Skip navigation.

..out of the dark

This kind of thing shouldn't have to be said in a democracy...

, ,

...but well done anyway, Mr. Greenwald.

http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/11/11/lieberman/index.html

...closing Guantanamo, ending torture and rendition, restoring habeas corpus, rejuvenating surveillance oversight, withdrawing from Iraq, applying the rule of law to political leaders past and present -- but it's at least as important that this be accomplished in the right way, that our constitutional framework be restored. That means restricting the President's role to what the Constitution prescribes and having Congress fulfill its assigned duties and perform its core functions.



Let's see how long it takes before someone starts harassing Greenwald for prejudging Obama's skill as emperor.

Please...

"..said one foreign policy expert close to the process....Obviously, there is no way from the outside that you can know all of what's happening on the inside."
(...)
"The first phase is to engage with people inside the administration to get their version of what's happening," he said. "They've been dealing with it for the last eight years."


Behold - the rebirth of critical journalism in the United States.

...sweet mother of.. :yuck: :faint:

Post- election coverage

, ,

"Biden Sees Vice President's Role as 'Adviser in Chief,' Aides Say"
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/05/AR2008110500107.html

"There will be cc's and not bcc's," said Antony Blinken, a top Biden adviser, referring to the practice in the current administration in which Cheney aides receive e-mails on key matters, but without other recipients knowing the vice president's staff is involved. "There is not going to be a shadow operation."

Biden aides said the senator from Delaware does not intend to take on a defining issue, as Al Gore sought to do with his "reinventing government" initiative, which aimed to improve the efficiency of the federal bureaucracy. Biden's team says such a project distracts from a vice president's ability to serve as a general adviser to the president.

Instead, they said, he is likely to take on special projects. They cited as an example Gore's work in the Clinton administration in helping negotiate an agreement with the Russian government to stop it from selling weapons to Iran.





"The single worst expression in American politics"
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/11/02/biden/index.html

[Joe Biden:]After next Tuesday, the very critics he has now and the rest of America will be calling him something else - they will be calling him the 44th president of the United States of America, our commander in chief Barack Obama!




"Obama Modifies 'Yes We Can' Message To Exclude Area Loser"
http://www.theonion.com/content/news/obama_modifies_yes_we_can_message

'Yes We Can, Except Nate Walsh,' Obama Says




"I Have a Dream"
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2008/11/martin-luther-king-jr.html

But there is something that I must say to my people, who stand on the warm threshold which leads into the palace of justice: In the process of gaining our rightful place, we must not be guilty of wrongful deeds. Let us not seek to satisfy our thirst for freedom by drinking from the cup of bitterness and hatred. We must forever conduct our struggle on the high plane of dignity and discipline. We must not allow our creative protest to degenerate into physical violence. Again and again, we must rise to the majestic heights of meeting physical force with soul force.


(read: Digby's on the fifteenth bout of Martinis, and has too many tears in her eyes to write.)


"Asian stocks up on Obama victory"
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7710106.stm

Asian stocks have risen following the election of Democrat Senator Barack Obama as the next US president.
(in- line text: "There are hopes the US will bounce back, helping exporting firms").
(...)
However, not all markets rose. India's Sensex index fell 2.8%, and in Europe, where shares had risen strongly on Tuesday, the markets were also down. Both the FTSE 100 in London and the Cac 40 index in Paris were down by about 3%.

/Change /

Shares in New York rose on Tuesday as people in the US went to the polls for the presidential election. The Dow Jones Industrial Average closed up 305.5 points at 9,625.3.

Doug Kass, founder and president of hedge fund Seabreeze Partners Management, said the Wall Street rally was an "Obama bounce, not an Obama rally".

"It's growing clear that the recession is going to have a shelf life unlike the last recessions in both scope and duration," he added.


(i.e., sigh of relief and creeping realisation that no more government- sponsored boosts will take place in the medium to long term. Similar scenarios should take place in the Middle- east as the Iraq mandate expires in December.)

"Afghanistan blir Obamas test for NATO"
(Afghanistan will be Obama's test for NATO)
http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/uriks/usavalg/article2749786.ece

Melby tror at Obama vil legge sterkt press på de andre NATO-landene om å bidra mer militært. Han spår at Norge vil bli bedt om å delta i alle typer operasjoner, med unntak av krigsoperasjoner i Sør-Afghanistan.
(Melby thinks Obama will put heavy pressure to get the other NATO- countries involved militarily. He predicts that Norway will be asked to commit troops to all types of operations (in Afghanistan) - with the exception of war- operations in South- Afghanistan.)

