Skip navigation.

fotoLibrarian

fotoLibra, fonts, follies and other stuff not beginning with F.O.

Posts tagged with "Photoshop"

Adobe Photoshop strips metadata

, , , ...

After asking Adobe why their new CS3 software strips the metadata from images, I've now got two responses from the software giant. My main question, "Why does APCS3 strip metadata?" was answered yesterday afternoon, ten days after I posted the question (they claim they respond within 24 working hours). Here's the reply:

You reference to your issue, this is a 'feature request', not an issue with the software, can I check that the software that you have purchased from Adobe works as designed, if you enter metadata in the Bridge for an image, is is retained when viewing inside of Photoshop?



My first reaction is that this is the corporate equivalent of sticking fingers in both ears and going 'LA-LA-LA-LA' when someone tells you something you don't want to know.

So my 'feature request' (they kindly provided a URL ending in 'Wish List'!) would be on the lines of 'Wouldn't it be great if Photoshop CS3 DIDN'T strip all the metadata from images?'

This is not a desirable feature. It is a mistake in the software.

You have to smile at the corporate mentality which is so convinced of its own perfection that it is incapable of acknowledging that it may possibly have made an error. There were a couple of small boys at school like that; I know they sincerely and genuinely believed they were perfect, and any failure or mistake on their part was met with tears of impotent and baffled rage. They're probably running Adobe now.

I'm reminded of a description I read of Leo Stein, Gertrude's elder brother:

"There seemed to be something in him which took it for granted that anything said by anybody except himself needed immediate denial or at least substantial modification."



The other reply to my more facetious question about 'Why is CS3 Design Premium $1,799 in the USA and $2,858 in the UK?' was, in full, from Adobe:

Taxes, US Paid-For Support, etc.



The prices I quoted were pre-tax from the Adobe Online Stores in the US and the UK. The answer isn't really satisfactory.

I don't choose to be a cynic, but that dismissive "Taxes, US Paid-For Support, etc." is enough to convert even Pollyanna into an embittered (and impoverished) old misanthrope.

And here I am.

BIG bug in Adobe Photoshop

, , , ...

As a picture library / stock agency it's vital for us to protect our members' copyrights. At fotoLibra our members add their captions and keywords, and we copyright the images in their names, adding the Copyright Status, Notice and Info URL.

All this metadata is neatly stripped out for anyone who uses Adobe Photoshop Creative Suite 3. Adobe Support charges us £30 if we want to speak to them (the CS3 suite costs a mere $3,200 in the UK) and meanwhile unscrupulous people can get hold of images with no clue as to their origin.

How do we get Adobe to listen to us? How do we contact them? How soon can they fix this bug? Sure, WE can use workarounds, but we have no idea what software our customers are using. And we are getting complaints from both our members and our customers that we're selling images with no metadata attached.

Of course we're not, but it's hard for them to believe it's the fault of giant Adobe rather than tiny fotoLibra.

But I do believe it is.

More Metadata and Submission Guidelines

, , , ...

OK, sorry about yesterday. There was more work needed on the Submission Guidelines than we forecast, but they've now been revised and the new version is online and ready for you to download. You can get it from http://www.fotolibra.com/about/metadata.php along with downloads of the BAPLA / Pic4Press panel and the BAPLA Digital Guidelines.

It's worth reading the Metadata page before you upload images to fotoLibra. It's full of good advice.

I know. I wrote it!

BAPLA / Pic4Press Metadata Panel

, , , ...

At last it's been released. Of course this means we now have to rewrite the Submission Guidelines which we only posted on the site last week. Still, we moaned about the pace of change in the document itself.

I'll put it up on the fotoLibra site and post a link to it from this blog tomorrow. It only works in Photoshop 8 and above, but we are working on a cunning plan to allow you to adapt and correct your metadata live on the fotoLibra site.

More information tomorrow!

Metadata Part Four

, , , ...

I cannot emphasise enough how important metadata is. Without accurate and accessible metadata, picture sales become a mere lottery. No matter how good your picture, if the buyers can’t find it they won’t buy it. It is that simple.

And despite the (deliberately, I suspect) complex terminology, it’s basically quite easy to deal with.

Metadata really just means an extended description. It is a set of data that describes other data, in fotoLibra’s case an image. All our images are digitised, so the image becomes a digital object. In order to give it a value and to market it, this digital object needs to be identified and described. Without the proper metadata, it is valueless. The label has fallen off the print.

We need to know what the picture is of, how big it will print, who owns it, where it can be bought, what rights are available and so on. If the image is born digital (taken originally on a digital camera) then the camera software will input shooting data such as the exposure, whether the flash fired or not, the date and time of photograph and loads more. Rather scary really, but we don’t have much of an alternative. They already know everything else we do, and now they know I prefer wide apertures.

We are going to make it as easy as possible for fotoLibra members to supply metadata for their images. As soon as the BAPLA/Pic4Press XMP panel guidelines are established, we will make the panel available as a download from our site.

Until then, please caption and keyword your images using the Description panel in Photoshop which maps to the correct IPTC data. When you upload to fotoLibra using FTP or drag and drop, the metadata is retained and used to describe the image.




Ten top tips on how to maximise your money-making potential with fotoLibra

, , , ...

I don’t enjoy being dictatorial, and the founding concept of fotoLibra is that’s it’s the first Open Access picture library / stock agency — we can all upload what we want. But if you want to help your pictures to sell, there are certain basic rules to follow. And here they are.

