Out My Window

Perez is the gay guy that discovered the nuances of Microsoft Paint and started a blog about celebrities. He then started billing himself as a "Gossip Blogger" but all he seems to do is slander everyone that does not make nice with him. His favorite is to post a picture of the celebrity with crude and vulgar text across it. He is also fixated on another sexual perversion in his illustrations. He eludes that the person in the image has just had messy sex. His trade mark is the alterations are very crudely done with white Paint. Please let your imagination run as wild as it likes on this or check out his site if you have the stomach for such things.

He is best know for three things; being a flaming gay, insisting others are gay, and being as obnoxious as he can about being gay.
He wants to proclaim gay rights but is quick to use obscenities to describe anyone that is not of that particular sexual persuasion.

Can you imagine one of his buddies being little child star, Miley Cyrus? If I was her daddy and caught her twitting to this low life pervert, I would rip the number pads off her iPhone.

“You’re a faggot, will.i.am! You’re not a f—ing artist!

So he is busy publicly slurring a well known singer, calling him a faggot, when fist started flying.
One little tap and he runs to his hotel room and gets on his cell phone. To call the police? No. To Tweet about it. He actually ask people on Twitter to send the cops because he was bleeding!

Now the public is beginning to turn against him and say he had it coming. Well, that's not going to stop him from suing. Poor guy has to make money someway. Surely not with talent.

I think a group of gays should get together and bash this guy! He is hiding behind his sexuality to be the biggest asshole since Rush Limbaugh.

Seems the networks are looking for ratings again.
Some of you may remember when NBC's Dateline reported on General Motors trucks "blowing up" in a wreck. Dateline showed footage of their test. It was later found that they had planted explosives in the trucks. All this to prove the conclusion that the trucks were unsafe.
Now ABC has come up with another test. Taking a hard line against our rights to bear arms, 20/20 claims that an armed citizen would be ineffective against a mass killers armed attack. Not only are they implying that we should not have rights to own firearms, they are claiming that we are too incompetent to protect ourselves.

Here is the set up:
They take college student and teach them how to fire a gun. They take each student and place them in the front-center chair of a simulated class room with other students and a teacher.
At some point a professional police instructor barges into the room and fires once at the teacher then at the front-center student.
If the student is able to get his gun out from his holster and from under his shirt and make a direct kill shot... the student wins.
If the professional gunman can get in both hits whether they are kills or not... mass murderer wins.
Of course there was no training on HOW to carry the weapon. Ill fitting holsters under baggy clothing does not fare well in a showdown.
Even as one student gets a hit, we are told that the shot to the leg was ineffective and the perpetrator was able to deliver a deadly shot to the chest. Sure! if it is just a damn paint gun. Let me take a whack with my .44 and see if he can still get a shot off after a little leg wound.
They really try to pass this off as a real world experiment. If one of the students were armed in this scenario, the armed student would not always be sitting in the front center of the class and the assailant would not know where his target would be. Although the attacker may be skilled, anyone that had experience in carrying a personal protection firearm would have, at some point, practiced and know the best way to have his weapon accessible.
Even after one girl fought it out and hit the intruder in the shoulder, it was pointed out that she came "within inches of hitting her fellow students." No mention that she had just stopped a crazed killer. All of the commentary seemed biased in every test. But then, they were out to "prove" that a professional gunman was no match for an untrained college student.
In April, a CNN poll showed that only 39% of the people surveyed wanted stricter laws - down from 50% in 2000.
And a poll sponsored by no less than ABC news found that 61% favored strong enforcement of existing laws vs 27% who want stricter laws.

Princess Maha al-Sudairi, is claiming diplomatic immunity in France after running up unpaid shopping bills of more than $24 million.
She has ignored her furious debtors and locked herself in her £2,500-a-night suite at the George V Hotel, which is owned by her nephew, Prince Al Waleed, in Paris.

We know the family well – they're in Paris a lot. She's not the kind of customer where you ask for a deposit, or to ask to see a piece of identity,

said Giami, who has launched civil proceedings through the Paris courts to seize assets.
Princess Maha, whose husband, Prince Nayef, is interior minister and second-in-line to the Saudi throne, is said to have spent millions on designer clothes, jewels and other luxury products in the French capital over the past year. Her weekly dry cleaning bill alone was said to be £30,000.

In 1995 Princess Maha al-Sudairi was accused of beating a servant in Orange County, Florida, whom she suspected of stealing $200,000 from her.

In 2001, another Saudi royal, Princess Hind al-Fassi, was found guilty in absentia by an Egyptian court of not paying for more than $1m worth of jewellery from a Cairo jewellery shop.

Again, in 2001, Princess Buniah al-Saud, a 41-year-old niece of Saudi Arabia's King Fahd, was charged with beating up her maid and stealing electronic equipment worth around $6,000.

Okay, so Saudi Princesses keep showing up in the news. Looks bad until you consider there are like, over 7,000 of them around. Bound to be a few bad apples in the barrel.

Carrie Prejean: Junior Miss Bryant
Beauty queen revives memories of Florida’s past with orange juice boycott

By DANIELLE TRUSZKOVSKY
MAY. 7, 2009

Seems that negative campaigning reigns on even after the elections are over.
Everyone remembers... whoa... maybe everyone doesn't remember Anita Bryant. She was a singer, pageant queen, Florida OJ spokesperson, and gay basher. During her "save our children from gays" campaign, she was struck in the face with a pie by a gay dude. No one drags out her records and sits around reminiscing about her anymore. In fact, This article is the first time I have heard her mentioned in a coon's age.
Now the name is forever linked with Carrie Prejean.
She was a semi-public figure that happens to NOT believe in gay marriage. Some people don't. I accept that and it really doesn't bother me a whole lot because it would be hypocritical of me to think that others don't have the right to their own opinion.

It is not like she set out to destroy anyone, she was set up. Who cares what a beauty queen thinks about gay marriage? It is a beauty contest people! Kind of shallow by definition, right?
Anyone expecting some profound social manifesto to come rolling from her lips is over reacting a little bit.

Now they are trying to link her with church groups as they are to blame for the social stigma she is suffering. I think we do need the moral compass of these church groups in some cases. They have the right to live their lives on the "straight and narrow". They have the right to be an example to us. They are have the right to marry people of the opposite sex if they like. And by all means, they have the right to express this view point!

If you want to keep this thing alive, ask yourself why Perez Hilton was a judge. He obviously has no taste. So who decided it was a good idea to let this jerk pick the most beautiful woman in the USA? And further more, why would anyone be glad they were chosen by him. I can see him doodling little genitalia on all the contestants now.

And for the record: I think we should have same sex marriages. As a matter of fact, I love the idea of same sex marriage for idiots. Idiots should not propagate.