My Opera is closing 3rd of March

..out of the dark

2007, August. José Padilla is declared guilty on terror- charges.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/08/16/padilla.verdict/index.html

...and the US, first through Congress, and then through the US justice system, acknowledges the view of the Bush- administration (and their supporters), that the law is a political prop. Where real people may be sentenced to prison, death, torture, or otherwise simply be vanished beyond the justice system, in order to sustain the political "reality" one imagines must be real.

The implications for american citizens are very present, though. This proves that even if you are an american citizen, as Padilla is, you may still be removed from the ordinary justice system, tortured for years, and then sentenced on the flimsiest evidence - that you are not allowed to see - in a secret court with literally token legal representation. It also proves that such a case brought before a judge in a court, will not - as has been thought - provoke a lengthy and difficult legal appeal that will eventually end up in a SC case that might challenge the very basis for the charge and the treatment in the first place. But will instead simply be passed on and tested on the individual legal merits, of the laws that have now been passed by Congress. And that was also not tested in a court, until now.


Glenn Greenwald has an appropriate comment here.

Just let me add that I am now proven right - it is simply not the case that no one could see this coming. It is the case that those in position to do something when it actually mattered, chose to believe in their own little stories about how "things would work out". While, at every point, arguing that the actual practical impact - people being tortured, people's lives being ruined, millions dead - was probably necessary. After all - once cannot do something that monumental, unless it is gravely important to do it. Of course.

Well - so what was it this time? Was it gravely necessary to treat Padilla in the way he has been treated for the last couple of years? Was there an enormously grave threat behind the "dirty bomber"'s nefarious plots, so that when he is now declared guilty of "conspiracy to support Islamic terrorism overseas", he certainly had to have been doing something wrong? Because of the gravity of the charge?

On second thought - why do I even have to ask..

Rove resigns his position as....On foreign policy orthodoxies....

Comments

Unregistered user Monday, August 20, 2007 1:05:26 AM

Ivan A. D'Mocracy writes: I agree. Although not an American nor living in that country (but visit frequently), I am terribly concerned about the state of their constitution. I have always admired that document as one of the world's very best - truly the epitome of the age of enlightenment.</p> Alas, I fear with the loss of habeas corpus was only the beginning of the myriad of other rights they have already, or soon will have foolishly given up. Its like a state of dis-belief! I am virtually in a state pre-mourning for Americans. Hopefully there is still time for saner heads to prevail — but alas I do not see optimistic signposts ahead.

fleinn Tuesday, August 21, 2007 11:39:31 AM

Well, what prevents the ideas we think it represents from surviving? It's not going to go away just because the US is a collection of phony fuckers of all kinds that happen to have the political self- awareness and control similar to that of incontinent puppies.

Write a comment

New comments have been disabled for this post.