Friday, 10. July 2009, 13:57:02
The editor started on 1234 Ninth
here. The fixation on 1234 is really a celebration of the Long View Gallery moving in there, but the history of what has gone on in that building is fascinating.
Before City Lights it was some sort of auto repair center, and that's covered nicely in
Preserving DC Stables in
this post. In researching the address a while back he kept coming across a reference like
1234 9th Street NW
T & W Auto
Washington, DC 20001
202-842-5470He and wife bought in 1978 and moved into the (mostly) renovated house in 1980. He doesn't recall an official auto shop back then, although the alley was in informal auto repair spot for many a shade tree mechanic. But without the trees. The
City Lights referenced in the last post may well have begun after he moved in by a few years.
After
City Lights moved on, and the
City Lights go-go joint died aborning, it was soon
1234 9th Street NW
Muzollo Vending
Washington, DC 20001
202-232-6038
Lots and lots of those vendor carts being towed out of the alley in the morning and back in the evening.
Then it changed hands again, perhaps after a period of vacancy. Now it was to be a charter school. The announcement of the first presentation thereon was
here, in the old, pre-blog Blagden Alley and Naylor Court newsletter. Let us just say that the community was not as enthralled as some people expected. Somehow, "charter school" did not equate with "good thing". Discussion dragged on over the goodness of the school, for example this hysterical
page from the Blagden Alley and Naylor Court news.
Sometime in the next year, the charter school thing went south. It did involve lots of difficulty, ADA issues, pollution issues (think of all those oil spills many moons ago), and historical preservation issues.
So 1234 Ninth lay dormant for a bit. Now it is nicely alive. Over thirty years, it has been interesting to watch.
Thursday, 9. July 2009, 15:01:09
Some time ago, the editor posted
this page.
As he's mentioned before, the blog provide has a statistical tracker on their blogs, and it shows (for free) about the last 30 hits.
Many days, two or three hits to that page come from the strangest places, usually from a google query. For example, today we have
this,
this and
this. That's Sweden, Hungary, and France. Actually, there were two from France.
Just interesting what people will google, that'a all. The editor does wonder how so many different folks get to that page, however. The Swedish image google for "Maine Coon" doesn't have their picture in the first few pages of the
google. Maine Coon Cats are a bit large, aren't they?
Thursday, 9. July 2009, 14:39:12
Mike Benardo, ANC 2C06, has a notice out:
The DC Department of Transportation (DDOT) will be providing a construction update meeting for the reconstruction of 11th Street, NW from L to O Streets, NW, on Tuesday July 21, 2009, from 6:00pm to 8:00pm.
Construction on the 11th St. NW project began in December 2008. Come and hear how construction is progressing and what construction activities are planned for the coming weeks and months.
The public meeting will be held at the Asbury United Methodist Church, 926 Eleventh Street, NW, Washington, DC (Access is through the side entrance on 11th Street).
Thank you,
Mike
There really is visible progress. The editor thinks that when the repair and upgrade of Eleventh Street is complete, renovation of the properties on the street will proceed. And a certain liquor store will become a memory, just like the "Gas Station From Hell" at Eight and M now is.
Tuesday, 7. July 2009, 19:16:53
This is not totally neighborhood. In fact, barely at all. It is, however, a particular bugaboo of the editor.
It refers to
this article in the Washington Examiner, entitled
Police chief denounces 'cowardly' iPhone users monitoring speed traps. And no, the editor has received two speeding tickets in his lifetime, one of which doesn't really count and will be discussed below.
The editor has for some time viewed speed traps and red light cameras as simple revenue generators. He has been driving downtown and around DC and the Metro area, for a long time. He simply does not recall a person in DC being pulled over after blatantly running a red light. That says that police aren't everywhere, of course. It also says also that most other people have never seen such a stop either. The editor knows what can happen when the police watch for such problems: They see them. For several months, before the Convention Center was built and this neighborhood had a far worse drug problem, the Mike Smith type of cops--well before Mike Smith--would catch red light runners at Ninth and M. Not so much to stop red light running, but to get an excuse to search cars for drugs. It helped.
But let's face it, the didactic effect of seeing a red light runner pulled over isn't all that high on the civic concern list. Revenue is, and now it can be automated and contracted out.
