Cleareaching

Interpreting

Along with the focus of attention to the experience, goes interpretation. Interpreting is an impersonal habit which we use to give our experience a name, because we want to know what’s going on. The moment anything happens, all our attention starts focusing on it and we try to get rid of it, repair it or understand it. With this focusing on our sensation, we immediately exclude the rest of life. Suddenly, our life consists only of the sensation and a feeling of “I” focusing on it, like tunnel vision. One end of the tunnel is the feeling of “I” and the other end is the sensation we want to get away from. It’s interesting to investigate how the habit of interpreting experience is linked to the focus of attention. The more the focus of attention is outwards, the more interpretation takes place.

Every human drama consists of a sensation and a trying to get away from it: we call it suffering. But what drives this mechanism of always searching for an exit from a sensation? Honestly, nothing. It’s just the mind’s interpretation of the sensation. This interpretation, this labeling divides our experience into good and bad, into wanting and not wanting, making our world appear in terms of duality.

Awareness on the other hand is the oneness. It’s the vigilance, the wakefulness, that which sees and is already awake – infinite, undisturbed, ever-present wakefulness. We, as awareness, have never been asleep to expect to reach some awakening. We have just been believing in our interpretations. That wakefulness, though, is never affected by them.

AwarenessA story about love

Comments

ersi Tuesday, April 12, 2011 11:18:41 AM

Originally posted by cleareaching:

It’s just the mind’s interpretation of the sensation. This interpretation, this labeling divides our experience


Mind does much more with experience than labelling. According to a(nother) theory, any experience is completely mental, i.e. mind creates the experience and then indulges in it. To quit the interpreting or labelling function of the mind presupposes that one has first separated the function of labelling from other mental functions, such as memory, discernment, and determination. The theory can be formulated, "It is all mental." imaginary friends

Abdulaziz Noratabdulaziznorat Tuesday, April 12, 2011 12:57:57 PM

Originally posted by ersi:

"It is all mental."


Whole topic concern with mental attitude. It is well accepted principal that human being is very well focus on " I " attitude!
When some one starts his story, the main theme is involve in mind is his personal ego interpreting attitude over other that " I " is all at every where. So, it is main focusing point.

cleareaching Wednesday, April 13, 2011 8:46:52 AM

Good ol' Dilbert!yes

Originally posted by ersi:

According to a(nother) theory, any experience is completely mental, i.e. mind creates the experience and then indulges in it.

It's not just a(nother) theory, it's one of the two main branches of "contemporary" philosophical thinking. You remember, of course, Descartes' famous "cogito ergo sum".

Originally posted by ersi:

"It is all mental."


Only if you take the theory fully. But can you do that? For example, a piece of black marble will always be for any of us nothing but a bunch of sensations we associate with it: black to the eye, cold and hard to the touch and so on and so on. But who can deny that apart from anything we perceive, the marble is there, it has existence of its own? So, no, it's not all mental.

To always fight and resist the experience at hand - this is mental. This automatic response to the experience sure makes us dwell in our minds alright. We end up producing interpretations and then scenarios - at no time we can practically be in hell, a hell that is home-made. This whole process is actually denial of reality. All this time we spend thinking, we are missing what's actually going on.

But what if, instead of fighting the moment, we let it be? That's a curio. What if we override the automatic response system? You might term that awakening too, in the sense that you grow awake to the moment.

cleareaching Wednesday, April 13, 2011 8:50:19 AM

Originally posted by abdulaziznorat:

It is well accepted principal that human being is very well focus on " I " attitude!

Absolutely. Each one of us can be nothing but an "I". We are born to be "I"s. At the same time, we are born as parts of awareness. I see no conflict there, just a change in focus, which allows life to explore.

Abdulaziz Noratabdulaziznorat Wednesday, April 13, 2011 9:42:25 AM

Originally posted by cleareaching:

I see no conflict there, just a change in focus, which allows life to explore.


Therefore, if we use " I " attitude of opposite party, I am sure we can win half battle in life! It mean we respect the others ego and emotions smile

cleareaching Wednesday, April 13, 2011 10:05:11 AM

In English they have this saying: "in someone's shoes", which means you understand the other person by putting yourself in his/her place. Empathy is another word in this vein. Neurologically speaking, there are these mirror neurons in us which resonate as the other person process thoughts, feelings, emotions...

Abdulaziz Noratabdulaziznorat Wednesday, April 13, 2011 12:11:39 PM

Only the wearers know where the shoe pinches, if we ourselves...

Originally posted by cleareaching:

which means you understand the other person by putting yourself in his/her place.

Most important is to be a positive and think other persons views first. smile

cleareaching Thursday, April 14, 2011 4:55:17 AM

Exactly! Have a beautiful day Aziz. smile coffee

Abdulaziz Noratabdulaziznorat Thursday, April 14, 2011 7:03:32 AM

Christina,

cleareaching Thursday, April 14, 2011 8:29:25 AM

Oh, heartful thanks!!!! heart

Write a comment

New comments have been disabled for this post.