You need to be logged in to post in the forums. If you do not have an account, please sign up first.

Go to last post

25. December 2011, 17:11:55

MrX1980

Posts: 6

SPDY implementation ?

Hello
it would be nice to have SPDY support in the near future.

SPDY:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SPDY
http://dev.chromium.org/spdy/
http://dev.chromium.org/spdy/spdy-whitepaper

example:
http://spdytest.com/ = wihout SPDY
https://spdytest.com/ = with SPDY

Merry Christmas and a happy new year.

25. December 2011, 17:30:20

serious

Lab mouse and likes it!

Posts: 5297

the correct wikipedia link is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SPDY
generally -1, as:

Originally posted by Wikipedia:

SPDY (pronounced speedy) is a proprietary networking protocol

All my posts only represent my own opinions.
[ Tweedo Monitor - Deluxe Website & Service Monitoring ]

25. December 2011, 18:09:17

MrX1980

Posts: 6

Originally posted by Wikipedia:

SPDY (pronounced speedy) is a proprietary networking protocol


I think this is not a reason to not implement it in the Opera Next builds.

SPDY support:
Google Chrome = since v11 (default = enabled)
Mozilla Firefox = since v11 [20111204] (default = disabled)

First test cases seems to work good:
http://bit.ly/tUAvzq

25. December 2011, 20:22:56

Frenzie

Posts: 14416

Originally posted by MrX1980:

I think this is not a reason to not implement it in the Opera Next builds.


TCP/IP and HTTP are open standards. The web is built on open standards.

Anyway, I don't know if Opera should be spearheading this one. See http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3309999
Intelligent alien life does exist, otherwise they would've contacted us. — CalendarExtend Opera

27. December 2011, 13:29:34

purgossu

Opera poweruser

Posts: 775

-1
Using last Opera stable version x64 build on Windows 7 x64.

A catharsis of transfiguration: lycanthropy, literature, films, role-playing games... and some other deliriums.

27. December 2011, 15:26:45

Originally posted by serious:

SPDY (pronounced speedy) is a proprietary networking protocol


You seriously have no proofs to back-up your quote from Wikipedia. The Wikipedia article does not contain the word 'proprietary' at all. I don't say you are wrong but I was unable to find a reputive citation for this.

Anyways, as per many websites, SPDY is still experimental or just in a 'Editor's draft' stage right now - so let's wait till mid 2012 to see whether SPDY touches the heights of success or fails in a drastic way.
Windows 7 SP1 x86 edition and Windows XP Service Pack 3.
If you need any help from me with regards to Opera, please make a comment on any of my blog posts.
Support Opera wishes

27. December 2011, 15:42:49

serious

Lab mouse and likes it!

Posts: 5297

Originally posted by Swapnil99pro:

You seriously have no proofs to back-up your quote from Wikipedia

erm, ever heard of their history feature? the changes to the article were made yesterday: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=SPDY&action=historysubmit&diff=467823237&oldid=467578290
All my posts only represent my own opinions.
[ Tweedo Monitor - Deluxe Website & Service Monitoring ]

28. December 2011, 09:36:23

Originally posted by serious:

erm, ever heard of their history feature? the changes to the article were made yesterday:


OK, really sorry.
Windows 7 SP1 x86 edition and Windows XP Service Pack 3.
If you need any help from me with regards to Opera, please make a comment on any of my blog posts.
Support Opera wishes

27. January 2012, 05:58:46

Ravindran

Posts: 37

+1
It's nice to have some more speed boost in Opera with SPDY.

27. January 2012, 08:44:06

MrX1980

Posts: 6

Originally posted by Frenzie:

TCP/IP and HTTP are open standards. The web is built on open standards.


SPDY will be an open standard:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2012JanMar/0098.html

Goals and Milestones:

Done First HTTP/1.1 Revision Internet Draft

Done First HTTP Security Properties Internet Draft

Feb 2012 Working Group Last Call for HTTP/1.1 Revision

Feb 2012 Working Group Last Call for HTTP Security Properties

Apr 2012 Submit HTTP/1.1 Revision to IESG for consideration as a
Proposed Standard

Apr 2012 Submit HTTP Security Properties to IESG for consideration as
Informational RFC

May 2012 First HTTP/2.0 Internet Draft

May 2013 Request Last Call for HTTP/2.0

Jul 2013 Submit HTTP/2.0 to IESG for consideration as a Proposed
Standard

28. January 2012, 18:55:01

woj-tek

Posts: 2329

ok, does this mean that we can hope for including it in the future Opera?

