Opera Labs with SPDY released
By Daniel Aleksandersendaniel. Friday, July 6, 2012 10:30:00 AM
An interesting new technology appeared out of Opera Labs a few minutes ago: a build with the low-latency HTTP pipelining replacement SPDY. In short, it means faster and prioritized connections between the browser and supporting server.
Head over to the Opera Labs blog to read all about the protocol and grab the downloads while they’re still fresh.
The feedback we are interested in for this release is whether you have any performance or consistent connection issues. Please use the comment section in the Opera Labs blog post.
SPDY has already been deployed on many Google services and on Twitter. The blog post includes some information about how to make your web site SPDY ready so you can take advantage of the new performance potential.
Head over to the Opera Labs blog to read all about the protocol and grab the downloads while they’re still fresh.
The feedback we are interested in for this release is whether you have any performance or consistent connection issues. Please use the comment section in the Opera Labs blog post.
SPDY has already been deployed on many Google services and on Twitter. The blog post includes some information about how to make your web site SPDY ready so you can take advantage of the new performance potential.
WARNING: This is an Opera Labs build: It contains work in progress, which may also have severe known issues, including crashes, and data loss situations. In fact, it may not work at all. Opera Labs builds are not based on current Opera Next releases.



kapsi # Friday, July 6, 2012 10:36:06 AM
SaveTheCatsICEsavethecatsice1 # Friday, July 6, 2012 10:37:31 AM
earth01 # Friday, July 6, 2012 10:38:37 AM
What about WebSockets too ? Are the standard specifications finished ?
Is there some news about its support in Opera ?
Hiramapriorimeister # Friday, July 6, 2012 10:51:40 AM
Originally posted by earth01:
http://www.opera.com/docs/specs/presto2.11/ (Presto/2.11.337)earth01 # Friday, July 6, 2012 10:56:42 AM
Originally posted by apriorimeister:
Ok, probably in the next version with some chance.
Satan D. Lucifersupertrol # Friday, July 6, 2012 11:02:08 AM
Does it contain the fixes in Next 12.01 build 1491? or completely separate build?
bachokocho # Friday, July 6, 2012 11:16:40 AM
Agoagostinog # Friday, July 6, 2012 11:47:03 AM
ohyeahgod # Friday, July 6, 2012 2:08:18 PM
kapsi # Friday, July 6, 2012 2:32:23 PM
Originally posted by agostinog:
Aren't we all addicted...
CryioAcryion # Friday, July 6, 2012 5:02:06 PM
Originally posted by supertrol:
Build number for Opera Labs doesn't matter. I quoted RuariRafael Luikrafaelluik # Friday, July 6, 2012 5:34:14 PM
Kajetan Świtalskikswitalski # Friday, July 6, 2012 5:39:23 PM
Originally posted by supertrol:
Yes, it contains all those fixes that are in build 1491.turtlepro # Friday, July 6, 2012 9:02:26 PM
NEOAethyr # Friday, July 6, 2012 11:20:33 PM
I don't trust the current protocol, let alone a new one.
This also makes more work for me in the long run...
And I don't quite agree with all the points being made over this spydy protocol.
Why in the world would you compress the headers anyways...
Why not just force support of compression in the headers, and hopefully when more servers support such things then well...
Ex. Accept-Encoding:
x-deflate,deflate,x-gzip,gzip,x-compress,compress
Just a bs example, I just saying, why not just enforce it a little by telling the server you support this or that compression standered.
It's up to the servers themselves to support it.
I think this is just a bad idea and a waste of time...
Sorry, just to put the point across, please make a way of getting rid of it too if you keep it...
I don't wanna have to impliment that crap in my software... sorry.
DillonAstrophizz # Saturday, July 7, 2012 3:00:08 AM
Alwyn van DeventerFunkyMunky1723 # Monday, July 9, 2012 9:07:20 AM
This release seems to do the trick, at least in terms of speed.
GTSSGela2010 # Monday, July 9, 2012 11:04:23 AM
cunjing # Monday, July 9, 2012 11:17:16 AM
This version is so fast!
I am looking forward to released SPDY version.
GTSSGela2010 # Monday, July 9, 2012 11:29:25 AM
Originally posted by cunjing:
12.01.1495 works very reliably, not only the speedKajetan Świtalskikswitalski # Monday, July 9, 2012 1:46:01 PM
Originally posted by NEOAethyr:
Yes, in the Labs build there is already a way of disabling support for SPDY (opera:config -> Use SPdy2/Use SPdy3) - we're going to keep it.
Karl Dubostkarlcow # Monday, July 9, 2012 2:06:11 PM
Originally posted by rafaelluik:
SPDY is being discussed currently by the HTTP WG. You can participate to the discussions if you are yourself experimenting with it. It is valuable input for implementers community to have real implementations of flavors of SPDY to be able to give input to the HTTP/2.0 which will have ideas and patterns of SPDY. Note also that when people say "SPDY implemented" it is usual a partial implementation of some of the features of SPDY. The discussions on HTTP WG mailing list are interesting. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/
Karl Dubostkarlcow # Monday, July 9, 2012 2:07:45 PM
Originally posted by Astrophizz:
It might be useful for people to be able to test Web sites and/or client implementations in a context where SPDY is not used. So it is practical to be able to deactivate it at will.
David Goulddavegould # Sunday, July 15, 2012 1:59:04 AM
http://developers.slashdot.org/story/12/07/13/1327235/varnish-author-suggests-spdy-should-be-viewed-as-a-prototype
Rafael Luikrafaelluik # Sunday, July 22, 2012 2:32:58 PM
Originally posted by karlcow:
Many thanks for your reply and information.Fitrifitrisartika # Saturday, August 4, 2012 12:54:25 PM
yop plavideobuzz # Monday, September 3, 2012 11:33:40 AM