Schubert and Folk Song
By musickna. Monday, 13. February 2006, 23:45:08
Original title: Comment on Troels' Health, morality, truth and beauty in Beethoven's and Schubert's music
Troels wrote an interesting and insightful article, and I strongly agree that Schubert music (loosely that is) often has a 'bluesey' feel to it. (I don't believe he ever wrote in the form that is now established as the standard 12-bar blues progression).
There is a good musical reason for this. Schubert's greatest achievement is as the composer of song; of the many hundreds he wrote, there are few that are not worth knowing.
Beethoven wrote very few songs - it was the poor stepchild in his output.
I have little doubt that Schubert - who was, like most young composers of the period, in awe of Beethoven - chose to write songs precisely because this was one area where he did not compete directly with Beethoven's genius.
But it goes further than that. The reason why Schubert's songs are so successful is that he possessed a melodic sensibility that was ideally suited to the form. It's a sensibility shared by all enduring songs in the folk music tradition. Blues music is an offshoot of folk (a unique blend of African-American and European styles), but is still fundamentally folk music.
Thus Schubert crafted numerous songs that really could be considered folk songs. And in doing so he tapped into the earthier and more direct emotive power of such songs - giving his music a wonderfully homespun feel that somehow feels more human in its frailties than the lofty achievements of Beethoven.
Anyway, that's my take on Schubert!
Troels wrote an interesting and insightful article, and I strongly agree that Schubert music (loosely that is) often has a 'bluesey' feel to it. (I don't believe he ever wrote in the form that is now established as the standard 12-bar blues progression).
There is a good musical reason for this. Schubert's greatest achievement is as the composer of song; of the many hundreds he wrote, there are few that are not worth knowing.
Beethoven wrote very few songs - it was the poor stepchild in his output.
I have little doubt that Schubert - who was, like most young composers of the period, in awe of Beethoven - chose to write songs precisely because this was one area where he did not compete directly with Beethoven's genius.
But it goes further than that. The reason why Schubert's songs are so successful is that he possessed a melodic sensibility that was ideally suited to the form. It's a sensibility shared by all enduring songs in the folk music tradition. Blues music is an offshoot of folk (a unique blend of African-American and European styles), but is still fundamentally folk music.
Thus Schubert crafted numerous songs that really could be considered folk songs. And in doing so he tapped into the earthier and more direct emotive power of such songs - giving his music a wonderfully homespun feel that somehow feels more human in its frailties than the lofty achievements of Beethoven.
Anyway, that's my take on Schubert!
