Skip navigation.

gnapse corner

web for everyone

Posts tagged with "tech"

Back to the neighborhood

, , , ...

I know, I know, I've been lost for a looooooooooooong while now, yes. It's a little bit more than seven months since my last post. What prompted me to write here again? Mainly I re-visited the whole site after the new version came out, just a couple of days ago. (And now that we're at it, I still do not know what the new features are).

It's not that I've been so busy that I was unable to post. I did have some time to post every now and then, although I've been busy. I've been working on interesing personal development projects, full of bleeding-edge technologies like AJAX. I've also been enjoying my new computing environment sooooo much you just can't imagine.

I am still on Ubuntu Linux Dapper 6.06 full-time, and I can't feel better at it. It is stable, friendly and enjoyable to the point that I have a hard time whenever I have to use that other OS that almost everybody use. I am developing web applications on Linux using jEdit as my main IDE. Aptana, of which I talked about in my last post coincidentally, turned out to be too resource-hungry, even though I have a modern PC with 512Mb RAM and 3.0GHz CPU speed. I've been using Firefox as my testing and debugging platform (Sorry Opera, but Firebug has no equal when it comes to test and debug a web application using JavaScript and AJAX heavily).

Thunderbird is still also my choice when it comes to email. Opera still does not have WYSIWYG email editor and other minor but handy features that I need. Opera continues to be my day-to-day browser for my web surfing needs, and OpenOffice, Gimp, ImageMagick, Beagle, Liferea, Gaim, Gnome, Vim/Cream, MPlayer and MPD do the rest. I've been also using Ruby's and Python's scripting power to automate some tasks in my working environment.

I've also been vey busy following the socio-political events that have happened in Cuba, my country, in the recent months, almost all related in some way to the illness of the president Fidel Castro and the temporary transfer of power, and how this has impacted our society. I know some people get more interested in this blog because of my nationality than for my interests and the topics I write about. Feel free to ask.

Anyway, I'll see if I can make the time to talk here again every now and then, mainly about the technologies I am using and how they make my life easier.

Evolution for Windows

, , , ...

Well, the title makes it look like if the Windows operating system is evolving, and this is sort of it in a way. Windows has evolved a little bit now with Gnome's leading e-mail client Evolution being ported to this closed platform.

Yes, you heard it right. Evolution is now available on Windows thanks to somebody named Tor Lillqvist. So go and enjoy it. I believe Thunderbird will have to keep up, and Outlook (Express) too, of course. Do you think Evolution will be to the latter like Firefox has been to Internet Explorer? Only time can tell.

Vista slip commented from the inside

, ,

This is absolutely entertaining and I ought to share it here with you. Although it highly possible that you already got to it. I was reading this wonderful blog post by an insider about how disappointed and frustrated are Microsoft employees today because of the embarrassing delays in the (featureless and already delayed-several-times) upcoming Windows version: Vista.

Article apart, which you can go and read and I encourage you to do so, take a look at the first few dozens of comments. I will quote below some of my favorites. This is really so enlightening about the inner workings of lazy giant caught up in a bureaucratic disaster.

"The migration to Vista will be a passive one, as someone else previously mentioned; appearing on new computers bought by companies.

The same for home users; a lot of people do not know enough to figure out what hardware upgrades they need ; so again, it will appear on new computers."


Is this what Windows has become? An upgrade no one wants, forced upon them because the new hardware they're buying doesn't support anything less?

Compare this to OS X, where people fall all over themselves trying to get the newest version running on their old hardware because there's actual value in the new features.

So Vista has its guts ripped out, slips, and we wait another 5 years for a potentially insipring version of Windows, meanwhile Apple ships another 3 updates to OS X.

I hope to God Office 12 steps up and kicks some ass.


"We could and should have shipped sooner with 20% of the current feature set. Seriously, what makes people think that anyone cares about all of these other features beyond the bullet points that will sell the product"

EXACTLY... It's about time we face the fact that the OS is nothing more than a hosting platform for REAL apps. Just like IE is for cool websites. We don't need apps on there done by us...calc and notepad are it. Let someone else "skin" Windows, let someone else write the stupid solitaire and let's do the security, kernel and move on. You honestly think anyone sits there wondering at the marvel that is Windows Explorer? No, they go in long enough to open an app or a file. Who gives a f--k what the folders look like, stop pretending that is important and requires a date slip.


MS is a big company and its getting ever bigger. Computer and software industry have to be quick and adaptable otherwise the inner bureaucratic mechanism will destroy the machine from inside. The managers are sitting in their ebony towers and deny the fact that there is a problem.


And the winner is....

Today's announcement is of course no surprise to anyone inside MS. The only surprise is that it was such a short delay announced.

Basically we do not believe Vista will make January 2007 or even March 2007. Anyone with any access knows what a frankenstein's monster NT is on the inside. At some point there is a law of diminishing returns trying to do anything to it at all, it seems like that limit is being reached today. The release is pushed back because of bugs but fixing those bugs will create more bugs. It is just godawful to be honest. And the process gets in the way at every step.

At some point we will have to do something and i know at least some in my team privately agree with me. We will have to throw out everything and start again. This is what Apple did with OSX, and sure it was painful, but it worked and now they're kicking our asses. We should have done that in 2000. Now it is even more obvious we should do it. Start again and just run a compatibility layer on top. Apple did it with classic why can't we???

IF we manage to ship vista at ALL then it is a miracle and the absolute last rev we can possible do working like this. It is insane the manhours wasted rearranging a house of cards. We need to START AGAIN PEOPLE.

