So it begins....

So it begins....

As should be common knowledge by now, Facebook is a very handy social-networking site.
Up until this point, there has been a single FB. Not anymore. ( )
http://www.millatfacebook.com/

Apparently the gov't of Pakistan takes issue with Facebook as it is, so they paid a couple of people to create Millatfacebook which is apparently a predominantly Muslim FB in which apparently other religious people are welcome.
(How very magnanimous of them! )
"MillatFacebook helps you connect and share with more than 1.57 Billion Muslims and Sweet people from other Religions." -Quote from the site

Good grief!
This begs the question, when will there be a "Christian, Jewish, Pagan, IPU, FSM, Nordic, Roman-era god" FB site?

I sense Poe's Law at work.

I agree, just look at the whois entry:

Domain Name: MILLATFACEBOOK.COM

Registrant:
PrivacyProtect.org
Domain Admin (contact@privacyprotect.org)
P.O. Box 97
Note - All Postal Mails Rejected, visit Privacyprotect.org
Moergestel
null,5066 ZH
NL
Tel. +45.36946676

Creation Date: 20-May-2010
Expiration Date: 20-May-2011

Yup…

This is all wrong. There should be absolutely no policy of partisanship whether it be Christian, Muslim, Atheist or whatever. This is pandering and blatantly so. Damnable is being polite in the face of such a situation.

rj, please read the previous three posts…

( Hm. Maybe I should re-read Frenzie's post: http://www.qatarliving.com/node/1067009 )

Originally posted by thedawgfan:

As should be common knowledge by now, Facebook is a very handy social-networking site.

Should? why?
I don't use facebook or any other social networking, exception being D&D because it's handy to practice basic writing in English, nothing more.

The home of entrepreneurship doesn't like when Pakistanis or whatever does the same?
The users regulate the contents and rules of social networking?

I can't quite see it being as big as facebook

…I wonder why it isn't based in Pakistan?

Originally posted by someone:

ها قد هلّ بالبشرى الهلالُ * بفجر العزّ آذنت التلالُ .. الموقع البديل للفيس بوك

Soon… Very soon.

Originally posted by Museatlantis:

I can't quite see it being as big as facebook

think again Christians are being (not to offend anyone) run over by muslims. more people are converting.

Originally posted by Belfrager:

Should? why?

Well, if you have a computer, I assume that you have heard of FB and what it is.
One would have to be quite sheltered to not have heard of it, and some of the controversies that have surrounded it.

Originally posted by Belfrager:

I don't use facebook or any other social networking, exception being D&D because it's handy to practice basic writing in English, nothing more.

I see. Well, it is handy for keeping up with old friends and sometimes meeting new ones with similar interests.

Originally posted by Belfrager:

The users regulate the contents and rules of social networking?

On this new religious FB, yes.
Apparently Muslims didn't like the "Draw a picture of Muhammad day" and have been leaving FB in droves and calling for their own FB.
Apparently this Millatfacebook is the FB they have been desiring.

Originally posted by thedawgfan:

As should be common knowledge by now, Facebook is a very handy social-networking site.
Up until this point, there has been a single FB. Not anymore. ( )
http://www.millatfacebook.com/

Apparently the gov't of Pakistan takes issue with Facebook as it is, so they paid a couple of people to create Millatfacebook which is apparently a predominantly Muslim FB in which apparently other religious people are welcome.
(How very magnanimous of them! )
"MillatFacebook helps you connect and share with more than 1.57 Billion Muslims and Sweet people from other Religions." -Quote from the site

Good grief!
This begs the question, when will there be a "Christian, Jewish, Pagan, IPU, FSM, Nordic, Roman-era god" FB site?

make one then dawg dont worry what pakistan is doing ,then make a athiest one and be the first athiest facebook of all time .
anyway ur not religious so i would not give too hoots on the matter

Originally posted by thedawgfan:

Originally posted by Belfrager:

Should? why?

Well, if you have a computer, I assume that you have heard of FB and what it is.
One would have to be quite sheltered to now have heard of it, and some of the controversies that have surrounded it.

