Mississippi takes Microsoft to task for anti-competitive practices
Monday, 15. June 2009, 19:02:16
If they are still not convinced that there is something to the antitrust case in the EU, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer is reporting that Microsoft has been forced to pay $100 million in a settlement with the state of Mississippi because of anti-competitive practices:
Originally posted by seattlepi.com:
The lawsuit is the last and largest of those filed by 21 states in the wake of the 2000 federal decision that proclaimed Microsoft abused its monopoly power by bundling Internet Explorer and Windows.
I really don't understand how anyone can think that Microsoft is innocent. It is, quite simply, mind-boggling. Their explanation is that the EU either doesn't know its own laws, or they bring up the alleged conspiracy to pick on poor an innocent Microsoft.
How quickly some people forget about history.



Haruka aka Seremel # 15. June 2009, 19:07
fearphage # 15. June 2009, 19:17
zoquete # 15. June 2009, 19:19
QUOTE: "every windows user can freely chooze his browser, he does not have to use IE and if he uses IE, it is because IE is the best browser, all pages works in IE, but not in Opera for example".
OS = car
IE = driwing weel
haavard # 15. June 2009, 19:40
Corrected.
Gyrobo # 15. June 2009, 19:41
Indyan # 15. June 2009, 20:07
Originally posted by Haruka aka Seremel:
Yeah. Incredible. I came across this comment on another tech board :
"We are so deep in the !@#$ing economic crisis, and our only hope is to use the law as an excuse to get money from rich companies."
fearphage # 15. June 2009, 20:21
Originally posted by haavard:
Problem just popped into your head because it's such an awesome place.Chas4 # 15. June 2009, 21:37
qlue # 16. June 2009, 06:54
Fortunately, phone users are simply not satisfied with built in browsers. We want better so we look for it.
And then, when we do get a computer, we avoid Mickey$oft.