Fiendish Games

Thoughts of a sometime board games designer

Subscribe to RSS feed

Essential Essen

, , ,

Back online after a trip to Essen and having spent a fortune at said games fair and traipsed miles around the exhibition hall, I now propose to bore you with details of my trip.

Spiel is a 4-day board games and comics fair, based in Essen. Were such a fair to be held in Britain there is every chance that attendees might number in the hundreds and that in all probability, if you attended, you would already know 50% of the other attendees. In Germany, where the playing of board games is a lot more ingrained in the national culture, things are slightly different; over a four day period, around 160,000 turn up, and most of them seem to congregate around the second hand stalls!
[/COLOR][/size] Day one Getting there is, theoretically, fairly easy. There is one famous hobby story of a gamer catching the train (via Eurotunnel) to Brussels, and then asking advice on how to get to Essen from the Belgian railway people; what he did not realise was that there is also an Essen in Belgium – one that does not have a huge exhibition hall hosting a games fair. I understand that he spent about 19 hours travelling from Brussels to Essen (Belgium), thence to Essen (Germany). Bearing this in mind, and also my famed masculine reluctance to ask anyone for directions, I decided it would be safer to fly there. A BA return ticket from Heathrow to Dusseldorf (hang on, let’s call up character map) – make that “Düsseldorf” – cost about a hundred quid. I deliberately chose an afternoon flight because, although that would mean I’d arrive too late to catch the first day of the fair, I knew I would still be rushing about like a blue-arsed fly on the day of the flight, doing last minute packing and t’ing. The best laid plans of mice and men often ging-gang-gooley, as the Scottish bard once didn’t say, and I ended up leaving home an hour later than intended. Why? Because number one son was off school (big shock) with a rugby injury and was complaining there was nothing to eat in the house, so I had to do some emergency shopping. I still left myself about 105 minutes to get from North London by rail to Heathrow tube. Not long enough, as it turns out. I was already cutting it fine when I heard the dreaded announcement from the train driver, “this train will now be terminating at Northfields. Passengers for Heathrow are advised to get off at Northfields and wait for the next Heathrow train”. What he didn’t add was that this would be about a 10-minute wait – ten minutes I could not afford. Ho-hum. I hadn’t realised quite how far west Heathrow was. Perhaps I would have been better going to Stansted and stumping up the £30 bandit price for the Stansted Express from Liverpool Street. Check in was at 14:40, boarding gates closed at 14:50. I had checked in online so already had my boarding pass but I still needed to get my cases checked in. The nice lady at the check-in counter checked her screen and said the plane had been delayed a bit and, if I ran all the way, I might make it there in time for them to stick my case in the emergency “latecomers” chute and get it on board. So, abandoning all dignity, I legged it to the departure lounge. In the circumstances, barging through the security check area claiming I had a plane to catch probably wasn’t going to work, so I calmed myself down (“Don’t panic, Mr. Mainwaring!”) and subjected myself to some desultory frisking, after which it was another pell-mell dash through duty free. I have never been so pleased to see one of those moving walkway things (horizontal escalators) they have at airports. I’d often wondered whether, in these days of wheeled suitcases, they were strictly necessary but now I realise what a boon they are. I got to the boarding gate at about 15:00, about 10 minutes before the plane was scheduled to leave. My case was bunged down the chute for the baggage handlers to play “Destination Roulette” with it and I finally had time to sit down, catch my breath, and wipe about three pints of sweat off my brow and chest. Thank God Heathrow is such a ridiculously busy airport; if the plane had not been delayed, I’d have had a tricky decision to make: go back home and return to catch the early morning flight, or kip at Heathrow? Now, if my life were a situation comedy, my relief at the plane being late and therefore allowing me to catch my flight would have turned to exasperation by 15:25 when the flight still had not boarded, and I’d have been whizzing off a complaint to BA’s Customer Relations department from the Blackberry I don’t own, but I was happy to use the time to chill out and treat my fellow passengers to the subtle aromas of Eau de Flopsweat. The trip to Düsseldorf is barely long enough to get stuck into your book. BA were suitably apologetic that the dispute with Gate Gourmet meant they were unable to offer on-board