Skip navigation.

ersi päevik

Opera or else

The Four Factors

But all things that are reproved are made manifest by the light: for whatsoever doth make manifest is light.

Ephesians 5:13

As the light shines, the surroundings become perceptible. Everything in the environment is revealed and nourished by the light.

The human being can see oneself as the other side of the environment. Also, the other side of light and of life is perceptible - shadows. These oppositions reveal the dual nature of life to the reflective mind in terms of interdependence and change.

Consequently, study of change and interdependence in life should discern four basic factors:
  • The source of light (the life-giving force)
  • The environment (the space with its properties, objects and subjects)
  • The human being (the container and arranger of perceptions)
  • The shadows (vital for visibility, discerning perceptions)

Change is what life is about. Nothing is static. Seeing the change as relative to the four factors provides a coherent perspective. Life and death and everything good or bad about them are relative to the same four factors.

This perspective is relative, but potentially all-encompassing. Admittedly, there can be something unchanging in the (really) big picture. It would be another perspective attainable by fusing the four factors into one organism with a single awareness, at first beyond reproving, then beyond manifestation, by comprehending the virtue of the absolute.

*
Om Santi

DayAmaya

Comments

starree 18. July 2009, 17:42

nice post. I think living in the present (instead of being focused on the future or past) probably helps to achieve this best. :smile:

ersi 19. July 2009, 06:49

yes, everything is now and here, not elsewhere :smile:

Anodyne 23. July 2009, 14:32

But all things that are reproved are made manifest by the light: for whatsoever doth make manifest is light.

Ephesians 5:13



Shouldn't this be this ?
But all things that are exposed are made manifest by the light, for whatever makes manifest is light. (- Bible, King James)

It is not so important for the subject in the following words but a big difference though. In my understanding "reprove" is not at all the same as "expose" .
This just for the record.

Moreover the divison in four factors by Santi seems a bit artificial and constructed to me.
I agree with your statements that now and here counts and kindly remind you of the fact that we have a great influence on how light is going to be spread and distributed and the importance of that fact is widley underestimated by mankind....
but whom do I tell. You both know it :smile: .
Love and peace which both merge to and come from light,
Anodyne

ersi 23. July 2009, 17:29

Originally posted by therealanodyne:

by Santi


Just for the record, this word along with its companion has a specific meaning, it's not a name. The text is by me :smile:

Of course, the text is a construct, because its purpose is to describe a model...

Anodyne 23. July 2009, 18:49

Originally posted by ersi:

Just for the record, this word along with its companion has a specific meaning, it's not a name. The text is by me :smile:

Of course, the text is a construct, because its purpose is to describe a model...


Oh, I'm sorry. :smile: sounded like an indian name or so, is it a kind of mantra ?
What about the bible quote ?
Cheers,
Anodyne

ersi 23. July 2009, 20:44

Yes, it's a mantra. As to the Bible quote, it's from the old KJV, because I thought it should raise no issues. Apparently it does.

Anodyne 23. July 2009, 20:51

Well, nevermind, as I said, for the topic in your small treatise the bible quote is not that important-
See you,
Anodyne

steven 24. July 2009, 06:21

the factors are "light" and "lack of light" = "non-light = "darkness"
shadows are everything between light and non-light
btw, Bible is nice, but written about 1700 years ago, or so
hey, very nice post ersi :smile: :up: :up:

Anodyne 24. July 2009, 12:59

Originally posted by ste-ven:

btw, Bible is nice, but written about 1700 years ago, or so


How does the age of a written document or the age of a statement have any effect on the evaluation of the mindset or essence of it ?

ersi 24. July 2009, 15:21

@ ste-ven
Instead of non-light or darkness, I really prefer shadows, because they are entities, whereas non-light is a non-entity. The factors have to be entities.

steven 24. July 2009, 18:30

ersi, i remember from time to time i was a physician :smile:

Write a comment

You must be logged in to write a comment. If you're not a registered member, please sign up.