Yeah, yeah, next week we should have something..
By Johan Borg. Friday, 13. October 2006, 16:01:09
We're looking forward to the Opera Backstage event in London next week, and hopefully we should be able to give you a sneak peek at another 9.X by the end of the week too 



1 2 Next »
Tri M. Nguyen # 13. October 2006, 16:01
Mathias # 13. October 2006, 16:05
Thanks
Andrey Petrov # 13. October 2006, 16:07
Ryan Octavianus # 13. October 2006, 16:11
Phred # 13. October 2006, 16:15
Mohammed S Muchhala # 13. October 2006, 16:17
Finally there's going to be some action.
But this is going to be a looooooooong week
Twilo # 13. October 2006, 16:22
Non-Troppo # 13. October 2006, 16:22
Sunshine # 13. October 2006, 16:23
Andrey Petrov # 13. October 2006, 16:25
Tamil # 13. October 2006, 16:30
Kostia Romanov # 13. October 2006, 16:34
Good luck in coding ;-)
healer # 13. October 2006, 16:34
ThArGos # 13. October 2006, 16:35
Thanks!
rseiler # 13. October 2006, 16:52
Good god, this should be obvious, but it is (more or less) a weekly WHEN THERE'S SOMETHING SUITABLE TO TEST. Surely you didn't think Opera meant there would be weeklies 52 weeks a year, did you?
Even the similarly needy Vista testers will know not to ask when the next build is coming once Vista is declared gold this month. Even they know that there's a pause in between.
Szőts Ákos # 13. October 2006, 17:11
It's only one week.
25 200 - 25 199 - 25 198 - 25 197...
Phred # 13. October 2006, 17:14
Anyone else feel that Opera is really slow and unresponsive on javascript/ajax intensive pages? (Yahoo mail beta, Gmail, Meebo.com, docs.google.com/writely.com, etc)
Christian # 13. October 2006, 17:15
Originally posted by non-troppo:
I think it is 9.1 with some smaller or 9.5 with some bigger new features. I'd guess it will be 9.1
@Opera (borg): thank's for the information, tension is rising
eminaz # 13. October 2006, 17:15
EricJH # 13. October 2006, 17:21
chrislu # 13. October 2006, 17:35
i want a opera release which finally solves problems and has fewer bugs as the last one. AND real in text search highlights again!
paulgca # 13. October 2006, 17:43
DennyCraneBL # 13. October 2006, 17:54
Kamikaze321 # 13. October 2006, 17:55
Andres # 13. October 2006, 18:00
Those guys are still alive !!
That's the more importan thing. Having feedback and news.
Mmm
For the new build...I can wait..
Make your bet
Who is really in the race...IE ?, Firefox ?, Opera ???.
Bye
Andrés Ruiz
Dustin Wilson # 13. October 2006, 18:11
Alexei # 13. October 2006, 18:49
Kyle Baker # 13. October 2006, 19:05
@rseiler
Cut everyone some slack, they are just excited. This is a good thing. I mean, if we didn't have people who were so enthusiastic about their Opera browser then we'd have a much smaller user-testing base. We're all excited about it. You post on every thread just like the rest of us, so I know you're excited when you see an update to the blog hoping it's a weekly as well.
Cheers!
João Eiras # 13. October 2006, 19:17
ivDrc # 13. October 2006, 22:35
Marcin # 13. October 2006, 22:40
Non-Troppo # 13. October 2006, 22:52
no, though there definately slowness is on digg.com (bugged and probable cause found).
yahoo mail beta will be slow because browser.js is used to fix it.
Dustin Wilson # 13. October 2006, 23:06
Here is what I'm talking about here for the most part. On the Macintosh there's another problem that occurs. The top and bottom arrows aren't the same size, styles apply HORRIBLY to the controls, and the top arrow has aliasing problems.
I can bypass this using some CSS and javascript, recreating a stylable form control that triggers the actual, hidden WF2 controls for the present time. I'd just like to let it be known to you guys that the WF2 controls don't behave similarly to the legacy form controls along with other problems.
Ryan Octavianus # 14. October 2006, 00:49
and i know the devs wanted to release stable version (weeklie), so it's not a problem and like the rest of everyone here, i hope the next release will be great
no offense taken
slegg # 14. October 2006, 01:23
Every major portal or e-bank is using ID-card identification already in Estonia. Next year they're banning the "usual insecure access" completely.
