Skip navigation.

Digital thoughts

Adventures in my inner cyberspace

Posts tagged with "digital"

Drops in a digital ocean

, ,

In a recent speech about the modern reality of journalism, Ariana Huffington (of Huffington Post fame) said:

The same people who never question why consumers would sit on a couch and watch TV for 8 hours straight can't understand why someone would find it rewarding to weigh in on the issues -- great and small -- that interest them. For free. They don't understand the people who contribute to Wikipedia for free, who maintain their own blogs for free, who Twitter for free, who constantly refresh and update their Facebook page for free, who want to help tell the stories of what is happening in their lives and in their communities... for free.

I'll add that the same people are OK with consumers playing computer games instead of watching TV. Because, you know, they're supposedly more active. But when the same consumers become producers, suddenly it's not OK to be active anymore. What is it with people being freaked out by creativity, generosity and/or altruism?

And please, don't try to tell me that "nothing is free". How much does it cost you to breathe? Or take a walk? Or, once you're in town, snap some photos and upload them to your blog? Over the same Internet connection you're paying for anyway?

It costs you so little, you can't even measure it. Yet your blog can bring joy to people you'll never know, for reasons you wouldn't dream of. I'm constantly surprised to see which of the little things I publish on my website are being sought out. Or which of my photos people actually like. What if I had censored myself? What if we all did?

Think of it this way: the world would be poorer by 4 billion photos. And that's just the tip of the iceberg. See, life is not a zero-sum game. Neither is the Internet. So dare to be creative.

Peace, people.

Creative Commons License
Drops in a digital ocean by Felix Pleșoianu is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.

The Internet Manifesto and Freedomware

, , , ...

A few days ago, a group of journalists has published the following Manifesto. You may want to read it all; it's about your freedoms in the 21st century.


Internet Manifesto: How journalism works today. Seventeen declarations.

1. The Internet is different.

It produces different public spheres, different terms of trade and different cultural skills. The media must adapt their work methods to today’s technological reality instead of ignoring or challenging it. It is their duty to develop the best possible form of journalism based on the available technology. This includes new journalistic products and methods.

2. The Internet is a pocket-sized media empire.

The web rearranges existing media structures by transcending their former boundaries and oligopolies. The publication and dissemination of media contents are no longer tied to heavy investments. Journalism’s self-conception is—fortunately—being cured of its gatekeeping function. All that remains is the journalistic quality through which journalism distinguishes itself from mere publication.

3. The Internet is our society is the Internet.

Web-based platforms like social networks, Wikipedia or YouTube have become a part of everyday life for the majority of people in the western world. They are as accessible as the telephone or television. If media companies want to continue to exist, they must understand the lifeworld of today’s users and embrace their forms of communication. This includes basic forms of social communication: listening and responding, also known as dialog.

4. The freedom of the Internet is inviolable.

The Internet’s open architecture constitutes the basic IT law of a society which communicates digitally and, consequently, of journalism. It may not be modified for the sake of protecting the special commercial or political interests often hidden behind the pretense of public interest. Regardless of how it is done, blocking access to the Internet endangers the free flow of information and corrupts our fundamental right to a self-determined level of information.

5. The Internet is the victory of information.

Due to inadequate technology, media companies, research centers, public institutions and other organizations compiled and classified the world’s information up to now. Today every citizen can set up her own personal news filter while search engines tap into wealths of information of a magnitude never before known. Individuals can now inform themselves better than ever.

6. The Internet changes improves journalism.

Through the Internet, journalism can fulfill its social-educational role in a new way. This includes presenting information as an ever-changing, continual process; the forfeiture of print media’s inalterability is a benefit. Those who want to survive in this new world of information need a new idealism, new journalistic ideas and a sense of pleasure in exploiting this new potential.

7. The net requires networking.

Links are connections. We know each other through links. Those who do not use them exclude themselves from social discourse. This also holds for the websites of traditional media companies.

8. Links reward, citations adorn.

Search engines and aggregators facilitate quality journalism: they boost the findability of outstanding content over a long-term basis and are thus an integral part of the new, networked public sphere. References through links and citations—especially including those made without any consent of or even remuneration of the originator—make the very culture of networked social discourse possible in the first place. They are by all means worthy of protection.

