Skip navigation.

Just Passing Through

Stuff not fit to publish elsewhere

December 2009

( Monthly archive )

The Paradox the Spiritual Leading

,

In Scripture, there is a working model of human nature: flesh, soul and spirit. Sometimes you will see the soul divided into mind, emotions and will, but I'm not sure we understand the use of those terms -- "we" being the Western Evangelicals -- in the context of Scripture.

At any rate, I was born in sin, fallen and without hope. My flesh was surely operational, and my mind was, too. But the limits of that fallen mind would have been reached with the full embrace of the highest tenets of Aristotelian logic. Only arrogance permits such logic to claim it can grasp the nature of things spiritual. It cannot; never could and never will. I was doomed in that state, as my spirit was dead.

God, at His own whim, inscrutably chose to rescue me from that state. He breathed His Spirit into my spirit, and brought it to life. From that time forward, it has been a struggle to renew the mind, teaching it to subject itself to the spirit-Spirit. My spirit knows all God would tell any human, but that sort of knowing is far beyond words, far beyond intellect. The best I can do is grasp the imperatives of the moment, and submit to the ineffable Living God my will to act.

At some point, I recognize certain fundamental trends in that process. Those trends are properly termed "convictions." You can analyze, hold and modify your opinions based on factual information; your convictions hold you. Planted as stones in the foundation of my new being in the Spirit, these things do not change, only my ability to respond to them. Upon the faces of those stones are engraved the requirements of my God for conclusions and decisions. The will must respond, whether the mind comprehends or not.

The paradox I face daily is this: I care deeply about human life, only because I want people to freely surrender it.

I would perform any action within my range of abilities to save human life. That includes lifting it, if only slightly, from the misery common to all fallen mankind. The purpose is not because human life itself is so precious. Not this fallen life! But it's the possibility God may yet have use for that soul. For my own life, it is already forfeit. Several times already I have escaped death by narrow margins, so I am on borrowed time. God alone saved my human existence those times, and it remains at His whim. When this tool He finds useful ceases to serve, it will be tossed aside. Believe me -- I look forward to it. But it remains His alone to decide, and the likelihood of Him notifying me in advance is minuscule.

So I would gladly obey Him, as His Spirit communes with my spirit, directing my actions from those stones of conviction, sacrifice myself for whatever need arises. Life is not precious, except as a sacrifice. He owns it now, lying upon the altar of His calling. Other lives rightly belong there, too, but I am not privy to the Lamb's Book of Life, so I don't know who is and isn't His. Nor do I make assumptions about it, only respond to my best ability to see where His hand leads. Do I work with this one? Do we pull in the harness together? Today but not tomorrow? His whim is my desire.

Sometimes His whim makes a kind of sense to the logic of my mind, but I never count on it. Faith itself is inherently super-logical -- it follows its own spiritual logic, which no human intellect can hope to understand.

Win7 Looses It

,

I gave it two weeks. Worked hard at making sure I tried everything available to meet my requirements. Couldn't do it with Win7.

Were I to type up a list of my complaints, it might include the following items:

  • Almost nothing works on the console. If you've never used the commandline, you may never understand my complaint.I found a nice 64-bit package for Vim and gVim, but nothing else compiled for Windows from the vast array of good commandline tools would work for me. And as yet, I can find no free compiler bundle for Win7, nor even Vista. That is probably a year or more away, which means I can't do what little I might be able to figure out in making the tools work.
  • Lack of choice; lack of control. If I want my pointer to be golden yellow, I have to turn off Aero effects. If I want a different style of the bundled games, I have to pay money. If the tile sets in Mahjongg are hard to see, I'm out of luck, because more of them cost money. If I want to run some really interesting tools, I have to fork over a lot for Win7 Pro, because MS refuses to release them for Home Premium. On and on it goes.
  • Senseless limitations. It's all perfectly legal for me to build and run a certain range of multimedia tools, but MS actively blocks their use in Windows. While codecs aren't such an issue these days, I have to jump through a lot of hoops just to play a video DVD I purchased legally, often purchasing other software.


I could keep going, but I don't wish to bore you, dear reader. The point is, while most of my needs were met, there is a large amount of peripheral items which were out of reach. When it is possible to gain those peripheral items another way, and with relative ease, it makes sense to switch.

So I'm running openSUSE 11.2 again. Sorry, Win7. I really tried to make it work.

Fixing the Leaks

, ,

In times past, only a handful of wide-eyed freaks really had the details. They traded the data via letters, phone calls, then got their hands on some shortwave radio equipment. A few began producing little newsletters and such, magazines, but it was pretty expensive. At some point, the Internet grew up and everyone jumped on that.

