Friday, 3. June 2005, 15:15:39
Opera only 88th on PC World's list.
[url]http://www.pcworld.com/reviews/article/0,aid,120763,pg,12,00.aspFriday, 3. June 2005, 16:44:28
Originally posted by Sigup
Only? It got the best browser award second time in a row!
Firefox is ranked first..
Friday, 3. June 2005, 16:46:50
Friday, 3. June 2005, 21:43:55
Friday, 3. June 2005, 23:21:41
Opera clearly wins over Firefox as a browser when it comes to features, performance and innovation (three of the thing used to pick the winners). Firefox has the price advantage, but I'm not sure about "exemplary design". It depends on what you prefer, I guess. But Firefox will never match the level of integration that Opera has.
Opera has three things going for it (features, performance, innovation), while Firefox has one (being ad-free). Don't let it get you down
Saturday, 4. June 2005, 00:17:45
Winning the best browser award two years in a row is a great achievement! Yet another point to add when converting people to Opera
Indeed. Congrats for two years running and a future 3rd year!
Saturday, 4. June 2005, 01:29:36
Saturday, 4. June 2005, 03:41:23
Originally posted by haavard
Opera has three things going for it (features, performance, innovation), while Firefox has one (being ad-free). Don't let it get you down![]()
A-hem. FF actually only has the three features that matter to me most. Great cookie handling, an ad killer and a flash killer. Opera fails in all three categorys. Opera blows FF out of the water in many other areas, but it is not so one sided as you suggest.
Saturday, 4. June 2005, 04:54:11
btw: if you read down through the FF details on the PC page you find the following: "Firefox: The best all-around alternative to IE. Great for power users who want to add functionality to the browser, and appropriate for newbies just getting started."
And what does it conclude about Opera? "Opera: Best for power users who keep many pages open at once and perform frequent downloads. There's an e-mail program included, but banner ads on the free version of the browser are annoying."
Saturday, 4. June 2005, 08:32:14
Originally posted by leushino
Cookie management, ad blocking and the ability to add extensions or not is what matters most to me as well. 60 million downloads clearly indicates that it is NOT as one-sided as is being suggested here.
btw: if you read down through the FF details on the PC page you find the following: "Firefox: The best all-around alternative to IE. Great for power users who want to add functionality to the browser, and appropriate for newbies just getting started."
And what does it conclude about Opera? "Opera: Best for power users who keep many pages open at once and perform frequent downloads. There's an e-mail program included, but banner ads on the free version of the browser are annoying."![]()
Mmmm, well, with an add on - some might call it an "extension" to Opera - called proxomitron, you can get 2 out of 3...
Extensions in general still sound like a different API for BHO's and we all saw how well that went for IE.
Saturday, 4. June 2005, 08:58:02
I'm actually abit curious as to their criteria... A few things on that list look really out of place.
Saturday, 4. June 2005, 09:00:12
Originally posted by ThePast
It does? I had no idea about that, guess that's another thing (among many) that lots of FF fanboys wrongly think is a Firefox invention then.
Yeah, what did you think BHO's/toolbars/browser hijackers were?
Saturday, 4. June 2005, 10:32:11
Firefox is a trend - and, different to Opera, just was there one day, while Opera had been there in the background for more than ten years without the public taking much notice of it. It's all marketing.
Saturday, 4. June 2005, 13:22:17 (edited)
Originally posted by Nekomusume
The really sad part is, firefox is #1. I mean, it's slow as dirt,
Slow ? Hmm, it opens pages 2 times faster than my Opera 8. It is like that any moment I try and compare ... so, be more realistic ... FIrefox also does not crash, does not suddenly stop opening pages needing restart and does not lose one month worth of emails in one moment. So I think unless Opera improves substantially (big words are not enough), the 88th position is quite reasonable ...
