt to use before you've had your first coffee.

FataL Thursday, February 11, 2010 9:14:47 AM

So now Opera loves JavaScript performance tests again? wink

Congrats! beer

Phaniphanikumarseelam Thursday, February 11, 2010 9:14:57 AM

no This is awesome. Although Opera was always the fastest in real world browsing, it feels good to beat everyone in these artificial benchmarks as well bigsmile

Ralf Demuthlachralle Thursday, February 11, 2010 9:24:16 AM

Great results, kudos! yes

Would look more complete with Safari, though.

Joseph D. Lienjdlien Thursday, February 11, 2010 9:25:52 AM

Safari is slower than chrome on all these benchmarks, so we still beat them smile I am eager to see some 3rd party testing in the tech press!

JUICEDanieljuiced Thursday, February 11, 2010 9:30:19 AM

Originally posted by jdlien:

THAT was fast! Thanks Daniel.


Just tried to keep up with the fastest browser on earth wink

Alexeif1avalanche Thursday, February 11, 2010 9:34:25 AM

It's magic! smile

dzooky Thursday, February 11, 2010 10:18:46 AM

Nice nice niceeee bigsmile

JUICEDanieljuiced Thursday, February 11, 2010 10:33:12 AM

I just updated my article with some screenshots. Check out: http://juiced.de/blog/opera-10-50-beta-veroeffentlicht-schneller-als-google-chrome/

Aux Thursday, February 11, 2010 10:46:43 AM

Does Vega now run with HW acceleration?

Helge Reikerashreikeras Thursday, February 11, 2010 10:47:45 AM

Opera could easily beat Firefox in terms of market share if they open source to encourage more users to write plugins. This is FF only advantage. Use the source Luke!

Petzi13 Thursday, February 11, 2010 10:53:21 AM

Yeah, fast indeed. Nice development process headbang

Haavardhaavard Thursday, February 11, 2010 11:12:36 AM

Originally posted by FataL:

So now Opera loves JavaScript performance tests again?

They are still artificial tests, but I suppose it's our turn to play the PR game the other browser vendors have played for a while smile

I personally still maintain that artificial benchmarks are exactly that. Measuring performance on real sites is much more difficult.

Taufiq Ahmedtareqf1 Thursday, February 11, 2010 11:13:52 AM

lets shut the mouth of Chrome
Opera Rulezz and back to the track once again.

Meteikista Thursday, February 11, 2010 11:16:24 AM

Opera was always great, but now awesome.

Opera Rulez!

Joseph D. Lienjdlien Thursday, February 11, 2010 11:21:58 AM

Originally posted by Aux:

Does Vega now run with HW acceleration?


No, it does not. But it can - and then it will be even faster!

Jakub Martonkubm Thursday, February 11, 2010 11:35:22 AM

Awesome beer

But please fix sunspider graph. IE8 is shown there as the fastest one.

Joseph D. Lienjdlien Thursday, February 11, 2010 11:45:46 AM

Um... the detailed sunspider graph is time in miliseconds. Lower times means that the page loaded faster. (In other words, Opera is the best)

Jakub Martonkubm Thursday, February 11, 2010 11:48:07 AM

doh I am sorry, my mistake smile

Joseph D. Lienjdlien Thursday, February 11, 2010 11:54:02 AM

I updated the graph to clarify this!

Avola Thursday, February 11, 2010 12:01:01 PM

Originally posted by jdlien:

Does Vega now run with HW acceleration?

No, it does not. But it can - and then it will be even faster!


I'm still crossing my fingers for hardware acceleration in the final happy

Adelad3l Thursday, February 11, 2010 12:24:48 PM

Great up

Aux Thursday, February 11, 2010 12:27:03 PM

Originally posted by haavard:

I personally still maintain that artificial benchmarks are exactly that. Measuring performance on real sites is much more difficult.


Yeah, I know one website which pushes browsers to the limit. And, surpisingly, Opera is the slowest there...

By the way, not including MP3 support to AUDIO tag is VERY BAD MOVE! I do understand h.264 issue, but MP3s are SO common, just as common as using (X)HTML for creating web pages! Leaving MP3 out will only harm Opera.

lennonprado Thursday, February 11, 2010 12:31:46 PM

Niceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

netwolf Thursday, February 11, 2010 12:38:41 PM

Great smile

btw, here are a few more benchmark and function test sites:

http://wd-testnet.world-direct.at/mozilla/dhtml/funo/jsTimeTest.htm
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2400/modernizr-test.html
http://view.jquery.com/tags/1.3.2/test/
http://testsuites.opera.com/JSON/runner.htm

As you'll notice, performance is great there too, but there are also still several functions that don't work properly.
So don't rest on your laurels for too long wink

EDIT: one more pretty thorough test (conformity, not performance):
http://kangax.github.com/sputniktests-webrunner/

As you can see here http://perfectionkills.com/sputniktests-web-runner/#browser-comparison, 10.10 doesn't perform very well with those tests, so I hope 10.50 will do a better job.

EDIT2: apparently the sputniktest exhibit a serious memory issue, >1GB after only 300 tests, can't even go near completion sad

Helge Reikerashreikeras Thursday, February 11, 2010 12:57:50 PM

If Opera is faster and better than FF (and all the other browsers) in every way, why does Opera still have lowest market share?

Sure, IE, Safari <- bundling, but FF, Chrome?

Originally posted by lwiczek:

Don't follow how open sourcing could have anything with plugins (you mean extensions, didn't you?)... Besides - Fx is OS and still Opera managed to be faster.

Extensions? Mozilla published an article that only about 1/3 of Fx users used them, and this also included themes/skins...



