lurif

Releasing an installer that has only been tested a few days, still containing severe bugs like deleting shortcuts that it did not create? Not wanting to adhere to the standard way of storing user data, instead trying to "work around" Windows access control by not installing to "Program Files" and not writing an entry in "Add/Remove Programs"? Finally implementing support for "lfs://" links but instead of supporting the existing syntax that has been around for over five years they invent a new one?