VickyFu's STranGer|丝娟集

Since Industry Revolution shakes the masses for technological immeasurable potence, all along scholars against techonology development has a fear that modern techonology is finally achieving a single-cultural world. Oppositely, from the obervation surround our living, modern techonology is making great efforts to meliorate the environment of national and regional cultures evolutions.In this essay, I will examine the reason to techonological support of the diverse culture.

Techonology is an unprecedented stragy to large the touch on national and regional cultures.Since the television has been invented, the chances for approaching alein arts and customs has became available and common, like Indian dancing, spaghetti, Chinese gongfu and so on. As we all known, the acquaintance for a kind of culture is the necessary precondition of the affecting passion for it. For any culture is alive on the human spirit, more people applaud the meaning of the culture, the stronger the live of the culture is.

As we have discussed, techonology is a carrier for the display of multi-culture, then we can see the techonology is trying to making new culture. we have to accept that the PC game is a new kind of culture which has many fans in the young. PC game, which is the production of the electronic technology, not only inherits the content of our old-aged myth, but also melts with modern dimensional paint art. This new fashion culture is very energetic because it is supported by many adults and children.

In conlusion, Techonology gives limitless space for multi-culture world, now all kinds of cultural forms can healthily grow in this melted world, all of them have chances to get acceptance for their charm form the culture traits. At least for a while, then, the threat of technology creating a “single world culture” seems very remote.

真是忘了前几天，在谁的blog上看到一个美国人和blog主谈论关于美国言论自由的问题。他大概的意思是美国政府一直控制媒体言论(和中国一样)，而随着互联网的发展后美国政府就有些苍白无力了。他还举例说，新奥尔良的受飓风卡特里娜袭击时，美国政府的救助不力在当地人写的blogger上面完全赤裸。

之前，谭君久教授的课上，我还被那片自由的土地所信奉民主所感动。宪政（constitutionalism）是“因为在公民面前政府拥有暴力工具，政府的权利是应该受限制”，人身自由权利是先于政府产生的，政府产生的目的是为更好保护公民权利。

昨天的样子，美国国会一项“网上言论自由的议案”（the Online Freedom of Speech Act）没有通过，225对182的票数，通过需要三分之二的人支持。议案的内容是保护嫌疑犯在网络上自由的表达自己的权利。美国有成千上万个政治内容的blog，也有成千上万个人Views,一个互联网给了个廉价却有不错效果的表达的环境。但是现在政府要开始限制，主流媒体认为不受约束的媒体是危险的，显然blog这样个人媒体形式首当其冲。我很想知道这个议案的将来。more on the bill's background

“满桶水不晃,半桶水乱晃。”

让我想起来我们国家的金盾工程。