Originally posted by Belfrager:

I don't use facebook or any other social networking, exception being D&D because it's handy to practice basic writing in English, nothing more.

I see. Well, it is handy for keeping up with old friends and sometimes meeting new ones with similar interests.

Originally posted by Belfrager:

The users regulate the contents and rules of social networking?

On this new religious FB, yes.
Apparently Muslims didn't like the "Draw a picture of Muhammad day" and have been leaving FB in droves and calling for their own FB.
Apparently this Millatfacebook is the FB they have been desiring.

then facebook will be less full .so much more space and room for me to play my games awwwww bliss .

Originally posted by Virusboy:

Originally posted by Museatlantis:

I can't quite see it being as big as facebook

think again Christians are being (not to offend anyone) run over by muslims. more people are converting.

why is that virus

Originally posted by rjhowie:

This is all wrong. There should be absolutely no policy of partisanship whether it be Christian, Muslim, Atheist or whatever. This is pandering and blatantly so. Damnable is being polite in the face of such a situation.

why you bother your not on facebook are you ,if so dont bother entering the Islamic one you may get sucked in and revert ,your orange kilt will have to be ankle length not allowed to show leggy

Originally posted by Virusboy:

more people are converting

Would you care to cite statistics, and their source(s)?

ok so i got ahead of my self
http://www.bible.ca/islam/islam-myths-fastest-growing.htm

Originally posted by Virusboy:

ok so i got ahead of my self
http://www.bible.ca/islam/islam-myths-fastest-growing.htm

typical pro propaganda Zionist run site as usual ...

Originally posted by Juggalo1:

typical pro propaganda Zionist run site as usual ...

Okay… Would you care to cite statistics?

Originally posted by thedawgfan:

Up until this point, there has been a single FB. Not anymore.

Aren't there a few dozen sites for egomaniacs that feel the whole world needs to know their every bowel movement?

Originally posted by OakdaleFTL:

…I wonder why it isn't based in Pakistan?

We live in Belgium and we've got American webhosting. Although going for the best price/quality rather than the best religion seems somewhat opposite the intended goal of the site. Religious people are plenty hypocritical, however, so that could easily be part of Poe's Law.

Originally posted by OakdaleFTL:

rj, please read the previous three posts…

( Hm. Maybe I should re-read Frenzie's post: http://www.qatarliving.com/node/1067009 )

I meant it quite literally. My gut says it's a joke, but I can't tell. It could be real.

Ditto. Except I'd edit "Religious people are plenty hypocritical" as shown… (Present company excepted., of course )
This just in, via Slashdot!

Originally posted by OakdaleFTL:

Ditto. Except I'd edit "Religious people are plenty hypocritical" as shown… (Present company excepted., of course )

Of course, but at least I'll most likely admit it rather than trying to defend it with some interpretation of the Qur'an. Then again, you don't need to interpret much to defend certain things with that piece of writing.

If they want their own facebook with their own rules let them be. I dont why that should bother anyone.

Given that it blatantly rips off layout and name, it should bother Facebook.

its about time that we christians should also unite against this muslim FB....so the time is now.

Originally posted by Y0Y0:

Aren't there a few dozen sites for egomaniacs that feel the whole world needs to know their every bowel movement?

Of course. FB being the most popular though.

Originally posted by Frenzie:

. My gut says it's a joke, but I can't tell. It could be real.

I actually think it is real. (Which is why I held off on commenting on your Poe's Law comment. )
The Pakistani Gov't actually condoned this Millatfacebook as an alternative to regular FB. The Paki Gov't has actually blocked FB, Wikipedia, YouTube, MySpace, etc.

I get the feeling theres going to be alot of conflict because of this new facebook

As jivelissie said, does anyone really give a fuck??
Muslim facebook. Hold the front page!!!!

im sure some do otherwise this new FB woudnt of been created. Why it was in the first place you got me, but its seems socially accepted.

