Cool! Perfect timing - today is my birthday

I love the speed dial function, very nice and smart idea!

Always nice to see new updates for my favorite browser, big thanks to the dev team =)
No gonna go check the web, see if things work better on some sites ^_^ :crossing fingers:

Raistlin: please don't post the complete bug mail address. Just mentioning the number will prevent spam to that address.
The issue is know - you can work around it by not using multi-word nicknames.

Good works!
But i have some problem...I use(first) this opera and windows say:opera stopped.... Here is the errorfile:
http://bartosslajos.atw.hu/letoltes/download.php?fname=./opera/d1d7_appcompat.txt
What was the problem?

I'm looking forward to the "Kestrel" weekly on friday.

Let the complaining begin

Widgets:
What version do i have ? Is it latest ?
Automatic update ?
Options (ex: gmail login info) ?

Compare to FF add-on manager.


What's that blue icon in address bar ? Something about widgets i presume ? Hints please ?

This orange one is something about RSS feeds. Which one ? Can i get an address ? Maybe even a title (if available) ?


Ok, enough for today, don't want to scare you


What are your plans for build 10k ? Big party ?

---
The Red O commands you ! DON'T try to resist !

I'll see, build 8771...why isn't here in the blog ? mmmm, so you have to go to www.opera.com and download the release.

Great.
Now I, but I think we, are waiting for "kestrel".
Great.

OK, next version and still the same bug. Opera still wants to download files that not supose to.
Here's example
http://www.microsoft.com/poland/windows/ie/using/howto/oe/setup.mspx
Opera will open that address only if I download setup.mspx like Opera wants. That's makes me crazy!

Thanks !

good work...that was fast

From the changelog:

Manipulating content inside about:blank will now change the address of about:blank to match that of the manipulating page.

What do they mean by that?

Thanks for the release anyway!

have an issue with the speed dial.. when you type just digit [1-9] in the address bar, the corresponding page stored as speed dial will load..
however, what if i've got a bookmark that's with the nickname of digits [1-9]?
the speed dial page will load but not the bookmark with nickname of that digit..
tiny chink..

Hi!
I'm really a beginner in Linux (Ubuntu), but i've downloaded the debi package and there's an error message

Conflicts with the installed package : Opera ;

I can't install/refresh my Opera (

pavlac: you still using M$ %*#& ???

GeekK: I am sure I saw on the community forum, delicious showing how opera can use it's bookmarks...

Lali19871014: please send bug reports here..
http://www.opera.com/support/search/supsearch.dml?index=180

and crash reports here..
http://www.opera.com/support/search/supsearch.dml?index=432

i have a biiig problem o.O

my hdd is full and when i download a file, opera only stops and give me the information that there is: an "error".

but what and why? after 15 minutes i found the reason.

can you change the message of the advance-status "error" to "full hdd" or something more useful in the download-manager ?!?

Hooray!!!

Conflicts with the installed package : Opera ;

Most likely you have opera-static installed and you are trying to install the shared package. Either uninstall your current opera-static and then install the new Opera 9.20 shared package or download the opera-static build and install it instead of the shared one.

"Macedonian language" hehe

zoligrg89,tsarhan:

If you want your wishes to be **found**
then read how to do it!!


click here to post a new wish!!!

PLEASE throw some additional comments as to the kind of build each download choice is on the Linux page; I know I need a GCC-3.2 shared version in a .bz2 format, but I have no idea if that's "Ubuntu Frozbatz" or "Gentoo Whodunit".

What's changed from 8767?

funny that so many of you are asking this question. first of all, there was another build squeezed in between 8767 and 8771...that would be build 8769. So first check what has changed between 8767 and 8769, then between 8769 and 8771.

@illiad
I don't think that zoligrg89 had a *wish* in his/her post.

@zoligrg89
Did you try removing the program first? That might solve your problem. Otherwise, if your previous version of Opera is working then just open up the irc chat and you can get some live help via the opera channel.

Originally posted by kennycrudup:

I need a GCC-3.2 shared version in a .bz2 format

shared .5

Actually, "shared .6" Claudio- but I guess what I mean is if you go to the main download page you only see Distro names with no clue as to which build format it actually is.

It's been so long since I've had to use the FTP site 'cause of the weeklies that I'd forgotten about it, but that's where I'd eventually got Build 638.

kyleabaker: well he could say. "I get the error : 'Conflicts with the installed package' and cannot start opera! please help!!"
- but then you go on to answer his wish......
.
.

and as for Hulkur, I want what he is drinking!

@illiad
lol...about all I can say. I'm here to help...not be mr. technicality. he/she reported a problem in a very appropriate place and I intend to aid them. So as you say, I..

go on to answer his wish......

no probs!! just pointing the direction for others...

Originally posted by kennycrudup:

Actually, "shared .6" Claudio

Nope .6 packages require libstdc++.so.6 which is built by gcc >=3.4, gcc <3.4 builds libstdc++.so.5 which is the lib the shared .5 build needs.

