Skip navigation.

gnapse corner

web for everyone

Posts tagged with "opera community"

Cuban bloggers being blocked by Google?

, , , ...

Some friend of mine told me about a possible situation between Cuban blogs and Blogger, of which their authors were being banned access to view and update/modify their content.

I immediately decided to try and see if I was still able to access my old blog at blogger, which I maintained before continuing my personal blog in the web site of the Opera Web Browser, and you can see that I was able to update it as I wrote this bilingual post about the situation. Nevertheless this doesn't prove anything, since Google may have blocked some and not all Cuban blogs. I am not aware of any Cuban blogger in a situation similar to the one described above.

The DRY principle (or Don't Repeat Yourself)

, ,

I recall that some days ago I was searching for information about VLANs and I got a considerable amount of different pages open in Opera at the same time, all related to this subject. But then I had to stop working on it. I don't remember if I was at work and was time to leave home, or if I was already at home and had to stop for some other reason. The thing is that I saved the configuration of all open tabs in a browser session.

A few minutes ago I was ready to continue working on it, because I desperately need to set up some CISCO switches to work out some VLANs. Our network is rapidly growing and bringing some order into it is now more than a mere whim for us here in the IT department. But guess what: my sessions do not include the session on VLANs that I perfectly remember. The problem is that I have four Opera instances of my own. I work on two computers regularly: one at work and one at home, and to worsen the scenario, each with both Windows and Linux installed. It is to drive anyone crazy, believe me.

I've written before about the idea of storing Opera configuration files online, as part of the user's profiles in the Opera Community. These might include layout configuration (toolbar, menus, panels), user information (sessions, bookmarks, notes, contacts) and maybe wand, history or other pieces of sensitive data with the inevitable security and privacy concerns being appropriately addressed.

To this crazy quadruple setup you should add that I re-install Windows every six months at most, and every time I do this I have to work out my layout again, which is by the way very different from the default Opera layout (a single top toolbar, status bar on, panels on right, menu bar off, custom panels, custom search engines and more). Also, with the advent of the yet-to-come Opera 9, per-site configurations will become a real headache to maintain.

There's this principle in programming called the DRY principle: Don't Repeat Yourself. And I feel like I'm repeating myself every time I have to re-work my Opera environment to fit my needs again. The idea of integration between My Opera user profiles and the browser is not new and it's not mine, but it's great. What do you think?

A Rose in the harsh and arid Desert

,

Is great news to know that the Opera Community title of Member of the Week was recently awarded to Zenya, a very dear good friend of mine. My community experience has improved in the recent weeks, and this is partly because of her sincere comments and great feedback. It is a joy to have her in my friends list, and even more joy to be in her friends list.

Desert Rose, I wish you luck and keep up that great blog fresh as always. We're all delighted to have you in, and I wanted you to know. Thanks!

More about a web-based OS, web 2.0 and Opera

, , , ...

Less than a month ago I wrote about Opera integration with its own community site, so that it would be a great advantage for those of us members of the community. But I suspected nothing on how this idea can be scaled up to be related with the notion of an online operating system based on the browser and other "connected" applications. I was actually thinking small when I wrote that.

And this (rather outdated) post over here depicts a similar but scaled scenario, that would be great if Opera (the company) would dare to implement. The author talks about how he thinks an online (web-based) operating system might be, and I pretty much agree with him. Perhaps something like this is what Opera needs to become the real killer application that it should be. Opera is currently the best browser out there in terms of features, speed, accessibility, standards support, functionality, stability, security, etc. But it should be evident for most of us Opera supporters, that in the world of today, even all these is not enough. It doesn't generates the hype that could get this piece of software to the place it belongs to.

I have to admit though, that the most likely to develop something like this is Google and perhaps Yahoo. But Opera has to do something, because today is the aggregated value the one that matters the most, not the intrinsic real value. Take for instance the Google search engine. Google is not a search company anymore, they're more like an advertising company. The vision of "organizing the world's information" is just a facade. What does gtalk has to do with that? Now take Opera. The vision of being "the fastest browser on earth" is not enough. And the small (albeit loyal) user base that we are, will not maintain the company.

And going a little bit off topic now (but no so much). Today I've spent a little bit more time on the Internet than usual, perhaps because I've been out of it for most of the last two weeks, busy with the celebrations and all that. And I've been reading a lot of new things about the not-so-new concept of a web-based operating system. It seems that the arrival of the new year has awaken the dreams of many people claiming that, in spite of the exciting year that passed away, 2006 will be even more exiting in terms of web technologies, trends and all that. We are witnessing (live) the rebirth of a whole set of technologies with enormous social, cultural and political implications. The web is reshaping herself just in front of us.