catering, but frankly the journey was not long enough to justify an in-flight meal. I have been to Essen once before, with the Small Furry Creatures crowd, and knew that it was possible to travel by rail from Düsseldorf airport to Essen without much difficulty. Well, without much difficulty if you get on the right platform. I just blundered down on to the first available platform and tried to make sense of the railway system. Clearly there were trains that travelled from the airport to Essen’s mainline station but equally clearly, they weren’t departing from the platform I was on. The trouble was, it was the only platform I could find. Turns out the other platforms were a “Skytrain” (no, not the Freddie Laker outfit – a sort of suspended monorail jobbie) journey away. In the end I decided to travel in the opposite direction to the one I wanted to go, get off at a mainline station that had lots of connections, and catch a train to Essen from there. This worked well enough. My only tricky decision was whether my ticket was valid on the inter-city service. I suspected it wasn’t, and so caught the local train which, interestingly, was a double-decker affair. The time was 19:30 local time and I guess I was getting the tail end of the rush-hour crowd. I was uncomfortably aware that, laden down with a smallish suitcase and a rucksack on my back, I was the sort of passenger I hated encountering on the London Underground; wherever I stood it was in the way, I was rubber-necking at each station to make sure I was not on some sort of special German train that hyper-jumped straight to Berlin, and I did not understand the language. Not a word of it. Well, hardly a word of it. All the German I know is either from “The Valiant” comic (Schnell, achtung, Gotten himmel, Englander, Fritz and Hans) or from German board games (wertung, spiel, punkte and, of course, ausreisse). I got to Essen mainline station OK – there was no hyper-jumping on the train I was on. I had previously printed off numerous maps to assist me and my next task was to find the hotel. Once I had found the correct exit from the station (think Kings Cross or Liverpool Street, but with more hot-dog booths) the hotel was relatively easy to find. I was staying at the Ibis, a serviceable but characterless hotel some 200 yards from the station. My room (and about 20 others) had been booked for me by Chris Boote, and I was concerned by an e-mail I had received from Chris two days before my trip which stated that he would cancel the booking of anyone who had not got a cheque to him by Monday. I received this e-mail from him on Tuesday morning ….. In fairness to Chris, he had sent the initial e-mail a few days earlier to my old, defunct, Demon e-mail address, and subsequently forwarded it to the right address when it bounced. Nevertheless, I had been unable to contact him before my flight, so I had no idea whether he had cancelled my booking or not. This was another reason why I had been late in leaving for the airport – I had been hitting the internet trying to find hotels in the Essen area that still had rooms available; I had in my pocket a list of 6 hotels that might still have had rooms available, albeit at prices almost double those being charged by the Ibis. Somebody up there likes me, because my room had been reserved, though the desk clerk did explain apologetically, that only non-smoking rooms were available. What a bummer! You mean I have to sleep in a room that does not stink of stale tobacco smoke? Can I get a discount? I’d worked out that most of the British contingent in the hotel would be out stuffing their faces on the archetypal German meal of meat with meat stuffed with meat, with meat sauce on a meat plate, followed by meat and ice cream (sausage flavoured) so I went up to my room to have, in the words of the immortal Terry-Thomas, “an absolute shower”. The plan was to chill out until about ten, then pop down to the bar area to see if anyone recognisable was down there playing games. After the shower I tried to phone Lin (Mrs. Fiendish) to let her know I had arrived safely, but could not get through, so I tried texting her. Twenty minutes later I got a somewhat sarcastic message back from her: “You know how to text!”. Yes, but I don’t know how to phone the UK from Germany (“This call has been barred”). I stuck on my headphones, and let the sounds of the Cosmic Rough Riders (“Pure Escapism”) wash over me, opened up my book (Truecrime by Jake Arnott) and settled down to while away the next couple of hours. I woke up about 1:30 in the morning, having drifted off to sleep. In all probability there were still going to be people down in the bar playing games but I decided that my body’s need for sleep was greater than my mind’s need for intellectual stimulation, so I turned in for the night. (More of this guff tomorrow, when I’ll give my first impressions of the fair) JoHn

Hello, John, got a new motor?

