Skip navigation.

exploreopera

| Help

Sign up | Help

Chthonic Wildlife Ramblings

Reflections of a heterodox conservationist

Weekend Orbweb

, , , , ,

Aah, things have been failry quiet here have't they. I'm trying to generate some more academic papers on conservation before heading off to Singapore. I should also be doing a fair bit of marking, but have got dangerously behind on that.

Anyway, in the weekend I spotted this girl hiding in full sight, so took some pictures. I liked the detail.

Larger Image

Weekend GannetsMiao Mother and Child

Comments

avatar
WOW, amazing photo. :up:

By Dacotah, # 22. May 2008, 10:41:31

avatar
Awwwwwwwwwwwwww, nature is magnificent ! :up:

By ellinidata, # 22. May 2008, 12:54:59

avatar
Beautiful photo!

By cakkleberrylane, # 22. May 2008, 13:57:30

avatar
Great camouflage! And good luck with the marking :D

By Words, # 22. May 2008, 20:57:12

avatar
Fantastic! I've been behind in checking out your blog--thanks to Angeliki for pointing me this way again.

Dumb question, but I'm no photographer. What lens do you use to get such great detail on the smaller subjects?

By mlynnjohnson, # 22. May 2008, 22:10:11

avatar
good things have to be shared :smile:

By ellinidata, # 22. May 2008, 22:28:03

avatar
:up:

Thanks for sharing :smile:

By Stomyr, # 22. May 2008, 22:58:48

avatar
Thanks guys- I'm glad people are still stopping by to visit.

I use a dedicated macro lens to take these pictures. These have optical formulas that allow getting close to the subject without generating image quality loss. Macro lenses are also (typically) very sharp. I also experiment with boosting magnification with either a raynox adaptor or coupling another lens to the main lens.

The lens I use a Tamron 90/2.8. Sigma also make a 105/2.8. Both tend to be cheaper than the branded versions. The cheapest macro lens around is the Cosina 100/3.5 or the 'plastic fantastic'. It does surprisingly well, but it's not up to the standards of the more expensive lenses.

Some tricks to get macro on the cheap is to reverse a lens or to couple any (decently) sharp lens with another.

I tend to shoot at around f16. Once you go wider, the depth of field gets even narrower. Above that, you start to lose image quality as diffraction occurs stopped down.

The other (almost) mandatory tool is an external flash. You need a lot of light to reveal details that would otherwise be lost in shadow.

By chthoniid, # 23. May 2008, 00:43:10

avatar
"You need a lot of light to reveal details that would otherwise be lost in shadow"

that's exactly what Richard did the other day.

Used a flash on a very sunny day for this:
http://my.opera.com/musickna/blog/2008/05/18/caterpillar
You can see the colors on the caterpillar :smile:

By ellinidata, # 23. May 2008, 02:02:12

avatar
Yes, the flash is very useful for macro photography- sometimes so useful I fire two of them simultaneously! Any number bigger than zero :D.

If you're interested, I also took some shots with a 50mm lens coupled to the 90mm macro- the depth of field shrunk drastically. OTOH, you get a lot of magnification.

Image- link

By chthoniid, # 23. May 2008, 09:27:26

avatar
thanks!
I find it fascinating that when I visit not only I learn and enjoy your pictures tremendously but I can proudly say that I started getting the "picture" of picture taking ! p:

By ellinidata, # 23. May 2008, 10:39:11

Write a comment

You must be logged in to write a comment. if you're not a registered member, please sign up.