- Norge argumenterer for de kollektive institusjonenes betydning. Nå vil de samme argumentene bli brukt mot oss. Amerikanerne vil si at hvis man mener at NATO er viktig, må man vise solidaritet. Det kan ikke være slik at bare noen nasjoners soldater driver krig og dør, sier Melby.
(- Norway argues for the significance of the collective institutions. Now the same arguments will be used against us. The Americans will say that if you think NATO is important, you must show solidarity. It won't do if only the soliders of some nations go to war and die, says Melby.)

For norske politikere tror han det vil bli «tyngre å si nei» til Obama enn til Bush.
(Melby thinks it will be "heavier to say no" to Obama than Bush)



Personally, "I think" it will be easier for everyone to tell the US to go fuck themselves, for the simple reason that we did not - and do still not - oppose the Iraq or Afghanistan projects in their current forms just because it was led by Bush. There are other reasons having to do with the fact that NATO will not be a substitution for the UN, and we will not endorse an expansion of NATO in either military or economical terms.

So the next big question will be what eventually will replace US damage control, as well as floundering european attempts to turn the EU into a military union.

Some would hope that the result is a more cautious direction based on inclusion, and not an expansion of influence - but who knows..

Anyway. Congrats, the US. You still suck, but at least some of you aren't proud of it. I salute you.

Much can be said..

..about religion in politics, but sometimes the problem is more subtle than first thought. It is, for example, easy to document how some turn their childhood beliefs into more mature political rhetoric when they grow up. But how does this happen? Is it simply a general idealistic belief that evolves into something more politically correct? Or is it a common theme through either belief? Is it actually possible to find the same dualism in the person's convictions, even though they change over time?

With thoughts like that, I listened to the local marxist- cadre's hero speak yesterday - and for some reason I couldn't find a way to avoid thinking the same afterwards. True - the financial crisis is real, and I agree that with the current mechanisms we insist on saying is good business in the world, we will inevitably face crises like these every couple of years. We have, and we will. There are a few particular beliefs you need to have as well when you think a plan- economy is the answer to the bad and destructive decisions "the market" has produced of late. So from the point of view that individuals are clever and smart, but people are idiots - it makes perfect logical sense to advocate a type of authoritarianism that abolishes the unaccountability that usually follows after an election where there are few real issues being voted on, etcetera. Does it also justify removing capitalism as the instrument for producing social mobility and opportunity for the individual? When you believe in that people are that trustworthy you can put your life in their hands, then sure.

What I can't seem to figure out is why the extremes here are so enticing. I have been in opposition all my life. If it was up to me, I would not choose democracy p: . But why remove the idea of human enterpise from the equation? Doing so is no better than suggesting everything will work out - if you only invade this country, or change that country into this.

But how appropriate - he's still less radical than the general consensus in Washington. Helped immensely by actual knowledge, rather than rhetoric without substance.

Political calculations in the new world

,

In the wake of the "sub-prime" financial "crisis", something strange appears to have happened with political discourse in the US.

Read more...

Circus in town

, ,

http://www.balloon-juice.com/?p=12509

For the record, I really do not care about Joe the Plumber’s background. All he did was ask a candidate for President a question, something I wish everyone got the chance to do at least once in their life.


Unfortunately, commenters on the former kool- aid divers' blog can't seem to get the point. Because Joe Schmoe appeals to some undocumentable quality in the American Psyche (read: he appeals to stupid idiots who can't think for themselves) - when accusing Obama of ruining small businesses in little America. And that means he's not just someone who receives loads of air- time and plugs from the McCain campaign - oh, no. That makes him a public persona, who is fair game when it comes to entirely legitimate personal character assassination. Which was completely and utterly not all right before when the Frosts (Democratic poster- family for subsidized health- care with predictable benefits for the insurance companies) received that same horrendous treatment from the Right.

In fact - comparing what happened to the Frosts - hiding in their yard and digging through their trash - is completely different from exposing mr. Joe Average as a /possible hypocrite/ and tax- evading scumbag without credibility. Because this time, it's an election, and so much is at stake; there's an election coming, you see. Where the fate of the entire world will be decided(!).. or something.