, , ,

Yes, I have, as a matter of fact. Thank you for asking. It is Lexus GS300 sport, and the fact that I don't drive does not prevent me being moderately excited about jointly owning it.

Buying it took most of Sunday, and this was after a few hours research the night before, so having spent bleeding ages selecting the damn thing, you'll forgive me (I hope) for a bit of childish enthusiasm. At the time of writing, I am looking forward to my first journey in it.

So, you spent 11 grand on a car without actually travelling in it?

Well, yeah. I'd done my research, eyed up the specs, mulled over the cost and then left it up to the driver in the family - Mrs. Fiendish - to make the decision. Seeing as Mrs. Fiendish is a real gadget fiend and the Lexus GS300 has more gadgets than the admittedly bankrupt Gadget Shop, it was a foregone conclusion that she would choose it over the series 5 BMW and the surprisingly luxurious Volvo we were also contemplating buying.

The GS300 features

  • Single slot 6-CD player
  • Arse-warming on the front seats
  • A little gizmo where you put your mobile's sim into a slot and you get hands free telephonic jiggery-pokery
  • Memory settings on the front seats
  • Semi-automatic gear box
  • An hydraulic spectacles dispenser


Well, that last one's a show-stopper, isn't it? Do I need to go on?

Car fans would probably like to know stuff like top speed, 0-60 time and all that macho stuff about valves and t'ing. I can't help you much, there, I am afraid. I did read on some web site that the top speed of the GS300 has been electronically limited at 148 mph but that's about all I know. I think it is safe to say that if the South London board gaming community ever organises another trip to Ireland, Lin and I won't be arriving at Fishguard ferry terminal 40 minutes after everyone else (and, more importantly, 10 minutes after the ferry had sailed!)

What I can tell you is that it is red (this after I told the salesman that the only pre-condition for me was that the car should not be red), it's got leather interior and it's not a bloody people-carrier. Our old seven-seater Vauxhall Sintra has given us stentorian service but it's rare these days that all 5 members of the family are in the same room, never mind the same car, and the occasions when the grandparents are in tow (not literally) too are rarer still. So, Mrs. Fiendish (let's call her Lin from now, shall we?) decided she wanted a swish saloon car. The plan is that in 4 years time we will swap again for a full-on mid-life crisis two-seater convertible sports car.

The only slight drawback to buying this beast is that it has got me vaguely interested in cars for the first time in my life. I think it is a guy thing. As was mentioned in the film Gregory's Girl, men seem to have on obsession about categorising and classifying: stamp collecting, computers, cars, football and so on. Women just have shoes and hand-bags smile

Exciting times (I don't think)

, ,

Not much to say today, I am afraid. Can't really get excited about the England match. I left at half time to post a package and did not exactly rush back to catch the second half. I very much doubt if I would have had that attitude even ten years ago; I used to love international games and used to sit there getting nervous during meaningful England matches, but now I am not that bothered. I am not sure whether that is due to the final loss of youthful enthusiasm for the beautiful game or the fact that England don't seem to play like England any more.

It was the sort of uninspired dreary performance we have come to expect from England under Sven. The big talking point will be Beckham's sending off. I'm not normally far from the front of the queue to criticise the massively over-publicised pretty boy but in this case I thought he was harshly done by. OK, book him for the arm in the face - professionals who claim it is impossible to jump up in the air without using your arms would have been amazed by a photo I used to have of Les Ferdinand as my Windows wallpaper - he was about 4 feet off the ground with his arms down by his side - but the second booking was very harsh.

Still, it gave someone else a crack at the free kicks and so we got shots on target instead of eye-catching swerving, dipping efforts that somehow always seem to go a few inches over the bar. It looks to me that Lampard is ready to take over the old Beckham role and the sooner Sven gets used to it, the better. Not that I am saying we should drop Beckham - he works hard, passes well and sells shirts - but I think having him as the captain is counter-productive.

Other than that, I thought Luke Young and Joe Cole did well. Neither is going to make a World XI or even a Europe XI but they did a decent job today.

Perhaps I should write about the Northern Ireland vs Wales game? A very entertaining match, full of drama - though drama of the Sylvester Stallone type for the most part.

