Skip navigation.

Rational Rations

My Blog . . . My Thoughts

Outrageous!

The administration's order that requires additional "ethics" training for our Marines, in the face of the accusations that followed the "Haditha massacre" (see this L.A. Times article) is not only a blatant admission that they believe the charges (well before any intensive investigation) but it is also another "kiss" on the asses of America's critics.

I voted for George W. Bush . . . twice! SOME of the things his administration has done in the past 5 1/2 years has made me glad I did but far too many of the things they do make me want to lead the revolution to get him and his lackys out of there.

I'll never be sorry for my votes AGAINST Gore and Kerry but I can't help regretting that my votes came down to votes AGAINST instead of votes FOR.

One radio personality put it perfectly when he called our last two elections "a choice between a dog shit sandwich and a goat shit sandwich." (He wasn't able to say "shit" on the radio but I knew what he meant.)

I, Bert!

BlogThings comes up with some pretty interesting stuff -- one such is the Sesame Street Personality Quiz. After taking the quiz and seeing my results, I'm a convert -- this test really nailed me. Here are my results:
You Are Bert
Extremely serious and a little eccentric, people find you loveable - even if you don't love them!

You are usually feeling: Logical - you rarely let your emotions rule you

You are famous for: Being smart, a total neat freak, and maybe just a little evil

How you life your life: With passion, even if your odd passions (like bottle caps and pigeons) are baffling to others
HarveyG (Just call me Bert!)

Spreading Democracy

,

It is no doubt true that a majority of people who live under dictatorial regimes would love to be given some measure of freedom. Freedom to say what's on their minds, dress as they choose, pray if, how and when they choose and, in general, sample the forbidden fruit of freedom.

It's apparent from President Bush's various statements and actions that he very much wants to see those who yearn for freedom from under the boot of a dictator, get their wishes. I'm sure, in fact, most people who live in free societies have that wish for those who don't; it only makes sense. As every student of history knows, a country run by the whim of a dictator is not only a certain threat to its own citizens but it is a potential threat to every other country within it's reach.

While President Bush's wish (objective?) is clear, noble and desirable (at least in my mind), the questions remain: Is it the role of the United States to spread freedom (or even attempt to spread freedom) throughout the world? Do we elect presidents to be our moral guides and to send our military on his personal crusades?

The answer to both questions is, of course, NO!

The United States is without a doubt a superpower in today's world and a world without dictators would certainly be to our benefit -- but no more than it would benefit France, Germany, Spain, Italy and all the other countries with elected governments. Unless the worlds free countries can present a united front to the worlds dictatorships, and unless the people living under those dictatorships rise up willingly to fight against their dictatorship -- we're talking about a good old-fashioned revolution here -- it's insane for the United States to take on the role of civilization's savior.

We elect our presidents to protect and defend OUR country without allowing their moral instincts, no matter how well intentioned, to overrule their ability to govern rationally and logically.

What the United States government should be doing right now to protect and defend us is:

1. Building up it's defenses (including securing our southern border).
2. Building up it's intelligence capabilities.
3. Acting (unilaterally if necessary) when a clearly defined threat to our country exists -- acting swiftly and decisively without regard to world opinion.

Ideally, the world's “opinion” of the United States should be this: “this is a country we don't want to mess with because if we do they'll crush us like bugs.“ There is no substitute for Sun Tzu's philosophy of Peace through Strength.

Blog Excerpts

Morality: A Private Affair

Morality, that ever elusive, always subjective touchstone of "right" and "wrong" behavior, is continually hijacking the National dialogue . . . and rightly so -- its an important subject.

You'll notice that most media-discussions of morality seem to imply (if not state) that there exists a single version or concept of morality (i.e., these things are good, these things are evil, etc.) and that that one concept should become the standard for our society's behavior.

Don't believe it! Don't believe it for these two reasons:

1) There is no one-size-fits-all moral code. Morality is a complex, very personal set of beliefs that guide an individual's thoughts and actions. Each person's moral code is based on what that person has learned, experienced, conceived and has come to believe.

2) Morality is not the only influence on behavior; one of the other important influences is situational ethics. (Killing another person, for example, is almost universally considered immoral in civilized societies but, in the context of self-defense, killing another person may be an acceptable behavior.)

So am I suggesting that our society is (and should be) made up of hundreds of thousands of "loose cannons," each with his or her own moral standards?

In fact, YES, that's exactly what I'm suggesting.

Fortunately however we have a couple mechanisms in place for controlling any chaos that might arise from all of these different belief systems: society itself and the legal system.

* If a person's actions offend a person or group the person is normally censured by the offended party.

* if a person's actions are far enough out of line to 'offend' the legal system, the offender faces legal penalties.

Note that neither the social or legal system judges morality itself -- they judge behavior; nor is either system intended to be, or replace, an individual's moral beliefs . . . these systems are more like roadblocks put in place to set limits -- not limits on beliefs but limits on behaviors.

So, when confronted with the proposition that morality should be publicly mandated, reject it. Morality is and should remain a personal issue.

Haiku For Our Times

, ,

FOR NOW WE LIVE

For man to survive
he takes sustenance from earth.
Earth gives willingly.

Earth sustains man but
has no source for sustenance;
some day it will die.

Man will follow earth
to a slow but certain death;
but for now, we live.

************************************************

For NOW we must 'keep our eye on the ball.'

Keep your eye on those people who are so sure that they have all the 'right answers' that they will go to any lengths to make sure that YOU only ask the right questions.

These people are the powerful and charasmatic leaders in every quarter (politics, media, entertainment, etc). These people are the people you look to for your inspiration, your advice, your guidance.

Be careful who you listen to!
July 2009
S M T W T F S
June 2009August 2009
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31