1/3 of users using plugins (FF extensions, Opera plugins/widgets/etc.) is still significant. Opera does not have the same selection and quality as FF. I think this is mainly due to

(1) Users are just more willing to contribute to OS projects as the source code and the platform is owned by the community.

(2) The plugin/widget/panel API and API documentation is lacking and at times complicated.

I believe going open source will go a along way to alleviate these issues. Opera is in any case free...

I'm not saying that going open source is always the right thing to do (in fact some claim that it killed Netscape), but it may be the right path for Opera to gain more market share, if that is their goal.

Charles SchlossChas4 Thursday, February 11, 2010 1:40:56 PM

up

Jakub Martonkubm Thursday, February 11, 2010 1:44:32 PM

Originally posted by hreikeras:

If Opera is faster and better than FF (and all the other browsers) in every way, why does Opera still have lowest market share?

Sure, IE, Safari <- bundling, but FF, Chrome?



Well, FF was and now Chrome is promoted as browser to be downloaded at www.google.com. That is just one reason.

netwolf Thursday, February 11, 2010 2:00:34 PM

Please, not another Opera vs. Chrome or 'why is Opera not more popular' discussion, it's so off topic here!

Joseph D. Lienjdlien Thursday, February 11, 2010 2:56:15 PM

I'd be very interested in seeing what kinds of results people are getting on their own computers in terms of different benchmarks between different browsers (Opera and Chrome, especially, since that is really the only competition here). Also, if people have some other ideas for other ways to test how fast Opera 10.50 is, or other kinds of benchmarks we can run, it would be great to hear about them.

netwolf Thursday, February 11, 2010 3:03:21 PM

@Joseph D. Lien: I posted a couple additional tests a few posts above this one.

Joseph D. Lienjdlien Thursday, February 11, 2010 3:09:02 PM

Originally posted by netwolf:

I posted a couple additional tests a few posts above this one.


Yup, I noticed that - I'll definitely take a look at them.

unruled Thursday, February 11, 2010 3:22:40 PM

Google maps is my favourite real world ajax benchmark, in which Opera previously performed very poorly. I have to say it's a LOT better now. Very very good.. it's going in the right direction now.

Also I like the new skin, but 2 gripes with it:
I wish there weren't the 5 or so pixels above tabs. Sometimes I wanna click the tab by just moving the mouse against the top border of my screen, but that doesn't work for selecting tabs.

Also when using the tab previews, the recently closed tabs button becomes huge, looks a bit nasty.

other than that, amazing progress!

netwolf Thursday, February 11, 2010 3:43:18 PM

Originally posted by unruled:

Google maps is my favourite real world ajax benchmark, in which Opera previously performed very poorly. I have to say it's a LOT better now. Very very good.. it's going in the right direction now.


The map turns black here once it finishes loading when I paste an address, e.g. http://maps.google.com/maps?client=opera&q=waldemar+thranesgt+98,+oslo+,norway&oe=utf-8&ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=Waldemar+Thranes+gate+98,+0175+Oslo,+Norway&gl=us&ei=feFxS5i7JIiGswO36eGxCA&ved=0CAwQ8gEwAA&z=15&layer=c&cbll=59.928266,10.75488&panoid=CRiwuGmBkAUc13-IXwBqLg&cbp=12,319.2,,0,-18.75

Alexodius PrimeAleksOD Thursday, February 11, 2010 3:57:00 PM

Wow, after Google Chrome, I thought this would be impossible. Thank you for proving me wrong, guys! up

Othaviano Humbertoothaviano Thursday, February 11, 2010 6:24:24 PM

My pc in Peacekeeper
OPERA 10.50 - 1888
Chrome 4.0.249.78 - 1609
Internet Explorer 8 - 325

masterofopera Thursday, February 11, 2010 7:16:48 PM

yes Excellent!
Prepare for Transwarp spock bigsmile

In march (17th), we are getting the last part of our present(s)!
:NoIE:

Purdi Thursday, February 11, 2010 9:28:44 PM

Originally posted by Aux:

Yeah, I know one website which pushes browsers to the limit. And, surpisingly, Opera is the slowest there...


Another page with artificial tests? Why are you so reluctant to share this page with the rest of us?

Purdi Thursday, February 11, 2010 9:29:01 PM

Originally posted by netwolf:

apparently the sputniktest exhibit a serious memory issue


The Sputnik test is useless.

Purdi Thursday, February 11, 2010 9:29:55 PM

Originally posted by hreikeras:

If Opera is faster and better than FF (and all the other browsers) in every way, why does Opera still have lowest market share?


It does? How do you know?

Sure, IE, Safari <- bundling, but FF, Chrome?


Um, Google used its online ad monopoly to promote Firefox, and now Chrome? Ring any bells?

I believe going open source will go a along way to alleviate these issues.


BS. You don't need to be open-source to support addons.

Mağruf ÇolakoğluZAHEK Thursday, February 11, 2010 9:31:16 PM

So fast smile

FireXtol Thursday, February 11, 2010 9:52:04 PM

Opera can't be open sourced(sure, parts of it could). It relies on license agreements, for functionality, which forbid disclosure of source that's required in 'open source' licenses. As I recall...(that's the gist of it).

There's actually a blog post around here somewhere explaining this in much further detail. The open source they *could* release would be pretty much non-functional in terms of a browser. They open sourced DragonFly, though. That should make at least a few people happy.

Oh, and for the record: -clears throat-
OPERA IS THE WORLD'S FASTEST BROWSER! -dances-

netwolf Thursday, February 11, 2010 10:14:24 PM

Originally posted by Purdi:

The Sputnik test is useless.


I didn't ask you for your opinion. Please stop quoting me.

For all other users: a few builds ago an Opera dev mentioned exactly this test on a blog (or Twitter) to illustrate the progress of Carakan, and it's of course not useless doh

Write a comment

New comments have been disabled for this post.