Originally posted by Museatlantis:

I get the feeling theres going to be alot of conflict because of this new facebook

I actually think not: I just came from there, and there were a whopping six members on-line! Blogs and discussion boards may host bloviation –as is their wont– but such will soon become filler for Google's cache…

@Frenzie: The key to understanding Muslim social morality lies (pun intended, since you already know about taqiyya) in the division of the world into Dar al-Islam and Dar al-Harb — which loosely translates to "sphere of peace" and "sphere of war".
But this thread is probably not the place for discussing such. (Perhaps at MFB? )

You mean the default position is war and animosity?

As for the Facebook clone - being on regular FB is already bad enough.

Facebook is popular, but it seems they've got a serious problem with privacy issues. I'm guessing here that the new Muslim version is going to be much the same way, unless they give the users better privacy controls. Happy fishbowl.

Question: If somebody DOES come up with a Christian version to counteract the Muslim version, can anybody think of a reason to go there? How about an atheist version? Oh, boy, think of the nightmares if every separate denomination comes up with their own versions!

Originally posted by mjmsprt40:

If somebody DOES come up with a Christian version to counteract the Muslim version

The already did , except I it doesn't seem to just be a reacrion to the Muslim sute (which I didn't get to see; they were having a server upgrade.)

On the "face" of it doesn't seems like they'd be that much of reason for their to be Christian, Muslim, Buddhist, Methodist, Catholic, etc social networking sites. You can just form a group on Facebook, but maybe a reason to have social networking site for your religion, cause or whatever could the known privacy issues with Facebook.

Originally posted by mjmsprt40:

Question: If somebody DOES come up with a Christian version to counteract the Muslim version, can anybody think of a reason to go there? How about an atheist version?

I couldn't be bothered to even look at one.

Originally posted by mjmsprt40:

Oh, boy, think of the nightmares if every separate denomination comes up with their own versions!

One for each baptist denomination alone would probably exhaust what's left of the IPv4 address space.
Otherwise - yeah, that would completely defeat the purpose.

Originally posted by mjmsprt40:

Oh, boy, think of the nightmares if every separate denomination comes up with their own versions!

Think USENET…

I hope facebook pursues any and all legal action that it can against this site. If Muslims want to make a social networking site, they should feel more than welcome, but to steal intellectual property and make an exact duplicate site because you don't like the content of the original is inexcusable.

By the way, the creators will be making money off of it almost certainly, off of someone else's ideas and designs. I wonder if religion was really the main factor here....

Geeeez, all the hoopla about a few Muslims having their own FaceBook site. So what.

Who gives a rats ass?

Next you'll be saying they're planning the 'End of Days' through it!

Hey, if FaceBook the real deal has got a problem with it, then there's the courts to settle the issue. All they'll do is change the name, pay a fine, & then continue on as they are.

I say ignore them if you don't like 'em.

Destroy them---each & every last one of them---if you find them encroaching upon your Freedoms & Liberties in your own back yard.

You are free to hate them all you want, but until they turn on you, I say defend their Right to Free Speech! Defend it with all you have to bear!

Defend their right to Free Speech, as if it were your own----because someday, & that day is most surely coming, someday it just might be your Free Speech & Liberty that's in the line of fire!!!

Originally posted by Smileyfaze:

Geeeez, all the hoopla about a few Muslims having their own FaceBook site. So what.

Who gives a rats ass?

Not me.

What about copyright laws! Muslims can join facebook, no problem. This other facebook-look-alike is just a jibberish!

May be a moot point anyways: Pakistani court removes Facebook ban

Originally posted by Belfrager:

Should? why?

I don't use facebook or any other social networking, exception being D&D because it's handy to practice basic writing in English, nothing more.

As I have said before social networking sites are curiously antisocial; they don't talk with other social networks. D&D is better, if not perfect in this regard. Anything on D&D is public, but you have to be a My Opera member to post.

Since you don't get your data out of Facebook, the best you can hope for is to get it deleted eventually, Facebook and similar sites have a network effect of the closed kind. This greatly benefit the biggest network, i.e. Facebook, and penalises smaller ones, like this Millatfacebook. Marketing their attempt as "Muslim Facebook", including look and feel, will give them some free press, but the challenge for any new entrant is huge.

Opening the social networks will be difficult too. Google, hardly a minnow, haven't gotten too far with their Buzz (while Orkut was just as closed as Facebook is).

