Friday, 31. August 2007, 03:21:21
Typography, Reading

这应该是我看得最快的一本英文书了,Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows,Harry历险的最终篇,从上周末幸运的在图书馆找到这本新得发烫的书到昨天晚上的12点,从Dudley的救赎到其乐融融的英雄二代上学记,759页,真的觉得Harry与Rowling一路走来实在不易,合上了书本,却觉得自己想留在那个神奇的异世界里。书很长,快赶上第5部的Phoenix Order的870页,但欣赏性比它可高很多(我一直以为Phoenix Order是最烂的一部),虽然感觉Rowling在剧情把握上可以适当调整以调配我等的趣味,例如Harry总是在那郁闷有点削弱了他的气概,战斗场景不够精彩,有些细节的解释不能让我信服,但故事一直是紧张扣人的,而且在大家都猜得到的结局上Rowling的处理仍是让人啧啧称奇的(就是说虽然早知道结局是怎么样,但看完才知道原来是这样进行到结局的啊这种感觉),之前的火焰杯我就没猜到那个Mad-Eye是个假货。为免剧透,我就不多说了,爱看的人自然会去看的,我能爆料的就是很多人死了,和平的代价很沉重。
另外可以聊一聊的就是在关心英文排版后,我发现某些书籍在后记之后会附带一”colophon“页,通常是出版商加的出版信息,我感兴趣的是里面的关于字体的内容,例如这本Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows,里面记着这本书所用的字体和字号:
The text was set in 12-point Adobe Garamond, a typeface based on the sixteen-century type designs of Claude Garamond, redrawn by Robert Slimbach in 1989.
一般系统都找得到Garamond这个字体(不是很确定是XP自带的还是安装了Microsoft Office之后附送的),是Monotype字体设计公司出品的,但我觉得不如Adobe出品的Garamond Pro精致,特别在于对大写Q的处理上,个人觉得,Adobe Garamond对Q的小钩处理得很出彩,如何出彩法呢?看看下图与Monotype版本的Garamond在12 pt和36 pt下的比较:

除了章节用了另外一种字体(这里讨论的是美版的Harry Potter,字体的名字好像叫Able,利用这个网站找到的信息:
http://www.identifont.com/show?9MQ;另外在HP迷的网站里找到一个这个字体的模仿字体Lumos,相似度很高,这儿有得下载:
http://www.mugglenet.com/downloads/fonts/,还有一些有趣的HP字体可供下载;还找到一个专门辨认HP书和电影里用到的字体的网站:
http://www.geocities.com/tatesha/HarryPotterAF.html,有趣有趣),整本书都是用的Adobe Garamond来排的,字体表现得很好,从上图可以看出它在12 pt下比Monotype的Garamond来得更清晰更易读,加上Harry Potter定位为儿童书,行间距定得很宽,每行字数控制在12字以下,读起来很轻松,这么考虑的话,759页其实也不算什么。
Tuesday, 19. June 2007, 21:50:39
Drawing, Painting, Reading
没错,这本书甚至超越了我偶像那本The Art of Hellboy或者去年我入手的那本Alex Ross的Mythology。这是一本感人的个人传记,但同时又是充满灵性的生活绘本,能胜过我偶像Mike Mignola的地方大概就是那合宜的文字与图像的组合。书里讲述的是作者Danny的太太Patti在一次地铁站候车时不幸失足坠落铁轨,而这时正是地铁入站的时间,幸运的是Patti保住了性命--在付出了下半身的机能性的代价上;从此丈夫担起了照顾瘫痪的太太+年幼的儿子+一家子杂事+自己的事业的重任,生活自然瞬间变成灰暗的颜色,这不仅是主观上的,客观上Danny的圈子里亲朋好友们都小心翼翼的考虑如何照顾Danny的感情,虽出自好心,但却造成一层沟通的隔膜,Danny发现自己变得孤独起来了;而某一个晚上,Danny灵光一现,觉得应该开始自学画画,不是说出于要记录下自己这一段家庭悲惨的遭遇,只是单纯的一个点子,但正是这么一个点子,给Danny带来一个冲破灰暗生活的契机,Danny通过学习画画重新认识自己周遭的世界,重新去享受造物主的恩宠,重新去发现生活的意义,而在这一切的经历下,留下了这么一本文字与图形并茂的记录本子,也就是这本Everyday Matters。书很感人,也很启发,对于Danny自己来说,这既是自己的身心恢复("Recovery")的记录,同时也是对这个世界再度认识("Discovery")的记录。Danny的字写得很好看,而且看得出来他的排版功力很有一套,文字和图画配合得很好,读着他的文字,看着旁边的配图,文字就开始立体起来,而且好像可以感觉到Danny在纽约街头边走边停边画的样子,生活,原本就应该这么活灵活现的。本书还有更巧妙的一点,整本书除了书末的条形码是印刷字体,其余一切都是Danny的字迹,连扉页正后方的那页版权页(就是记录作者、编辑和出版社信息,还有那些ISBN编码的地方)也是Danny自己手写的,虽然不在明显的地方,但让人觉得很有新意。
大家可以去Danny的官方网站看看这本书的介绍:
http://www.dannygregory.com/store.php,在Everyday Matters by Danny的那个条目下有个链接
Learn more about this book,又或者你可以去Amazon上看:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/156898443X?v=glance&n=283155&s=books&v=glance


图很漂亮,是吧?我还想引用其中的一段文字,有关画画与生活:
Something about that drawing was different from anything I'd done before. I took my time and then suddenly I zoned out. My mind went blank, my breathing slowed, and when I finally stopped to look at my page, I was amazed that I had managed to create anything so beautiful. At first it seems a fluke, but then I draw the content of our medicine cabinet (slowly, slowly), and again I saw something new. (You can see it, too, on the next page).
What was different was not the drawing bu the seeing. I caressed what I drew with my eyes, lingering over every curve and bump, gliding around contours and into shadows. No matter what I looked at in this way, I saw beauty and felt love. It was very weird but it happened again and again. When I slowed way down and let my mind go, I had the same incredibly sensual experience. It didn't matter what I drew. And then I discovered that it didn't matter what the drawing was like. In fact, I could simply toss it away, like the skin of a banana.
What mattered was the slow, careful gaze.
The reason why most people draw badly is because they draw symbols instead of what they see. A nose is a sort of triangle. An eye is a circle with another one inside. An ear is a circle with a squiggle. The brain has an inventory of shorthand symbols for stuff, and that's what we draw.
It's very human. Assigning things to categories, using symbols and signs; these skills separate us from the beasts. Unfortunately, these symbols are a screen through which we come to see the world. We say, "That person is rich, that one's crass. He's a criminal type, she's a blonde, they're famous, she's in a wheelchair..."
We lump people and things and experiences into categories and deal with them accordingly. It's efficient but it strips the world of texture and chance, like eating every meal at McDonald's or wearing the same uniform every day.
This kind of thinking shows itself when we try to draw. In fact, that's the reason most people will say, "Oh, I can't draw." Kids never say that, until they reach the age of twelve or so, and their symbols are hard-baked.
What I began to see by drawing is that everything is actually special and unique and interesting and beautiful. Everything. Just by sitting and studying it, I quickly began to penetrate beyond the categorical imperative that made me feel so afraid.
I saw that if everything around me looks different than I think it does, maybe the gloomy life I had been defining for us was also just an illusion.
Because just as a tree is not a tree is not a tree, I had no real idea what life with a disabled wife would be like.
I'd have to wait and see.