Skip navigation.

BaancBlog

Blagden Alley and Naylor Court Jesting

1225 Tenth Street: "I feel a lot of sadness ... "

Jim Loucks received an email:

Subject: A Victorian house is going down....and I have many questions....

The vacant Victorian (it also [has] an eclectic mix with some elements of the Federal Style) located on the Eastern sidewalk of 10th Street NW, between M & N, is going down. [Ed: That’s 1225]

I feel a lot of sadness whenever I see a historic building go down this way.....

Do we know if this was the only alternative? I tend to be doubtful....
there are ways to save an old building, and as they say, if there's a will, there's a way.

Does anyone know what is going to go up in its place? A new condo? A modern -and out of context- building? Some nicely designed structure that will harmoniously blend with the rest of the neighboring buildings?

Or will it be something totally out of context and a permanent eyesore for the next 100 years? Has anyone being shown the plans for what will be erected in its place?

Will it remain as a vacant lot? Cynically speaking, it will be contextual in that block where there are some other vacant lots which seem to remain permanently vacant. In an architectural and urban context
that is the equivalent of a smile that is missing a few too many
teeth,
and almost as attractive.

Were the neighbors consulted?
Was the Blagden Alley Association consulted?
Was the Historic Preservation Review Board notified?
Will this lead to the demolition of the buildings at the back of the block?

I hope someone has answers to my questions, and some positive feelings about it. I don't, for now.


Jim responded:

When I moved to the block in 1987, the house was in a similar state of repair as till recently. The property was purchased by its current owner sometime in the early 1990s.

At some point a year or so ago my understanding is that the city condemned the house and requested it be demolished or fixed. I don't believe that the owner wished to have it demolished but it seemed the only option open to her at the time. The demolition request went through all the appropriate channels, the Historic Preservation Office, the Logan Circle Historic Committee and Blagden Alley Association was notified of the pending demolition.

While the structure of the building was seriously compromised you and I know that most anything can be fixed if you put your mind to it. Unfortunately in this instance time ran out on fixing the building and it was demolished. The facing bricks are to be salvaged and
reused if a structure replaces it.

As to what will eventually go there, there are no plans at the current time to my knowledge.

Jim Loucks


Sometimes there is no nice solution. The editor recalls several such instances in the 80's and later. Many of the gaps you see on the 900 block of M Street were not there a while back, for example. Not all "gentrification" is building or renovation. Sometimes it's watching things disappear.

It is worth noting that the loss of this building is proceeding differently than the old days. Back then, the drug dealers, users, and homeless would have been in there and within a few years there would have been a fire. And then another. Pretty soon, the building would be so weakened that it would essentially collapse. With luck, only that house would come down. Attempts to seal up such buildings were much less successful than now. And the causes of those fires, from the drug dealers to the homeless to the transvestite prostitutes have long gone, at least as a large group. This building, as much as its loss hurts, is a reminder of how fragile the preservation of the character of the neighborhood was.

The editor will note that one of the vacant lots on Tenth Street had a building proposed sometime in the 1990's. To put it nicely, the proposed structure made Bauhaus seem Victorian. The community killed it, along with a good deal of help from others.

Some current pictures from Jim:





Looking a bit closer to the first, we see

You'll see a lot of that ornamentation in the neighborhood. Whenever the editor sees one of those bricks in a pile somewhere, he thinks that it was once a bit of pride on a nice house.

For a bit of context, see here. 1225 is the one on the left.

Unfortunate Politics

I received an email from someone I've known a long time who has been involved in the community/constituent services side of government for a years. One of the things one learns in that kind of job is who is good in the bureaucracy and who isn't. Who delivers and who just attends meetings.

Dear Friends:

As you may know, the Committee on Libraries, Parks and Recreation has voted to disapprove Dr. Hartsock's appointment as Director of Parks and Recreation. There is an effort for the matter not to go to the full Council for a vote.