9. The Internet is the new venue for political discourse.

Democracy thrives on participation and freedom of information. Transferring the political discussion from traditional media to the Internet and expanding on this discussion by involving the active participation of the public is one of journalism’s new tasks.

10. Today’s freedom of the press means freedom of opinion.

Article 5 of the German Constitution does not comprise protective rights for professions or technically traditional business models. The Internet overrides the technological boundaries between the amateur and professional. This is why the privilege of freedom of the press must hold for anyone who can contribute to the fulfillment of journalistic duties. Qualitatively speaking, no differentiation should be made between paid and unpaid journalism, but rather, between good and poor journalism.

11. More is more – there is no such thing as too much information.

Once upon a time, institutions such as the church prioritized power over personal awareness and warned of an unsifted flood of information when the letterpress was invented. On the other hand were the pamphleteers, encyclopaedists and journalists who proved that more information leads to more freedom, both for the individual as well as society as a whole. To this day, nothing has changed in this respect.

12. Tradition is not a business model.

Money can be made on the Internet with journalistic content. There are many examples of this today already. Yet because the Internet is fiercely competitive, business models have to be adapted to the structure of the net. No one should try to abscond from this essential adaptation through policy-making geared to preserving the status quo. Journalism needs open competition for the best refinancing solutions on the net, along with the courage to invest in the multifaceted implementation of these solutions.

13. Copyright becomes a civic duty on the Internet.

Copyright is a cornerstone of information organization on the Internet. Originators’ rights to decide on the type and scope of dissemination of their contents are also valid on the net. At the same time, copyright may not be abused as a lever to safeguard obsolete supply mechanisms and shut out new distribution models or license schemes. Ownership entails obligations.

14. The Internet has many currencies.

Journalistic online services financed through adverts offer content in exchange for a pull effect. A reader’s, viewer’s or listener’s time is valuable. In the industry of journalism, this correlation has always been one of the fundamental tenets of financing. Other forms of refinancing which are journalistically justifiable need to be forged and tested.

15. What’s on the net stays on the net.

The Internet is lifting journalism to a new qualitative level. Online, text, sound and images no longer have to be transient. They remain retrievable, thus building an archive of contemporary history. Journalism must take the development of information, its interpretation and errors into account, i.e., it must admit its mistakes and correct them in a transparent manner.

16. Quality remains the most important quality.

The Internet debunks homogenous bulk goods. Only those who are outstanding, credible and exceptional will gain a steady following in the long run. Users’ demands have increased. Journalism must fulfill them and abide by its own frequently formulated principles.

17. All for all.

The web constitutes an infrastructure for social exchange superior to that of 20th century mass media: When in doubt, the “generation Wikipedia” is capable of appraising the credibility of a source, tracking news back to its original source, researching it, checking it and assessing it—alone or as part of a group effort. Journalists who snub this and are unwilling to respect these skills are not taken seriously by these Internet users. Rightly so. The Internet makes it possible to communicate directly with those once known as recipients—readers, listeners and viewers—and to take advantage of their knowledge. Not the journalists who know it all are in demand, but those who communicate and investigate.

Internet, 07.09.2009

Translated from the German original by Jenna L. Brinning

(Via P2P Blog. A Romanian version is available.)

Though it mentions journalism a lot, I think it's safe to say the above Manifesto embodies the ideals of any digital native. The world runs mostly on information nowadays, and information has this tendency to spread fast and wide, not restricted by physical limitations. This has made it obvious that social institutions we were taking for granted don't work very well; indeed, better ways to run the show are arising naturally out of the freedom the Internet has granted us. The incumbents - the corrupt, despotic, greedy politicians and CEOs who rule the modern world - are being made obsolete as we speak, and they are fighting back. Hopefully, what they are doing is just thrashing in the tar pit, but because they are so big and powerful, they can still do a lot of harm.

See, what the Internet Manifesto doesn't say is that in order to use the Internet freely, you first need to use your computer freely, without fear of surveillance or censorship. For over six months, I used this blog to warn against attempts to limit that freedom. But it's easy to miss the forest among all the trees. Luckily, there is another Manifesto that was also published a few days ago. It's titled To Liberate Computer Users and, though it is rather technical (and not very coherent), you might want to read it as well. By the way, The Austin, Texas initiative it mentions is the Helios Project.