Originally posted by Juggalo1:

then facebook will be less full .so much more space and room for me to play my games awwwww bliss .

The Facebook/Zynga (the rather dubious casual gaming company that grew up in the shadow of Facebook) spat is publicly mended, not that that surprised anyone.

(I initially thought that was what "So it begins...." referred to, when it was clear the topic was about Facebook.)

Originally posted by jax:

Opening the social networks will be difficult too. Google, hardly a minnow, haven't gotten too far with their Buzz (while Orkut was just as closed as Facebook is).

Considering they just forced it down people's throats with hideous default settings, I wouldn't be surprised if most people disabled it ASAP when they noticed it, just like me. If they had had a banner on Gmail saying "ooh new, shiny, Google Buzz, try it now" imho they might've had more success. Not saying they would've managed to gain anything on Twitter in any way, but the sudden automated sharing with any sod in your address book (which due to the way Google's Contacts work is just about anyone you ever sent an email to) was a major mishap.

Originally posted by Juggalo1:

make one then dawg

Nope, the original FB is jut fine for me.

Originally posted by mjmsprt40:

Oh, boy, think of the nightmares if every separate denomination comes up with their own versions!

My point exactly, Mjmsprt40.

Originally posted by parkerjm:

If Muslims want to make a social networking site, they should feel more than welcome, but to steal intellectual property and make an exact duplicate site because you don't like the content of the original is inexcusable.

Absolutely.

Originally posted by Smileyfaze:

Geeeez, all the hoopla about a few Muslims having their own FaceBook site. So what.



Who gives a rats ass?

I suspect the creators of the original Fb give quite the proverbial rat's ass.

Originally posted by Smileyfaze:

Next you'll be saying they're planning the 'End of Days' through it!

Nope, not me, that's the ATPC's ally, not mine.

Originally posted by Smileyfaze:

Defend their right to Free Speech, as if it were your own----because someday, & that day is most surely coming, someday it just might be your Free Speech & Liberty that's in the line of fire!!!

George Walker Bush would be proud of such a fear-mongering post.

Originally posted by jax:

(I initially thought that was what "So it begins...." referred to, when it was clear the topic was about Facebook.)

That certainly could be tied into it, but I was thinking of the day(s) when Baptists, Pagans, Jews and Scientologists, etc created their own FB and started a domino effect.

Very unlikely to happen due to the network effect. The greatest incentive for joining a social site is that you want to keep in touch with others on the site, which means that given two sites that are otherwise equal, the bigger one wins. Facebook today is Biggest, and is in the process of sucking out members from smaller competitors of similar type. A Baptist network could work with hardcore Baptists, but for people merely with Baptist sympathies would veer towards the bigger sites, unless the Baptist site has some attractive content the more mainstream site doesn't have.

Has anybody been to JaybroBook?
.........................................
I know that all of you have been waiting for this one!
http://www.facebook.com/jim.brotherton1

It holds everything you've always wanted to know about Jaybro!

Originally posted by thedawgfan:

Originally posted by Smileyfaze:

... Defend their right to Free Speech, as if it were your own----because someday, & that day is most surely coming, someday it just might be your Free Speech & Liberty that's in the line of fire!!!

Originally posted by thedawgfan:

George Walker Bush would be proud of such a fear-mongering post.

Thats not true, & that's not a joke.
Those sentiments would surely be echoed by Drs. Ron & Rand Paul, not just because it's falsely labeled as "fear mongering" by you, but because it is the truth, a truth that you fail to or just blindly don't want to accept, but a truth that as American Patriots they are quite passionate about.

Sonny boy, if you honestly think Liberty & Freedom are not in peril, you are sadly mistaken.

Thank God fools like yourself don't yet have a way to promote sweeping change by lowering the value & meanings of those principals. I say YET, because as time goes on, unless there is an event to unite America so it defends it's Freedom & Liberty, they will be washed away by or plundered by those that despise America & what She stands for--both externally & internally. Freedom is not free, & Liberty is not a right vacant of the need of being defended.

Wake up, it's still your/our Country, & She needs you US now more than ever!