But no. Peter Ustinov is on the telly. Well, his ashes are (boom, boom!) and so I am going to sign off.

TTFN,


JoHn

The Road to Liquidity

, , , ...

When it comes to keeping score, Michelangelo apparently canes Raphael’s arse.

No, we are not talking ninja turtles. We’re not even, really, talking about pencil squeezers.

[/COLOR]
Van Gogh did some eyeball pleasers
He must have been a pencil squeezer
He didn’t pain the Mona Lisa
That was some eye-talian geezer

(There Ain’t Half Been Some Clever Bastards – Ian Dury)
We’re talking about the (barely) fascinating world of book sales on Amazon. For reasons which I shall explain in a minute, I currently have copies of “I, Michelangelo” and “I, Raphael” up for sale on Amazon.co.uk. MikeyA’s coffee table collection is available for a very reasonable £21 and has a sales rank of 427,000 or thereabouts, whilst Raph’s designer door-stop is available for an even more reasonable £15 and has a sales rank of about 876,000. I really must do a search on Amazon some time to see if there is an “I, Rolf” collection.

Going on the sales ranks, neither book is exactly a hot seller though hopefully I will sell the buggers at some point to art fans, but I am curious to know why Michelangelo is a bigger seller than Raphael, and yet his book costs more? It doesn’t work that way with CDs, does it? If I want to get the new Coldplay album I could (seek psychiatric care or …) probably get it for about six or seven quid, but if I want a copy of a Pluto Shervington album, I’m probably going to have to stump up £13, unless it is some sort of Hallmark or Music for Pleasure compilation.

Of course, the going rate for either book could change. When you open up a seller’s account on Amazon they give you a helpful page that lists all the titles you have up for sale and which compares your selling price with that of the cheapest seller; the page also enables you to update a whole page’s worth of titles (up to 350 to a page) with new prices at a single swoop, so it is quite easy to zip down the page, undercutting the lowest seller. So easy, in fact, that 2 hours after you have done so, some other bugger’s done much the same and you are once again not the lowest priced seller on half a dozen items. Before you know it, this tit for tat mentality has reduced everyone’s profit margins by 25% in the space of 8 hours. The free market in action. Quite fun, really, though I might be less enamoured of the game were I selling books on Amazon for a living.

So, what am I doing on Amazon?

Well, it all dates back to a time when I was persuaded by Peter Stanton to join a book club on the grounds that Peter had already used his allocation of 10 titles for that month and he wanted me to sign up and blag a few more titles for him while they were cheap. Lest you think that Peter is a manipulative sort, he did point out that the book club featured a large selection of exactly the sort of books he and I liked, which are the sort of books that give pedants a bad name (think “Eats, Shoots and Leaves” to the power of ten).

So, I signed up and since then have enjoyed a varied assortment of cheap but interesting books. “A Nice Cup of Tea and A Sit Down” – the absolutely essential guide to cake and biscuits; “How to Dunk A Donut” – the science of everyday things (are we sensing a theme here? The book should more accurately have been called “How to dunk a biscuit” but I presume they changed the name for the American market – although it does turn out that the doughnut is scientifically more suited to non-collapsing dunking than the humble biccie); plus a very interesting book about people who were once very famous but are now totally forgotten – like Peter Marinello. Well, OK, slightly more historic and significant figures than the Scottish George Best.

The only drawback with the book club is that you have to remember to cancel the “Recommended Title of the Month” each month, otherwise you end up with something very large, expensive and dull on your doorstep, such as “Bronze Armour Excavations in Granada”. As it turns out, if you do forget to cancel the title you can send it back and incur a handling charge of £3, but the first time I fell victim to this form of “inertia selling” I meekly accepted my fate and kept the book, which was “The Road To Reality” by Roger Penrose. So far as I can work out, Roger Penrose is the bloke Stephen Hawking consults when he finds a problem he can’t resolve. So, right up my street really – and Geoff Challinger thinks I only read private detective novels!

Having lumped out £23 for this weighty tome (£5.30 to send by post, if you must know) I thought I might as well have a stab at reading it. Not that I was particularly interested in finding out how the universe works. I regard the workings of the universe in much the same way as I regard light switches; so long as the sun comes up in the morning I’ll let the universe run itself, and likewise, so long as the light bulb lights up when I flick a switch, I’ll not worry too much how this miracle came about.

