Skip navigation.

I Fell from the Moon

Don't worry ma'am. I'm from cyberspace.

Posts tagged with "computers"

Finally good-looking widgets on Linux

, , , ...


I can finally use Opera Widgets on Ubuntu thanks to support for compositing in Opera 10 Alpha. Well. I could use widgets before too, but shadows in widgets were drawn over an opaque gray background, resulting in hideous looking widgets.

Opera 10 Alpha has no real show stopper bugs to me. Although icons in Tango CL and PNGs with transparency, such as my avatar, look somewhat wrong. I'm suspecting these bugs are related.

To enable transparency in Opera 10 Alpha for Linux, you'll need to run Opera from a terminal window. Opera should produce a message telling you how to enable compositing support. Remember to edit your Opera launchers to reflect the instructions.

Have fun with additional eye candy on your GNU/Linux desktop.

Technology against Poverty

, , , ...

The poor of our "rich" society are often overlooked. Every now and then we hear about disasters or crisises in distant countries that make thousands, hundred thousands or even more people homeless and poor. But we in countries that look at ourself as "developed" also have our poor people with low standards of living. And we need to help them, as well as poor people in other countries. So we're going to look at several technologies that can improve the life of poor people or help them lift themselves out of poverty.

Homes

Some times people without homes might find themselves sleeping outside or in provisional rooms. The living standards of homeless people might be improved by using shipping containers as housing. Many companies have excess shipping containers that just take up space they could use for other things. And a shipping container is a standardised container that is easily stacked, and easily moved which makes for a easily and quickly established home.

But maybe you're thinking, "a shipping container would be cold, dark and ugly". Not necessarily. It can easily be painted and insulated. Windows can be mounted as easy as in a regular house. The container could even expand to increase space available inside. Shipping containers could become cheap, comfortable and good looking spaces to live for both the poor and the modernist.

Water

A common trait in some undeveloped countries is that many people have limited access to clean drinking water. Half of the world's poor suffer from water borne diseases. As much as 6000 of these, mostly children, die daily. But cleaning water would be too expensive, right? Not any more.

LifeStraw is a straw that filters water, removes bacteria and viruses and makes unclean water taste better. It'll clean drinking water for one person for one year. It's easily mass distributed where it's needed the most.

Education

A common cause of poverty is lack of education. Education material and access to knowledge in developing countries can be very limited. Computers with a connection to the internet could solve this problem, but computers are expensive and so is the infrastructure.

The OLPC XO-1 is built to solve this problem. It's built to be a cheap, yet powerful, state of the art laptop, tailored to childrens education, especially in developing countries. At the price of $188 it hasn't reached its goal of becoming the $100 laptop yet, but will hopefully do so during 2008.

It's a robust laptop that can be carried like a suitcase when closed. The screen can be rotated and will work as a ebook when closed over the keyboard. The shell is specifically built to withstand dust and moisture. It contains no moving parts inside and thus is rather resistant to shock. The keyboard is sized to fit the hands of children.

The XO-1 contains a set of technologies tailored for education in developing countries. It comes with lots of educational software, a offline version of Wikipedia, has a very low power consumption and can be charged by hand, or with a car battery. XO-1 can make a so-called "mesh network" where many laptops work together to form a network with eachother over a wide area. If one laptop in this network is connected to the internet, it can share this connection with the rest of the mesh network.

Conclusion

These are just some of the ways we can improve the lives of the poor, both in both developed countries and in developing countries. These solutions are in no way a master cure for poverty in the world but can still improve the situation for the world's poor people and poor countries considerably. These solutions doesn't necessarily have to be paid for by poor people. We whom aren't poor can help the poor fund these solutions.

Thanks to...

  1. Atomische.com for Shipping Containers
  2. Mr. Kimberly for Shipping Container House
  3. Trav and Nan for An African Classroom 1
  4. Walter for Galadima0.jpg

The computer that vanished

, , , ...

The microchip. Growing smaller and smaller by the years. It'll keep up. So will everything else in your bulky computer, until the point where you can't see it. The only traces of the computer will be a discrete simple interface you can take with you everywhere. So where will it go? Think small. Smaller than a cellphone. Think really, really small. At the nanoscale. The future computers will be woven into clothing fibres, mixed with the very ground we walk on or even in our bloodstream. Invisible computers will be everywhere there's people.

The cost of nanoengineering will greatly decrease in the upcoming years. It used to be a very time consuming and expensive process, where a scientist had to build things atom for atom. But not any more. Pre-programmed viruses will assemble the very atoms required to make computer components. All powered by a solution of nutritients and elements required to build these nanomaterials. Nanomachines will assemble these computers. They will even assemble new nanomachines. The result will be fully functional computers, small enough to be voven as fibres into clothes or mixed with any liquid.

All these nanocomputers will be networked and share their computing power with the entire world. The interface to use this processing power can be a surface covered with light-emitting nanomachines, nanomachines in your retina or even nanomachines directly connected to your brain cells.

Anyone will be able to tap into a omnipresent network of processing power. We could process vast information just by thinking, we'd be able to design the most complex things at the blink of an eye. And we'll unlock secrets of science we'd never though possible. With the upcoming revolution in computers, the future of the mankind could even take one of two distinct turns. A utopian future where mankind shapes theirselves and their lives in any way they wish. And a dystopian one where a evil superpower controls everything and not even your thought is free.

We have to decide what our future will bear now, before it's too late. If we continue to let our lives in the hands of a few elite people, they could very well be the ones in charge of that dystopian future. But if we put the power back in our own hands, the computer revolution will lead to a utopia even better than you can imagine with your meat err brain now.