As for what you can do about it, let me repeat some advice I gave back in May:

  1. Learn the basics of programming. Think of it this way: you're using the computer all the time, yet you don't know how to talk to it. Note the emphasis: a GUI restricts you to the equivalent of pointing and grunting. You owe it to yourself to do better than that. And don't feel intimidated, the aura of mystique that seems to surround programming nowadays is purely an illusion.
  2. Learn the languages of the Web. Similarly, you surf the Web day in and day out, but can you make a simple Web page if the need arises? Because if you don't, you'll always be dependent on third parties for your continued sharing in the world-wide conversation.
  3. Use a free, open source operating system. Isn't it enough that you barely have control over your hardware? Do you really need someone named Steve to tell you how you're supposed to use your own machine, what software to run and when to upgrade? Do I even need to ask you that?

That, and spread the word. It's what the Internet does best, after all.

Creative Commons License
The Internet Manifesto and Freedomware by Felix Pleșoianu is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Based on a work at www.p2p-blog.com.

Microblogging, the missing medium

, , , ...

It seems no month goes by without some remarkable news coming from the land of ones and zeroes. Even more remarkable is the amount of coolness people turn out when they're not afraid of the future. This time it's about a most traditional medium - Broadway musicals - embracing a very new one: microblogging. The story (or should I say meta-story?) as covered by the New York Times is simple. Some smart people ran a show simultaneously in the theater and as a Twitter adaptation. The result: half a million followers, many of whom were interested enough to go see the live performance, but also to engage with the cast and crew in conversation.

This is just the latest in a long stream of success stories from the relatively young medium of microblogging. It was used to report on the Iranian election protests in June, and to organize the Moldovan election protests in April. It told the world in real time about the Hudson River plane crash in January and arguably helped Mr. Obama win the U.S. presidential elections last year. More recently, we've been shown How an Indie Musician can make $19,000 in 10 hours using Twitter. And still, each new microblogging success story seems to amaze the world. Why is that?

The answer, I think, is perfectly summarized in this tweet quoted by a recent article in Wired Magazine:

@danyork said 'the popularity of microblogging shows us that we were missing a medium,'

Much has been written about what is obviously a major cultural phenomenon. It seems appropriate that the best explanation would fit in 140 characters. Like cellphones and the Internet itself, microblogging filled a void we didn't know existed. Sure, some people use the new medium to send spam, or to tell the whole world what they had for breakfast, while others never post anything, but just follow others. But a surprising number of talented, imaginative enthusiasts use it to do stuff with information that the rest of us didn't think possible, and I can't help but wonder: what's next?

The answer is likely to surprise me.

P.S. Is it a coincidence that Twitter was just hit with a patent lawsuit? As the saying goes, "...then they fight you...". And we all know how that ends.

Creative Commons License
Microblogging, the missing medium by Felix Pleșoianu is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.

Digital Week #30: In brief

, , , ...

Bad weather, bad health and some interesting days at work left me almost too tired for putting together a newsletter. For the curious, I'm programming a 2.5D game engine, and learning (at 32!) the physics I failed to grasp in high school. It's exhilarating, but exhausting.

Last week's news don't feel me with energy, either. Social unrest continues in Iran, both in Tehran, and online. It is the latter side that gets Clay Shirky excited and Iranian authorities scared, apparently. Sadly, those who want to lend a (digital) hand to the protesters may be in danger, not from said authorities (who are, despite rumors to the contrary, likely unable to reach them in their countries), but by the very laws of the United States.

In the copyfight department, the big news has been, of course, the outcome of the Jammie Thomas trial. The shocker here isn't the guilty verdict, but the absurd fine of almost 2 million dollars. That's for 24 songs which she may or may not have uploaded to other people. Do you seriously think they were worth $80000 apiece? As a very successful musician writes:

i'm so sorry that any music fan anywhere is ever made to feel bad for making the effort to listen to music.

the riaa needs to be disbanded.

