9.24
By csant. Wednesday, 17. October 2007, 11:05:36
We just released 9.24, which has some important security fixes and is a recommended upgrade. Go download it!
Changelogs are available:
Windows
Mac
Linux/UNIX
Changelogs are available:
Windows
Mac
Linux/UNIX



Tamil # 17. October 2007, 11:39
DandS # 17. October 2007, 11:42
remcolanting # 17. October 2007, 11:42
Thanks for reporting those bugs Michael and David!
codename_slesar # 17. October 2007, 11:47
MetalRaise # 17. October 2007, 12:23
kiaM # 17. October 2007, 12:41
edupav # 17. October 2007, 12:54
Maulkin # 17. October 2007, 13:06
DjiXas # 17. October 2007, 14:24
andresruiz # 17. October 2007, 15:31
varish # 17. October 2007, 15:40
Sushubh # 17. October 2007, 15:49
Kelson # 17. October 2007, 16:17
Question: Are these fixes included in the latest 9.5 alpha build?
shy_ad # 17. October 2007, 16:29
Some peaple are still downloading 9.23.
mav1976 # 17. October 2007, 18:12
illiad # 17. October 2007, 18:24
FataL # 17. October 2007, 19:38
r76 # 17. October 2007, 20:39
Why would I use one of those
Thanks!
primolus # 17. October 2007, 21:32
IowaBoy # 17. October 2007, 21:36
Khaled-Khalil # 17. October 2007, 21:48
thanks, but not for me
Serpher # 17. October 2007, 22:09
Marsjanin # 18. October 2007, 00:15
superici # 18. October 2007, 02:23
Jesús # 18. October 2007, 02:24
I have 9.5, it´s better that 9.5 ?
jinyue # 18. October 2007, 02:50
suribe # 18. October 2007, 02:54
If you use Opera every day, it's recommended to use the 9.24
Turin # 18. October 2007, 06:03
I would highly recommended against installing that way.
john.perkins # 18. October 2007, 14:38
http//arsmc.org/documents/gatewayentry.xml
for XML, XSLT, header links, rendering time, etc better than any version of Opera so far.
Jesús # 19. October 2007, 03:19
TNX: Suribe.
Marsjanin # 19. October 2007, 09:06
I got Windows XP now. I got Opera since 8.x or even 7.x installed on virtual drive O: (O:\Opera\). The drive is result of SUBST instruction, that links C:\Programy\ with it. And (almost – see below) never got any problems coresponding to that virtual (SUBST-ed) drive. But the installer of THIS Opera version, says:
http://img91.imageshack.us/img91/1156/operantfsfe0.png
…but I got admin privileges, and I am owner of this directory. Well, I see this second time; some Opera's builds ago, there was the same bug. If I remember correctly, I soluted it, by moving Opera to a directory on FAT-32 drive, and links SUBST drive O: to that one. No way here:
http://img91.imageshack.us/img91/7950/operafat32xv0.png
What is going on…? What rights? On a FAT-32 drive?! For folder, that the installer creates itself? Paranoia…
I'm out of ideas. Why the other people got no errors? Hey folks, are You making a clean install every time? Or what… :-|
Oh, and by the way: the installer ending message is a bullshit, when installation fails like this. First paragraph says, the installation failed, but the last one, the installation ends with success ane let user press a button to quit installer.
________
EDIT:
OK, the Classic Installer did the trick. So, I don't need *help* anymore, but I leave question about MSI open.
boxhead # 20. October 2007, 23:57
grilix # 22. October 2007, 20:31
Good job, i love opera
Turin # 22. October 2007, 21:54
Start a thread in the Macintosh forum. It would receive more attention there than here
TLPM # 31. October 2007, 12:46
I have been very pleased with OperaMail until this version. This is the second time to of my mailboxes go crazy. They ask for the password all the time, but don't accept it. It is the correct one of course, but Opera is still going on and asking for password, and don't connect to the mailserver. I have to jump to 9.5 beta and hopefully it,s better...
suezanne # 14. December 2007, 08:30