You need to be logged in to post in the forums. If you do not have an account, please sign up first.
Originally posted by parmindermangat:
Bolt browser 2.1 supports full HTML5
Nope. It might support a tiny subset. And that link talks about a crappy test that doesn't even test HTML5 properly. It claims that stuff like H264 and Geolocation is part of HTML5, which is just a lie.
And actually, Bolt doesn't support HTML5 video. It converts some videos to a crappy compressed format.
26. May 2010, 09:52:10 (edited)
For example, if J2ME browser (e.g. Bolt if I have understood correctly) converts the flash video into format supported by the phone, it runs the conversion software on the server. Thus the http://html5test.com/ test tells you what is done on the server side. Since Opera Mini does not even try to convert anything on their server, it does not need Flash player on Opera Mini server. Therefore the test gives something like 0/30 for video support.
Originally posted by serola:
Very true. But that's the whole idea behind browsers like bolt and opera mini, convert stuff to a format that can viewed on mobiles at a fraction of the cost. So if html5 content can be viewed on a mobile thanks to server side reformatting and compression, that means it's supported but ya ya technically speaking it ain't.I suppose in case of Opera Mini and Bolt the http://html5test.com/ only tests the browser running on their server. Thus the browser on proxy server can get high scores but it really does not mean you get it on client side.
For example, if J2ME browser (e.g. Bolt if I have understood correctly) converts the flash video into format supported by the phone, it runs the conversion software on the server. Thus the http://html5test.com/ test tells you what is done on the server side. Since Opera Mini does not even try to convert anything on their server, it does not need Flash player on Opera Mini server. Therefore the test gives something like 0/30 for video support.
Originally posted by insyt:
So if html5 content can be viewed on a mobile thanks to server side reformatting and compression
Except it can't. Transcoding video and nothing else does not equal "HTML5". HTML5 means interactive, scriptable, real-time video. Let me see how much interaction and scripting you can do with a proxy browser showing videos...
Never mind the fact that the video quality in Bolt is absolutely horrifically bad.
We all know how BOLT does it, why it is not real HTML5, why Opera Mini doesn't do it and all that. But in real world, these are of little or no relevance to the end user. And to them, some video is always better than no video at all.
Again, HTML5 is still under-construction and of course, OM might have built a viewing system. Of course, Opera was one of the influences in bringing <video> to HTML.
"Don't tell me that sky is the limit when I already see footsteps on the moon !"
Quarrel for the improvement of Opera Mini!
Discuss on mobile stuff:
<a href="http://www.mobileroyale.co.cc">Mobile Royale - Mobile News & Downloads</a>
Originally posted by serola:
Thus the http://html5test.com/ test tells you what is done on the server side.
beta.html5test.com is interesting also. However Bolt dont have a mobile ua and a test drive on scribd.com shows that the full html5 support=0.