Opera Widgets for Desktop Labs release
By Remigiusz Bondarowicz. Thursday, 15. October 2009, 12:28:13
This is the first time I'm posting on the desktop team blog, so let me introduce myself quickly.
I'm Remigiusz Bondarowicz and I'm leading the desktop team in Poland.
For the last couple of months we have been working hard on bringing
Opera Widgets onto the next level … first-class web applications.
Today we posted an Opera Labs release , so you can already preview the result!
With the new Opera Widgets for Desktop we managed to break the dependency between widgets and the browser interface. From now on you don't have to have the Opera Browser open to run a widget. Furthermore, each widget runs in a separate process and integrates with the platform much better. We also give into your hands a new widget mode called “Application” so you can equip your widgets with the system default window decoration theme.
These are just some of the many new features and enhancements introduced with the new Opera Widgets for Desktop.
For a complete list of features please refer to the article Opera Desktop Widgets Evolved.
Warning:
This is a development snapshot: it may contain some bugs and incomplete features.
I'm Remigiusz Bondarowicz and I'm leading the desktop team in Poland.
For the last couple of months we have been working hard on bringing
Opera Widgets onto the next level … first-class web applications.
Today we posted an Opera Labs release , so you can already preview the result!
With the new Opera Widgets for Desktop we managed to break the dependency between widgets and the browser interface. From now on you don't have to have the Opera Browser open to run a widget. Furthermore, each widget runs in a separate process and integrates with the platform much better. We also give into your hands a new widget mode called “Application” so you can equip your widgets with the system default window decoration theme.
These are just some of the many new features and enhancements introduced with the new Opera Widgets for Desktop.
For a complete list of features please refer to the article Opera Desktop Widgets Evolved.
Warning:
This is a development snapshot: it may contain some bugs and incomplete features.



1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
set # 15. October 2009, 12:43
Tamil # 15. October 2009, 12:52
lucideer # 15. October 2009, 12:54
Joakim # 15. October 2009, 12:57
Irontiger # 15. October 2009, 13:05
Broken Sword # 15. October 2009, 13:07
sirnh1 # 15. October 2009, 13:19
Does this mean that at one point in the (distant) future Unite might also work without having to keep opera open?
Originally posted by dev.opera.com:
Will there be an option/question to remove the settings anyway?
Rijk # 15. October 2009, 13:41
Originally posted by sirnh1:
The technical work of having a separately running Opera with separate settings would be mostly ready indeed. Note that you would still be running an instance of Opera, you just wouldn't have the application window drawn. You can already 'hide' Opera right now with Ctrl+Alt+Shift+H if you don't want to see the app windowI'm not sure what the proper UI would be for Unite apps, to replace the access that the Unite panel currently gives to the app properties, and to see the status of your running Unite apps.
DrillSarge # 15. October 2009, 13:44
Am I blind?
Vectronic # 15. October 2009, 13:47
Externalizing them is great, but, why drop the internal controls entirely? At least a menu with a list, click to start (but without any control of the widget thereafter from Opera) would be ok.
Remigiusz Bondarowicz # 15. October 2009, 13:50
Originally posted by sirnh1:
Most of the modern, native applications leave their profile/preferences after uninstallation. We want to follow this model.
Daniel Aleksandersen # 15. October 2009, 13:56
Originally posted by DrillSarge:
Look in your Start menu.DrillSarge # 15. October 2009, 13:58
Originally posted by danaleks:
damn, I installed it without any (new) shortcuts.
what are the shortcuts parameters? (@windows)
Harlekin MOND # 15. October 2009, 14:00
Remigiusz Bondarowicz # 15. October 2009, 14:02
Originally posted by DrillSarge:
There is no widget manager in the browser anymore.
We move widgets into Operating System world.
Now widgets are managed the same way as other native applications are - via shortcuts, OS common applications listings, widget's installation directory etc.
Nico # 15. October 2009, 14:04
Just for the records: Will Opera Widgets be a feature of 10.10 or will it be available in a later Build, like 10.20?
GeekK # 15. October 2009, 14:31
Originally posted by Vectronic:
+1I'd liked the widget menu/panel to organise, disable them etc.
Though I'm aware it's difficult to combine with the standalone approach, I think there has to be a manager of some kind.
sirnh1 # 15. October 2009, 14:39
Originally posted by 2beR:
Some (not many) applications specifically ask the user if he/she wants to keep settings, save games, preferences, etc... when uninstalling (that's why I asked, I was wondering what opera would do with the widgets).
But I guess I can remove them manually
Originally posted by Rijk:
I know, but I always close opera first and a few hours later think 'Oops
Originally posted by HellbillyDeluxe:
I'll certainly miss that option. It was nice (and easy) to have a list of all widgets inside opera.
G-Bojko # 15. October 2009, 14:43
Vectronic # 15. October 2009, 15:04
Originally posted by krusha:
If you mean does this build have Unite, yes it does.
Rijk # 15. October 2009, 15:11
Originally posted by HellbillyDeluxe:
Let's first see how many problems you guys find with these renewed widgets before talking about shipping versionsnetwolf # 15. October 2009, 15:14
Rijk # 15. October 2009, 15:15
Originally posted by sirnh1:
But mixing access models is problematic for usability. And, this cleans up the browser UISérgio Pedro dos Santos Capela # 15. October 2009, 15:19
Immanis # 15. October 2009, 15:23
-We don't need a copy of the same executable and dll for each widget, please, create only one folder with the shared runtime components and place shortcuts in the specific widget folder.
-The widgets require the Opera engine somewhere, they are not completely standalone applications (or are they?), please place them somewhere within the user profile folder.