Saturday, 4. June 2005, 11:11:51
Anyway here you can see that Opera indeed is best browser in the web category [url]http://www.pcworld.com/reviews/article/0,aid,120763,pg,6,00.asp
Saturday, 4. June 2005, 15:23:13
Originally posted by Ivos
Slow ? Hmm, it opens pages 2 times faster than my Opera 8. It is like that any moment I try and compare ... so, be more realistic ... FIrefox also does not crash, does not suddenly stop opening pages needing restart and does not lose one month worth of emails in one moment. So I think unless Opera improves substantially (big words are not enough), the 88th position is quite reasonable ...
Well, that experiance is far from universal. Every actual test I've seen performed, linked from slashdot, here, and elsewhere shows Opera 8 to objectively be faster than FireFox. I find the mouse guestures, tab handling, and instant back/forward + UI to be much faster as well.
And I only compare against the base firefox. As soon as someone starts demanding I take extensions into account to use FireFox, I'll start demanding they buy Opera, and take proxomitron + some custom buttons from the wiki into account when they use Opera.
All this is of course not to disparage your experiance. It likely is that way on your PC - due to who knows what, especially if running windows.
Monday, 6. June 2005, 14:06:28
"In an incredibly unscientific comparison of browsers, Opera emerged the winner in each of my incredibly unscientific categories."
Read more:
[url]http://business.bostonherald.com/technologyNews/view.bg?articleid=88202
Monday, 6. June 2005, 14:28:17
Originally posted by leushino
Thunderbird ties in quite nicely, Illiad. It also allows html mail when the need arises.![]()
![]()
Again, not to be argumentative, but if you're allowed to add a second program like thunderbird for mail to compare to Opera, why are Opera users not "allowed" to add a second program like Proxomitron for adblocking etc to compare to FireFox?
It's this double standard that annoys me the most. ITS THE SAME BLEEPING THING! Another program for additional functionality.
Monday, 6. June 2005, 14:36:38
Originally posted by jp10558
Again, not to be argumentative, but if you're allowed to add a second program like thunderbird for mail to compare to Opera, why are Opera users not "allowed" to add a second program like Proxomitron for adblocking etc to compare to FireFox?
It's this double standard that annoys me the most. ITS THE SAME BLEEPING THING! Another program for additional functionality.
"Copyrightly" both FF and TB are Mozilla development, so it's not the same case.
But technically isn't any integration.
Tuesday, 7. June 2005, 11:20:46
Originally posted by leushino
Thunderbird ties in quite nicely, Illiad. It also allows html mail when the need arises.![]()
![]()
so you might as well say, that opera can use 'full html/xml/whatever' email, you just use the client that comes with windows! you know, outlook express....
Tuesday, 7. June 2005, 16:14:02
Originally posted by leushino
Apples and oranges. It's just not the same thing and I think you know this.![]()
I don't know this. How is it different? Does thunderbird become a tab in FireFox when you install it?
As far as I know, FF + Thunderbird would work the same as Opera + Thunderbird or Opera + Eudora...
Tuesday, 7. June 2005, 17:47:28
I search everywhere on pcworld.com, many articles on Opera, noone about this famous browser award.
can you give me a link ?
Tuesday, 7. June 2005, 17:55:21
[url]http://my.opera.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=92954#post950456
Tuesday, 7. June 2005, 19:12:21
Netscape lost the first browser war against IE, and IE became the
"dictator". Mozilla Foundation hadn't enough power to fight
against IE. And almost from the nothing came FF, the plain,
naked browser, unlike to Mozilla or Opera, as integrated suites.
And in this environment "won" against IE less than one year. I mean
"winning" is the fact, that IE lost its monopoly after 8 year.
I know, that IE is dominant WEB browser, yet, but don't has
monopoly. I mean, that this first place doesn't show any technical
triumph (although FF became a very good browser), but rather a
WEB-diplomatic victory.
By my opinion Opera technically is much more fine, but no doubt FF has
some first rating features. And has a big comparative advantage:
it can part the development of " not so much important" elements
with the open source community (extensions), and can concentrate
to the core development, has much more time for the improvements
for rendering. And the main staff receive support from the business
partners, who apply the Gecko engine (AOL-Netscape,IBM,Oracle,
Google, etc...).
Opera is in the first line since many years. I wonder, how long
can FF hold this dynamism.
