Haavard

Mozilla Japan: Firefox 3 is two times faster than Opera 9.5?

Tuesday, 17. June 2008, 09:08:50

Mozilla Japan is apparently claiming that Firefox 3 is two times faster than Opera 9.5. Does that mean that I can claim that Opera is an infinitely smaller download than Firefox and get away with it?

Download.com: 5 stars for Opera 9.5Download numbers for 9.5 are in, and number of Opera users doubled in two years

Comments

NFGman # 17. June 2008, 09:31

What an odd thing to say. I wonder what obscure bit of performance they measured to justify that statement?

Indyan # 17. June 2008, 12:15

Ah. They have started soreadubg FUD once again.

Cyro # 17. June 2008, 16:48

Not necessarily. But yes, I do hope Opera gets a little bit faster in Javascript performance. This seems to be one of Opera 9.5 weak points (according to the media)

haavard # 17. June 2008, 18:32

Firefox is definitely not twice as fast as Opera at JavaScript. In fact, we beat them at their own performance tests a few weeks ago.

olli # 22. June 2008, 13:38

Tested Dromaeo in 10071 and against FF 3.0 and we were faster there.

3345.40ms (Total) vs
3695.20ms (Total)

Opera with: 16 tabs mail etc and Firefox 3 with one tab only..

lockoom # 23. June 2008, 06:49

Opera with dozen of pop3/imap accounts, multiple feeds, 5 tabs opened: 2213.00ms
Plain Fx 3 with one tab: 2108.40ms

Apparently, they are "better"

Anonymous # 1. July 2008, 15:01

Anonymous writes:

I guess tháts a perspective-thing...

Anonymous # 20. July 2008, 12:38

Anonymous writes:

i made a little test, and voila! Opera is faster than firefox 3. The website is www.heroeswm.com

grfgguvf # 20. August 2008, 21:22

GMail (Ajax; version 2) is much more responsive in Fx3 than in O9.5

Anonymous # 23. August 2008, 14:50

Anonymous writes:

@grfgguvf, what did you expect? Firefox is officially supported by Gmail (it's Google's main browser). Firefox is the first browser they support with their services -- ALWAYS. Opera support is an afterthought and without all the optimizations they are using specifically for Firefox.

In other words, Gmail is USELESS if you want to compare general performance. It isn't that Firefox is faster. It's that the Google engineers to everything they can to make Firefox work flawlessly with their services.

grfgguvf # 15. October 2008, 22:34

@Anonymous

You've been proved wrong, and anyway Google/GMail engineers always posted screenshots from Safari long before the release of WebKit-based "Chrome".

Anonymous # 16. October 2008, 08:41

Anonymous writes:

@grfgguvf

What on earth are you talking about?

"Proved wrong"? On what? The fact that Firefox is officially supported by Google, and Google's services optimized specifically for Firefox?

Moron.