Opera code names uncovered
By Johan Borg. Friday, 16. February 2007, 16:31:14
We've had some requests lately about where Opera 9.x is heading, so I'll give you a sneak peak into the current projects and their internal code names. We usually prefer code names over version numbers until the product actually ships.
Merlin
Merlin is the current code base, used for 9.0, 9.1 and the coming 9.2. On Merlin the main focus is on stability and only select new features are added. As you can see, the version number of the last preview build was 9.2, which normally indicates new functionality. The new feature is close to completion and will be unveiled here later this month. You have not seen it in a desktop browser before...
- Merlin falcons often hunt by flying fast and low, typically less than 1 meter above the ground, taking prey by surprise. Rolls-Royce used the same code-name for the engine that powered the legendary Spitfire.
Peregrine

The most important planned update to Opera on desktop. Peregrine will contain significant improvements in the user interface, improved standards support, improved performance, thousands of bug fixes and groundbreaking new functionality. In other words: We're pretty excited about it.
Previews of Peregrine will be found on this blog in 2007.
- The Peregrine Falcon is the fastest creature on the planet in its hunting dive, the stoop, in which it soars to a great height, then dives steeply at speeds in excess of 300 km/h. Suzuki named the fastest production motorcycle in the world after the Japanese word for Peregrine, Hayabusa.
Kestrel
Kestrel is the latest addition to our roadmap and fills the gap between Merlin and Peregrine. It will be the first release with rendering improvements from Peregrine. For the first time we will coordinate the desktop release with other Opera products, working towards a more unified Opera experience across devices. If you haven't done so yet, it's time to try out Opera Mini on your mobile phone.
- The Kestrel falcon is able to see ultraviolet, which helps them spot prey while hovering 10-20 meters over the ground. The Rolls-Royce Kestrel engine was later replaced by the Peregrine...
Merlin
Merlin is the current code base, used for 9.0, 9.1 and the coming 9.2. On Merlin the main focus is on stability and only select new features are added. As you can see, the version number of the last preview build was 9.2, which normally indicates new functionality. The new feature is close to completion and will be unveiled here later this month. You have not seen it in a desktop browser before...
- Merlin falcons often hunt by flying fast and low, typically less than 1 meter above the ground, taking prey by surprise. Rolls-Royce used the same code-name for the engine that powered the legendary Spitfire.
Peregrine

The most important planned update to Opera on desktop. Peregrine will contain significant improvements in the user interface, improved standards support, improved performance, thousands of bug fixes and groundbreaking new functionality. In other words: We're pretty excited about it.
Previews of Peregrine will be found on this blog in 2007.
- The Peregrine Falcon is the fastest creature on the planet in its hunting dive, the stoop, in which it soars to a great height, then dives steeply at speeds in excess of 300 km/h. Suzuki named the fastest production motorcycle in the world after the Japanese word for Peregrine, Hayabusa.
Kestrel
Kestrel is the latest addition to our roadmap and fills the gap between Merlin and Peregrine. It will be the first release with rendering improvements from Peregrine. For the first time we will coordinate the desktop release with other Opera products, working towards a more unified Opera experience across devices. If you haven't done so yet, it's time to try out Opera Mini on your mobile phone.
- The Kestrel falcon is able to see ultraviolet, which helps them spot prey while hovering 10-20 meters over the ground. The Rolls-Royce Kestrel engine was later replaced by the Peregrine...



« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
FataL # 16. February 2007, 20:38
I'm not against extensions, addons, API for them, etc. Just think that it is not piority #1 itself.
Alexis Deveria # 16. February 2007, 21:00
If I made that kind of made money, I don't think I'd be hanging around making comments on the Opera Desktop Team blog...
...aah, who am I kidding, I'd be here no matter what kind of money I made.
Hey...does it also cost them 30% more for Internet Explorer 7? 'cause it's more popular than FF2...
whatever3 # 16. February 2007, 21:12
in corporate world adoptions are late, mostly due to massive decision lag, and costs it generates to migrate thousands of workstations. the downtime alone can be worth milions, not counting software etc.
berend ytsma # 16. February 2007, 21:13
You should first make them Opera and then the others. Most if the time you'll get there faster where you wan't to be.
And for hand writting stuf, Once you'll made them it's easy to adjust them to your liking, You don't have to write everything again for the next job.
Christian # 16. February 2007, 21:17
@Borg: thanks a lot, this explanations are really interesting and it is very nice to have at least little pieces of official information.