But... opera still doesn't support any smart card identification mechanisms that will be obligatory within couple of months. It's sad, sad, sad
I've discussed it with several guys of Opera premium support - no luck.
So... there's no use of your rendering improvements etc if the browser cannot support daily elemantary smart card identification (I even dare not to bring out the topic about encrypted e-mails...)
Shortly - the "most secure browser" has to be abandoned every time I have to do something really secure in Internet. IE7 and Firefox2 are gaining more and more popularity. There's no way to promote Opera among my friends, because the first question will always be: does it support ID-card? :'(
Andrey Petrov # 14. October 2006, 01:43
Use of ID-card in your bank is understandable but why would you use this card on some web portal?
BTW, I never heard about this ID-cards in Ukraine, nor in USA.
I have a different story about why I can't recommend Opera to everybody this time. Just because it doesn't work or works badly with Yahoo Mail and some newest Google and Microsoft online applications.
I know that's not Opera's fault in most cases, but who cares...
Opera needs web developer tools badly... Maybe than developers will start care about Opera support in their more and more complex web applications.
john # 14. October 2006, 02:03
Fortunately or unfortunately, Opera is not just a browser. Fortunately, because I think that's a smart strategy, considering the dominance of msie. Unfortunately, perhaps, because fx can focus on browsing and leave other features to complimentary products. Opera has the lead on portability to other browser/mesaging media -- for now. I'm betting that won't last.
Here's what I suspect joe/jane user wants. S/he wants a browser that works as well as msie and fx and, presumably, safari (not to exlude others) right out of the box. S/he wants a mailer that works as well as msoe and thunderbird (not to exlude others) right out of the box. S/he wants a feed reader that works better than google reader but that supports the various portal applications as well as msie and fx and, presumably, safari (not to exclude others) right out of the box -- which is a browser feature.
In the browser category, though I like the opera feed reader, I don't really depend on it, for lack of features. In the mailer category, I'm not inclined to migrate to opera, even from sylpheed-claws (since I have a long history with pegasus in windows and understand what a good mailer is) -- but that's an unfair comparison since msoe is the benchmark here and thunderbird is the competition. Still, the comparison seems unfavourable, if only because opera stubbornly refuses to accommodate the hierarchical mindset of a folder user out of the box. Fx defaults to a bookmark feature for basic feeds and pretty well depends upon extensions for elaborating this feature in ways that newshounds demand.
I think that if opera wants to appeal to joe/jane user, it has to worry more than it does about how the product works without tweaking of any kind. And this doesn't simply apply to the ui. I like to tweak, so I'm not exactly a typical joe/jane. But, to cite one glorious example, I mention bookmarks. If you have hundreds (perhaps thousands) of bookmarks, as I do, you cannot live with fx bookmarks. And that won't change with fx 2. But you might well prefer the fx scrapbook extension to opera notes (with it's line editor metaphor), as I do. Opera needs to rethink notes.
In short, I hope that opera strategists will have an eye to their weaknesses in relation to basic functions. msie 7 will make a splash, but further development will be negligible (if past history is any guide). The challenge is therefore not to preempt msie 7. Microsoft will have its moment and can command universal adherence for reasons we all understand. The issue is to rival fx. In order to do this, opera has to be a better _browser_ out of the box and more stable, which it will be only if it does what fx does, but better. That means: without important bugs. It must also support the hijinks of google, yahoo and any other important portal applications as they stumble along, wreaking havoc on standards. I don't pretend this is easy, but I do think it's a strategic issue worth more consideration that it seems to get.
Dima64 # 14. October 2006, 02:22
Blaz Pristy # 14. October 2006, 05:30
Remaining ....MB
Icon 32x32 on right side on the bottom of the Transfers Window
Naelphin # 14. October 2006, 09:08
9.03
rxbbx # 14. October 2006, 09:19
illiad # 14. October 2006, 10:16
and watch out for net congestion on the 18th... and maybe a few unhappy peeps a week or so later...
Gao Yiwei # 14. October 2006, 13:19
Yahia # 14. October 2006, 17:08
Kc4 the Great # 14. October 2006, 17:40
yllar # 15. October 2006, 08:59
illiad # 15. October 2006, 11:01
- That friday could be when all the "Oh no! IE7 is awful!" people come to our side....
Anil # 15. October 2006, 11:35
1. NTLM SUCKS...... Fix it.
2. Column width Adjustments bug....
Babboon # 15. October 2006, 12:36
Andrey Petrov # 15. October 2006, 16:20