So just meeting the Joe Plumber reasoning with - you know, facts and stuff. Explaining that increasing the tax- burden on the big businesses and higher earners will first of all not affect the smaller businesses (like, sub a small African country budget smaller). And that increasing the tax burden, as well as creating a progressive tax- system - is Obama's clever trick for magically financing a more broadly available health- service (read: a subsidized insurance plan. And thus releasing small businesses from part of the cost of employing people).

I mean, can't be having with that either. Because... people are too stupid to get it. Ha.. ha. *sigh*

John Cleese on Sarah Palin

The hordes in foreign lands fighting to abolish your right to assemble and speak freely.

,

http://www.wjno.com/cc-common/news/sections/newsarticle.html?feed=244038&article=4363230

"Bless your heart sir, my son is in Iraq fighting for your right to protest."

This is Sara Palin, speaking at a Right- wing Rally in Estero, Florida.

You might think that the Gop- campaign is gauging their audience carefully, and stoking the barely contained rage in this part of the state directed at Cuba - but you're wrong. This is what the Right is all about. And nowehere in the audience is anyone saying, I don't know.. "you're a fraud, Mrs. Palin! You're fighting to abolish my right to free speech right here in the US, in the name of open- ended, undeclared wars launched at random presidential whims. Your government is the most secretive in history, it actively opposes clear laws governing spying and wiretapping, even of American citizens - while purporting to protect the American public! You're a cheat and a fraud, Mrs. Palin! And.. mmmmffff.. Secret Service piggies..aaarrrh!".

Oh, no. Can't be having with any of that.

Really - when did the US turn into a pack of cowed wimps?

War and so on..

For some reason, I'm always shocked when people say things like: "but war is the crucible where real courage is forged", and "who but the valiant in battle can claim the mantle of".. and shit like that.

It's not that I don't see the fact that fighting for something resolutely will not yield results, of course. I've also had a volley of machinegun- fire flying about 30cm over my head - not in a war- zone - but you still think in a different way about how things work afterwards. Perhaps in the sense that you know your own strenght, but realise you're not immortal. And can disappear without a trace just like that, no matter what your ideals are.

Because people who argue for war as an existential force for good, and liberty, and democracy - they're not the ones who have to die for no reason. Neither do they care that people die - indeed, it is only a problem to not see how noble the sacrifice is, and how that sacrifice should be repeated over and over. (Until it's necessary to stay in a war in order to justify the losses so far - and not sully the names of the brave fighters).

People who argue like that, who cheer on war as entertainment, should not have a viewpoint that's worth any debate.

Because trust me on this one - we have more than enough problems already with those who geniunely have a good reason to fight.

Read more...

Here it comes.

,

"Finally", the McCain campaign will no doubt announce soon, "Bush has betrayed the conservative creed.

Invading a country at random - yeah, well they all did that. Raising the deficit beyond the reasonably imaginable to pay for a trickle down scheme that never works - a proud conservative tradition. Bush just did it better, and more heroic, than anyone else. Coming close to blowing up the world - well, you can't have the dramatic finish for /every/ presidency, now can you.

But now... Bailing out the private sector by guaranteeing the money the banks have lent out to people who can't pay (either because of increased interest, or overeager salesmen).. Now that's a difficult one.

First, it's a choice between seeing it as rewarding businesses for not earning money. Or, seeing it as getting the banks back their money by "democratically" levvying the population, in the biggest socialistic insanity on the entire planet.

Or you can see it as a way for Bush to desperately avoid taking the immediate hit politically from his own fiscal policies in the short- term. And so using tax- money to salvage himself from a political crisis.

But - finally, you can see the bailout- plan as necessary for that the US isn't supposed to tank completely - in other words, Bush failed(in the only way that matters in Opposite- world: he had to fix something.

Indeed, the McCain camp finally sees the opportunity to create a new narrative for for McCain: he's going to raise the Republican values that Bush has now failed..slightly.. In a well- meaning, yet catastrophic way.

So right after the three minute silence in respect of the one that passed away this week (or Time- Out, as the campaign called it), expect some truly fantastic idiocy to show up. Personally, I can't wait.