Originally posted by Jaybro:

Has anybody been to JaybroBook?

.........................................

I know that all of you have been waiting for this one!

http://www.facebook.com/jim.brotherton1



It holds everything you've always wanted to know about Jaybro!

Funny you mention that. My roommates from my last two years of school encouraged me to open Jamesbook.com, which requested social security numbers, credit card numbers, etc., all for nefarious purposes.

Uh, disregard what I just said. Jamesbook.com is the #1 way to stay in touch with your friends. More than 100 million people use it. Join now!

edit: wow I didn't know jamesbook.com was a real website... not related to me, unfortunately.

Originally posted by Smileyfaze:

Thats not true, & that's not a joke.

It's quite true and I didn't mean it jokingly.

Originally posted by Smileyfaze:

Those sentiments would surely be echoed by Drs. Ron & Rand Paul

Perhaps by the raving opportunist and racist Rand Paul, but Ron Paul is more worried about our economy and spending then the tired old fear-mongering you posted.

Originally posted by Smileyfaze:

not just because it's falsely labeled as "fear mongering" by you, but because it is the truth, a truth that you fail to or just blindly don't want to accept, but a truth that as American Patriots they are quite passionate about.

Oh so now you have decided to start declaring truths have you? Perhaps in your ATPC thread, you can honestly answer a half dozen questions I have posted for you that you have given cop-outs, evasions, or just ignored?
Patriotism is a dangerous thing. I have thanked all my local veterans today for their services over the years. I've shaken hands with them.
I celebrate July 4th every year. Am I any less patriotic than you?
The "patriotism" you invoke is nothing but nationalism to get an ends to your cult's means.

Originally posted by Smileyfaze:

Sonny boy, if you honestly think Liberty & Freedom are not in peril, you are sadly mistaken.

If America can survive the disaster of a presidency from 2001-2008, freedom and liberty are safe for the time being.
Strange how you weren't complaining loudly (and in my case, I still am) when the most un-American bill to ever cross the President's desk and was signed into law. (Patriot Act) Then again, Tea People are hypocrites and are never truthful, so.....

Originally posted by Smileyfaze:

Thank God fools like yourself don't yet have a way to promote sweeping change by lowering the value & meanings of those principals. I say YET, because as time goes on, unless there is an event to unite America so it defends it's Freedom & Liberty, they will be washed away by or plundered by those that despise America & what She stands for--both externally & internally. Freedom is not free, & Liberty is not a right vacant of the need of being defended.



Wake up, it's still your/our Country, & She needs you US now more than ever!

Firstly, nice personal attack.
Secondly, Why not run as the Tea candidate in '12? You'd probably get about 7% of the vote.



Anyway, this thread is about Millatfacebook and not the ATPC.

Originally posted by OakdaleFTL:

Originally posted by Juggalo1:

typical pro propaganda Zionist run site as usual ...

Okay… Would you care to cite statistics?

we on about a website here ok

Originally posted by KANJEDZA:

its about time that we christians should also unite against this muslim FB....so the time is now.

your on your own i not seen one backing you .

Originally posted by jax:

Originally posted by Juggalo1:

then facebook will be less full .so much more space and room for me to play my games awwwww bliss .

The Facebook/Zynga (the rather dubious casual gaming company that grew up in the shadow of Facebook) spat is publicly mended, not that that surprised anyone.

(I initially thought that was what "So it begins...." referred to, when it was clear the topic was about Facebook.)

yes they on facebook i play farmville .

Originally posted by Thabotizz:

What about copyright laws! Muslims can join facebook, no problem. This other facebook-look-alike is just a jibberish!

i thought it was pretty good shows you how to cheat in farmville and seek your favourite hide away island all in code oh the joys of Arabic numerals
i understand nothing .

Originally posted by thedawgfan:

Originally posted by Juggalo1:

make one then dawg

Nope, the original FB is jut fine for me.

Originally posted by mjmsprt40:

Oh, boy, think of the nightmares if every separate denomination comes up with their own versions!

My point exactly, Mjmsprt40.