In other news, Japan decides it's illegal to copy music for one's own use, China blames Google for linking to websites, and a French collecting society blames YouTube for their own inability to use the copyright enforcement tools Google does provide. Fortunately, as TorrentFreak notes, record labels don't have it so easy in Europe.. On the other hand, Australia may be a different matter.

And just because I love blowing up preconceived notions, it turns out that Google Street View, far from being evil, can help solve crimes, and filmmakers can, in fact, make money from free movies.

I'll end with a rather technical topic. As you may have noticed, I normally try to avoid these, because I realize most of my potential readers are probably not geeks. But technology concerns us all. We depend on it; we enjoy its advantages. The least we can do is know the first thing about it.

It's especially ugly when a journalist writing for the Internet spreads FUD about open source software. Yes, the same software that keeps the Internet going. Such ignorance wouldn't have been all that surprising ten years ago, but, as I, Quaid points out, it is totally unacceptable in 2009.

There's a lot more to write about the subject, but Digital Week isn't the most appropriate place for it. I hope to follow up with a special on Friday. No promises, though.

Creative Commons License
Digital Week #30: In brief by Felix Pleşoianu is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.

Digital Week #28: the voice of reason

, , , ...

Last week wasn't much different from the previous one. Government organizations and big companies alike are increasingly out of touch with reality, while the rest of us keep piling arguments in favor of freedom, innovation and creativity. Lots of news, too -- again. Don't get used to it, though, I don't know how long I can keep up.

Just to get the horror stories out of the way, let's look at what a non-neutral 'Net looks like, UK-style, and how Switzerland Decides That It's Ok For Private Firm To Violate Your Privacy If It's Searching For 'Pirates'. Across the pond, we have a Texas blogger jailed after failing to turn PC over to judge (and if you fail to see what's wrong with that, remember that turning over your PC is not the same as turning over, say, your car; nowadays the computer is a part of your life). Then, down under, Anti-Piracy Groups Target Australia's Children. In other words, when arguments fail (e.g. because you don't have any) try indoctrination!

But governmental tribulations in the digital age can be funny, as well. In the U.S., a Construction Crew Severs [a] Secret 'Black Line', and the men in black show up in minutes. I don't know, Mr. Secret Agent, maybe your T1 line being hush-hush wasn't such a good idea after all. How about letting the local authorities know about what's on their turf? Only so they can take proper precautions? Then again, you'd probably just fall in the other extreme...

And speaking of funny, let's see some unintended effects of the doomed anti-filesharing war. In Sweden, a Band Used By The Prosecution In Pirate Bay Case Releases Latest Album... On The Pirate Bay. Then we have French Internet activists launch VPN to foil Three Strikes (VPN also became popular in Sweden after said trial's controversial verdict). And then there is Brazil, where they found the Government Intranet Packed Full of Warez. More on copyfight further below.

Less funny is Microsoft's recent attitude. Not only they seem to think they can unilaterally redefine the word 'netbook', now they're messing with 3rd-party apps willy-nilly. I knew the old joke that Windows is one big computer virus, but I didn't expect MS to make it true on purpose. Especially when headlines such as Linux Picks Up Where Windows FAIL! are becoming commonplace, if not old news.

In other fields, the big companies' tendency to kill themselves is even more obvious. The ASCAP Thinks That Video Game Providers Should Pay Music Performance Royalties (which makes no sense for a lot of reasons, see the article), and since we're talking video games, Take-Two Interactive plans to weather the recession by... wait for it... focusing on the most expensive titles. Of course, as we all know, the most expensive titles are also the least innovative, and that's the main complaint of the gaming public right now. Oh well, there are always the indie developers...

But the most visible corporate suicidal nowadays is that of the large American newspapers. Xark has a great write-up about this. So good, in fact, I need to quote several bits:

Your newspaper overlords believe they can sell you their content if they can just get everybody on the same page and nail the sales pitch this time. They're looking for the magic words, not the underlying logic.

Don't even get me started about magical thinking and how it dominates much of modern society. Do you think it has any connection to the financial crysis?

This spring and early summer has been a continuous parade of naked emperors and specious arguments.

You can say that again... and not just with regard to newspapers.

They'll do anything to survive... so long as it doesn't involve change.