Things like tagging, social software, folksonomy, standards, simple over complicated, small dedicated applications over one-app-fits-all-needs, feeds, communities, wisdom of the crowds, user-generated content, decentralization of web publishing, etc. All these and other stuff are becoming more and more an integral part of our daily experience and interaction with what started up being just a markup language.

Thoughts about browsers, ubiquity and Opera

, , , ...

Each day we spend more and more time on the web than doing anything else in our computers. We are increasingly preferring online applications than the traditional offline desktop-based ones. The most vivid examples are email clients, calendars and scheduling applications, newsfeeds aggregators, pictures and video managers, maps, and even online office suites and desktops. Some people have also talked about complete (or at least highly usable) web-based operating systems as a possibility in the future.

There are several reasons for all this. First, there are lots of free alternatives out there for many different kinds of applications. They are often more configurable and adaptable than their desktop counterparts (read theming, internationalization and localization, extendibility via plugins and open APIs). But perhaps the most important reason of all is the consistency and availability from a variety of differing systems and platforms. Some of these applications have also alternate but similar interfaces for mobile devices. This simple fact ensures that you see the same interface no matter where you are, if at work or at home, or if you are on someone else's computer, or in some Internet cafe while on your trip to Seychelles, or on that six-months stay on board the International Space Station orbiting the Earth.

But there is a single application that will hardly even have an online counterpart, not to mention a counterpart worth the switch. And that would be the web browser. The web browser is our permanent window to this immense zoo of blooming web desktops and applications. The web browser is the interface that doesn't travel with you as the rest of the set does. You could get to Seychelles and find out that they only have browsers X and Y, but they don't have Z, your browser of choice. Or you could find your self reinstalling a new box at home, and you have to go through all the process again. The process of fine-tuning your browser just the way you like it.

Opera already does a good job in this respect. Most of the configuration files inside the browser's profile folder are reusable. You can save them and restore them later on another computer, or give it away to other users. But I've had issues reusing Opera profile folders from Windows into a Linux user account, for example. It doesn't work out of the box. And even if it would, it will always imply an extra effort of backup and restore.

Imagine if Opera Community members could have their basic Opera customizations synchronized and stored online, as part of their user account in the community. This certainly doesn't solve all the problems of accessing the web from different places, but at least we could have a central configuration repository. And any changes you do to your interface (such as modifying your bookmarks or toolbars and menu layout), would be instantly available no matter where you start up Opera from.

Some other suggestions combined, such as developing a PortableOpera (as in PortableFirefox), could make this browser a real killer. Can you imagine your self with Opera installed in your USB flash memory stick (Linux, Windows and OSX could coexists), and authenticated against the Opera Community web site. The browser could also incorporate some of the community portal functionality, such as a built-in or plugin blog add-post interface and just about anything else you can imagine in terms of integration.

Rediscovering Yahoo!

, , , ...

Well, I had to prove myself that I was not becoming a blind Google advocate, so I decided to go and find out what Yahoo! could offer better than Google. It's been a long time since I've sticked to some Google services, and I thought that Yahoo! services should have improved too since then. As a result I have to say that I might change my web habits a little bit.

  • My Yahoo! - I don't like it. It lacks the dynamism that Google's Personalized Homepage offers. The layout options are too restrictive and the RSS reader is quite boring.
  • Yahoo! News - I have to admit this one impressed me so much I think I'm gonna keep it on top for a while. Google's been loosing space on their Google News portal. Since they introduced personalization, they've done wrong in a number of things, like storing settings in local cookies, instead of using Google Accounts. I hate to re-configure my news settings in every computer I sit on. One detail regarding usability on Yahoo! though: they should use more screen area, with no restrictive width for their content. This way they could lower the amount of vertical scrolling, by using two-columns layouts, for instance.
  • Yahoo! Mail - No way! Gmail is absolutely superior. Why? Because of conversation view, labeling instead of folders, AJAX, free POP access, storage space and perhaps more. I have to say that Yahoo! has a better contact/address-book manager.
  • Yahoo! Maps - Not as it is right now, but I heard something about an improved version. Meanwhile I'll stick to Google Maps.
  • I use both Yahoo! Messenger and Google Talk, as that depends on where your friends are. Unfortunately, there's no integration or standardization in this regard. But on the other hand, if someone tells me they use MSN Messenger, I tell them to get a Yahoo! account, or I offer invites for Gmail.
  • In terms of aggregators, Yahoo! doesn't seem to have anything relevant, so I keep Google Reader.
  • Google doesn't have a weather system, so I keep Yahoo! Weather.
  • For a personal web space, I like neither Blogger nor Yahoo 360, so I keep with this wonderful community.