The editor has read about the iPhone thing for a week or two now. Sort of finds it a bit inventive. But it isn't really new. If you're concerned about speed traps, try
here. They have Ellendale, DE in there, as they should.
Ellendale is a little wide spot on Highway 16 in Delaware between Greenwood and Milton. The editor can understand being careful about a 25mph speed limit in the town. But they have something up their sleeves: When you leave the town headed east to Milton and Rehoboth, and you see wide open road,. the speed doesn't go up for a few hundred yards. Nothing there, just no increase in speed limit where almost every other town puts it. So you speed up, to say 35. Then they get their revenue. The editor has not stopped for anything in that town, nor spent a cent there in at least 30 years.
The editor is aware that many studies say that red light cameras and speed cameras increase safety. He is also aware that other studies differ. The only thing almost all of the studies have in common is that they bring extra revenue to their jurisdictions.
Sorry for the rant, but that's why they invented blogs.
Thursday, 2. July 2009, 19:03:09
From Theresa Dubois (and we thank you Theresa for the updates) see below.
15,000 at a convention is a lot. The phrase "There is no official shuttle bus operation associated with this convention" means that a large number of attendees are not staying at hotels, but with friends or local organization contacts. That means a lot of those people will drive ("
Drive, He Said" (1971)) and often park in the neighborhood, since many of them will know their way around. So if you leave your current parking space and come back, you'll get an historical walking tour of Petworth or Truxton Circle as you walk back from your new parking spot. Might be interesting.
If you want to get on Theresa's lists, contact her at
TDubois@dcconvention.com. As a side note, parking problem are not hers, but the event organizers.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Washington Convention Center Authority (WCCA)
COMMUNITY UPDATE
Issued: July 2, 2009
Traffic Advisory
Washington Convention Center Authority (WCCA)
Issue Date: Thursday, July 2, 2009
Islamic Society of North America's 46th Annual Convention
July 3 - 6, 2009
The Walter E. Washington Convention Center will host the Islamic Society of North America's 46th Annual ISNA Convention from Friday, July 3rd through Monday, July 6th. Overall event hours are 8:30 a.m. until 11:00 p.m. each day of the event. Estimated attendance is projected to be upwards of 15,000.
There is no official shuttle bus operation associated with this convention. You may anticipate increased use of the Mount Vernon/7th Street-Convention Center Metro station as well as greater than usual pedestrian and vehicular traffic within several blocks of the Convention Center. No road closures are planned at this time.
Be advised that heavy vehicular traffic is expected on M Street between 7th and 9th Streets NW during move-in and move-out of the ISNA Convention, as follows:
Move-in
Thursday, July 2nd 7:00 a.m. until 9:00 p.m.
Friday, July 3rd 8:00 a.m. until 12:00 noon
Move-out
Monday, July 6th 12:00 noon until 11:59 p.m.
Thursday, 2. July 2009, 18:08:22
Let's use "CCH" for the "Convention Center Hotel" for the next few years. It really sounds as if it's a gonna happen. If the WaPo is right, and the other rumors/scuttlebutt(*) the editor has heard are true, we should have "shovels in the ground" in a couple of months.
(*)The Opera spell-checker bought "scuttlebutt". Amazing.
Thursday, 2. July 2009, 17:23:39
A fun (from today's vantage point)
article about the old neighborhood. Ruben Casteneda, who wrote it, and Linda Wheeler, who also handled the neighborhood well, makes one want the old Post back.
Tuesday, 30. June 2009, 13:49:43
The editor has been remiss in not letting out a rousing "Huzzah!" about the Long View's move to 1234 Ninth Street, which was announced
here, in
RenewShaw.com. It's been a long time for 1234.
When the editor moved into the Blagden Alley and Naylor Court neighborhood, the property was occupied by City Lights, which supplied lighting to various theatrical productions around town and had an inventory of several million dollars. The editor was always amazed that that there wasn't a major theft from the business, but their security must have been really good.
After a while City Lights moved elsewhere, and the property was vacant for a few years. It was one of those places that led to a certain depression in the community, in that it sat there vacant after having been a real business. The feeling was, among many, that this slum would never improve. There was among some the feeling that anything, yes anything, was better than a vacant property.