Still segfaults without XSHM set to 0

For Windows Vista: either fix the widgets 'Always below' option or rename it to 'Invisible'.
Don't know about others but i use only that mode of widgets display. Reference: Bug #259707.

Hi there.
In my case "the fastest" is more and more slower than FF.
Since the great 8.x things slowed down ... I see now js menus running significantly slower than FF let's say (see menus from nvidia site). I saw some interesting js speed test claiming that Opera's js implementation is actually the fastest there is ... but still ... what I feel is quite the opposite.
I do not have benchmarks of any kind to back up my claims. I only state what browsing feel like from subjective point of view.
Simple things like going to yahoo mail logging page (I don't mean entering the creepy beta) shows Opera spending significantly more time in negociating the secured session than FF is (and is not because site checking!)... about three times slower (negociating a lot at about 80 Bytes/s from +100 kB/s available is a bit strange ... ).
I used to be convinced that Opera has the best rendering engine of them all but I see sites like looneytunes (reported on this blog before) taking opera to the "crashing zone" and FF still holding fine.
And the settings/tunnings should not be to blame ... I use the default settings available in both browsers. If something is to be changed than it should have been already in defaults.
So, what is wrong with this picture?

(Slackware 11.0 + KDE 3.5.4 on PIII @ 600/133, 256 MB)

Crossing fingers for first 64Bit linux release on friday

maybe something like pre pre alpha 9.5

Nice to see an announcement. I was downloading this at 2:30AM EDT, and wondering why there was no official announcement yet...

You still haven't fixed the error message for emails
("Don't show error dialog when failed checking mail")

Of course you have limited time and can't take care of all wishes at once, but I consider this one issue more like reporting a bug than requesting a new feature.

For the rest of this version, I will have to explore...

Hello

I need a 64bit version for debian etch

Twilo

No offense, I do respect your work but I think it was released to public too fast... Now everyone will review it, found many bugs and nominate firefox as best browser again cause opera is buggy... Like last time with 9.1

Build 8769

Help > Check for updates

Opera is up to date... (yeah...)

Latest is Windows build 8771, isn't it?

@cbh: I can not. There are not language files for Opera 9.20 :-|

@borg: You are looking in it? You definitely have to slow down. I have only something about 5 wishes left, need time to think about next before you made my 5 ;-)

nice，thanks！

http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/show.dml/846744?startidx=50#comment2681655

Not fixed yet, not sure what you have modified in that version, but it doesn't wor since then :-)

I might give you some permissions into my admin panel so you can check yourself or so...

@CSant: I misspoke- I meant GCC 3.4+ builds (I've been using .6 builds for a while, having upgraded to GCC 3.4 last year; I build my own Qt).

@DjiXas:

I'm using the 9.10 release, build 8679, and it tells me the same thing. ;-)

DjiXas, that might be some sctipt breaking the back button.

And to the others complaining that site x doesn't work (correctly) that's for 90% because of bad coding of the site's pages. Most sites are created to be viewed in IE or FireFox, and other browsers will/might show them incorrectly. Recently, I had a strange bug on my site. But after checking the code twice, I figured that it was my own fault. So, if it's your site that works incorrectly, check your code. If it's not, contact the site's administrators.

And to the Desktop Team, Good job guys! I love the new version

elf_sander, script wasn't modified since today :-) Worked perfectly for 1y++ :-)

Thanks but when will be able definetely turn off this bloody error console, for god's sake ?

If anyone won't Slovenian language...it's here

http://www.the-cannibal.net/slopera.html (main page)

LNG link: http://www.the-cannibal.net/slOpera.rar (WinRAR archive)

It's not my translation but i started the translation request and i posted on Slovenian RN forum under Opera users...
http://www.racunalniske-novice.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=34146&highlight=opera

It work's and read perfect.

Originally posted by DjiXas:

No offense, I do respect your work but I think it was released to public too fast... Now everyone will review it, found many bugs and nominate firefox as best browser again cause opera is buggy... Like last time with 9.1

No offense, but why can't you at least have the decency to mention these horrible bugs that must be fixed right now, instead of some vague complaint that doesn't make sense to anyone?

I can't think of one single really CRITICAL bug that MUST be fixed ASAP.

Also, all software is "buggy", and released with known bugs. It is a fact of life. Firefox is always released with known bugs, just like Opera, and just like all other programs.

Problems with Java on the latest build (8771):

The test page at http://www.java.com/en/download/installed.jsp correctly displays:
Java Runtime Version1.6.0_01

The Java test at http://www.java.com/en/download/help/testvm.xml is lacking the "dancing Duke logo image".

The route planner at http://rp.rac.co.uk/ never finishes loading the interactive (Java) map.

The page http://map24.com/ causes Opera to hang or shutdown.

All of these work in IE7.

Anyone else could confirm?

(Windows XP SP2)

@yksyks

I use Java 1.5.10 on a WinXP SP2 system and don't experience any difficulty.

Perhaps the 1.6 version is to blame for your difficulties? I seem to remember on the Forum people saying something along these lines.



For the rest - I like 9.2, although I'm still wedded to my Start bar...

@yksyks
I don't have any problems with mentioned websites. Everything works perfect!