You should know that I dropped out of physics in the fourth year (year 10 for you juvenile types) and I can’t say that the physics teacher was surprised or disappointed. Furthermore, I barely scraped through maths at “O” level (GCSE for you juvenile types). Thank God for the multiple choice section, I say, though had I read “The Road To Reality” all the way through, maybe I would be thanking someone other than God. So, reading a heavy maths book on the train that had lots of formulae in it was an ambitious undertaking and I abandoned it in the third chapter once Penrose got beyond the Greeks and the history of maths.

Mind you, it did look impressive on my desk at work when I plonked it down in my in-tray each morning. However, eventually it got relegated to the back of the bookshelf and I tried to forget about wasting £23 on it. Subsequently, number one son, who has never read a book in his life in his own free time (unless you count the Argos catalogue) asked me to get hold of a book called “Hitler: A Study In Tyranny” by Professor Alan Bullock. Obviously, this was not “reading for pleasure” but was a rare – nay, unique – example of number one son “reading around the subject” and so, like any doting middle-class father, I was happy to purchase it for him. Of course, I knew he would never actually read all of it and quite possibly he wouldn’t read any of it, so I was overjoyed when I noticed on Amazon that I could buy a used copy for two quid (call it four once you add in p&p).

Having been introduced to the concept of selling used books on Amazon, naturally my mind hit on the idea of selling “The Road to Reality”. I listed it for about £16 (“good as new”) and it sold within a week to some grateful student at Oxford University. Once Amazon fees and postage had been taken into account I had recouped about £9 of my £23 purchase fee and was slightly chuffed at reducing my losses.

That would have been the end of the book-selling venture, other than selling off some of number 3 son’s books to make room for the next batch of Edge Chronicles I will doubtless end up buying him, but I noticed in next month’s book club catalogue that “The Road to Reality” – now that it was no longer a recommended title of the month – had slumped in price to £3.99. Provided my monthly order came to more than £30, delivery would be free, so naturally I loaded up and bought ten copies!

For a while, there were truly rich pickings to be had with this book. One copy I sold for a profit of just under £9 but gradually the competition has forced me down to a price where I am making a mere £3.59 per book. Sales tend to be a bit seasonal. I’ve sold 4 since the beginning of September, so I don’t think I’ll be retiring on the proceeds just yet. Now that I have told you lot about the huge mark-up available on this book I expect competition will get even tougher p

Still, as my wife, Lin, points out, I am not really in it to make money. “It’s just a game for you, isn’t it?” and, as usual, she is right. Though making money on the game is nice, too. Most of the people from my gaming crowd who do blogs have got seriously into online poker and this fills up much of their blog space; I have played online poker and am not ashamed to say that I blew my £50 deposit (I only signed up so a Spurs message board could get a kick-back) in the space of 3 months, so I don’t think anyone will be logging on to read my thoughts on poker strategy. So, I need some other form of activity to bore you with – something I can do some duvet-stuffing on.

Whoa! Jargon alert!

“Duvet-stuffing” is a phrase I coined back in the day that was picked up on by Mike Siggins. I was reviewing a gaming fanzine, called “Ha! I Have No Tuba”, which was edited by Richard Clyne. In this zine he ran a Statis Pro Football league. This was pre-email era (more or less, though if anyone was likely to have an email address in those days, Richard was) and so players would send in orders, by post, for this detailed and long-playing American football game. Richard would then play through the games (each match probably took about 3 hours to run through – maybe more if he kept copious stats, which he undoubtedly did) according to each coach’s instructions, and then print match reports in his zine. I happened to mention that I would rather stay in an stuff a duvet full of lint in preference to adjudicating Statis Pro games, since when the phrase “duvet stuffing” has come to refer to any self-indulgent, futile yet enjoyable practice, usually involving the compilation of massive amounts of statistics of zero interest to anyone other than the compiler. Avalon Hill’s “B-17: Queen of the Skies”, anyone?

So, let’s stuff that duvet!

