Microsoft's "Native HTML5" nonsense
Wednesday, April 13, 2011 10:20:00 AM
Another week, another nonsensical marketing claim from Microsoft.
This time they have tried to coin the term "Native HTML5", which basically contradicts the whole idea of the web as non-native and platform-agnostic. You know, the idea the entire web was built on?
HTML5 is not native. It is not supposed to be native. It is silly to even attempt to tie HTML5 to a specific platform.
Some people are making fun of Microsoft's antics, which is all well and good. The idea of "Native HTML5" is that ridiculous. Others are quite harsh in their coverage. I think a combined approach is necessary: Make fun of their obvious attempt to hijack HTML5, while making sure that their claims are also met with clear, factual refutations.
In my opinion, Dean Hachamovitch should be ashamed of himself for signing his name to such a shoddy piece of dishonest marketing nonsense. Call me a grumpy old open web fundamentalist, but I'm getting fed up with this.
Whew, glad to get that off my chest
This time they have tried to coin the term "Native HTML5", which basically contradicts the whole idea of the web as non-native and platform-agnostic. You know, the idea the entire web was built on?
HTML5 is not native. It is not supposed to be native. It is silly to even attempt to tie HTML5 to a specific platform.
Some people are making fun of Microsoft's antics, which is all well and good. The idea of "Native HTML5" is that ridiculous. Others are quite harsh in their coverage. I think a combined approach is necessary: Make fun of their obvious attempt to hijack HTML5, while making sure that their claims are also met with clear, factual refutations.
In my opinion, Dean Hachamovitch should be ashamed of himself for signing his name to such a shoddy piece of dishonest marketing nonsense. Call me a grumpy old open web fundamentalist, but I'm getting fed up with this.
Whew, glad to get that off my chest


Krzysztof Hankiewiczlordmorgul # Wednesday, April 13, 2011 11:20:10 AM
Opera Community ModeratorJayneDoe # Wednesday, April 13, 2011 11:33:23 AM
-JD
sirnh1 # Wednesday, April 13, 2011 11:41:10 AM
(screenshot)
Yes, native html 5 is soon only for windows 7
Chirpie # Wednesday, April 13, 2011 11:41:50 AM
There's a pretty major difference between saying "we have a new product that we think will change the web" (when all types of devices are able to communicate freely across the web, has the web not changed significantly?) and saying "you can only view the proper web with IE; all the rest are just fake."
Microsoft always does that. Other companies usually do their marketing without outright deception.
Charles SchlossChas4 # Wednesday, April 13, 2011 1:06:41 PM
Swapnil RustagiSwapnil99pro # Wednesday, April 13, 2011 2:08:40 PM
IE 9 has the least HTML5 support. IE 10 PP1 has the same amount of HTML5 support + some CSS3 features.
With least HTML5 standards support, they are saying "Native HTML5"???
And yes, HTML is web coding language, not a feature that only the IE 9 platform supports.
Internet Explorer 9,???
It has no special pros when comparing to other browsers and high cons such as IE 9 not supporting Windows XP and IE 10 PP1 not supporting Windows Vista
Charles SchlossChas4 # Wednesday, April 13, 2011 3:05:34 PM
Originally posted by Swapnil99pro:
XP has less than 3 years of support left, and I think IE 9 needs some library versions that are in Vista and up
Blaz(ž) Pristavitalianjob44 # Wednesday, April 13, 2011 4:54:45 PM
Charles SchlossChas4 # Wednesday, April 13, 2011 6:18:31 PM
Mustafa OğuzinBusteR # Wednesday, April 13, 2011 8:03:56 PM
PengePenge4 # Wednesday, April 13, 2011 8:18:35 PM
Martin RauscherHades32 # Wednesday, April 13, 2011 8:41:11 PM
Thomas Angelbo Christensenroosteronacid # Wednesday, April 13, 2011 9:06:08 PM
Without Chrome, Opera and FireFox pushing for change, HTML5, canvas or CSS3 wouldn't exist! Way to stay classy...
Rafael Luikrafaelluik # Wednesday, April 13, 2011 11:25:25 PM
Originally posted by Penge4:
WTF?PS: A very good read: http://www.osnews.com/story/23876/Why_the_OS_Matters/
Jimtoyotabedzrock # Thursday, April 14, 2011 4:50:42 AM
Wouldn't that mean Opera will have "Native HTML5" too?
Originally posted by Penge4:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649408#c2
.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649408#c47
Native HTML5 example site
gar1t # Thursday, April 14, 2011 5:19:32 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9mXe9nRiPHI
Please note: Some strong/NSFW language
Haavardhaavard # Thursday, April 14, 2011 9:05:53 AM
Originally posted by toyotabedzrock:
No, not without fish. We need fish.Sn3ipen # Thursday, April 14, 2011 1:49:12 PM
We have to fork the Linux kernel and integrate some rendering engine into it, to get that same native HTML 5 experience.
Maybe we have to contact Steve Jobs and ask if he can integrate Presto into the underlying Unix Kernel he is using in OS X, so Opera users will get the same native HTML5 experience.
This man is so full of it. It's just sad.
Charles SchlossChas4 # Thursday, April 14, 2011 1:55:43 PM
Ravna # Thursday, April 14, 2011 5:10:59 PM
Rafael Luikrafaelluik # Thursday, April 14, 2011 6:30:00 PM
Originally posted by toyotabedzrock:
LOL!!!Charles SchlossChas4 # Thursday, April 14, 2011 7:51:07 PM
Originally posted by Ravna:
Not so much any more as smart phone are growing, same with the rest of mobile browsing
QuHno # Thursday, April 14, 2011 8:12:27 PM
Put a
straw manperson on a stage and let him tell something about native HTML5 support - and all the press is full of IE10 news, they even talk about that on the the Mozilla and Opera related web pages ...Cutting Spoonhellspork # Thursday, April 14, 2011 11:28:41 PM
Ilidioilidiomartins # Friday, April 15, 2011 8:29:29 PM
http://img39.imageshack.us/img39/2702/capturadeecr20110415211.png -
Cutting Spoonhellspork # Friday, April 15, 2011 10:33:00 PM
Charles SchlossChas4 # Friday, April 15, 2011 10:43:57 PM
Blaz(ž) Pristavitalianjob44 # Saturday, April 16, 2011 8:41:05 AM
XP1 # Saturday, April 16, 2011 11:02:33 AM
Northgrove # Saturday, April 16, 2011 3:57:17 PM
Cutting Spoonhellspork # Monday, April 18, 2011 2:37:08 AM
Charles SchlossChas4 # Monday, April 18, 2011 3:18:04 AM
Originally posted by hellspork:
true
Sn3ipen # Monday, April 18, 2011 6:37:50 AM
I can also remember that Apple claimed they had introduced allot of features first. The truth was that they already where in Opera, long before that. They simply "forgot" about Opera in their ads.
Charles SchlossChas4 # Monday, April 18, 2011 4:03:09 PM
Hector Macias Ayalahectormacias # Tuesday, April 19, 2011 12:39:18 AM