29. January 2012, 15:34:11

RyanChappelle

NonOperator^=

Posts: 396

Knowing Opera, if it is going to be open, it will be implemented shortly after it is officially released as such.
My Wishlist:
SOCKS ALREADY! + Gopher ∥ sys notifications ∥ +Info Panel ∥ dæmon mode ∥ etc
Mi web
GULIX -- Araucanía

Opera can adapt to the world, but that should not be at the cost of making any of them both stupider

12. February 2012, 07:48:42

MrX1980

Posts: 6

GoogleTechTalk about SPDY (Dezember 2011)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TNBkxA313kk

12. February 2012, 19:26:44

Krake

Posts: 2365

-1

Drawbacks:
Content is pushed regardless of existing cache resulting in waste of bandwidth.
Filtering software that rely on HTTP requests will no longer work.

The browsers Google Chrome and Chromium utilize SPDY when communicating with Google services, such as Google Search, Gmail, Chrome sync and when serving Google's ads.



Be aware, Google isn't Mother Teresa.
Every morning in Africa, a gazelle wakes up. It knows it must run faster than the fastest lion or it will be killed.
Every morning a lion wakes up. It knows it must outrun the slowest gazelle or it will starve to death.
It doesn't matter whether you are a lion or a gazelle: when the sun comes up, you'd better be running.

15. February 2012, 09:07:12

Silvery-Corgan

Posts: 4

+1

I don't care if it's proprietary or not I just want to have speed!

19. March 2012, 13:43:11

RyanChappelle

NonOperator^=

Posts: 396

↑↑ That's the line of thinking that got us Flash and H264 and other things. You might not care if it is propietary or not, but the devels do have to care because they can't be sure if they can actually even try and provide you with improvements or new stuff otherwise, or even with the very program to begin with.
My Wishlist:
SOCKS ALREADY! + Gopher ∥ sys notifications ∥ +Info Panel ∥ dæmon mode ∥ etc
Mi web
GULIX -- Araucanía

Opera can adapt to the world, but that should not be at the cost of making any of them both stupider

22. March 2012, 14:12:40

jirayu16563

Posts: 69

I don't know how necessary of this protocol. only pro of this protocol i known is faster than http.

so, +1

22. March 2012, 17:59:13

davews

Posts: 466

I remain somewhat sceptical about SPDY as it was covered in a recent Steve Gibson Security Now podcast. Opera is already a pretty fast browser and uses multiple connection streams so any improvement is likely to be limited. The published speed improvements from Google/Chrome don't seem to define too well how they were done, and in all probability were tweaked to overstate the improvement based solely on Chrome. More worrying though is if servers use SPDY's push mode they will be pushing all sorts of ads and video content that the user may well want to block via 'block content' or hosts files - only sites heavily into these sorts of things will show a speed improvement...

But until Opera implements SPDY there will be no way of knowing whether it is worth it.

22. March 2012, 18:58:18

serious

Lab mouse and likes it!

Posts: 5297

Still -1, as long as SPDY is not standardized similar to HTTP and other such protocols.
All my posts only represent my own opinions.
[ Tweedo Monitor - Deluxe Website & Service Monitoring ]

22. March 2012, 19:19:10

Krake

Posts: 2365

Originally posted by jirayu16563:

I don't know how necessary of this protocol. only pro of this protocol i known is faster than http.

so, +1


It might be faster at cost of some CPU heating.

However there is an issue I can see for users using new hardware as well.
Namely, a huge part of Google's revenues are resulting from ads.
SPDY allows forcing ads to the browser without being requested first. As a result, all third party filtering software ore extensions like Adblock Plus will render useless.
Every morning in Africa, a gazelle wakes up. It knows it must run faster than the fastest lion or it will be killed.
Every morning a lion wakes up. It knows it must outrun the slowest gazelle or it will starve to death.
It doesn't matter whether you are a lion or a gazelle: when the sun comes up, you'd better be running.

24. March 2012, 00:47:17

latebeat

Posts: 19

+1 !!!!!!!!

It really works
Dramatic difference with spdy aware browser and website
Huge investment in it
It's undeniably the future... all big websites are implementing it.. (twitter just became fully spdy aware)

Much much better than opera turbo

http://youtu.be/s96SpnguLcE?t=56m12s

and as @MRx1980 said:

I think this is not a reason to not implement it in the Opera Next builds.