This post has been cross posted on the #techie blog by DrLaunch

Thanks to
  1. Tambako the Jaguar for Wafer detail
  2. tanakawho for Folds
  3. bogenfreund for The Mechanic Eye
  4. koalie for Memorial to the victims of Communism

Office Open XML rejected as a ISO document standard. Why?

, , , ...

Office Open XML (OOXML) is a document format much like the Word document format. Microsoft has developed it together with some companies to allow it to work better with new technologies used in companies today. Office Open XML is an ECMA standard and it's proposed as an ISO-standard. But it got rejected. Why would ISO reject an open XML standard?

ISO consists of several countries and the standards unit in each country can vote for proposed ISO-standards. Most these countries voted no after evaluating OOXML. There are severeal reasons for this. And I have some opinions against OOXML my self too. Most of the countries that voted yes to OOXML have so because of corruption, cheating, because they don't mind Microsoft's market share, or similar. Most of the yes votes were most likely done because of pressure from Microsoft. Microsoft have simply attempted to force OOXML to become an ISO-standard. They've done so because a lot of their monopoly is at stake. They might lose to the free OpenOffice.org suite in the government sector in several countries. Because a lot of governments don't want to depend on a single software vendor like Microsoft.

We already have a ISO-standard for the exact same thing. It's called ODF or Open Document Format. It's the document format used mainly by almost every competitor to Microsoft. Most of the public sector in most countries have a obligation to use ISO-sertified formats like ODF. A lot of them might switch office suite too unless Microsoft's OOXML becomes ISO-certified. Microsoft's monopoly is at stake, so of cource they're trying to force it to become ISO-certified. But why do people vote no? Obviously, the way Microsoft is forcing it to get ISO-certified explains this to a small degree. Because it wouldn't get certified once the standardisation units in each country find out what's going on. The official OOXML specification isn't very good. In fact it's really bad. It's 6000 pages of almost unusable specification, repeatings, references to older formats and broken XML. Yes. XML is a strict standard and the OOXML specification contains several examples of broken XML. It's a document designed to confuse everyone. ODF is shorter with just a few hundred pages, but it's much better specified. ODF is interoperable almost like HTML, while OOXML is not. OOXML also depends on a lot of Microsoft's patents, so a software vendor might be infringing Microsoft's patents by implementing it. The XML part of the name is just a gimmick added to make people think it's an open standard. The only company capable of implementing it properly must be the creator themselves, Microsoft.

So in short, Microsoft is trying to force a bad standard through the ISO-certification, while we already have ODF, before anyone understands what they're up to in order to retain more of its monopoly. So, unless you work for Microsoft, or really want them to have their viritual monopoly, you should be against OOXML. There are simply better reasons to be against it than to be for it.

OOXML - not open - not XML - not standard

AddThis social bookmark button Feed icon

The future of the mobile phone

, , , ...

Introduction

I'm sure most of you have a mobile phone. Or maybe you think you don't need it. Maybe you're right. Maybe mobile phones are a fad that will be replaced by something else. Or maybe not. So what will happen to the mobile phone? Get your tea or your beverage of choice and prepare for this essay. Let's dive into a little of the mobile phone history first...

Read more...

Microsoft's market position

, , , ...

You’re probably using Microsoft products on your PC without thinking about it. Maybe you think it’s the way a PC should be used. Microsoft has managed to grab users with their claws. And their main products, Windows and Office are giving them lots of revenue.

Maybe you’re thinking “Good! Then they can focus on bringing me better products.” Well. That’s not how things work. Read on to learn why I'm saying this.

Read more...

#techie blog: Ubuntu 6.10 Edgy Eft released. Cheers!

, , , ...

I am thrilled to tell you that Ubuntu 6.10 (Edgy Eft) was released today
Read more...

Trusted computing. Sounds great. Is it?

, , , ...

Trusted computing


Sounds great. Is it?

Learn more
www.againsttcpa.com

Sources
This video on Google Video

One Laptop Per Child - Bringing children in developing countries a tool for education

, , , ...

Introduced first by Nicholas Negroponte at the World Economic Forum in Switzerland in January 2005, the OLPC project was born. The goal was to bring each child in developing nations a specially designed, low cost laptop for education.

The laptop
The result is 2B1. A quite capable laptop running Linux with the Sugar interface. Making it run windows and reach the price of $100 would be impossible since Microsoft refuses to sell Windows licenses with low enough cost for this. I am personally glad Linux was chosen because of the increased security.

The OLPC laptop is made especially for kids in developing countries. The keyboard is custom made for small fingers. It's very durable. When you close the lid the laptop is sealed from sand and dust and it can handle being dropped on the ground. Its power brick will be equipped with possibillities for charging with human power. One minute of charging gives 10 minutes of operation.

Features
The 2B1 boots faster than your average PC and is rather responsive.
When placed together the laptops form a mesh network where each PC functions as a router for other PCs. If one PC is connected to the Internet all the other PCs in the mesh network share the connection.

The 2B1 comes equipped with 512MB of flash memory. The operating system image is stored there and there's still enough space left to save files. It will also have USB and a slot for a memory card. What it will not do is store massive amounts of data.

While it might look like a gadget it's not. It does what your PC can. It is also more secure and the default system can be restored in minutes without the user loosing files or applications.

The laptop and its OS is still in development.

Several countries have shown interest in buying large quantities of this laptop. In recent news, Libiya have signed up for OLPC.

External links
Laptop.org. The official website of the OLPC project.
Pictures of the prototypes.
The OLPC Wiki.

Photo1: OLPC.
Photo2: OLPC Wiki
Download Opera, the fastest and most secure browser