So, let's start guessing again:
Originally posted by Borg:
Could be magic ERA, as it already works quite a while (maybe with flaws?) but is not officially documented yet for Opera desktop while usual for mobile and devices. The difference to former/current implementation (SSR with media:handheld or View-Small Screen, MSR with Fit to Width, etc) will probably be that the rendering modes could be applied automatically (refined for desktop, probably opt in). Name: Auto-Zoom
Background:
The remaining a bit shorter:
Zeppelin # 16. February 2007, 21:23
I am lawful user of opera (and M2) almost since I am an Internet user,
In addition I don't admire ff in spite I am a linux user and I support open source project.
BUT I regret to say that day by day I am "obliged" to open ff more often because of operas "site incompatibilities".
I wish these problems to be resolved, as no one wants to surf with two browsers...
--------
I wish and hope the best for opera (soon)...
andrew # 16. February 2007, 21:24
Christian # 16. February 2007, 21:38
By the way: a good name for Opera Mini seems to be Taita Falcon
chesss # 16. February 2007, 22:03
Nice code names btw
Tim Altman # 16. February 2007, 22:09
origPumu # 16. February 2007, 22:15
Originally posted by mkoo:
Nope, that are Caldari-Frigs!
Simon Houston # 16. February 2007, 22:24
FataL # 16. February 2007, 22:28
Serpher # 16. February 2007, 22:56
On the other hand... Opera could be have a new engine whose would be emulating the FF or IE engine because Opera don't want to show me some graphics on the site and some texts are in wonderings places.
Opera - Rulez!
Tjalve Aarflot # 16. February 2007, 23:10
Oh, and another one: sleeker transfer window / download manager. And an optional widget engine that can start on desktop login or something. Would make all these nice widgets much more useful.
Tamil # 16. February 2007, 23:23
_Grey_ # 17. February 2007, 00:05
Awaiting first Kestrel build with anticipation
Petter Nilsen # 17. February 2007, 01:00
Daniel Sitnik # 17. February 2007, 03:58
Can't wait for those falcons.
Paz # 17. February 2007, 04:35
Arthur Wilkinson # 17. February 2007, 05:57
Thanks for the info. Now I'm dying with anticipation for these new versions with cool new features, and extra speed.
Phoenix # 17. February 2007, 06:07
Rune Kenneth Meisingset # 17. February 2007, 08:35
K.L. # 17. February 2007, 08:49
i`m a web developer as well. and you are right with most ideas.
e.g. lack of oncontextmenu is very disappointing and doesn`t allow opera to stay side by side with ff and ie.
have you seen new widget for DOM? i suppose it will be standard feature now. but it is awful. people don`t do like this! DOM inspector should be core feature but not widget. it`s not handy at all. and where is ajax requests tracer? ff have it. so i still have to you ff for this core feature and opera for other dev things.
questions to all:
what about bookmarks? why i cant edit them right there? why i should open special manager window?
and where is HTML-letters-creation feature at M2? is it so hard to implement? =))))))
what about resend email as attachment feature? sysadmins love it. it`s very usefull for tracing spamers and viruses.
i don`t understand what opera devs do. browser should have feature for both advanced and novice users. but novice will go crazy of opera. can you imagine opera-targeted book "Web for dummies" or "Web in 24 hours"? i`m not.
and all this new standards support like CSS3...... IE is the big one. and untill it doesn`t support something nobody need it in other browsers. is it so hard to understand!
PS
we also have clients willing to have opera browser supported. and i just wonder why they want it. look at browsers (PC) market shares. opera is almost nothing.
SteveKong # 17. February 2007, 09:01
@tdzark: I totally agree, we need an update mechanism like this and it have to work for useres not beeing administrator.
olli # 17. February 2007, 09:02
olli # 17. February 2007, 09:06
SteveKong # 17. February 2007, 09:08
Insight in a current project:
Me: "What's about browser compatibility?"
MH: "The customer specified IE6."
Me: "Firefox, Opera?"
MH: "Nice to have but not needed."
Me: "IE7? It's out and people will use it?"
MH: "Perhaps in a future release."
Pallab De # 17. February 2007, 09:09
Cool. That is an imporant addition.
K.L. # 17. February 2007, 09:35
you are right. its` a pitty but it`s not my business. i`m just an employee.
as for ALL users. well. a lot of customers even says "f... FF, forget it, just IE".
