Synchronization doesn't necessarily mean locking
Tuesday, 15. May 2007, 21:46:54
... or it may mean different kind of locking.
One of the biggest problems we deal today is correct thread synchronization. Thread synchronization itself is a maze. I would like to discuss my new proposed solution to a problem; reference counting smart pointer based lock-free implementation.
One of the biggest problems we deal today is correct thread synchronization. Thread synchronization itself is a maze. I would like to discuss my new proposed solution to a problem; reference counting smart pointer based lock-free implementation.
WIDGETIZE