Solving the Google Code Jam "countPaths" problem in Python
Wednesday, August 16, 2006 1:54:26 PM
I found this article about Haskell:
Solving the Google Code Jam "countPaths" problem in Haskell
Recently Guido van Rossum announced that Python is one of the supported languages in the next Google Code Jam. I decided to write a solution to the puzzle in Python. I haven't looked at the Haskell code. It is too strange anyway.(*) Neither looked at the C code from the other site - too long. Here it is in Python in 25 lines. And it is very fast.
Original Problem Statement here
The author of the Haskell article Tom Moertel investigates this extreme case:
"to find a word composed of 50 “A” letters within a 50×50 grid of “A” cells.".
Let us see if we remove the check for exceeding 1 billion what will happen?
The result is 303835410591851117616135618108340196903254429200 and this is the same
value that Tom Moertel found.
The calculation took whole 8 seconds on oooold Athlon 1000Mhz with Win XP.
Nice.
Well not really. The Google Code Jam rules are as Tom Moertel pointed out "All submissions have a maximum of 2 seconds of runtime per test case". If Goggle is running the tests on 4Ghz Athlon we will be almost in limits. But lets not take chances. We have to stop the run earlier. That unfortunately will increase our code size. One very straightforward solution is with exceptions:
And the result on 1Ghz is the blazing speed of:
So the conclusion is that Python can be used in Google's Code Jam, but one must be carefull with the time limits!
(*) Update. Some people are commenting on reddit my ignorance of the Haskell code. I actually learned most of Haskell some time ago, until I got to Monads. Then I found 267 articles expalining what Monads are from which 27 just tutorials. At that moment I tought "Enough! Maybe I will read it later.". The so called "Maybe" monad. That was 1.5 years ago.
Solving the Google Code Jam "countPaths" problem in Haskell
Recently Guido van Rossum announced that Python is one of the supported languages in the next Google Code Jam. I decided to write a solution to the puzzle in Python. I haven't looked at the Haskell code. It is too strange anyway.(*) Neither looked at the C code from the other site - too long. Here it is in Python in 25 lines. And it is very fast.
class WordPath:
def howMany(self, (x,y), word):
if x < 0 or x >=self.N or y<0 or y>=self.M or self.grid[x][y] != word[0]:
return 0
if len(word) == 1:
return 1
s = 0
for a in (x-1, x, x+1):
for b in (y-1, y, y+1):
if not (a == x and b ==y):
if (a, b, word) not in self.cache:
self.cache[ (a,b,word) ] = self.howMany( (a,b), word[1:])
s += self.cache[ (a,b,word) ]
return s
def countPaths( self, grid, word):
self.grid = grid
self.N = len(grid)
self.M = len(grid[0])
self.cache = {}
s = sum ( [ self.howMany( (x,y), word) for x in range (self.N)
for y in range(self.M)] )
if s > 1000000000:
s = -1
return s
#
test = WordPath()
assert 1 == test.countPaths( ("ABC","FED","GHI"), "ABCDEFGHI")
assert 108 == test.countPaths( ("AA","AA"), "AAAA")
assert 2 == test.countPaths( ("ABC","FED","GAI"), "ABCDEA")
assert 0 == test.countPaths( ("ABC","DEF","GHI"), "ABCD")
assert 56448 == test.countPaths( ("ABABA","BABAB","ABABA","BABAB","ABABA"), "ABABABBA")
assert -1 == test.countPaths( ("AAAAA","AAAAA","AAAAA","AAAAA","AAAAA"), "AAAAAAAAAAA")
Original Problem Statement here
The author of the Haskell article Tom Moertel investigates this extreme case:
"to find a word composed of 50 “A” letters within a 50×50 grid of “A” cells.".
Let us see if we remove the check for exceeding 1 billion what will happen?
print test.countPaths( [ "A"*50 for a in range(50)], "A"*50)
The result is 303835410591851117616135618108340196903254429200 and this is the same
value that Tom Moertel found.
The calculation took whole 8 seconds on oooold Athlon 1000Mhz with Win XP.
Nice.
Well not really. The Google Code Jam rules are as Tom Moertel pointed out "All submissions have a maximum of 2 seconds of runtime per test case". If Goggle is running the tests on 4Ghz Athlon we will be almost in limits. But lets not take chances. We have to stop the run earlier. That unfortunately will increase our code size. One very straightforward solution is with exceptions:
import timeit
class WordPath:
def howMany(self, (x,y), word):
if x < 0 or x >=self.N or y<0 or y>=self.M or self.grid[x][y] != word[0]:
return 0
if len(word) == 1:
return 1
s = 0
for a in (x-1, x, x+1):
for b in (y-1, y, y+1):
if not (a == x and b ==y):
if (a, b, word) not in self.cache:
self.cache[ (a,b,word) ] = self.howMany( (a,b), word[1:])
s += self.cache[ (a,b,word) ]
if s > 1000000000:
raise OverflowError ('spam', 'eggs')
return s
def countPaths( self, grid, word):
self.grid = grid
self.N = len(grid)
self.M = len(grid[0])
self.cache = {}
try:
s = sum ( [ self.howMany( (x,y), word) for x in range (self.N)
for y in range(self.M)] )
if s > 1000000000:
s = -1
return s
except OverflowError :
return -1
#
t = timeit.Timer(stmt='WordPath().countPaths( [ "A"*50 for a in range(50)], "A"*50)',
setup = 'from __main__ import WordPath')
print "%.2f sec/pass" % (t.timeit(number=100)/100)
And the result on 1Ghz is the blazing speed of:
0.03 sec/pass
So the conclusion is that Python can be used in Google's Code Jam, but one must be carefull with the time limits!
(*) Update. Some people are commenting on reddit my ignorance of the Haskell code. I actually learned most of Haskell some time ago, until I got to Monads. Then I found 267 articles expalining what Monads are from which 27 just tutorials. At that moment I tought "Enough! Maybe I will read it later.". The so called "Maybe" monad. That was 1.5 years ago.