When the ruling oligarchs of this world controlled most of the flow of information, we all tended to believe the myths they spun to cover it. We were deluded into thinking our world made sense, and people were decent by and large, and we were all pretty much on the same page about morals. But it wasn't true. What we had was a manufactured unity of morals based on a very shallow understanding, in part because nations are easier to control when there is a well-enforced code of conduct. Incremental changes in the code of conduct would eventually bring the masses under any slaving lash the oligarchs chose.

When something truly disruptive comes into human society, chaos is the natural result. Sometimes that chaos is intended, but no one ever really controls the outcome. If oligarchs introduce a truly revolutionary technology to enhance their control, a few brilliant revolutionaries will find a way to leech freedom from the controls themselves. All the oligarchs can do then is hope to profit by controlling how that technology is supplied, while they work on ways to disrupt the disruption.

The Internet was intended as a military channel of communications, but too many college kids got hold of it. The technology ran out from under the oligarchs. As I keep my eyes on various efforts to set loose hidden information, it's no longer a handful of wild-eyed conspiracy theorists, but huge masses of sensible people. So the lies about Climate Change, Climategate, Copenhagen Conference, the condition of the US and global economy, are all being brought into the light.

Currently the oligarchs are doing their best to counteract this. Their lies in the mainstream media are ever more audacious, and they pay well those who work so hard to make fools of the truth or the truth-tellers. When someone came up with a viable scientific method for reducing CO2 and other "greenhouse gases," Algore and friends silenced him, so as to protect their thriving trade in "carbon credit futures." We have all manner of Truthers out there peeling back the layers on everything.

A critical element in control is sometimes diluting a flow you cannot stop. Back when it was short-wave and newsletters, some of the big voices were shills for the oligarchs. On the Internet, aside from the reliably lying mainstream media outlets, we have a lot of fake Truthers.

You can't trust anybody, can you?

If you pine for a simpler golden age somewhere in the past, you are lying to yourself. Can't trust that face in the mirror. The current cultural chaos is partly manufactured by the oligarchs to weaken, but a few threads, as always, represent good sense. Much in our world's recent history is pure hogwash, painted prettily, because history is simply the story told by those who own the printing press or other means of delivery. The kids who ran around in the 1960s creating chaos in schools were actually doing a good thing, part of the time. Rejecting a repressive, materialistic, artificial lifestyle was entirely righteous. Trading it for mindless hedonism was not righteous. A select few traded for something better.

This is not senseless rambling. In the next few months, powerful and dangerous efforts to finally wrest control over the leaking information on the Internet will manifest. There have been several threads. One is to simply make everyone lose interest, and switch to something like cellphones-as-pocket-computers, much more easily controlled. Another has been seeding the culture with dire warnings about how serious threats on the Net require surrendering current freedoms. At the same time, the oligarchs are funding the people doing the particular attacking which ruins your day.

You can learn a lot more about computers and how to defend your Windows. Or you can get something harder to crack, like a Mac; you can learn to run Linux and install that. If you are really ambitious, you'll learn about even more esoteric operating systems: the BSDs, Open Solaris, Haiku, Syllable, etc. I understand ReactOS (a cleaner, smarter Windows XP clone) is not too awfully far from ready for mainstream use. Sooner or later I'm probably going to have to ditch Windows 7 for something else.

More importantly, you can take advantage of the fading opportunity to get acquainted with chaos. That is, you can learn the very anchor of your being, your comfort and sanity, does not rely on what's around you, but what's inside you. Maybe you can learn to grasp how your world is hardly what you've been taught to believe, that you really can't own or control anything at all, with the narrow exception of your reaction to the very real chaos around you, hidden behind that thin veneer of stability.

Peter was never closer to Jesus than when he stepped out of that boat and into the storm.

I'm Not the Same

,

There is no way to explain it. Maybe I can use words to indicate something about it, and some of you will get the idea. Just over a week ago, there was an odd, subtle, almost imperceptible shift in my consciousness. It changed everything. The business of mysticism is reality.

Maybe I can lay out some visible markers to where I've gone, in case you are interested in exploring it yourself.

I realized long ago the notion of objective truth was just a delusion. There are facts, and there are even wise and astute analysis of facts, but there is no truth in the sense most people mean it. In this world, truth is a fleeting collision between the context of this world and God's revelation of Himself. Truth is God, and insofar as something works to reveal Him in some way, that passing moment of revelation is truth. Lots of people mistake warm fuzzy feelings for a moment of truth. Lots of people assert they understand the truth with their minds, but it's not possible. We can barely recognize it if our minds are trained by mysticism.

When you become committed to the truth, even your entire being takes a back seat. You don't take yourself that seriously. You don't expect to control much of anything because you realize you never had it in the first place. So when stuff comes along which you did not anticipate, you aren't angry, impatient, taking it as a personal insult and looking for someone to blame. You just take it in stride and try to figure out what to do next.

