My Opera is closing 3rd of March

Flaccid Penguin - Security Industry Watchdog

A place to get and give info about the Security Industry

Aegis Iraq

, , , , ,

The Sandline Affair... Why Does Aegis continue to win US contracts?

Aegis Defense Services is a company partly owned by former British Army LTC Tim Spicer. LTC Spicer managed a company called Sandline International in the 1990s. Sandline International was involved in conflicts in Papua New Guinea in 1997 causing the Sandline affair. Sandline ceased all operations on 16 April 2004. It has been rumored that some, if not most of Sandline's personnel, are now part of Aegis Defense Services company.

Why does a company that has strong ties to Sandline continue to win US security contracts? If you guys don't know what the Sandline Affair was, follow the link in the previous paragraph to find out.

I worked side by side with Aegis when I was in the box. The guys that they hired were pretty squared away and I was outside the wire with their teams more than once. No issues with the Aegis operators.

What concerns me is the WHY? Why does Aegis continue to win contracts? There are a number of solid American companies that went after the large contract that Aegis won in 2007.

Why were the American companies passed over for a British company that has strong ties (if not the same company by a different name)to Sandline International. A company that assisted in the overtthrow of a government.

Am guessing that there were some health kick backs for that contract award.

Also wonder why the press let that one slide as well.

Let me know what you guys think and know.

Flaccid P

Custer Battles / What's Their Status?ISA and Storm Relief Efforts

Comments

Unregistered user Thursday, October 30, 2008 3:03:00 PM

Anonymous writes: I don't think Sandline and Exec. Outcomes were that bad. They were hired for a greater good and were effective. Yes, a government was overthrown--a corrupt one. As far as I know, all the big US agencies have hired US companies. Who awarded Aegis a contract? But, it is a good question to raise. You have to look at it from a hiring standpoint. What's the cost? Are the US companies stretched thin right now? Can you meet my demands immediately? Do I want seasoned guys with years of experience (British SOF backgrounds), or Army and Marine PFCs who did 3 or 4 years and got out to go try to be cool (SOCSMG)? I'm not arguing for or against, just posing thought. There are top tier US companies, but there are good British ones, too. I've been doing this for a while, and I think the next couple of years might be a little tight. We may see more British companies taking over, or a slump in the industry altogether. A few buddies of mine have worked for Brit companies, and had no troubles. Who knows...

Unregistered user Thursday, October 30, 2008 3:38:41 PM

Anonymous writes: You are right, things will be getting tight. The contract they won was the USACE RSS (Corps of Engineers Reconstruction Support Services) contract. You are right that the bottom line is the key descriminator right now. If you've been in this for a while, you know that to work the same job we would have in 04 we would have to take about 1/3 less money. Thanks for the input and for your take on it.:pingu: Flaccid Penguin

Unregistered user Sunday, November 2, 2008 7:49:26 PM

Anonymous writes: Bottom line is money. Although they can undercut most US contractors...they are using substandard or lesser trained foriegn nationals that will do the work for less than half than what we used to make. It's a different ballgame now. Talk about outsourcing!

Write a comment

New comments have been disabled for this post.

February 2014
M T W T F S S
January 2014March 2014
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28