What do you think? What are your favorite applications on the Web? Certainly Yahoo! has much more to offer in terms of quantity, but Google offers high quality too. By the way take a look at Google Base. I haven't grasped the concept quite well yet, but it seems to be appealing. Does Yahoo! have anything alike?

Link blog

, ,

I was thinking on the convenience of having a linkblog feature here at the community. Sometimes I want to post just to share a URL with others. This is exactly what a linkblog is. If you are a member of this community, and would like to vote for this feature, to say what you think, or to find out a little bit more about linkblogs, then visit this forum thread.

Want to see some linkblogs: Erik's, Jeremy Zawodny's.

Feel free with Opera

, , , ...


I was visiting the Opera homepage today, just a mere routine. And there it was:

Opera is free!!!
I cannot believe that I predicted this, and just a few days ago. You can see in the picture on the right the homepage that I saw today. I guess that eventually this page will get incorporated into their traditional homepage, so I wanted to take a snapshot of the event.


No ads.
Better browsing.
Opera removes ad banner and licensing fee.


Opera should stop being just a browser. They have this wonderful product, they have this splendid community, they have a portal, they have web search. If they just get all this a little bit farther, they might get positioned a little bit further. It is always nice for customers to see how competition fosters innovation. Today I see the birth of a new company getting into the realm of Yahoo!, AOL, MSN and Google. I don't know if in the end they are aiming at something like this but it'll be great if they do. And if this dream becomes true and they come anywhere near those big ones, note that Opera will be the only one from outside the US.

Definitely dropping Blogger

, , , ...

I think I will definitely move my blogger blog into this community, and stay. I wrote a few days ago, before making this decision, about the pros and cons of switching. I am also thinking about using Opera as my default web browser again.

I switched from Opera to Firefox almost a year ago, partly because of Gmail’s AJAXed interface, which didn’t work in Opera at the time. Also several modern services using some state-of-the-art non-standard technologies (AJAX mostly) work quite well in the Norwegian browser. Flickr, Yahoo! Instant Search, Google Personalized Homepage and Google News Customization are good examples of this.

Opera Community vs. Blogger

, , ,

I am seriously considering to switch definitely to this blog at the Opera Community web site, from my current blog at Blogger. Of course, finally being able to import that blog into this one plays a significant role in that potential desicion.

Some of the features that make this blog a better choice are

  • Integrated services besides the blog itself: photo albums, links section, about page. All these gives a greater sense of belonging to a real community.
  • That beautiful calendar on the right side of blog pages, with quick links to the days I've posted something.
  • The tagging system, which gives the opportunity to categorize posts within the blog. This makes it easier for visitors to find posts a particular subject.
  • The mechanism to include pictures and other files into my posts. Blogger has his won, but I like this one a lot more.
  • The possibility to post private posts, or restrict access to my friends. In Blogger all posts are public.
  • The naming convention for posts URLs is more convenient, because it does not depends on the post's name.
  • Pages are truly dinamyc. Blogger pages are created statically when new posts are created.

I should also highlight major Blogger features that are not available here. However, I am confident that some (if not all) of them will be added. We must remember that this new Opera Community is a young project with a future ahead.

  • Comments can be posted by any visitor, not just Blogger members. Here at Opera only the community members can comment on my posts. I understand this is to avoid comment spamming, but there are other ways.
  • The spell-checker within the post editor.
  • The preview and WYSIWYG editing mode in the post editor.
  • The Blogger for Word utility, that makes it possible to write posts within Microsoft Word and submitting directly to Blogger, without having to open the Web interface.
  • The ability to decide the date and time of a new post.

Also, being Blogger a part of Google, blogs over there are readily available on the new Google Blog Search. I would like to see my Opera blog also available over there. Blogging is a lot about being heard, and being indexed is certainly a part of it, mostly if it's Google's index we're talking about.
December 2009
M T W T F S S
November 2009January 2010
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31