The idea you can make your own world, make things happen, is sheer blasphemy. God is in charge, and you aren't Him. You'll be really blessed if you can just control your own reactions. You might be able to discern where things are headed and generally succeed in reaching some worldly goal of prosperity, social approval, etc. It's an illusion. When you are gone, no one will remember those things. Try to do things which will reflect something which outlasts you. Not just fame, massive fortune, or great power and influence over other people. What happens when those you influenced are gone? The whole of human history is filled with forgotten names. Get over it, because after that, you stand before God.

What will He remember? He'll remember how much you looked like His Son... or how much you didn't. You can't simply try to learn acting like Jesus. It's not what God looks for; He's looking for the very essence of how His Son managed to portray eternal truth in every context. You can claim to be covered by the Blood of Jesus, but it may also be just words. People who have been washed have this strange tendency to want to think from a very different level. They tend to realize just about nothing in this world matters of itself. It will all be gone, a forgotten memory.

There will come a time when Jesus comes back here. All those pieces of wood people claim were chunks of His Cross? They'll burn up. So will the Shroud of Turin, and every "holy" place in this world. So much for our concept of holiness. If you can see it, touch it or say it, don't call it "holy." Holy is not the quality of things, but of moments. They pass by, show themselves, then are gone. Only insofar as they reveal something about God's holiness can we call them "holy." So what if they find the actual footprints of Jesus in the sand, or His sweat stains on some place He passed by -- it's not holy.

Holy is the desire to make Him known, to please Him like a child wants to please their father. The treasure of the Kingdom of Heaven, the "coin of the realm" of the Spirit of God, is sacrificial love. By this will all men know you are My disciples: You have My love for others. Everything else is just tools for the work. Inappropriate tools get laid aside, worn tools get replaced, and broken tools are thrown away. Your life on this earth is just a tool.

God uses broken vessels because there aren't any other kind. I'm not any less broken than before. I don't have more of Him in me than you do. But God has seen fit to show me just one more glimpse of His treasure in me. You can go to Heaven without mysticism. You can be a mystic and not go to Heaven. But you can't fully appreciate truth, and truly walk with God if you don't embrace His mysticism.

Two Uniforms, One Team

Our two party system is utterly fake. It's only one pro-government party with two wings. The differences are so insignificant, I wonder why anyone bothers to read or watch political reports. Let me give you a concrete example: Both parties are run by sexual predators.

Consider: The one party openly advocates child sexualization in schools. The other party simply prefers to keep their child molestation secret. Net result is the same -- perverts.

Aside from a tiny minority of almost decent people, politicians as a whole are some of the nastiest creatures on earth. You aren't permitted to enter politics if you aren't a pervert.

Explaining the Choice of Labels: Emergent

The word "character" means something distinct from others of a similar nature. We refer to characters in type setting and fonts, because if you can't tell what the marks mean, they don't mean anything beyond some nebulous decorative purpose. For words to have meaning, they must exclude things they don't mean. Though Heaven's language is indicative symbols, there are lots of things we have to do to make the symbols work, and that means having human language with sounds and character combinations which take on meaning by narrowing down what it indicates. Degrees of precision may be the subject of debate, but the basic principle stands.

By choosing terms such as "mystical" and "emergent," we naturally exclude things we don't want associated with our ministry. That we would also find ourselves including things we may also not want is another matter. The process of communicating is presenting pools of meaning, then pointing to the place where those pools overlap. Two words each meaning very broad ideas will then together winnow out the chaff.

It is likely we could never be a part of the Emergent Village -- the original emergent ministry -- because we are frankly not inclusive enough. For them to include us would dilute or tarnish the branding, as it were. But we cannot easily avoid the connotations of what they are. There comes a point where you don't waste too much effort chasing down every possible meaning, defining and defending it every time someone asks. This remains a fallen and imperfect world, and part of being emergent surely includes embracing and tolerating things unsettled, as a part of the on-going conversation with God and His Creation.

This is precisely the point. No one of us, nor any group of us is fit to be all things to all men. We would love it if God would do that, but He made it pretty obvious He would not. Only Jesus gets that privilege. The rest of us are the multitude of expressions of Jesus who take Him to little parts of God's Creation. Choosing the label "emergent" means we exclude folks who don't like that label. We do add to the pool of meaning, but we hardly control how it registers in the minds of others. Accepting the very real limitations, we seek God's face for definitions to our service in His Realm, and it seems He has led us to this choice. We are called now to work with those who won't choke on the term "emergent." We let go in peace those who don't like what they feel "emergent" means.

