# Re: Fractal Foundations of mathematics: Axioms notions and the set FS as a model

http://www.fractalforums.com/index.php?action=profile;u=410;sa=showPosts

## Motion is Cause

There is no beginning, just vibrant space, ceaselessly in motion, expanding and contracting around countless poles; condensing and evaporating into and out of fractal patterns at all scales; rotating and swirling in all orientations and directions, creating, not chaos but transformations. That is cause.

When one builds a model of dynamic 3d space, one realises the necessity of thinning sheets of space, and also the foundational condensing pools of space. It is space that moves, not things in space. Space moves vorticularly through dynamic moving space. Such a motion is not conceivable except in terms of sheets that interpenetrate at all scales and at all dynamisms.

Space itself is vibrant, and when our vibrating senses tune in to it what we experience is as transformational and as dynamic as space itself. Space is never empty, nor can it ever be, for it is full of the most pregnant motions that we experience as possibilities, only we cannot fathom every possibility space enwraps us with and penetrates us with. That which we can apprehend is probable, and somehow we measure it with ourown experiences, comparing it against our own memeories and imaginations.

The cause of our own sensibility, the complex patterned subjective processing, the layered and self referencing levels of interaction, the emerging sensations of awareness that we eventually experience as consciousness is the motion of space itself in this fractally intimate way.

http://www.fractalforums.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=12154.0;attach=7367;image

ultimately change and motion are the identical notions. That we spin off different sounds to describe it is a function of our relative experience of it, for , for us all is relative, fractal and intertwined in connections of motions, that is change.

Nothing ever rests. Everything transforms. The flawed laws of Thermodynamics do not predict the behaviour of motion, because they do not properly analyse ceaseless motion. The flawed kinetic theory does not model the behaviour of motion properly, because it does not analyse ceaseless motion. The flawed axioms of science do not provide a firm foundation for analysing motion because they do not admit the fractal nature of ceaseless motion. All these will be transformed. That is the very nature of motion as cause,

### Write a comment

New comments have been disabled for this post.

December 2013
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31