Originally posted by parkerjm:

If Muslims want to make a social networking site, they should feel more than welcome, but to steal intellectual property and make an exact duplicate site because you don't like the content of the original is inexcusable.

Absolutely.

Originally posted by Smileyfaze:

Geeeez, all the hoopla about a few Muslims having their own FaceBook site. So what.



Who gives a rats ass?

I suspect the creators of the original Fb give quite the proverbial rat's ass.

Originally posted by Smileyfaze:

Next you'll be saying they're planning the 'End of Days' through it!

Nope, not me, that's the ATPC's ally, not mine.

Originally posted by Smileyfaze:

Defend their right to Free Speech, as if it were your own----because someday, & that day is most surely coming, someday it just might be your Free Speech & Liberty that's in the line of fire!!!

George Walker Bush would be proud of such a fear-mongering post.

Originally posted by jax:

(I initially thought that was what "So it begins...." referred to, when it was clear the topic was about Facebook.)

That certainly could be tied into it, but I was thinking of the day(s) when Baptists, Pagans, Jews and Scientologists, etc created their own FB and started a domino effect.

Could call its Dawgsbook .

I typed a long-ish post, read it through twice…chose Select All, and hit the Delete key. (I feel much better now!)

Originally posted by thedawgfan:

If America can survive the disaster of a presidency from 2001-2008, freedom and liberty are safe for the time being.

Strange how you weren't complaining loudly (and in my case, I still am) when the most un-American bill to ever cross the President's desk and was signed into law.

Safe? Safe can be measured by a fraction of an inch!

Ask any Marine who's helmet took a hit by an incoming round.

Don't ask me, because I won't tell you.

Why? Because you don't deserve to know. That's why.

The only true safety lies in strenuous & continued vigilance!

Keep a close eye on your friends, & a closer eye on your enemies.

No long list of complaints here about the post 9/11 security measures. The alternative would have been worse. I felt safer knowing me & my family were being protected then, than worried to tears knowing that those measures would temporarily infringe upon my freedoms. Just as long as those that would want to take my Freedoms away permanently were held at length! It's having the freedom to allow it, & then the freedom to rescind it that's really the powerful aspect of 'real' freedom. In it's day drastic measures were necessary to protect Americans from murderous Islamic filth, not that some of those protections aren't necessary today. They were meant to be temporary, but from time to time---if there ever comes another need---they might need resuscitating. For that I would give my full consent depending upon the conditions of the time. It's painfully obvious you will never understand that basic concept. It's something that can't be taught, but is very easy to learn.

Overall, I still feel the same damn way about that idiot son of a lying bastard father, as I told you before more than once.

Oh, and while we are at it, just in case you asked me on another thread, & I neglected to answer you, I do support water boarding, will always support water boarding, & think those that think it's too cruel to make those that would gladly end our way of life subject to it are simply dead wrong. I wish they would have had family & friends in the towers on that fateful 9/11 morning. Maybe then, if asked about using water boarding, they wouldn't deny those entrusted with protecting them, from using this perfectly legitimate method of getting information. Especially if they knew that it could possibly have saved their loved one's lives. On that we will never know though, will we? For my personal grief & anguish I wish water boarding was used on friends of those murderers, & those murderous Islamic filth were stopped! Those that I loved would still be here to share in this beautiful world with me. May they rest. Hopefully all available methods will be used to stop the next attack (especially water boarding), to save the loved one's of those opposed to their use---& may they be made acutely aware that they were used. Maybe then they would sing a different tune. We might never know, will we.

Originally posted by Smileyfaze:

Don't ask me, because I won't tell you.



Why? Because you don't deserve to know. That's why.

Fantastic.

Originally posted by Smileyfaze:

No long list of complaints here about the post 9/11 security measures.

I'm not surprised by that.

Originally posted by Smileyfaze:

For that I would give my full consent depending upon the conditions of the time. It's painfully obvious you will never understand that basic concept.

Again, I'm not surprised by this answer.
You have no understanding whatsoever of the "blowback effect" that Dr. Paul mentioned in 2007, and you make it ever more clear that you have only just embraced Libertarianism in the past few months. It's just like some of the people around here: Alabama wins the collegiate national football championship and all of a sudden MS is overrun by "fairweather" Bama fans. That same principle applies to your ATPC.