The baggage we do have is now pretty easy to start identifying. Mysticism, which we have already embraced long ago, is an obvious part of that label. In some ways, I feel our justification for mysticism is probably stronger than I've seen offered by most emergent writers. I'm not sure how to go about sharing that with them, but I would gladly. Meanwhile, there are a host of other associations.

We don't do suit and tie, nor any part of the subculture which calls for it. Feel free to wear one, but don't ever pretend it's important to what we do. We don't do settled and predictable, so organization will always be fluid, contextual. While ideas surely matter, people matter more. We place the burden of adjustment on ideas to meet the needs of people. That hardly excludes some things being settled in Heaven before God. At the same time, we quickly take issue with what most people assume is settled in Heaven.

Most obvious, and most perplexing to non-emergents, is our actions tend to follow a wholly different logic. We utterly reject the notion conversion is a cognitive process. It surely has cognitive results, but redemption is born -- is rooted -- somewhere else in the human soul. If your definitions of things forces that to mean "subjective emotions" then we can't offer you much help. That is, we discern you lack the spiritual equipment to hold a discussion. In our minds, there is such a thing as heresy, and Aristotelian/Enlightenment epistemology is that.

Thus, or actions will make no sense to folks still rooted in human rational "theology" which declares a "propositional truth" in God's Word, since Jesus Himself eschewed such a thing. We aren't selling a cognitive decision, but offering eternal grace, a mystical gift which will always defy human understanding. We can walk among the sinners of this world making no demands whatsoever unless absolutely critical to our own witness. We don't care about keeping our personal boundaries intact, because we are nothing in ourselves; our only value before God is our commitment to Him. We draw that circle of defense much closer to ourselves. We don't believe keeping yourself "unspotted by sins of this world" means public relations maneuvering, and we don't believe keeping yourself from "the appearance of sin" means a shallow pretense.

We expect to earn the privilege of being heard, but demand the right to be seen. We'll stick out not because of our subcultural expressions of artistic and stylistic tastes, but by the graceful personal interactions. To a large degree, we choose to absorb a lot of abuse just for the sake of the Cross. We let splash on us lots of filth because appearances mean very little, but persistence means a lot. So, yes, I call homosexuality a sin, but I can't do much good to gays if I don't remain friends with them in the long term. They need to know grace from Heaven is stronger than all their other gay friends, and what bonds me to them is not some sexual preference, nor merely an acceptance of it, but something deeper. If they never catch on, that's not my problem, because only God can reveal Himself. Yes, it will surely lead to some misunderstandings, but I'm sure Mary faced a lot of them, as did Jesus regarding His paternity.

So we defy convention, not merely for the sake of defiance, but because it is broken. The very definition of convention is whatever people come up with to reduce complexity and increase convenience and comfort. Convention is fundamentally a product of avoiding difficulties by nailing things down in neat categories and procedures. The Truth of God cannot possibly come to us in that framework, since He is ineffable. God always colors outside the lines, and even redefines color itself. Man is utterly unable to grasp order on God's level, so he mocks God by creating his own pitiful caricature of order, and thereby rejects God entirely. How else can we bear that mighty grace to you if everything we do is what you already expect? Your god is too small.

I love Classical Music, but I'll put up with almost any artistic acoustic expression if it gets me closer to people who need Jesus. I'll make friends with tax gatherers, prostitutes, queers, traitors, commies, thugs, dope dealers, pedophiles -- I'm not afraid to be seen with them. It's no different from helping the blind, burn victims, broken hearted, poor and anyone else who is suffering. It won't matter how they got there; they need to get out. I can't help them if they can't touch me.

That's the choice, and giving it the label "emergent" is simply a measure of accuracy.

Win7 Wins It

, ,

Got my Windows 7 Upgrade Kit from Dell a couple of days ago. It took over an hour to do its thing, but I'm very glad I went through the hassle. Keep in mind, this refers to the 64-bit version of Win7 Home Premium.

You can easily read up on all the visual improvements from lots of technology websites. Believe me, Windows 7 is a lot prettier. There were two things I noticed which may not appear in any reviews.

1. Win7 uses a lot less horsepower to get the same work done. I have been running a meter on the desktop which measures something called RAM caching. The amount of my RAM which is kept by the system just for normal use was almost cut in half from what Vista required.

2. Some things work better, like Firefox. Opera works less well. Under Vista, Firefox locked up and crashed a lot. Under Win7, it runs very nicely. Opera has become cranky, but that's not really news.

So I'm blessed, and quite unlikely to ever bother with running Linux again. No, neither is inherently superior, it's just a matter of what I do with a computer. At one time, Linux carried the load better for what I did. Things change, and so did my needs. Win7 is now the winner for what I do. I'll still be glad to help anyone who has Linux questions.