Then came a proposal from an AMG Corporation, which wrote a piece for the March 1992 newletter:
March 1993
City Lights Night Club by Alton Gayle AMG, Inc.
AMG, Inc. has leased with an option to buy the City Lights building, located at 1234 9th Street, N.W., between "M" and "N" Streets. This building was previously used as a lighting production warehouse. We plan to develop the property as a nightclub. A hearing will be held in May 1992, concerning the issuance of a liquor license.
Our plan is to renovate the building to convert it to a nightclub, keeping the name "City Lights".
The building exterior will be kept the same, except for the addition of a door. The nightclub will have an international flavor, featuring various types of music, such as jazz, calypso, top 40 and reggae. The interior will be tastefully decorated to attract and maintain a mature professional clientele. A light fare menu will be served.
With the proposed redevelopment of the District of Columbia owned property, located directly across 9th Street, AMG, Inc. anticipates being able to support an upscale restaurant as well as a nightclub, in the future. Currently, the District of Columbia property is planned for development as an underground Convention Center with mixed-use development above ground.
We view the development of "City Lights" nightclub as a spark that may spur economic development along 9th Street. With new development in the area, others may begin to position themselves to take advantage of the major revitalization planned for the Ninth Street Corridor.The was the proposed logo:

From a September, 1992 newsletter, probably by the editor:
City Lights Out
The City Lights nightclub has apparently died aborning. There is a regulation that certain kinds of liquor licenses are not permitted within 400 feet of a church--if the church objects.
The Salem Baptist Church objected. The District measured, and came up with 420 feet.
So did the applicant's surveyor. That's to the Church "lot", if one doesn't count the parking lot, which the applicant's lawyer said you shouldn't since it was purchased at a different time than the "church lot" and had a different lot number and there was maybe a different comma or initial in the ownership title and "church lot" really meant to the front door, anyway, not the edge of the lot, and so it was beyond 400 feet.
But there was also something in the regulations about the "shortest distance" across public space, not down the block and square across the street. So they remeasured on the bias, and lo and behold, it was well under 400 feet. Pythagoras (and Euclid) did not live in vain!
I do expect the lawyer to appeal on the basis that the curvature of the Earth was not taken into account.The community exhaled, since
City Lights was to be a go-go club. Those were active in other parts of the District then, with the requisite number of shootings and killings.
More in Few DaysThe editor will fill in more on 1234 in a bit.
There is Always a Blog...
After reading that AMG piece, you're probably saying to yourself: Isn't there a blog about unnecessary quotation marks? Yes, it's
here. And the never satisified among you, and you know who you are, then probably asks about apostrophes. It's
here.
The editor saw these when he was checking
InstaPundit this morning.
Friday, 26. June 2009, 13:51:18
There were City Council hearings on the proposed convention center hotel this Wednesday. To the editor it sounds as if the thing will move, and if it moves groundbreaking would be in a very few months. The editor testified, as did many others. In general, the community would like to see it built, as would the editor. The editor also believes that the uncertainty of its being built has caused several years of delay in the renovation of Ninth Street. But that's in his testimony below:
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Testimony of Harold Davitt
Past President of the
Blagden Alley and Naylor Court Association
Committee on Economic Development
and
Committee on Finance and Revenue
Joint Public Hearing
June 24, 2009
John A. Wilson Building
B18-310, the “New Convention Center Hotel Amendments Act of 2009.”
Thank you, Chairman Brown, Chairman Evans and Councilmembers. My name is Harold Davitt, and I am here today for as a private citizen who has lived for 30 years on the 900 block of M Street, which is one block north of the proposed Convention Center Hotel. I have also served from time to time as President of the Blagden Alley and Naylor Court Association, which is the association representing the neighborhood directly west of the new Convention Center.
Today, I would like to talk to you about the impact of the lateness of the Convention Center Hotel on the community immediately to the north of the proposed hotel.