-As others mentioned, we want a central point to manage our widgets and the widget panel is perfect for that task. This is particularly important since the widgets does not have a task bar or tray bar icon, so if something goes wrong we don't have a clean way to shutdown it.
-The windows installer services are overkill for uninstall simple widgets, please add that functionality to the widget panel within Opera.
-It is good that we have shortcuts to launch the widgets from the OS, but I feel that now is a little bit messy, it is possible to create a Opera folder and add the shortcut to the widgets there?
Other than that, good work!
Immanis # 15. October 2009, 15:27
Originally posted by Rijk:
The current solution is more cluttered IMHO. It is good to launch a widget from the OS, but I don't see why doing that from the Opera UI would be that much of a problem.
I like the idea of a widget panel as a central hub to install, uninstall and launch widgets.
Sérgio Pedro dos Santos Capela # 15. October 2009, 15:32
-closing a widget is not saving its state. I use the time and date widget with the always in top option and that state is not being saved when I close the widget;
-furthermore the widget for no reason disappeared from my desktop while it was in always on top mode. Before I could resolve the problem from within widgets panel by changing the widgets mode or even close and start the widget again but now that is impossible.
Tamil # 15. October 2009, 15:32
Originally posted by GeekK:
+1In Widgets import wizard, under "Your folders are installed in the folder:" folder path is missing.
Originally posted by Immanis:
Or Opera Widgets folder.Originally posted by Immanis:
+1Ar1Pe # 15. October 2009, 15:38
lucideer # 15. October 2009, 15:46
Originally posted by Immanis:
+1
Moving them into the "operating system domain" is all well and good for shortcuts for launching, managing, etc. But unless you're actually creating new folders in Program Files (or /usr/*/) and treating them properly as entirely separate applications, I don't see the benefit of taking them out of the Opera profile folder - it only seems to make backups and migration a bigger pain.
G-Bojko # 15. October 2009, 15:51
Andrew Davidson # 15. October 2009, 16:01
Think removing control from Opera entirely is a strange one. Yeah having them as part of the OS is all well and good but if you look at most widget implementations they have them controlled by a central point of whatever the controlling app/environment is. In Windows you have the "Gadgets" area, rather than appearing as separate apps in "Programs and Features".
So yeah, not keen on that.
I also think even if you decide to go ahead and remove the control from the Opera interface, that they are totally related to Opera is lost and not nicely by the fact you download them as normal files. The old loading interface a la the skins as well worked better than just showing them in transfer/downloads.
I'll post a separate comment after this one with issue rather than comments.
Andrew Davidson # 15. October 2009, 16:04
I installed it separately and beside my existing 10.10 install all well and good.
I installed the touchtheSky widget great.
I installed Artists Sketchbook also great.
I installed Analog Clock and kaboom. Not happy. It appeared as a grey/black and now white area in the middle of the screen but won't respond plus I can't kill the process, even using killing process tree in task manager.
I also have the twitter widget and it has not opened, but is appearing as a process that I can't stop.
Those two are appearing in task manager as "Not Responding" processes that I can't kill.
I'm running Windows 7 x64 (RTM from technet)
Sami Olmari # 15. October 2009, 16:05
EricJH # 15. October 2009, 16:09
Tamil # 15. October 2009, 16:25
novelgazer # 15. October 2009, 16:30
Andrew Davidson # 15. October 2009, 16:34
Another comment:
I know memory is cheap and I'm sitting with 12GB but even so... my w7 gadgets (6 of them) in the "sidebar.exe" process is taking up 25MB but each individual Opera widget is taking up about 20MB?
Ar1Pe # 15. October 2009, 16:39
Originally posted by Vectronic:
+1
ouzoWTF # 15. October 2009, 16:41
Originally posted by netwolf:
lwiczek # 15. October 2009, 16:43
- they aren't completely like separate applications - they are installed in user-profile-folder (which i hate and this is main reason I use chrome or other google programs >: )
- saving configuration after uninstallation is the most annoying thing tho (i just hate when i uninstall an application and have to clean after it afterwards :/ ). It's better to remove settings by default and add option to save them if user explicitly want that...
Martin Rauscher # 15. October 2009, 17:22
kyu3 # 15. October 2009, 17:22
elyon # 15. October 2009, 17:23
I think it would be a good idea if it would not be difficult to implement. I believe that the basic idea would to have the ability to run Unite Applications as background services, so they begin when you start your computer, and they don't stop when you close your last Opera window.
Regarding control, in Windows I would imagine that it would be possible to separate the Opera icon from the new mail icon, and to keep the icon in the taskbar while Unite is running. You could edit your services or open the main window from the taskbar, but you could also hide it if you want to without missing new mail notifications ... or Opera Unite could have it's own icon, but link the editing and such into launching an Opera window.
Harish # 15. October 2009, 17:29
(the current one's a bit low on features)
Todd # 15. October 2009, 17:43
Isn't anyone at Opera screaming "meat & potatoes" render pages correctly(even badly coded ones), have a seamless interface, and the users will come? It seems like many of the new features are so theoretical, head in the clouds ideas, when you look at them as user it just doesn't make sense.
random414 # 15. October 2009, 17:46
Originally posted by Tamil:
+1
zikzakatak # 15. October 2009, 17:47
testing...
Harish # 15. October 2009, 17:57
Originally posted by ferrisnox:
yes and no... its a battle in standardizing the whole web.. perhaps some day in near future. A good cause need not have a huge fan-boys around some poster boy..
pardon me for using it but still (I'm a pharmacist!), consider if all those medicines we human beings consume, are not standards compliant would we take it? the web-community is yet to understand that.
zikzakatak # 15. October 2009, 18:06