Sunday, 14. December 2008, 22:18:56
No Opera for x86_64 GCC4/QT4?
I'm looking for a GCC4/QT4 build of Opera for x86_64, preferable in RPM packaging. (This is for Fedora 10.) I'm suprised to see that apparently QT4 isn't supported for x86_64:ftp://get.opera.com/pub/opera/linux/962/final/en/x86_64/
Is this really the case, that there is no Opera for x86_64 QT4?
Thanks.
Monday, 15. December 2008, 16:47:46
So no, there are no Qt4 x86_64 builds yet, sadly
Sunday, 1. February 2009, 16:29:31
I'm using opensuse 11.1 x86_64 with KDE4 and actual opera qt3 builds look awful, especially the "save file" dialogs, which remembers me the old win 3.1
And please don't tell me "there's the i386 qt4 build" because it's a pain with plugins and desktop integration!
I hope the next opera 10 will include more x86_64 builds, as today's computers are usually configured with 4gb+ ram (eheh.. thanks vista
Bye
Matteo
Sunday, 1. February 2009, 18:05:34
Wednesday, 4. February 2009, 05:13:40
Until Opera starts doing 64bit Qt4 builds-I'm going to go elsewhere for a browser. People have begged and pleaded for a very long time for it-and nada, no justification for it, not even so much as an acknowledgement from the Opera devs on the topic.
So here I am using Konqueror again, I only miss Speed Dial. I shouldn't need to load two different Qt libraries on boot simply to browse the internet. I hate these "leaving" messages-but a memo needs to be gotten acknowledged to the devs.
~signed disgruntled Linux ex-Opera user.
Wednesday, 4. February 2009, 06:31:58
Wednesday, 25. February 2009, 09:55:33
Anyway,
Can I stick another request in for Qt4 x86_64 I have at least 3 machines personally that need it. Let alone the ones in the office i'd like to get using it.
Pretty please
Really - one more compilation can't be that hard can it.
Thursday, 12. March 2009, 09:05:01
when opera do decide to make a qt4 version, make a qt4.5 version not the bugged qt4.4
Friday, 13. March 2009, 22:20:14
The bit provides the most irritation is that almost ironically, the i386 version would run fine - except as you cannot then have an i386 app dynamically linking to an x86_64 library (I almost said dll... shit, lol) it largely defeats the purpose.
Monday, 6. April 2009, 18:37:10
Tuesday, 7. April 2009, 09:09:48
However it seems wierd that there are perfectly well working QT4 builds out there...why not use one of those.
Friday, 10. April 2009, 09:36:26
Saturday, 11. April 2009, 20:42:48
Until they release them though, static qt3 builds will work perfectly fine.
Monday, 13. April 2009, 10:46:27
Monday, 13. April 2009, 16:54:23
After I reported an issue with Opera/Qt/Linux.I think the latest version of Opera uses Qt 3, which isn't even supported by us anymore, so no. Best option would be to compile and link a Qt based application yourself.
Friday, 24. April 2009, 12:33:23
Tuesday, 28. April 2009, 06:47:35
Developers, please recompile it with QT4 ... if the i386/QT4 build is possible, and it is, and it is working great, a 64 bit version should also be possible.
Thanks.
Tuesday, 28. April 2009, 14:59:22
I'm gonna go out on a limb here. Is Operas interface being re-built in QT for the 10 official release. Given that QT3 will be long out of date before the release of 10 it seems silly to still be using it.
Is this why:
a) 10 alpha has the same interface as 9.
b) We are not seeing too much work going into updating the interface of the current builds from qt3 - qt4.
Maybe I'm about to start a wild and dangerous rumor here but it seems pretty likely to me.
Wednesday, 29. April 2009, 09:01:10
Wednesday, 29. April 2009, 20:41:43
Friday, 5. June 2009, 02:57:16
Friday, 5. June 2009, 03:13:46
Originally posted by JaJohNee:
Take a look here: http://mirror.liteserver.nl/pub/opera/linux/964/final/en/i386/
And THAT ladies and gents, is how you admit that you did not even bother to read the thread topic.
Wednesday, 17. June 2009, 07:11:12
I thought about replying further, but I guess I should leave that to the developers when they see fit to do so. Suffice it to say, they are working on it.
Wednesday, 17. June 2009, 10:19:00
Originally posted by sgunhouse:
Strangely, Opera seems to like computers with nVidia graphics cards under Linux ...
Yeah i can second that , i used to run Opera on suse 10.1 without a Nvidia kernel
When swapping to Suse 11.1 i thought of installing the Nividia Kernel on my Acer Aspire which has a FX go 5700 gpu and i can say that it is smoother.
I never thought it would make a "big" difference but it did.
Thursday, 25. June 2009, 16:01:23
A version to play with should be just around the corner .... whatever that means!
Thursday, 25. June 2009, 16:31:01
Originally posted by ruario:
As Steve pointed out, we do have internal builds of opera qt4 for x86_64 but they have a few issues. They will come ... we won't leave you stuck on Qt3 forever, even if it may feel like it sometimes.
A version to play with should be just around the corner .... whatever that means!![]()
I can't wait till you fix the issues. (in the past I would have said to bring it on but I guess there must be good reason not to bring it on yet
Anyway what I don't understand is why opera seem to use the old and very buggy qt4.4.0 instead of qt4.5.1 or kde's qt-copy-branch.
(nor do I understand the use of the ancient gcc4.1.1 instead of 4.4.0 or 4.3.3)
ANyway it's nice to be kept up to date once in a while
Forums » Opera Community » Opera desktop platforms » Opera for UNIX - Linux, Solaris, FreeBSD