Which is pretty much what the dinosaurs did, and we all know how much it helped them.

As you can see, the quotations above apply to any of the big old companies, in any field of endeavour, which is why I wanted to emphasize them. E.g. we're all familiar with the antics of the music and movie industries. Thankfully, in their case the voice of reason is starting to prevail. There are studies showing that P2P customers are Hollywood's best friends, (indie) movie-makers relating copyleft to freedom of expression and musicians who advocate completely relinquishing copyright for similar reasons, and then a few more. Last but not least, the Digital Renaissance blog beautifully points out why music will forever stand and gives a very clear description of the music companies' changing role.

More generally, there's a lot of buzz lately around large-scale innovation as enabled by the Internet. Some point out The Web is hackable! (for a lack of a better word). Others are looking for a less loaded word. But all agree on the importance of -- and connection between -- Open Platforms and Innovation. Luckily, so do some governments.

On a slightly unrelated note, Cory Doctorow warns that Search is too important to leave to one company -- even Google, while Tantek Çelik points out why point-to-point communications don't scale.

And because I'm a geek, let's see what the mad scientists have been doing last week. While learning there are seasons on Titan is interesting, the news that Earth Gets Billion-Year Life Extension is positively reassuring. And just in time, a New Technique Promises Billion-Year Data Storage. As always, the most difficult part is making people understand science.

I'll end this issue with last week's single most important piece of news from the standpoint of digital culture: Pirate Party Wins and Enters The European Parliament. You know what? It was friggin' time. And I hope this is just the beginning.

Creative Commons License
Digital Week #28: the voice of reason by Felix Pleşoianu is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.

Burnout healing time

, , , ...

Yes, you've read that right. I need to take a break from Digital Week. But lest you think I'm abandoning you, here are the most important news from last week.

I'll start with a double victory for the digital democracy. Within a single week, the EU has struck down the 3-strikes law and terminated the proposed music copyright extension. Let's hope these decisions will hold, bad ideas have this tendency to come back like undead in crappy horror movies.

On the other side of the barricade, we have the Media Giants Asking Google To Weight Its Content Higher (sic) and music makers discovering to their dismay that no "pirates" means no sales, either. Oh, so suddenly you need people to talk about you? And we thought you just wanted our money...

Last but no least, Creative Commons has published an Analysis of 100M CC-Licensed Images on Flickr. The treshold has been crossed the previous week, and I'm proud to have contributed in a small way to this amazing repository of human knowledge.

And now let me tell you what I've been doing in guise of burnout therapy. Can you guess where the image below is from?

ANSI Flower

It's from a MUSH called Puggy, a text-based virtual environment not unlike a text adventure. Now, depending on where you stand, interactive fiction is either timeless or hopelessly obsolete. But a MUSH is much more than just a game or a story. It is a semantic network (thanks, Alex), a rapid prototyping medium, a social experiment and possibly other things. For me it has also been an opportunity to make new friends.

And because the spring has come, I couldn't miss the opportunity to celebrate my own way: with a cameraphone and a glass of orange juice at Verde Cafe, Bucharest.

Drink in the sun
Rose plant
Swing

What? That's all, folks! All right, all right, I'll tell you: it's been exactly 10 years since The Matrix was released. Dodge this!

Creative Commons License
Burnout healing time by Felix Pleşoianu is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.

Digital Week #16: Inconvenient truths

, , ,

Last week had more bad news than average, but don't despair; there is plenty of hope, too.

Let's start with some made-in-UK boneheadedness. Not satisfied to force their own ISPs to block P2P, the British also want to kill net neutrality at the EU level. And lest you think Asians have more common sense, South Korea has actually adopted a three-strikes law.

Not that content publishers need much encouragement to screw their customers. While in the USA Amazon Uses DMCA To Restrict Ebook Purchases (then again, when was the DMCA used for anything BUT abuses?) German book publishers want to sue thousands of file sharers. It will be interesting to see how the trials themselves turn out — laws here in Europe tend to be more clear-cut than on the other side of the Atlantic.

