Out My Window

Turns out that Joran Van der Sloot is a serial killer but not a very good one as far as the classic ones go.

Most serial killers get away with their crimes on their wits, slinking in the dark. Joran Van der Sloot got away with his crimes because his family was rich, police bumbled the case, and he kept moving along in the life style he was accustom to undaunted by Holloway's relentless search for the truth.

He made many mistakes but was never, ever called on it by authorities. He was free to trade drugs, sex, humans, and kill when ever it suited him.

Stephany Flores Ramirez is dead because this monster was allowed to live his lavish life-style over the last several years. Aruba's police and Joran's family and friends killed Stephany just the same as if they had broken her neck themselves.

And the cost? Thirty-five years! He will only be 57 when he gets out a free man.
Here is hoping his legal fee's eat up his fortune and no one is interested in publishing his book.

I want to ask a question to a few famous and influential people.
To: Whoopi Goldberg, Harvey Weinstein, Adrien Brody, Martin Scorsese, and Woody Allen along with over one hundred supporters that have called for the release of Roman Polanski, child rapist.
If someone had drugged, raped, and sodomized your 13 year old daughter, how much time in prison do you think they should serve? Is 42 days really enough?

Polanski is still living in luxury even though under house arrest in Switzerland. He’s lived the last 30+ years of his life in luxury and leisure. His friends are saying he has served his time and the case should be dropped. Roman Polanksi has not paid for his crimes. Polanski fled the country in 1978 only after learning during a discussion with the district attorney outside a Los Angeles courtroom that the judge in his case was preparing to sentence him to a long prison term.
He has admitted he had sex with 13-year-old Samantha Geimer after plying her with champagne and Quaaludes at the home of actor Jack Nicholson. He was 40 years old.

Well, gee! If he didn't want to chance getting a prison sentence he shouldn't have stuck his prick in a 13 year old girl. Sure fire way to get in trouble with the law.

He is rich and famous and he can more than likely get away with child rape but what concerns me is all the people that have come to his aid. I think we should hold them accountable for the supporting the rape of children.
I guess Whoopi just didn't get into the role she played in The Color Purple , where a 14 year old girl was raped.

Remember my blog about the teacher that received a 12 year prison sentence for having sex with her "almost 18" student?
Today we have the story of a 39 year old married religious education teacher that seduced a 15 year old via the internet and has received only 32 months for 10 counts of sex with a minor under 16.

Madeleine Martin seduced the boy via Facebook after being appointed to mentor him at school.
They exchanged a series of emails and had sex three times in the back of her car at a country park, a shopping center and at her home during their brief relationship.

Get this:
Martin, a mother-of-two, even persuaded the teenager to have her name tattooed in a heart on his arm to remind him of her when they were apart.
She, in return, had a tattoo for him of some Hebrew script on her lower back.

But after just nine days the pair decided to end their relationship.
Source:

So here is my point, 32 months for aggressively pursuing and seducing a minor? That is rape. At 10 counts, that could and should have been 60 years.
Where is the justice?
Rape a child and roll the dice. You might get away with a slap on the wrist... You might get the maximum. Depends on how the judge's day is going.

I am sure you have all seen the new Walmart TV ads touting the $4 Prescription Program. It made me feel safe in selecting them to fill my prescriptions. That was a mistake.
Recently I had to pay them $100 for a 10 day supply of medication that should have been $30 for a 30 day supply. They gave no consultation and they would not refund my money.
After years of having them fill my prescriptions I decided to change pharmacies. I had all of my scripts transferred and refilled yesterday and picked them up this morning.
One of my refills had been costing me $98 from Walmart. Imagine my surprise when the total cost of five of my meds were only $98 at my new pharmacy.
I have one more that wasn't filled that cost just over $100 at Walmart. I will let you know how much it turns out to be next week.
Now I am glad that the pharmacist at Walmart was an asshole. Look how much money he has saved me by making me stop giving them my money. I just wish the $300 a month they are losing in sales, would make a dent in their bottom line. Maybe more people will wake up, not believe the smart commercials, and check out better service and lower prices elsewhere.

Technically it is not a rip off if they just give you what is asked for right? After all, once you paid for it, it is yours... no take backs no matter what excuse you have.
I have a friend that uses Soma 350 mg for back pain and recommended I try it for my neck pain. He gets 90 pills of the generic drug for $30. I talked to my doctor and he called a prescription in to Walmart Pharmacy for me.
My wife goes in to pick them up for me and returns to the car in shock... $100.

"Didn't they have generic?"
"She said these were the generic. My God! There is only ten days worth in here."
"$100 for 30 pills? He must have good insurance!"

We sent a text and his reply was "you got screwed"

Yes, yes I did. I went back to return them which is, as I found out, "against the law".
(I am reminded of the pharmacy up the street that must have "broken the law" by taking back a prescription given to an 82 year old lady because the $65 was more than she really could afford that week.)
Well, if my doctor had asked for the same thing in a little stronger tab, they could have given it to me for about $10. One call to my doctor could have fixed that if they had told me but they have my money now and aren't about to do anything they don't have to.

You know how some pharmacies really care about customer service? How they take you aside when you have a new prescription and tell you more than you ever wanted to know about the drug and how to use it? You know how they advertise how they combat high cost by offering generic drugs and been over backwards for customer service because they know you have a choice of where you spend you money?

That is not this Walmart. You might as well be complaining to the teen cashier at the local KFC. They could give a crap if you go buy from Long John's. Less work for them.

And you know how most places come running over to the counter to talk to the customer? Well, at this Walmart, they don't do that. This way when they are an asshole to the customer, the customer can't grab them and smack the crap out of them.

It wasn't the unexpected cost of $100 that did it, it was the fact that he just didn't care.

Now to be fair, the pharmacy is not really run by Walmart. Each pharmacy is independently operated so the blame for this total lack of customer service should be brought to the manager of the pharmacy, not Walmart. They snapped that I could talk to him Monday "but it won't do any good."

I'm sure it won't.