Gates bashing $100 laptops and praising his business

, , ,

No wonder Bill Gates slammed the $100 laptop MIT project backed by Google. Microsoft products are not likely to ever be part of these or future similar projects that aim at globalizing the computing experience in developing nations, because of their close nature and high costs, and this is no good news for the software giant and its chief software architect. He expressed that

hardware is only a small part of the cost of providing computing capabilities, and the big costs typically come from network connectivity, applications and support

Sure, if you use Microsoft products, you'll find yourself paying much more for software applications than for hardware. Nonetheless, I am curious about this project, because the articles referenced above mention a detail I wasn't aware of: these laptops won't have disks. And in this one I agree with Gates. How useful can be a computer with no disk?

Why to fight DRM

, , ,

I found these two excellent articles about Digital Rights Management (DRM) and why is necessary to fight against it.

The big DRM mistake
Learning to love big brother

Most people nowadays live unaware of the implications of all those restrictions that are imposed on us with respect to our rights over what we own. We live day by day without thinking "why am I not supposed to copy this or that?"

Back to the articles, I loved those quotations of George Orwell's book named "1984".

Google's censorship in China

, , ,

I like Google, and if you read this blog regularly, you could say that I am a fan of that company. It is even more than a company nowadays. It is for me, as for many other people in the world, another word for the verb search. I read that it was even being included in some dictionary because of its widespread use.

And I almost always talk about them favorably. But this censorship issue regarding their brand new Chinese version of their portal is no good. They even changed their censorship policy, after having that page unavailable for a while.

It is interesting how big companies are able to put down their policies and their clients in favor of their own interests. Because this is what Google has done. The Chinese market is a big one, and the revenues are going to be surely juicy. It is too much money to dump just for a few lines stating that

Google does not censor results for any search term. The order and content of our results are completely automated; we do not manipulate our search results by hand. We believe strongly in allowing the democracy of the web to determine the inclusion and ranking of sites in our search results.

It is no longer a broken link, but now the page reads

It is Google's policy not to censor search results. However, in response to local laws, regulations, or policies, we may do so. When we remove search results for these reasons, we display a notice on our search results pages.

I have to say that it is very well written though.

Why would I be disappointed?

, , ,

I was so glad when I read Jeremy Zawodny's personal opinion about all this DoJ vs. Google stuff. In spite of being a Yahoo! employee, he sincerely expresses his opinion on this matter, and he explicitely states that he's speaking for himself, and not on behalf of his employer. I like what he said and I mostly agree with it, as you could figure out by reading my original post about this issue.

Only one thing though: Why is he disappointed in the Government? People are disappointed when they get a response they didn't expect. I would have been disappointed if Google would have given all that information to the Justice Department, and I am disappointed because Yahoo and the others did. I would feel disappointed if my best friend stabs me in the back, but I would not feel that way if my worst enemy does.

So why would someone feel disappointed in the US government? Those kind of things are exactly what I always expect from them, so it's no surprise. No surprise at all.

Privacy rapists

, , , ...

Google is a threat because of the power they are obtaining, I have no doubt of that. It is true that all the information they have about their users can give them enough power to drive market trends through its advertising networks and search results, and who knows what more? But I ask, aren't Microsoft and Yahoo able to do the same thing that Google does? Don't they have comparable amounts of personal information that could be used for their own purposes too?

I am not saying that we should underestimate those privacy concerns, but is foolish to focus so much on Google, when the other two or three major players are not only amassing all these data, but they're also sharing it with the US government while Google is not.

Yes, in case you didn't know, the current US administration is requesting data from Google's search records during a week, and is already working with similar data from Yahoo! and Microsoft. Certainly the data they're currently requesting is not enough to tie it to individuals, but the request, if granted, would be a dangerous precedent for future attempts to invade privacy. And I fully support Google's determination on not to allow this to happen, while I am disappointed at Y and M. Privacy is something they all owe to their users, and if you fail to provide it you're taking a big risk.

Web n.0 ???

, ,

I wonder if they really mean it, or is just a catchy title to grab some attention so that people go and click on it on their aggregators. Here we have this article titled Web 4.0 which is nonsense to me. First, all those stories about Web 3.0, which was and still is a good analogy to refer to what comes next. But it ends just there. Web 3.0 is still referring to what comes next, because Web 2.0 is in its infancy. And today I see this Web 4.0 thing, which makes me think that people are trying to go too far ahead without having passed through all the way there.

It's not the article itself, is what it talks about. It turns out that the terms Web n.0 appear all over the web in a more or less decreasing order, according to Google's graphic shown. I wonder why would someone want to name or mention in their pages something like "Web 8.0".

Web vs. Desktop

, ,

I read sometime ago an interesting article about the differences between web and desktop interfaces, and is also interesting to note how the perspective on these matters change over time. The web is developing more and more everyday, mostly regarding what people call Web 2.0 (in spite of some arguing that this is not an appropriate term).

To go to the point and see what I mean, I'll quote the relevant fragment of article mentioned above. It is an amazingly prophetic article, taking into account that is more than two and a half years old already.

Computer applications, excluding games, fall into one of three baskets: information retrieval, database interaction, and content creation. History shows that the Web browser, or something like it, is the right way to do the first two. Which leaves content creation.

You see the reason that makes me think that these days are risky to go around doing assertions like the one above? Don't take me wrong, I am not criticizing the author of the article. The day he wrote that I didn't even dreamed of all the things I see today, and this guy was already aware of what was coming, more or less. What I want to say is that something like content creation on the web, which is almost a reality nowadays with services like Writely and similar, was not even on the horizon at the time. What will we be able to see on the horizon two years from now? I won't dare to be prophetic on this one.

Related links
Writely
gOffice
FCK Editor
ThinkFree Office Online
December 2009
M T W T F S S
November 2009January 2010
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31