To get some more bad news out of the way, in the democracy-what's-that? department we learn of a pirate party politician fired for his political views. And no, American freedom of expression isn't much safer, not since this precedent that makes libel suits OK even if libel is truthful. In other words, God forbid someone comes up with an inconvenient truth and evidence to back it up; appearances are everything!

On the other side of digital culture, the discourse has been rather more poignant. Artists are actively taking positions against record labels, a torrent tracker preemptively sues a recording industry association, and economists flatly warn: abolish copyright & patents to save the economy. And not a moment too soon: piracy has become mainstream, studies show. Maybe, just maybe, the "politicians" who are supposed to, you know, represent us will remember that the whole point of the law is to formalize what a majority of people consider acceptable behavior at any one time. Well, we are the majority, and the time is now. Wake up, will you?

But the prize for best summary of the current economic situation goes to this blog post by Clay Shirky, which is already making rounds on the Web:

With the old economics destroyed, organizational forms perfected for industrial production have to be replaced with structures optimized for digital data. It makes increasingly less sense even to talk about a publishing industry, because the core problem publishing solves — the incredible difficulty, complexity, and expense of making something available to the public — has stopped being a problem.

(...)

Society doesn’t need newspapers. What we need is journalism.

Case in point. Have a nice digital week.

Creative Commons License
Digital Week #16: Inconvenient truths by Felix Pleşoianu is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.

Digital Week #15

, , , ...

Not many news at all last week, which is just as well, as I have some extended commentary for you. I'll start with a couple of apparently unrelated stories: first, we have a Windows support guy assaulting a Linux consultant (and please ignore the sensationalist side of it for a moment). Then there is this MPAA study [that] links piracy to gangs and terrorists (and please ignore their facetious conflation of counterfeiting and file-sharing for a moment). Well, I see a connection here: in both cases, people have run out of rational arguments. What differs is the reaction: a lowly tech support can only think of using his fists, while "respectable" businessmen blame terrorism for yet another world problem. And both end up looking ridiculous.

Speaking of ridiculous, what would you say if I told you that Metallica's spokesman Lars Ulrich (yes, the same guy who drove Napster into the ground) just admitted to pirating his band's own latest album? ‘Wow, this is how it works.’ Wow indeed, Mr. Ulrich. Are you finally seeing why you lost in the end? Your business was to sell music, as opposed to physical CDs. You confused the means with the ends, that's what happened. Incidentally, Wall Street made the same mistake regarding money. Look where it got them.

On a related note, Paul Graham explains why TV lost, and Techcrunch points out the reason why newspapers are going out of business. In both cases, it's the exact same cause as above: industry leaders forgetting (assuming they ever knew in the first place) what the public really wanted all along. Hint: it was to be part of a community. Nobody cares about the random stranger who got run over by a car last night in a remote corner of the country. What we care about is gossiping about it around the water cooler. Incidentally, Romanian media acknowledges that: newspapers and televisions alike rely more and more on feedback, tips and even raw material from the public. Guess what, they're positively thriving. For now.

In other news, while Norway is embracing file-sharing at the state level, New Zealand's chief music-industry-apologist (official title: CEO of RIANZ) has the gall to come out and claim that the guilty-upon-accusation law is "reasonable". Interestingly enough, most of the article is about laws and policies. Tell me this, Mr. Smith: if the music industry's online business model is so good, why do you need the full force of the law (more, actually) to back it up? I'm guessing it's the same reason why your American counterparts needed the DMCA to back up DRM: it's fundamentally flawed and can't work unless artificially sustained.

To end with comment bait, here's what Technologizer has to say on the recent Kindle 2 debacle: "The Author’s Guild is Wrong About the Kindle. And That’s Okay. They’re the Authors." And you know what? The man's basically right. They should be allowed to drive their own business into the ground if that's what they want. What bothers me is all the dirt they'll heap upon us technology enthusiasts on the way down.

Creative Commons License
Digital Week #15 by Felix Pleşoianu is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.

Digital Week #12: Common sense on trial

, , , ...

No feedback for me last week. Apparently, asking for it yourself doesn't work. P: Very well, I'll just pretend the current format is OK. Expect the occasional mini-experiment, though.