And rather I want see FF in this position, than IE as the "re-new" dictator again.
But I hope, Opera will be the next winner in this war:up:
Tuesday, 7. June 2005, 19:16:19
Wednesday, 8. June 2005, 04:21:24
Wednesday, 8. June 2005, 06:51:29
[url]http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/asa/archives/008289.html
opera lies about being named pc world best browser
Opera Software seems to have decided that it's easier lie that to win. Here's the chain of events as best as I can tell.
PC World announced their 100 Best Products of 2005.
Firefox not only won the coveted Product of the Year award, sweeping all 99 other products in the list, but it beat out two other browsers, Maxthon at number 12 and Opera way down at number 88.
Opera puts out a press release claiming "A Winning Streak: Opera once again wins PC World's World Class Award for best Web browser". Opera.com then places this same thing on their front page (see the third checkbox with the claim that they've won best browser in '05.)
Conclusion: Opera is simply lying. They were one of 100 products to be labeled as "World Class" but they did not win any "best Web browser" anything. They were last in the ranking of three web browsers. They got beat by both Maxthon and Firefox.
Wednesday, 8. June 2005, 09:08:03
Opera only 88th on PC World's list.
"Opera didn't win best anything. They were one of the 100 celebrated listings and they're mentioned specifically in the "web" category (it's just a category, not a specific award group) but they're ranked number 88 in the list and Firefox is listed as number 1 with a full-page spread. It's clear to everyone looking that Opera is lying about what they've won and that Firefox is PC World's winner overall and the highest ranked browser. Opera is the lowest ranked browser of those recognized (falling way behind even Maxthon.)" (TRT)Get the non-fanboy truth here: [url]http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/asa/archives/008289.html
SHAME ON OPERA!
Wednesday, 8. June 2005, 09:19:42
Re: Opera only 88th on PC World's list.
Originally posted by PeterReaper
"Opera didn't win best anything. They were one of the 100 celebrated listings and they're mentioned specifically in the "web" category (it's just a category, not a specific award group) but they're ranked number 88 in the list and Firefox is listed as number 1 with a full-page spread. It's clear to everyone looking that Opera is lying about what they've won and that Firefox is PC World's winner overall and the highest ranked browser. Opera is the lowest ranked browser of those recognized (falling way behind even Maxthon.)" (TRT)
Get the non-fanboy truth here: [url]http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/asa/archives/008289.html
SHAME ON OPERA!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Wednesday, 8. June 2005, 09:26:56
Re: Opera only 88th on PC World's list.
Originally posted by PeterReaper
"Opera didn't win best anything. They were one of the 100 celebrated listings and they're mentioned specifically in the "web" category (it's just a category, not a specific award group) but they're ranked number 88 in the list and Firefox is listed as number 1 with a full-page spread. It's clear to everyone looking that Opera is lying about what they've won and that Firefox is PC World's winner overall and the highest ranked browser. Opera is the lowest ranked browser of those recognized (falling way behind even Maxthon.)" (TRT)
Get the non-fanboy truth here: [url]http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/asa/archives/008289.html
SHAME ON OPERA!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Opera is listed as "WEB BROWSER" in the web category. No other browsers to be seen. Guess you ignored that on purpose, huh?
Also, ASA LIED!
Wednesday, 8. June 2005, 09:40:21
Re: Opera only 88th on PC World's list.
Originally posted by PeterReaper
Get the non-fanboy truth here: [url]http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/asa/archives/008289.html
LMAO, ROFL So to get the non-fanboy truth I should go to the weblog of one of the biggest FF fanboys there is?
Peter, you are funny, ever considered a career in Stand-up Comedy?
Wednesday, 8. June 2005, 09:52:56
Wednesday, 8. June 2005, 10:07:10
So Opera is just one of "The Best Products of 2005" and nothing more.
It's the only product called "browser" listed among others in the category "Web". But I'm not sure if this means "...Award for best Web browser".
Showing topic replies 1 - 50 of 113.
Forums » Opera Community » Opera for desktop » Opera browser