You need to be logged in to post in the forums. If you do not have an account, please sign up first.
Scrupulous fairness? One ex-Colonist will be happy (but) !
I was watching the Daily politics Show and they announced what was apparently a feature leading up to the General Election. The (UK) Libertarian Party. Puzzled me a bit as I wasn't aware they were participating having only been founded in 2008. They then had a brief chat with the leader a smart and obviously intelligent young man who had been a product of that fine school, Eton. He then explained that they did support a couple of Independents that being just a small lot of 450 "but growing" they were putting up one candidate for Westminster.However thedawgfan may not be happy with the end of the interview. Andrew Neil politely quizzed him about a blog he had made where he used some very vicious and rather despicable language some of which couldn't be repeated so early in the day (9pm watershed and all that). He became noticeably ill at ease and squirmed and had to make a grovelling tv apology. He will have to learn that as a party leader you must have a more sensible public attitude and I do trust that their counterparts in the ex-Colonies show better judgement?
Originally posted by rjhowie:
However thedawgfan may not be happy with the end of the interview. Andrew Neil politely quizzed him about a blog he had made where he used some very vicious and rather despicable language some of which couldn't be repeated so early in the day (9pm watershed and all that). He became noticeably ill at ease and squirmed and had to make a grovelling tv apology.
Well, mistakes do tend to happen to new parties.
He will have to learn from them and (depending on the seriousness of the language) move on. (Or alternatively resign for the good of the party)
Originally posted by rjhowie:
and I do trust that their counterparts in the ex-Colonies show better judgement?
Of course we do! I expect significant gains due to the new health law that has just passed.
Most unfortunately, the Libertarian Party and myself disagree quite vehemently on the new law.
I must say though, I am quite glad that the filth that joins the Tea Party doesn't bother joining the Libertarian Party.
Most fellow Libertarians I know despise that pathetic "movement". They, like I, know that those fools will probably set us a back a decade or two.
Still though, it's quite nice for the UK to have formed it's own Libertarian Party. I wish it the best of luck.
http://www.usdebtclock.org/
"Americans should not go abroad to slay dragons they do not understand in the name of spreading democracy." -President John Quincy Adams
They probably have more members than the Libertarian Party. They certainly put up a lot of candidates at elections.
However there is an escape route where many of us are gathering to avoid Armagedon:
see The DnD Sanctuary for gaming, for discussions on Browsers or anything in particular, and just Lounging about.
Originally posted by string:
They probably have more members than the Libertarian Party. They certainly put up a lot of candidates at elections.
Already read it. I'd vote for them
All air conditioners to be placed on the outside of buildings to combat global warming.....gotta love them!Originally posted by string:
Speaking of daft parties (!)

Originally posted by string:
you(all)
You mean y'all?

Originally posted by string:
They probably have more members than the Libertarian Party.
Well I'd ruddy well hope so.

The MRLP was formed in the late 80's after all.
Originally posted by string:
They certainly put up a lot of candidates at elections.
You seem to underestimate the power of the sneaky-sneaky... (Libertarian Party)
When you Brits begin to pay for Greece's debt, I suspect a lot of people get angry.
I doubt they will turn to the Tories or Labour to solve their problems.
No doubt they will turn to the UKIP or new Libertatian party.
http://www.usdebtclock.org/
"Americans should not go abroad to slay dragons they do not understand in the name of spreading democracy." -President John Quincy Adams
Originally posted by rjhowie:
Andrew Neil politely quizzed him about a blog he had made where he used some very vicious and rather despicable language some of which couldn't be repeated so early in the day (9pm watershed and all that).
It was more lynching that interview. The language that Mounsey used was hardly that reprehensible, but I spent four years in the Navy, so you know where I'm coming from. I've heard worse here. He did admit to calling a pol a "filthy troll," and wished that she would "bleed to death." He did apologize, but shame on him.
Originally posted by rjhowie:
Andrew Neil politely quizzed him about a blog he had made . . .
What happened to, "For everything, there is a season, and a time for every purpose under the sun?"
Copylefted by GNU! http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html
Originally posted by Virgil:
Omnia vincit Amor: et nos cedamus Amori.
........ Love conquers all, and we surrender to Love.