Now, for the flying-blind department I'll cheat a bit and insert a newspiece from this week. After 2 big satellites collide[d] 500 miles over Siberia (a historical first), a couple of submarine captains decided to check just how big the Atlantic is. Apparently not big enough. At least the Brits are running Windows since January. What do the French have for an excuse?

We move smoothly to the yesterday-it-was-sci-fi department, where we learn that a modern car runs more software than an Airbus 380. In other news, a geek solves captchas with a Firefox extension (and no, it's not called SkyNet). But the big prize goes to IBM, who just filed a patent for a bullet-dodging bionic body armor. Matrix fans rejoice. Finally, a special mention for a more practical way to save lives: CNN reports that a man appears free of HIV after stem cell transplant.

Speaking of geeks: as announced last week on TorrentFreak, the Pirate Bay trial has started and can be followed on Twitter (one side of it, anyway - I'm seriously biased wrt this whole story). For now, the prosecutor is busy embarassing himself.

But forget about geeks; this trial is important for everyone. While in the US they are trying to forbid reading books aloud, the people of New Zealand are about to become guilty upon accusation. At least there is some good news: YouTube Tests Download and Creative Commons License Options. Oh well, one step at a time.

A different mix of good and bad news is to be found in the brave-new-economy department. Clay Shirky resurfaces to explain (again) Why Small Payments Won't Save Publishers, and said publishers finally understand the real value of Twitter (here's that name again; it's turning into a noun). At the same time, game makers learn to engage their communities, and Samsung wooes ecologists with a solar-powered phone. Frankly, the last one makes me think rather of all the people who don't have electricity at home, but that's just me.

I'll end with the only bad economic news that grabbed my attention last week: Laid-Off Foreigners Flee as Dubai Spirals Down. The New York Times, always the professionals, point out that Dubai's economy was relying heavily on real estate and finance. Where have I heard that before? Oh yeah, from the US and Iceland. There's a lesson to be learned here. Is it obvious yet that speculation is not value?

Verdict: rocky week. The next one promises to be mad.

Creative Commons License
Digital Week #12: Common sense on trial by Felix Pleşoianu is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.

Digital Week #10: breaking the Internet

, ,

Lots of bad news last week, and I'm not talking about my Friday. But funny news aren't absent by any means, so let's have a laugh first. While an American university opened a Starcraft course, another in Taiwan went for pornography. I'd ask what's next, but I'm not sure I want to know.

Still somewhat funny, in the question-everything department, the New York Times reports that teenagers are less promiscuous than most people think and that kids getting dirty are actually training their immune system. Why am I not surprised?

Back to serious stuff, Friday was a bad day for a lot of people. First, the social bookmarking service Ma.gnolia crashed and burned. Not to be outdone, Google broke the Internet. But while Google came back to normal in a few hours, Ma.gnolia went from displaying a downtime notice to being completely offline. Goes to show that nobody is immune to trouble. Just be prepared.

But the really bad news come from... you guessed it, copyfight. While in England Lord Carter vows to force ISPs to crack down on web piracy, an Irish ISP agrees to disconnect repeat P2P users. Yes, voluntarily. Across the pond, the situation doesn't look much better, with AT&T, Comcast part Of RIAA's new 3 strikes plan, but at least Comcast promptly discredited the whole idea. And then, as if anti-piracy needed any more discrediting, we have a traffic management company, no less, reporting that Anti-Piracy Measures Don’t Work.

Still in the copyfight department, but on the bright side, there are plenty of reports in favor of filesharing. While one Dutch researcher says copyright will be obsolete by 2010 (via P2P Blog), an institute in the same country reminds everyone that the average downloader buys more DVDs, music, and games. How much more? A lot, apparently: free Monty Python Videos on Youtube lead to 23,000% DVD sale increase. Even the Wall Street Journal admits there's something here. Besides, traditional distribution channels are increasingly unsustainable (OK, this last one is slightly off-topic).

In other words, you can't stop the future, and just to show how well this virtual stuff meshes with the real world, [LimeWire's] Creator Brings Open-Source Approach to Urban Planning. I wish him luck. In fact, I hope he comes to Bucharest next.

Verdict: troubled week. Oh well, it happens.

Creative Commons License
Digital Week #10: breaking the Internet by Felix Pleşoianu is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.