1. Only upload your very, very best pictures.
Eleven blurred pictures of a ¾ side view of a G-list celebrity merely fills up your storage space and does not benefit you or us.
2. Become massively proficient in a few subjects.
If you excel in portraiture, then upload portraits. If you love trees, then photograph them in every season and condition. Always give the Linnean names as well as the common name. If your passion is architecture, either use a rising front or become a Photoshop expert. Choose a subject you love and let your love shine through.
3. Always respond to Picture Calls when you can.
If you live in Oslo and someone needs a picture of the Lehmann Brothers building in Mumbai, you may not be able to help — unless you have a library shot which you haven’t yet uploaded. And if they say Mumbai, they mean Mumbai — they will not want the Lehmann Brothers building in New York City or anywhere else.
4. Follow the Picture Call instructions to the letter.
If Jacqui asks for 24MB portrait images, she won’t even look at 12MB landscape images. You will be wasting your time, not hers.
5. Always leave yourself enough room in your space allocation to respond to Picture Calls.
Full members get three gigabytes, a huge amount of storage space. Don’t fill it up as quickly as you can.
6. Delete all those pictures which don’t get past item (1), which will then allow you to do (3).
It’s a good idea to prune your pictures regularly, to sift through and delete duplicates, the ones uploaded on their sides, the ones that don’t meet up with your rigorous quality standards. You’re getting better all the time, so make sure your pictures reflect this.
7. The caption must describe the picture.
That’s what a caption is for, an unemotional flat description of what the picture is about. Be as clinical and precise as you can. You only have 36 characters in which to do it.
8. Don’t make puns or jokes in captions.
The caption is a tool to help buyers find your picture. They do not search by punch lines. If you cannot resist it, place your joke among the keywords.
9. Use the TypoChecker.
Even my lean, tanned fingers sometimes mistakenly hit the next key. fotoLibra’s Typochecker picks up inadvertent as well as advertent mistakes.
10. Make absolutely certain your keywords are relevant and correctly spelled.
Don’t cut and paste synonyms from thesauruses. Mention the things that can clearly be seen in the picture. Describe moods and emotions, colours, places and times. And now go back to rule (1).

These comments apply principally to rights-managed images. Royalty-free pictures are subject to slightly different criteria. Another time, perhaps.

Alternatives to Photoshop

, , , ...

Adobe Photoshop is the king of all image editing software programs. It is indispensable.

Or is it? The problem is that it’s not cheap. In the USA it costs $649. I think it’s worth it. That’s £373 in British money.

But it doesn’t cost £373 in Britain. It costs £485. That’s 30% more expensive. That’s extortionate.

So if you want to hunt round for alternatives, here are some. Let me know if you hear of any others and I’ll add them to the list.

You could also tell me how to post a list in a blog without having to paste in a PNG which you'll have to drag and drop off the page to read.

Sloping seas

, , , ...

Of all the pro-am contrasts, one thing in particular differentiates the serious photographer from the enthusiastic amateur.

The full-on professional will spend more time working on the photograph after it’s been taken than before. Lots of pictures will have been taken, the great majority will have been discarded, and only the very best will make it through to public scrutiny.

For want of a better term I’ll call this post-processing. That covers a manifold of subjects but here I’m going to concentrate on two things: horizontals and verticals.

Walls usually rise vertically. Water surfaces are usually horizontally flat. So our pictures need to reflect those two states, unless you are striving for a particular effect.

By far the most difficult effect to achieve is the vertical wall, and I will cover that in a future blog. The reassurance is that it’s a lot easier to do now than it used to be.

The easiest to get is the level horizon. There can be no excuse for not getting your horizons level. Look through all your photographs which have visible horizons – seascapes, those dreaded sunset pictures and so on. Is the horizon at 90 degrees to the side of the picture? If it’s at 88 or 91 degrees you may think that’s close enough, but you’d be wrong. Only 90 degrees is close enough. No musician can get away by always playing off key. Even a demi-hemi-semitone off is excruciating to many ears, and a guarantee of a short career.

OK, so you’ve spotted a barely perceptible tilt. Now look carefully at your other photographs. You know what? I will guarantee that you will find the same angle of tilt in all of them.

It’s natural. We lean. Our eyes may tell us we’re vertical, we’re right as a Ribstone Pippin, but they lie.

Accept it, because you can do something about it in post-processing. But first, there’s something you might be able to do about it in pre-processing. If you have a highly featured SLR, you might be able to change the focusing screen in your pentaprism – consult your manual. You can buy focusing screens with grid patterns engraved on them which makes lining up horizons and verticals a doddle.

Even better news is that virtually all digital SLRs have ‘on demand grid lines’ as a custom setting in the viewfinder, which you can turn on or off at will.

Yet even with these tricks of the trade many of my photos still have a perceptible lean, so out comes the trusty old Photoshop. There are other image editing programs, but if I tell you how to do it in Photoshop you’ll be able to find the equivalent feature in your preferred application.

Just go to View> Show> Grid. Click on it and a grid overlays your image. You then select the whole image and tug it about in Edit> Transform> Rotate to ensure that your levels are level.

You then have to crop the image, and in the process you will inevitably lose 10-15% of your image area. It’s worth it if the picture sells.

Alternatively, ensure you get the photo level from the start. I’m only trying to help!
December 2009
S M T W T F S
November 2009January 2010
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31