Pensieve

Myślodsiewnia...

Subscribe to RSS feed

Misused symbols

All societies started off being pagan. There's no argument here (even if some Catholic politicians try to make you forget about it - for example in Poland we have some fucked up people who believe Jesus is the king of the country and his mother Mary is the Queen - I am not going into the Oedipus complex theory here, but yes, it is very tempting at the moment smile).

Many symbols we know these days were in use centuries ago as protective elements.
I will go through couple of the ones that these days seem to carry a negative connotation, and one that had its meaning the improperly sanctified.



Swastika

"It is an equilateral cross with its arms bent at right angles, in either right-facing (卐) form or its mirrored left-facing (卍) form." Its name comes from Sanscrit and it means a "lucky object". When displayed it was supposed to provide good energy, wealth and happiness. Its origin can be traced back to 4000 b.c.
Today - if one decides wear swastika on their neck, or embroider it it their clothes they would be perceived as Nazis.
Auntie Wikipedia even says:
"The German (and Austrian) postwar criminal code makes the public showing of the Hakenkreuz (the swastika) and other Nazi symbols illegal and punishable, except for scholarly reasons."
This symbol was simply "borrowed" by Hitler, as he was hoping it will bring him luck and will show others that somehow he is worthy "inheriting" the power of gods...



Pentagram

Pentagram is in the shape of a five-pointed star drawn with five straight strokes.
Its origin can be dated up to 3000 b.c. It was used (and still is by Pagans) as a symbol of five main forces - fire, water, earth, wood, and metal.

But what is the first thing that comes into your mind when you see it? How does society perceive people wearing it their neck?
First thing that comes in mind is Satanism (and yes, we should thank the Catholic Church for this, because they make sure everything in the world is about them...).

I wear a Pentacle on my neck - and to be frank British people do not seem to notice this too much, which is great. But as soon as I head home - some devout Catho-granny will make sure she points out to me that I will be burning in hell smile



Cross

The cross symbol has been used in many cultures for various different purposes (it is even linked to Swastika), it can be used as a symbol of life or fertility, a "medicine wheel of life", a house protection from fire etc. etc.
For the past 1500 years (and under various shapes and names) it has mostly been used in Christian religions. Even the Inverted Cross (another pseudo-satanist link here) originated from a Christian - Saint Peter, who was crucified upside down.






It is important to remember when looking at symbols that whatever we associate to them may not be right. So many symbols are perceived as evil (or "unlucky") and they have even been prohibited in some parts of the world, but we forget about the heritage they carry with them, we forget that their original meaning is different to what we perceive it to be.
And sometimes, we give sanctified meaning to symbols that were simply protect us from bad luck (like the cross) because we fail to dig deeper and see that they haven't in fact originated in the current era.

It worries me that although now we've got access to all the knowledge in the world we choose to pick up only the messages fed to us by the mainstream groups and fail to look for the correct information ourselves.
We are becoming lazy and we turn to stereotypes for instant information...

It's not you, it's me...

It needs to click. Simple as that.
And sometimes it doesn't...

Psychologically we want to fit in. Some people even change their accent depending on who they speak to.

It's good for our survival (looking at it from the "cave men" perspective) if the group wants us. We feel secure, we don't have to worry about food and shelter, we are safer from predators, it is easier to find somebody to mate ;P

It feels nice to belong. We are happy when others find us interesting and worth their time. It is truly great to be a part of the team.



Sometimes however we hit a brick wall and it's no longer nice. No matter how much we try there is no chemistry between the group members. Something just doesn't feel right...
The deal with the group is that they usually have common history and ways that have built up way before we decided to join it. In such situations our "impedimenta" clashes with theirs and something's gotta give.

Usually, as we are outnumbered, we change ourselves in order to meet other people's expectations. And sometimes we give up and look for a better environment elsewhere...

The less is (not) the new black

,

We are hunter-gatherers (or so I was told at school). This means our behaviours can be similar to those of a magpie.
Those birds tend to pick up everything that's shiny, bring it to their nest and embed it within it.

To survive we need water, food, sex and shelter.
There is however a force, that makes (almost) every person seek for more, attempt to be better, learn new things and accumulate goods. Thanks to it we evolve as a race. We think of better ways to save time, to make ourselves more comfortable (and lazy and fat p).

I guess it is good in some ways, but on the other side - it doesn't seem to make us happier. It doesn't seem to bring us more peace of mind. We are stressed over things we don't have, and fail to appreciate the things that we do.
I call it the "Mc Syndrome" (borrowed the prefix from the name of the oh-so-famous American fast food chain).

Because everything is so easy accessible, and we don't even need to have money to buy it (let me just dig out that credit card from my wallet!) - we tend to go by quantity rather than quality.
The rumour has it that goods are no longer produced to last, as it is clearly better if you need a new TV every three years.
And boy, does getting a new one give you a rush!





Why am I writing this (for the one thousand fifth time on this blog - well the old posts are no longer visible, so I may as well indulge myself!)?