I'm writing to you to ask that you call or email Chairman Vincent Gray to schedule a vote on Ximena's confirmation. First, I believe it's more fair for the entire Council to vote on her appointment. Second, as you know, there's been much turmoil at Parks and Recreation and it's time for this to end. We need to focus on getting the job done.

On a personal note, I have worked with Ximena for many years, first as a principal at Ross Elementary School, then as Assistant Chancellor at DCPS and now at Parks and Rec. Her commitment and dedication is second to none. She's truly a transformational leader and I believe she will be a credit to the District.


Here is a picture of Dr. Hartsock speaking at the groundbreaking of the Tenth Street Park.



I checked with someone else in the constituent services business and got

She’s wonderful. She’s worked hard to get the 10th street park up and running, the 7th and N Street park renovated and the dog park. If you want to send a supportive email you can email Chair Gray and also

dcatania@dccouncil.us
pmendelson@dccouncil.us
kbrown@dccouncil.us
mbrown@dccouncil.us


The editor had some part in getting the Tenth Street Park going many moons ago. One of the problems was that the land seemed to be "owned" by several different parts of the DC Government, and simply getting to where the plot of land was not covered by a mare's nest of conflicting pieces of paper but a single lot "owned" by DC Parks and Recreation was real work.

Here's an editorial from todays WaPo.

Use those emails. Dr. Hartsock has already proven to the community that she makes good things happen.

Update

The WaPo has another editorial on the matter. Somehow, these City Council actions seem a bit strange. Maybe the Post explanation as a fit of pique is correct, but when things get this strange the editor suspects more beneath the surface. Maybe time will tell.

Perhaps some of the council members should just climb our of the playpen and confirm the lady.

Groundbreaking

The official start of the building of the Tenth Street Park took place yesterday at 10:30 am. There was a good crowd, 70-80+. Just about everyone was there.

Groundbreakings are sort of like funerals, only happy. You get to see a number of people you haven't seen in a bit and talk a bit about common interests and catch up on other matters.

There is always a tripod of some sort at these things.
Standing quietly in the background was Jim Loucks, who helped get the concept of fixing that lot up many years ago. Without his initial work, and persistence, it wouldn't have happened.Jack was there, as was the Mayor. Jack and some of his people have been tracking and helping with Jim for a long time. Also note the Convention Center in the background. Jack was major in making that happen, too. The Mayor and his people were, of course, pivotal. Here he is with Stacy Hannah, President of the Tenth Street Park Project, with its $1M budget, and Bob Maffin on the left. And finally, the "groundbreaking". Calling this "ground" is a bit of an overstatement, and if it is "ground", its been broken a long time. But it will be nice soon.

Check This Out

Mari has a post in her InShaw blog that reminds the editor of 20+ years ago around here even though she lives in the Truxton Circle area. It's interesting also in that it might serve as a marker for the edge of renovation.

She also makes the point that her neighborhood now votes harder than years before. It not clear whether one should think that politicians and city agencies respond first to voters or to people who are active in fixing their neighborhood as well as demanding services. Perhaps heavy voting is more consequence of a hardworking neighborhood.

Tenth Street Park Groundbreaking Thursday

It's finally happening. We're going to have a park on Tenth, between L and M. The announcement is

The website for the folks who made this happen is here.

Singles at Modern Liquor!

We're not talking about the Wednesday wine tastings here. We're talking about "selling singles".

In the on-going attempt to make the world a better place, the cognoscenti have found a blunderbuss that's going to solve the problem of loose beer cans in the 'hood. In certain areas, the selling of single cans of beer would be prohibited. For a beer oriented summary, see here.

The editor is not against giving a liquor store or two a hard time on selling singles via the "voluntary agreement" route. That guarantees, to some degree, that the local neighborhood has a problem with a liquor store and needs to give a strong nudge to change its ways. Designating a whole ward as so far gone that it needs to have the liquor store default position be "no singles" seems like overkill. Perhaps it's close, but "close" only counts in horse shoes and nuclear weapons. The City Council decided to skip the horse shoes step, which was already in the hands of the neighborhood via the voluntary agreement. If a neighborhood can't negotiate amenable voluntary agreements, that neighborhood has far more serious problems to fix before it graduates to controlling single beer can sales. The "do something" urge is understandable. The editor remembers when having no beer cans in the front yard was a rare day. The editor also remembers that entrepreneurial folks in alley would buy six packs, take them back to the alley and sell singles. When the folks in the alley (Blagden Alley, Naylor Court) decamped, the beer cans in the yard almost totally stopped. Seems like any loose beer can (or especially soda pop can) is from someone passing through.