The sales rank of “The Road to Reality” is 3,274, suggesting that physics is a lot more popular subject that mediæval pencil squeezers (join the “Campaign to Save the Dipthong” now!). I can only assume it is essential reading for university bods studying physics and related subjects. Though I have assiduously researched the Amazon prices of other cheap books offered by my book-club, “The Road to Reality” remains the cash-cow, though the books that sold out most swiftly were “Timber Building in Britain” (sales rank: 56,078) and “Britain in Revolution” (70,994), which both sold within hours of me listing them.

The game for me – apart from the helter-skelter undercutting pricing system (Reiner Knizia, are you watching?) – is working out which new batch of books to get in each month. Obviously “The Road to Reality” gets restocked every so often, but what’s the trade-off between a slow selling book with a big profit margin (“Tamerlane: Sword of Islam” – a real crowd-pleaser this, in the current environment, with a bafflingly low sales rank of 227,492 but a decent profit margin of around 125%) and a relatively popular title with a low margin, such as the aforementioned “Britain in Revolution: 1625 – 1660”, where I made a profit of £2.59.

Should I be looking at percentage profit margins or absolute (pounds, shillings and pence) margins?

I guess that so long as I have the room to store the things, I can afford to continue to take speculative punts on such “must-have” titles (ahem) as “Glasgow In The Age of the Tram” but ideally what I want to do is find 9 other titles that are as rock solid as “The Road To Reality”.[/FONT]

The Long Firm - TV series better than the book?

, , , ...

It’s unusual for the book to be inferior to the film or TV adaptation, but in the case of The Long Firm, the BBC version of this everyday story of bent East End gangsters in the latter half of the twentieth century is more enjoyable, largely thanks to an excellent performance by Mark Strong as the central character, Harry Starks.

The book almost reads as an historical narrative, with much emphasis on describing the period (formica topped tables in Italian caffs, pill popping mods turning into stoned hippies) and slotting in real or thinly disguised characters from the period. So, the Krays get a name-check, of course, as do Jack the Hat, Barbara Windsor, Tom Driberg, Joe Meek, Johnny Ray, Judy Garland and Diana Dors, whilst in the thinly disguised category we have "Gerald Wilman", a camp comedian, famous for his funny voices on the radio, and "Lord Thursby", a homosexual peer of the realm whose liking for a bit of rough got him mixed up with East End gangsters. Somewhere in between a storyline is slotted in, involving protection rackets, pornography, murders of handsome young men at homosexual orgies. West End night-clubs and the overlap between gangster culture and a certain type of B-list celebrity.

Despite all the effort put in by author Jake Arnott to properly evoke the era he can't compete with the BBC show's masterful reproduction of the sometimes less than swinging sixties ("It was swinging, but it was also dodgy"), helped by excellent portrayals of Johnnie Ray (Tim Flavin) and Judy Garland (Tracie Bennett) but mostly by top notch performances from Mark Strong, Derek Jacobi and Lena Headley, all of whom breathe life into the sometimes tired dialogue. Strong plays the central character, Harry Starks, around whom the story revolves. He's working class, queer ("I'm not gay, I'm a homo"), ambitious, ruthless but intelligent, and his only weakness seems to be a predilection for showbiz drama queens. Starks has a real flair for torture and this menacing aspect is made all the more threatening by the way Mark Strong underplays it; as Oliver Reed always used to say, a whispering hard man is more frightening than a bellowing one.

Jacobi plays Lord Thursby, a Tory peer who is clearly meant to be Lord Boothby. Though playing weak, effete but influential people is probably not a stretch for Jacobi, he does the snivelling upper class poofter role with all the elan you would expect, alternating between getting on his high horse and falling off it in spectacular style. If anything, however, he was outshone by Lena Headley, who plays a faded starlet (Ruby Ryder) destined to always play second string to Diana Dors or Barbara Windsor. Shunned by the British film industry after her cat burglar husband gets banged up inside, she ends up acting as choreographer for the show-girls in Harry Starks's dodgy West End night club. Characters unable to escape their doom make for great drama (well, it worked for the Greeks) and Ryder screws up big time in falling for Harry Starks's "bum boy". To be fair to Jake Arnott, this episode is well handled in his book too - he seems to handle the gay scene ... er ... scenes more adroitly than the gangster ones.