I am currently a conscious "not-owner" of any sort of TV.
I believe it feeds you shit and makes you crave more of the same...
Maybe it isn't fair - I know there are a lot of interesting documentaries to be found, I myself also like some TV series (I used to be an Ally McBeal junkie, and now enjoy watching stuff like House or Grey's Anatomy), but I am afraid that once I get a TV I will turn into a brainless maniac, eating cereal while sitting in front of the shiny box, not even looking at my hands whilst doing it.

Jacek (my partner) thinks that as we are both foreigners, having TV at home could help us progress our language onto another level (or help us with understanding more of the various accents that surround us here).
And I have already started linking his craving into mine - I always wanted to try using one of those boxes with a mat connected to it, that help you with yoga and other exercising, and I know one WILL lead to another. We will end up with a TV, satellite dish, satellite decoder, a gaming console and a surround sound system.

With already four computers at home (two PCs, one netbook and one laptop that holds SQL server on it) I am not sure whether I am ready for another set of boxes that will clutter my personal space and make humming sounds.

What's wrong with spare time spent in peace and quiet with a cuppa of earl grey with lemon and a book in your hand, or a face to face conversation with a friend instead?
It actually scares me, I don't want our evenings to change into time when we sit next to each other looking at silver screen, instead of being together consciously.

Am I turning into a technophobe?

Refuse to choose


I am a devout reader of the Psychologies Magazine and this month I read something that struck me. The online article about the matter can be found here:

http://psychologies.co.uk/self/what-do-you-do-when-you-want-to-do-everything/


We all think a clear path is required of us. We believe that we need to know exactly what our life aspirations are and what we want to achieve, we have a clear imagine of our life in thirty years time.
It seems that some (or maybe many?!?) people are struggling with it, thinking they are lacking the "purpose", that it is wrong they don't have the "calling".

It turns out, not everyone can easily get past the initial stage that has been drawn in so many self-help career books ("specify your passions, then [we will] tell you how to make them reality").
I often envy people who knew clearly from the beginning that they wanted to be a doctor, a violin player (hello sister), a programmer (hello brother), but now I know that having my finger in (too) many pies does not mean I am lazy, not-committed or lack focus.

In fact I have noticed that if/when I am doing something I am always trying to give it that 101%, as I really enjoy making things happen and seeing my goals accomplished fully. But it doesn't have to mean everything I do is of major interest to me, nor it have to mean I will only deal with things that I enjoy doing.

Some time ago, when I first created a social network account, I wasn't sure what to enter under the "About you" bit, and I remember typing: "knowing everything about everything"... At the time it seemed like I didn't really have anything to enter, but now I see that this is how I function as a human being.

The article refers to the people that can't choose their path and can't really specify their life purpose as Scanners.
Scanners - people who don't specialise in one area, who won't necessarily understand the love for work and/or hobby that others feel. But on the other hand, people who have less problems seeing a bigger picture, as they don't "dive in" the tasks and situations in their lives fully.

I don't mean to say that Scanners do not commit, as I can vouch for myself that I can't leave things unfinished and, when need be, I WILL complete any task well. As I see it, it simply means that I am not losing myself in only one aspect of my life. I want/need to try different things, attempt many little projects at a time. I get pleasure from business and strive on knowledge.

I guess this explains why I am working as a programmer, singing is my hobby and in my spare time I read psychological articles... and have problems falling asleep at night, contemplating the meaning of life and artificial intelligence.

Oh... and I forgot about the cross-stitching smile



Things that should be done

As we approach certain milestones (not neccesarily linked to our age) some things should be rid of.

How does one decide what is to stay and what is to be let go?

Is embracing the change ever easy to anybody?

What are you looking for?

Apparently person interested in psychology subconsciously wants to "fix" some parts of themselves. It isn't a particularly good thought if one ever faces the unfortunate need of visiting a psychologist.

Does person interested in psychology want to dig their thumb into someone else's brain out of curiosity, or do they want to comfort themselves into a though that they are not that screwed after all (in comparison to their patients)?

Technically speaking psychology has been with us for ages, it grew on the back of philosophy. Old men, dressed in white sheets were contemplating their existence, disputing egos and existence of a higher power.
And now thinking that... guess what auntie Wiki says about philosophy's history:
"Historians point to the writings of ancient Greek philosophers, such as Thales, Plato, and Aristotle (...) as the first significant body of work in the West to be rich in psychological thought"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychology

So, what makes us so susceptible to psychology and it's ideas?
What makes us want to inspect our psyche, find hidden traumas, contemplate different paths?

Is it another stage of evolution? Fixing our phobias and paranoias will definitely help building healthier societies. Maybe that's the whole point? Maybe we yearn for the ever-inaccessible ideal and we believe our live will have more meaning once this is achieved?

The only problem here is that - once we reach the ideal, it ceases to be the same. Human beings are built in a specific way. That way makes us want more, need more, be more.
I guess there is one conclusion to this - we will NEVER be able to grasp the ideal.