Google to open-source VP8?
Tuesday, April 13, 2010 10:24:28 AM
Google is on a roll!
Just the other day they decided to throw some money at Theora, and now rumours have it that they are planning to open-source the VP8 codec!
People were wondering what the acquisition of On2 would lead to, and the FSF even asked Google to "free VP8". As you may know, On2 the maker of the VP2 codec, which Theora is based on. If VP8 ends up as open-source and not encumbered by patents thanks to Google, only good can come from that.
I really hope the rumours are true, because the Web needs all the help it can get when battling closed, patent-encumbered technologies like H.264. HTML5 video should be based on free and open technologies, at least as a common baseline.
Google really does know how to shake up existing markets, that's for sure.
Just the other day they decided to throw some money at Theora, and now rumours have it that they are planning to open-source the VP8 codec!
People were wondering what the acquisition of On2 would lead to, and the FSF even asked Google to "free VP8". As you may know, On2 the maker of the VP2 codec, which Theora is based on. If VP8 ends up as open-source and not encumbered by patents thanks to Google, only good can come from that.
I really hope the rumours are true, because the Web needs all the help it can get when battling closed, patent-encumbered technologies like H.264. HTML5 video should be based on free and open technologies, at least as a common baseline.
Google really does know how to shake up existing markets, that's for sure.


sirnh1 # Tuesday, April 13, 2010 10:52:55 AM
I guess we'll have to wait and see. As long as it's not a patent minefield I'm OK with it...
ouzowtfouzoWTF # Tuesday, April 13, 2010 11:05:57 AM
Daniel HendrycksDanielHendrycks # Tuesday, April 13, 2010 11:51:33 AM
Originally posted by haavard:
VP3
Originally posted by haavard:
And royalty free.
I hope they'll give it to Xiph.
Originally posted by ouzoWTF:
... "If it is royalty free"
They would be good marketing. I think Opera should do it.
ouzowtfouzoWTF # Tuesday, April 13, 2010 1:17:24 PM
Originally posted by DanielHendrycks:
Yes, of course
netwolf # Tuesday, April 13, 2010 1:23:27 PM
Teoumbra-tenebris # Tuesday, April 13, 2010 1:46:45 PM
DillonAstrophizz # Tuesday, April 13, 2010 10:07:40 PM
Personally I hope they don't give it to Xiph exclusively (and that wouldn't be open source would it?) as they don't have much expertise on video codecs. Or at least if they did give it to Xiph I hope some more knowledgeable people (like Dark Shikari and Pengvado) would join the Xiph development team. Dark Shikari has even said that he would help develop Theora if the codebase wasn't such a mess. I doubt Google would give it up entirely, though; they'd probably just open development while maintaining ownership. They'd have their own versions while the community can make their own ala Chrome/Chromium (or h.264 reference encoder/x264 encoder for that matter).
Some commentary from Dark Shikari: http://x264dev.multimedia.cx/?p=292
EDIT: Sorry, Haavard, about that first sentence (prior to edit). I didn't intend what I posted before as a personal attack. Goodness knows I've made misinformed statements before without knowing.
Cutting Spoonhellspork # Thursday, April 15, 2010 1:43:27 AM
Cutting Spoonhellspork # Friday, April 16, 2010 8:42:31 PM
BBBBAAAAAAWWWWWW
Well go figure, if someone with MONEY owns the codec now, everyone will be digging through their drawers looking for an oil well to tap.