K.L. # 17. February 2007, 09:56
don`t like it:
- c- and flash-programmers
- senior managers
like it:
- php- and java-programmers
- middle managers
- designers
illiad # 17. February 2007, 10:02
less than a year ago, FF was 'almost nothing' .....
look at the archives here..
http://www.thecounter.com/stats/
http://www.thecounter.com/stats/2006/February/browser.php
whatever3 # 17. February 2007, 10:15
mostly due to hopeless marketing. a guy in blue panties and these latest owls/falcons thingies.. these are not cool, and you cant underestimate the cool factor.
Edmund Blackadder # 17. February 2007, 10:20
I'd very much like the ability to also get experimental & tech preview builds via the auto-updater. Although I guess it should be opt-in via ini-file or at least fairly obscure preferences setting.
@whatever3
As I agree that there might be other things worth prioritizing over widgets, at least now they're coming to a mobile platform via opera mini(?), where there might be more use for them.
I bet a lot of the stuff we're asking for is in the works for Kestrel or Peregrine though, so at least there's some light at the end of the tunnel.
A.Ruzanov # 17. February 2007, 12:35
@whatever3
+1
@Indyan
opera:config#ISP|ID = SV1; Alexa Toolbar. Need restart.
alekksander # 17. February 2007, 13:01
alekksander # 17. February 2007, 13:10
ps2. mine avatar looks like a polaroid photo...
desperado666 # 17. February 2007, 14:05
* Activate/ disable urlfilter.ini
* new email notify / notification area (Linux/Gnome)
details here http://my.opera.com/community/forums/topic.dml?id=155156
* alsa sound support
* Flash 9 Support (some websites are not working with flash 9)
e.g. www.dsf.de , www.o2online.de
B # 17. February 2007, 14:06
i HAVE JUST SEEN THAT THE FLAW ON WWW.VIPMAIL.HU HAS BEEN FIXED.
THANKS A LOT GUYS
Lilo # 17. February 2007, 14:13
The current JavaScript solution is not really a useful extension for webprogrammers.
* Missing JS debugger
* Problematical Userinterface
Sorry to say this.
FataL # 17. February 2007, 14:53
Originally posted by coviex:
Sorry, but you so wrong here.If not Opera, Firefox, Safari with new standards support we probably would see inupdated IE 6 forever.
Also you should know what "progressive enhancement" and "graceful degradation" are.
Khaled Khalil # 17. February 2007, 15:28
congratulations, your brouser (ours) seems to be the only one to pass this test: http://www.webstandards.org/files/acid2/test.html#top
for further information: http://www.webstandards.org/action/acid2/guide/
Edmund Blackadder # 17. February 2007, 15:37
Is the nose suppose to turn blue as long as you're on the same horisontal *line* as the nose within the smiley face?
Vertically you pretty much have to touch the nose, or at least come close to it, but horisontally you only have to be anywhere within the smiley.
Is this correct behavior?
Mehmet # 17. February 2007, 16:10
A.Ruzanov # 17. February 2007, 16:46
He will download small delta-patch or full installer?
Viljami # 17. February 2007, 18:05
I'm always excited about new features, but Opera should also update their old features. I agree with desperado666 feature requests and I would like to point out some more features that Opera should maintain.
I've a dream that one day I could have all my stuff like mail and feeds, etc in Opera, but nowdays the rss in Opera isn't so usefull.
-It doesn't show tags of the feeds: <category>-element in RSS 2.0
-the options for feeds are very minimalist: one cannot even deside if he/she wants the notification (or I've not found it)
-The filtering system is kinda poor.
-and one cannot combine several feeds.
These are all essential features when (for example) one is subscribing feeds from news sites that don't have several feeds by category, only one feed for all news. But if the user is interested only in computer related news, he/she could turn of the notification from the news feed itself and make filter that notifies only when it catches feed with "computer-tag" on it.
Then there are some other minor disadvantages with mail (mostly with not-so-good filters) and FTP (well the lack of usefull FTP is major problem, but I think developpers know it and we'll one shiny day have it), but I'dont think this is place for me to complain about them, since they are minor things. But I'd like to hear from some developper what is the logic in following: in bookmarks the sites are arranged in alphabetical order, but when I perform "open every site in this folder" Opera opens the sites in order they were added to bookmarks.
But overall Opera is best browser I know. Thanks developpers, you are doing great.
strat89 # 17. February 2007, 19:16
"You have not seen it in a desktop browser before..."
Boggles the mind.
Yahia # 17. February 2007, 19:17
But couldn't you improve existing ones?
I don't think I'm the only one who needs:
1. to customize the headers & footers when printing
2. a real and integrated webdev tool
3. an improved caching system
jeroo # 17. February 2007, 20:49
My guess is that Peregrine will be wild!
jeroo # 17. February 2007, 20:54