Opera 8.52
By olli. Friday, 17. February 2006, 00:03:22
As some of you noticed, Opera 8.52 was available on our ftp servers
yesterday. It was removed this morning because some files were not updated
correctly. We are currently uploading updated builds to our ftp server.
Unlike 8.51, 8.52 will be available in localized versions. Not all
localized versions on Windows will be available initially, but they will
be uploaded as they are ready over the next couple of days. Localized
versions on Mac will be available at the time of the official launch.
Downloadable language files on UNIX will be available at the time of the
offical launch as usual.
The official launch of 8.52 will occur tomorrow if no further problems are
discovered. The changelog for this release will be available at that time.
yesterday. It was removed this morning because some files were not updated
correctly. We are currently uploading updated builds to our ftp server.
Unlike 8.51, 8.52 will be available in localized versions. Not all
localized versions on Windows will be available initially, but they will
be uploaded as they are ready over the next couple of days. Localized
versions on Mac will be available at the time of the official launch.
Downloadable language files on UNIX will be available at the time of the
offical launch as usual.
The official launch of 8.52 will occur tomorrow if no further problems are
discovered. The changelog for this release will be available at that time.




TheMajor # 17. February 2006, 00:35
STNG # 17. February 2006, 01:12
I am downloaded it yesterday. Translation quality in russian localized Opera 8.52 still is very terrible
Thread about this problem in "Translating Opera" forum: Russian localization for 8th - When?
paonline # 17. February 2006, 04:14
Junyor # 17. February 2006, 08:02
@STNG: That thread is about Opera being popular in Russia.... I guess you mean this thread: http://my.opera.com/community/forums/topic.dml?id=88837.
Dennis_Hawks # 17. February 2006, 08:16
I think STNG refers to that thread:
http://my.opera.com/community/forums/findpost.pl?id=1439547
xErath # 17. February 2006, 08:42
http://my.opera.com/community/forums/findpost.pl?id=1437022
100% reproducible. Already bugged crashlogs.
Zajec # 17. February 2006, 08:56
Dennis_Hawks # 17. February 2006, 08:57
Yes, it crashes here on WinXP with the newly downloaded 8.52.
Sorry, did not check that page with the original 8.52.
Kildor # 17. February 2006, 09:19
In saturday??????
Dennis_Hawks # 17. February 2006, 09:23
By olli. Friday, 17. February 2006, 02:03:22
the guy does not sleep at all
So in Norway it could be Thursday.
Pondus # 17. February 2006, 09:29
Dennis_Hawks # 17. February 2006, 09:42
It's marketing, guys.
But I do not object.
porneL # 17. February 2006, 10:03
Dennis_Hawks # 17. February 2006, 10:11
Originally posted by porneL:
yes, just a bit stupid joke.
and leaves its opponents behind.
Renny # 17. February 2006, 10:24
Chris Hester # 17. February 2006, 11:32
Pondus # 17. February 2006, 11:38
Kildor # 17. February 2006, 11:39
And timestamp of post is
Opera 8.52
By olli. Friday, 17. February 2006, 06:03:22
for me.
Anyway, read changelog…
Pink # 17. February 2006, 13:19
Language file for 8.52 contains strings for BitTorrent (9 more than 8.51) and for advertising - registering Opera (12 lines more than 9.02)
Is there any possibility to check, which strings are currently used by Opera?
non-troppo # 17. February 2006, 14:05
Jakub81 # 17. February 2006, 14:16
Zajec # 17. February 2006, 14:18
I can see plpl852 on FTP: ftp://ftp.opera.com/pub/opera/win/852/pl/
olli # 18. February 2006, 01:45
shogunu # 18. February 2006, 04:28
I downloaded Opera 8.52 from filehippo.com (http://www.filehippo.com/download_opera/) and then aloso from opera.com. Both installers work but they have different md5 checksums, the one from filehippo.com has d3198971103d00db6d1ee070d7998030, is this the file that was updated incorrectly?
I installed them both and they work, what's the difference between the installers?
olli # 18. February 2006, 10:49
shogunu # 18. February 2006, 21:46
rpsgc # 18. February 2006, 23:47
hesido # 22. February 2006, 15:00
o2mcgovem # 12. March 2006, 22:21
It's really irritating having to put up with US English (e.g. Color > Colour, Localization > Localisation). It's not the proper form of English, it's English that's been tampered with by Mr. Webster (I think it was him anyway, I'm not too sure).
qicaispace # 29. May 2006, 10:57
qicai02 # 16. June 2006, 08:38
Chinese?