When the groundbreaking for the new Convention Center took place in 1998, the impression of the community was that the commercial part of the neighborhood, Ninth Street between L and P streets, would finally bloom. It didn’t. There has been some commercial renovation, but not the serious makeover expected. The opening in 2003 has added two restaurants and some smaller retail, but that’s it. The development on Ninth Street has been essentially locally oriented, either to the neighborhood or to the District. Some businesses have have bought and renovated long vacant properties because it is in the central city, the neighborhood has a strong historical character, and it’s affordable gallery or office space compared to K Street locations. As the vacant properties become occupied, Ninth Street does improve somewhat. The neighborhood’s residential renovation has been in full swing since the mid-1980's and generally complete several years ago. The few vacant residentially zoned lots have been built out with condominiums.
If the redevelopment of Ninth Street proceeds as it is doing now, then Ninth Street will be of local flavor, oblivious to the possible tourist revenue across the street at the Convention Center. While interesting to the neighborhood, it should not be satisfying to parties concerned with maximizing revenues from the convention trade. Instead of getting the tourists out of their hotel rooms in various parts of the District and into local restaurants and points of interest on their way to and from their conventions, we will be leaving them to their hotel food and the cable channels.
This neighborhood would like to see serious renovation which includes orientation to the convention and tourist trade. It would add to the personality of the area, but it will not happen if the convention center hotel languishes. I have seen several real estate deals die because of the unpredictability of the “elephant in the room” at Ninth and Massachusetts. While the current economy is not helping, the problem of indecision with respect to the Convention Center Hotel impeding development has been ongoing over the last few years.
We have been through this before. Early in the 1980's I recall preliminary neighborhood briefings on proposed developments, which of course needed slight upgrades in the zoning map and thus needed community concurrence. Leaving aside the quality of the developments proposed, it showed that serious businesses with serious zoning lawyers considered the neighborhood interesting.
Then the proposals, the upzoning requests and other commercial feelers to the neighborhood dried up by the late 1980's. The certainty that a new convention center would be built here was in the air. I have talked with people who know that history, and the only obvious place in the late 1980's was where the current convention center is located.
The minuet concerning the construction of the Convention Center Hotel has done the same thing to the neighborhood over the last few years. It has certainly slowed the development of Ninth Street, but it has also forced developers away from thinking that they can profit by serving the conventioneers and they must now orient to local clienteles. This direction of locally-oriented renovation will take more time, but will happen. If that happens, then the influence of the Convention Center on the renovation of the neighborhood will be far less than envisioned.
We are a tourist town. When we build a convention center, it should be make money. There should be a return on our investment. We have interesting neighborhoods for the metropolitan population, but none outside of downtown which say to the tourist: Spend your money here. Because of the delay in the building of the Convention Center Hotel, we may have already lost the opportunity to nurture such a neighborhood right next to the Convention Center.
In poker terms, our new Convention Center was a large opening bet. If we are afraid to place the appropriate continuation bet, we must have decided that we have a weaker hand than we thought. And the other players will notice.
The new Convention Center Hotel is an expected adjunct of a big-league convention center. We do need it to start now, or the lot should be sold for near term development for other purposes. The opportunity costs of delay are very high.
Thank you very much.
Tuesday, 23. June 2009, 18:28:24
The following made it to a number of neighborhood mailing lists....
From: richard rogers <rrwashingtondc@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 11:29 PM
Subject: [ShawNeighborhood] 100 Proof/Why The Convention Center is a failure.
To: mvsna <mvsna@yahoogroups.com>, ShawNeighborhood@yahoogroups.com
Dear politicans,
If the new convention center is so great and a wonderful success, why is the 1,800 sqft 1st floor condo which is occupied by Modern Liquor(9th and M) for sale for $300,000. including the inventory(booze and Utz)?
A taxpayer
(signed)
---------------------------------------------------
The reply was....
Subject: Modern Liquors
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:54:02 -0700
Dear "Taxpayer,"
Thank you for your concern, but it is unwarranted.
Yes, Modern Liquors--the business-- is for sale...to myself. I am in the process of buying it from my mother-in-law, who is retiring, so there is no need to worry about the business closing due to the perceived failure of the new Convention Center. I have run it for the six years, and plan to continue doing so.
In the future, I suggest you do a little research before you blast email the city.
Cheers!
Jeff Harrison
1 2 3 4 5 ... 17 Next »
Showing posts 1 -
10 of 161.