Originally posted by Smileyfaze:

Overall, I still feel the same damn way about that idiot son of a lying bastard father, as I told you before more than once.

Yeah, yet only now you start wanting to do something about our liberties that have been eroded.
Now that a Democrat is in the WH. Hardly surprising at all old chap!

Originally posted by Smileyfaze:

I do support water boarding, will always support water boarding,

Again, no surprised here.
Yahweh would be proud.

Originally posted by Smileyfaze:

I wish they would have had family & friends in the towers on that fateful 9/11 morning.

Perhaps your full anger is misplaced?
I hate fundamentalists as much as you do, but it is not entirely the nutjob's fault. (Only 3/4 of the way)
You seem to overlook that for the past 65+ years that our gov't has had a policy of Empire building via the military-industrial complex.
If America was occupied by the Czech Republic, would you take that lightly?
(I might point out to you that we have bases in 192 countries across the world. People are getting fed up with our military occupations. Japan is an excellent example of this.)

Originally posted by Smileyfaze:

Hopefully all available methods will be used to stop the next attack (especially water boarding), to save the loved one's of those opposed to their use---& may they be made acutely aware that they were used.

Hopefully we will end our Imperialism and an attack can be avoided all together.

Originally posted by Juggalo1:

Could call its Dawgsbook .

Nah

I do wonder when FB will file their lawsuit?

Originally posted by thedawgfan:

Perhaps your full anger is misplaced?

I hate fundamentalists as much as you do, but it is not entirely the nutjob's fault. (Only 3/4 of the way)

You seem to overlook that for the past 65+ years that our gov't has had a policy of Empire building via the military-industrial complex.

If America was occupied by the Czech Republic, would you take that lightly?

(I might point out to you that we have bases in 192 countries across the world. People are getting fed up with our military occupations. Japan is an excellent example of this.)

I hold my head up high, & completely forgive my sometimes lackadaisical government for a few minor indiscretions in the past. Hopefully they won't repeat those few indiscretions. As for those 192 or so bases around the world you mentioned, I'd be willing close a few if the National Interest can afford to do so, otherwise, I'd wait until they try & throw the US out to see how the cookie crumbles. Unlike many inexperienced youngsters, which not long ago I was one, I believe in my country, & absolutely refuse to subscribe to the chants & rants of the misguided "Blame America First" mob in order to gain approval from the European scum that wouldn't loose any sleep if America would crumble---some are actively pressing the issue. May the swine rot in a hell on earth.

If Japan won the war, they'd be drinking Saki, & harassing the womenfolk in downtown Camden, Waynesboro, Senatobia, Booneville, & Madison. With the victor goes the spoils. Sooo Sorrie! +(;->

Originally posted by Jaybro:

Has anybody been to JaybroBook?
.........................................
I know that all of you have been waiting for this one!
http://www.facebook.com/jim.brotherton1

It holds everything you've always wanted to know about Jaybro!

Meh, my opera profile contains everything I don't mind you to know about me

Originally posted by thedawgfan:

If America was occupied by the Czech Republic, would you take that lightly?

The first thing they'd do is to shut down Anheuser-Busch, Coors and all the other industrial horsepiss factories and then teach the people who worked there how to make actual beer. Now what exactly is bad about that?

Originally posted by thedawgfan:

(I might point out to you that we have bases in 192 countries across the world. People are getting fed up with our military occupations. Japan is an excellent example of this.)

As of 2004 we had troops in 135 countries. Shucks, the Brits have troops in about 20 countries. And I wonder if "occupations" is the most accurate description.

However tired people might be hosting our troops, I'm thinking that they might just ask us to leave. I think we'd accommodate them. Kyrgyzstan is a good example. They asked us to leave and we raised the ante to $63 million and provide $67 million to "upgrade" an airport. BTW, Russia has troops there, too.

I love hosting American nukes. Um, I mean, there are no American nukes here. None. Zip. Nada. No secret nuclear arsenal to attack the Soviet UnionChina in my backyard.

