Skip navigation.

gnapse corner

web for everyone

Posts tagged with "firefox"

Ubuntu web page broken in Opera

, , , ...

Is it Opera's fault or the CSS styling of the Ubuntu web site is non-standard? Have you noted that the tabs at the top right are unaligned when seen in Opera, but are ok seen from IE and Firefox?

From Opera



From Firefox



Update (July 2)

A good fellow member of this community, whose blog is devoted to Opera and web pages compatibility with this browser, tells me that...

this is a known bug and described as "floated list item children of inline list child of an absolutely positioned element are not displayed on one line".

...it is even considered quite important (probably mainly because of it appearing on the Ubuntu website)

So it is unfortunately a bug in Opera, and not a bug in Ubuntu's web site coding. I hope this bug will get fixed soon.

Opera remains unique in out-of-the-box features

, , , ...

It is absolutely incredible, but I've always needed a feature from Opera related to tabbed browsing. Wait, I know you would like to know so I'll tell you through the following (common) scenario.

I start browsing in the morning. I am eager to know about what's going on out there in the world so I go and get some news about the topics I'm interested in. I open Google Reader (my aggregator of choice), Google News and Yahoo News. A rapid glimpse through the immense amount of hyperlinked headlines generates a myriad of middle clicks to open in background tabs whatever seems interesting. Before I'm actually aware of it, I have twenty to thirty tabs in a single Opera window. I don't know you, but I don't like more than a dozen tabs together. Too much clutter.

What if I could move some of the tabs to a second (or even a third) window? Well, I realized today that I've always assumed this wasn't possible. I always looked for an option in the contextual menu you get when you right-click a tab, and I didn't find any. Don't ask me why (and you may call me a fool) but I thought today, what if I create another Opera window and drag some tabs into its tab bar? Voila! Eureka!

I haven't seen this feature in any other browser. Firefox didn't even have the plain and simple drag-and-drop of tabs within a single window until the latest 1.5 release (It had and extension, though).

It is amazing how Opera manages to give so many little but useful features out of the box. It is these little things that make this little browser so great. What? You want to know some other cool stuff?

  • No need to restart to change the skin
  • Session management
  • The links and info panels
  • The [extensible and customizable] search panel
  • Custom panels
  • Full customizability of toolbars layout
  • The ability to recover tabs closed accidentally
  • The "Fit to window width" button
  • Small-screen rendering
  • Zoom (instead of just changing the text size)
  • The [magic] wand (there's just no other one like it)
  • Voice
  • Notes
  • Fast-forward and rewind.
  • You name it...
and if this is not enough, check out this wonderful collection of custom Opera buttons that are able to put any imaginable functionality just a click away.

Before I finish, I'd like to make a request. If you are familiar with any obscure and not-so-known ability of this mighty browser, and you happen to be reading this, please, let us all know about it.

A gap I wouldn't like Opera to get in

, , , ...

It's always sad when a web site explicitly states that it doesn't support a certain browser. Phrases like "this page is best viewed in Internet Explorer 5 or above" always annoy me a little. And now with all this Firefox hype, the same thing happens with this alternative web browser. Firefox fan-boys are now populating the web with "Best viewed in Firefox 1+" kind of pages. I guess this is an attempt to fight IE back, after all these years, but they're also hurting the rest of the browsers, and they're doing exactly what most of this advocates criticized.

I would love Opera becoming mainstream in the desktop browser market, but if this ever happens, I wouldn't like web sites developing pages that are "best viewed" in Opera. Browser choice should be something about browser features, speed, stability, security and the like. It shouldn't be a matter of compatibility with web sites. But anyway, there are so many things wrong in this world, that asking for some justice in browser-land is definitely not a priority.

Why all this rant? you may wonder. Well, I was intending to visit Gap Online, and I didn't find what I expected. Instead, this is what I got
The relevant part of the message literally says

We're sorry, but we do not support the version of the browser you are using.
Our site works best with the following browsers:

PC users
Internet Explorer 5.5 and above. Click here to download the latest browser.
Netscape 7 and above. Click here to download the latest browser.
Mozilla (including Firefox) 1.0 and above. Click here to download the latest browser.

Mac users
Netscape 7 and above. Click here to download the latest browser.
Mozilla (including Firefox) 1.0 and above. Click here to download the latest browser.
Safari 2.0.3* and above. Click here to update your browser.

And what did I do? I do have Firefox installed, and I have access to a Windows box where I could have used the brand old ever-buggy and platform-dependent Internet Explorer 6. But I didn't. I restrained myself from visiting this site.

Update
I reported this problem with Gap Online in the "Open the Web" forum.

Microsoft copying ideas again

, , , ...

Microsoft's Internet Explorer 7 will use Firefox's RSS icon to give users similar interfaces across browsers. It seems to me a good move, a signal of collaboration among the two antagonist teams (Mozilla and MSIE). But Microsoft has shown in the last 25 years or so that you can't trust them when they show themselves as good guys. Sorry Redmond, is nothing personal, is just what you've got through all these years.

By the way, talking about the icon itself. I never liked it, because it never meant to me anything visually similar to the concept of feeds and aggregated content. Someone in the comments expressed exactly the way I feel.

This icon, though - I never liked it in Mozilla. Every time I see it, I think "wireless". I _know_ what it's supposed to mean, but by now it's practically ingrained in my head that little waves means "wireless."

Plus, feeds aren't "broadcasted" anyway; as you know, they're client-pull.

Pretty please reconsider this decision...

December 2009
M T W T F S S
November 2009January 2010
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31