Meanwhile, the less said about Phil Daniels's portrayal of Jack the Hat, the better. Not because it is particularly bad, but because it is Phil Daniels playing the role of Phil Daniels. Did this actor ever have a chance of developing into as powerful a screen presence as his contemporary, Ray Winstone? Probably not, but it still seems to me that his career has been a bit of a waste.

For me, the TV adaptation lost its way a bit when it moved into the seventies. By this stage of the story, Starks has received a 20-year sentence for his misdemeanours, and has been adopted by a long-haired bearded weirdo sociologist, who visits him and other top-security villains in prison in an effort to demonstrate to the prisoners that they are not necessarily "villains", just "deviants" - people who operate outside of society's norms. The sociologist in the TV series comes across as the sort of character who might get a passing 2 minute send-up in an episode of Reggie Perrin, and I felt the whole "seventies sociology theories were crackpot nonsense" schtick was too soft and obvious a target. In the book, the character is more deeply developed. He believes himself to be a radical, a dope smoking rebel with a mission to overthrow the establishment. Yet, at the same time, he is completely mystified by his (female) partner's increasing conversion to feminism - he just doesn't get the whole "male oppression" thing - and ultimately is completely undone, first by his partner's seduction of the female student he had been having an affair with and then, ultimately, by Starks's development as a far more original and creative sociology theorist.

Both the book and the TV series end on a slightly subdued note, which I actually liked, but some people might hanker for the big finale. Not all crime thrillers can end up with 6 people all pointing guns at each other; some, like "I Was A Fugitive From A Chain Gang" benefit from an open-ended outcome, and that is the sort of (non-)ending you get in this story. Of course, that could just be a cynical ploy to bring Harry Starks back as a character if he proves to be roaring success. I'm currently reading the next book in the series, so I'll let you know.

Bottom line: Hmm, perhaps I should not have used the "bottom line" phrase when describing this book, though it does remind me of one joke from the book, supposedly from the mouth of Kenneth Williams - I mean "Gerald Wilman": a man is caught in a hotel room performing an indecent act on a bell-boy. "I thought you were going to turn over a new leaf" says his accuser. "I will do, just as soon as I get to the bottom of this page."

Where was I? Oh, yes. Is the book worth reading? Is the DVD worth renting? If you enjoy seedy, low rent thrillers set in England, then "Yes" to both. I was a quarter of the way through the book before I saw the TV series (repeated on the Drama channel on cable TV) and it in no way spoiled the book. As hinted at above, it's not what happens that is the appeal of this story so much as the atmosphere in which it took place.

Just start writing

The hardest part of writing is getting paid for it, but other than that, the hardest part of the process of writing is starting. The best thing to do is to just start bashing away (ooh err!) and see where the muse takes you. If necessary, you can always go back and edit it. Can you do that on a blog? I have no idea.

So, here it is. My blog. Not done because I felt a burning desire to do one but because, well, most of my friends have started one and, you know, I saw this option on Opera's home page and thought, "It's fate, mate; you know you won't be able to resist it!"

It's well over 20 years since I started a postal gaming fanzine with my good friend Kevin Warne and for nigh on fifteen years that was an outlet for my opinions and attempts at humorous comment. I don't think this blog will see me putting as much effort into entertaining as I did in the zine (which was called Take That You Fiend! - just in case Google's web-spider is visiting), but the main aim is to occasionally write something that people feel annoyed about enough to comment on. Like my choice of font colour at the head of this entry.

I have no idea who is going to end up reading this, but I strongly suspect it will consist almost entirely of people with whom I communicate frequently anyway, which is the so called South London Mafia. I should explain to outsiders that members of this group aren't actually in the Mafia and, these days, very few of them are in south London. Well, one does have certain standards, and who in their right mind would openly admit to living in south London?

Anyway, whoever you are, I hope you enjoy what you are reading and pop back occasionally. As New Labour had it only two elections back, "things can only get better" - and we all know how that turned out, don't we?


- JoHn
May 2013
S M T W T F S
April 2013June 2013
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31