Originally posted by Macallan:

Meh, my opera profile contains everything I don't mind you to know about me

Originally posted by Macallan's profile:

Last movie seen:
Cheech & Chong's Up In Smoke

I realize you probably wrote this years ago (or at least the junk on my profile is a little outdated), but that's actually one of the last movies I saw. I intend to watch Cheech & Chong's Next Movie one of these days.

Originally posted by Frenzie:

Originally posted by Macallan:

Meh, my opera profile contains everything I don't mind you to know about me

Originally posted by Macallan's profile:

Last movie seen:
Cheech & Chong's Up In Smoke

I realize you probably wrote this years ago (or at least the junk on my profile is a little outdated),

Yeah, I think I wrote that in 2006 or so

Originally posted by Frenzie:

but that's actually one of the last movies I saw. I intend to watch Cheech & Chong's Next Movie one of these days.

sounds like a good idea

Originally posted by Smileyfaze:

I hold my head up high, & completely forgive my sometimes lackadaisical government for a few minor indiscretions in the past.

Minor is hardly the word for it.
So you forgive Presidents Kennedy through Obama for continuing the Imperialism that President Eisenhower warned about?

Originally posted by Smileyfaze:

Unlike many inexperienced youngsters, which not long ago I was one, I believe in my country, & absolutely refuse to subscribe to the chants & rants of the misguided "Blame America First" mob in order to gain approval from the European scum that wouldn't loose any sleep if America would crumble---some are actively pressing the issue.

Who is:

1. Not believing in their country?
2. Blaming America first?
3. Trying to impress the Europeans?

Originally posted by Smileyfaze:

If Japan won the war, they'd be drinking Saki, & harassing the womenfolk in downtown Camden, Waynesboro, Senatobia, Booneville, & Madison. With the victor goes the spoils.

Japan hell, they never stood a chance.

Originally posted by Macallan:

Now what exactly is bad about that?

Methinks you know what I was getting at.

Originally posted by thedawgfan:

Originally posted by Smileyfaze:

Unlike many inexperienced youngsters, which not long ago I was one, I believe in my country, & absolutely refuse to subscribe to the chants & rants of the misguided "Blame America First" mob in order to gain approval from the European scum that wouldn't loose any sleep if America would crumble---some are actively pressing the issue.

Who is:

1. Not believing in their country?
2. Blaming America first?
3. Trying to impress the Europeans?

I could write an extensive reply here, but this here describes my thoughts on 1 quite well. Regarding 2 and 3 I have no clue. It probably derives from 1.

does this mean I have to make a pagan twitter now?

Meh who cares , I doubt it will be that popular anyhow but just don't join the muslim facebook if you don't like it.

Originally posted by starree:

just don't join the muslim facebook if you don't like it.

Their server is in the US, as soon as it shows up on their radar Facebook will sue their pants off.

I sense a lawsuit boiling... copyright i hope the lulz last a bit...

Originally posted by thedawgfan:

Good grief!
This begs the question, when will there be a "Christian, Jewish, Pagan, IPU, FSM, Nordic, Roman-era god" FB site?

without mentioning the Church of the Subgenius and i hate to mention this... but i think i'd go batshit crazy like Tom Cruise in the warmth of an Oprah's couch after eating Placenta if i ever saw a ScientologyFacebook hahahahaha...

Originally posted by luisdanielmesa:

but i think i'd go batshit crazy like Tom Cruise in the warmth of an Oprah's couch after eating Placenta if i ever saw a ScientologyFacebook hahahahaha...

Originally posted by luisdanielmesa:

without mentioning the Church of the Subgenius and i hate to mention this...

I had thought about including them, but didn't bother about it. (Sorry Bob!)

Welcome to D&D by the way.

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=15459915645

Originally posted by Juggalo1:

make one then dawg dont worry what pakistan is doing ,then make a athiest one and be the first athiest facebook of all time .
anyway ur not religious so i would not give too hoots on the matter

Only for Athiests ? (Like minds and thoughts Pretty boring,)

D&D is where its at, Many opposing views,very stimulating.