SPDY support:
Google Chrome = since v11 (default = enabled)
Mozilla Firefox = since v11 [20111204] (default = disabled)

24. March 2012, 09:37:38

LinuxMint7

The Minty After Dinner Linux

Posts: 2838

Definitely -1000, Google are becoming a monopoly, They have their fingers in too many pies
already. They are doing it for their own monetary gain, Not for the benefit of the web user.

I am actually currently looking for alternatives for Translate and Image search, Which are
the only Google services i have ever used, Then i can completely boycott Google altogether.
Opera 12.14 - 1738 (Portable 32bit) on Win8 Pro, Or portable versions of Linux Mint 14 or Puppy Linux Upup Precise - 3.8.3.1

19. April 2012, 11:23:59

hxaker1

Posts: 4

I am for implementation SPDY opera.
This protocol is a progressive, strongly accelerating the work sites.
Opera should not be otstoyuschim browser. It is necessary to introduce support for new, innovative standards.

19. April 2012, 12:34:13

tarc

Posts: 52

This protocol is NOT proprietary anymore

so +1

19. April 2012, 13:21:33

serious

Lab mouse and likes it!

Posts: 5297

Originally posted by tarc:

This protocol is NOT proprietary anymore

is it an rfc yet? wink
All my posts only represent my own opinions.
[ Tweedo Monitor - Deluxe Website & Service Monitoring ]

20. April 2012, 03:43:38

Atomic1fire

Posts: 19

Firefox has implemented support in newer versions (not sure if that support is in the stable build yet), Microsoft is suggesting it be added to HTTP 2.0 along with websocket support, and google came up with it.
I suspect Opera will likely wait until it's either well implemented or finalized in HTTP.

9. May 2012, 11:23:08

mp3geek

Posts: 33

Later this month nginx will support spdy, and cloudflare will be supporting it also thus will improve speeds on our site which is served via cloudflare.. would love to see opera support it.

14. May 2012, 12:53:21

PtDragon

Posts: 2

+1
It will be useful.

18. May 2012, 19:04:16

KerenSkyy

Posts: 62

+1

Thanks.
"It is, on the other hand, also thickly populated by fraudsters, pornographers of the worst kind and cranks."

21. May 2012, 17:21:51

keygenx

Beta Tester

Posts: 153

Since its in development stage its not really necessary.
But there is a browser war going on.
We must fight!!!!!!
Opera 12 (The Internet awaits the wake of the legend)

5. June 2012, 19:34:39

Blueice

Posts: 21

Firefox 13 has just been released with SPDY support. This is the browser war. Opera must hurry with its own implementation.

I have been using Opera since the days of built in advertisement. I love it but for me, Opera is still struggling with some websites. I always report them but nothing happened for years. Eg. http://www.mobile01.com/

7. June 2012, 15:26:46

hochmartinez

Posts: 18

+1

Super fast gmail, docs, etc. with Firefox 13 and SPDY.

20. June 2012, 05:47:48

tarc

Posts: 52

Originally posted by serious:

Originally posted by tarc:

This protocol is NOT proprietary anymore

is it an rfc yet? wink

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mbelshe-httpbis-spdy-00

Publication date is Feb 2012

20. June 2012, 08:16:53

serious

Lab mouse and likes it!

Posts: 5297

http://www.guypo.com/technical/not-as-spdy-as-you-thought/ ... so as long as sites are not optimized for it it seems there is little benefit ...
All my posts only represent my own opinions.
[ Tweedo Monitor - Deluxe Website & Service Monitoring ]

6. July 2012, 11:52:58

kapsi

Posts: 282

Well, it's coming.
Opera 12.10, Windows 7 x64;
Core 2 Duo 2.5 GHz, 4GB RAM.

6. July 2012, 12:08:39

Pesala

Reclining Buddha

Posts: 25574

A labs release to get your SPDY senses tingling
SkinsTipsButtonsBackupSecurityUser ScriptsLanguage ForumsWiki
Browser JSChangelogsOpera NextDragonflyBugsCrashesFTP
My WebsiteMy ForumsOpera ReviewMy FontsIrfanViewSearchDownloads
Opera 11.64 on Windows XP Home • AMD64 3500 1GB RAM specs idea
Rules of Conduct and Posting RulesPlease Don't ShoutEditing PostsOpera Config Links

28. August 2012, 17:43:11

Zero3K

Posts: 147

The latest snapshot of 12.50 now supports SPDY. All that needs to happen now is for opera.com and its subdomains to be supporting it.

Forums » Opera for Windows/Mac/Linux » Desktop wish-list