The good news is that Modern Liquors has been granted an exception to the ban. They can sell singles.

Usually, Jeff and Anna sell the higher end singles. You know, the ones costing $10.00 or more. But Jeff can envision the day when someone from the new Convention Center Hotel (groundbreaking before the first snow is expected) walks up and asks for two Bud Lights. Since we're a tourist town, that seems like normal thing. DC should accommodate those folks, even if they come from Salt Lake City.

Congratulations Jeff and Anna, and congratulations to ABRA. And congratulations to the community for supporting the exception.

New Convention Center Web Site

Theresa (DuBois) sent out one of her emails this am, bragging about the new CC web site. The editor can see why. It looks good, and helps the incoming conventioneers. But it is a work in progress.

There's the "Click here to view a listing of the Shaw neighborhood businesses." And it's just a listing, with addresses. It's certainly not a user friendly map for people who may not know what's north or west when they walk out of the CC on the first day. Nothing extra on what kind of food the restaurants serve, and so on. But that will come along.

The downloadable parking lot map lists the spot where the ground will be broken for the new CC hotel quite shortly.

And the editor has a concern about the parking for handicapped section:

parking placards/permits or license tags in the following locations:
North end of 7th Street between L and Mt Vernon Streets (3 metered spaces)
South end of 9th Steet between Mount Vernon Place and L Street (3 metered spaces)
South end of 9th Street between L Street and M Street (3 metered spaces)
South end of 9th Street between M Street and N Street (3 metered spaces)


The editor did a post on most of these places a while ago here. The upshot is that they don't seem to be "reserved for" handicapped but "accessible to". The above entry from the CC website seems to say exactly the opposite. We shall see.


The Side of a Building on L Street (Updated!)

The editor has gone by the corner at Ninth and L (where Central Lock used to be) many, many times over the last thirty years, and has always been fascinated by the side of this building.

He went down to the signing of the Convention Center Hotel bill (August 12) and took pictures of the event. Nice pictures, nice people and all, but not really exciting enough to make a post. But he had the camera along and finally got the picture he wanted. For years he's walked past this corner and said that he should get the camera and come back, but something always came up.

The outlined stairways are the last remaining shadow of the building that was there. One can almost imagine the inside of the place. Soon that will be gone.

Update!

Si Kailian sent along a couple of L Street pictures. Bad spelling is noticeable, of course, almost as bad as this blog! Hope these are left alone for a few years to welcome the Convention Center Hotel. It would give the people from Des Moines something to talk about when they get back home.



Still More on 1234 Ninth Street

The editor occasionally looks at the web tracking software provided by the blog provider, Opera. It gives visiting sites, not individuals necessarily, and also the "referrer", which for Google involves the query string that got the page that lead the user to the blog. (That kind of explanation was not immediately clear to many people a while back, so they invented "Object Oriented Analysis" to clarify things.)

At any rate, one of the visiting sites lead him to this page. At teh top of the page is this picture
And at the bottom of said page, is this:.

It makes a nice addition to the post here. And an interesting historical site as well.

Modern Liquors in History

Jeff Harrison at Modern Liquors was recently given a matchbook cover from the old days. From that, he has developed posters and T Shirts.


Note that he has some of the proceeds going to the Tenth Street Park Project
and the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation.
So just grab one or two the next time you go to one of the wine tastings. It's really history.

The editor and his wife first saw Modern Liquors and met Ed and Anna in 1978, when we bought a place on M Street. It was not as grand then as apparently it was earlier in life.
December 2009
M T W T F S S
November 2009January 2010
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31