change is a sighn of growth

Subscribe to RSS feed

did you think i could slow down any faster?

Did you think I could slow down any faster?
Sometimes in my past I can see the future. I turn to look back and all I can see is what’s going to happen next. Does learning from your mistakes qualify as conversant? , Or does it really just teach you to make mistakes that are more complex in detail than the last.
Psychics are defined as people who can see in to the future, they are defined as some one who can relate to the human mind, they have an extraordinary perception, and an ability to recognize patterns on a genius level; so essentially a psychic recognizes similarities between the results of situations as a whole.
Hopefully putting things in to perspective; one would then have to wonder, if a “psychic” ever makes mistakes, or is put in to a situation where they wonder if they made the right decision, and if they ever have to look in to there own past to see what might happen next.
What then would distinguish everyone else from these people? As basic human psychology says everything follows a pattern. Everything that happens will happen again, and everything happening now will have the same results as something that happened previously. Taking this in to consideration, you would think that being able to predict the future, would be a standard feat, however quite the contrary seems to be the case. As a matter of “fact” it seems to be so respected we are willing to pay the people with this gift to share it. So many of us seem to have no eye in the future, we wonder blindly wondering what is going to happen next.

change is a sighn of growth

Change is a sign of growth: Sometimes going through life, thinking everything you touch is just turning to shit is accurate. Sometimes you are just changing things. Everything that happens is a direct effect of something else that has already happened, so in theory everything that happens will eventually happen again assuming the universe, like everything else follows a pattern. Of course it would also be on the same pattern that everything else is on, only on a much larger scale. People inadvertently mess things up. They just go in to destruct mode. But it’s not because it’s in human nature to want to constantly destroy things, but rather because our complex minds require constant change to maintain any form of “mental health”, and assure constant stimulation. Translation ? Change is necessary for human sanity. When you argue the difference between “Fact” and “Opinion”, essentially what you are doing is arguing the difference between mass opinion and opinion. “Fact” is only an opinion that the masses have agreed on and appears to be flawless (Although several “facts” have noticeable grey areas that are seldom questioned). Common sense would then be “sense” that is explained to be “common” among the masses. However the literal meaning of the word seems to contradict the figurative sentence it’s usually used in. (“That’s common sense”/ “That should be common sense”) not to say that common sense is a factual word, but rather concept. Why can’t we do whatever we want? Would the world be just one big ball of mad chaos? Would it be because we lack the discipline necessary to function in a truly * “free” world, or would it be because although destruction, (unless it’s to gain/re-gain power) isn’t in our nature, structure and solidity is? Why is change equal to food, water, and sleep, and why must you “step in to the box” to discuss it with other people. Typically when people try to change things they mess them up, and when they see a mess they have a hard time sorting through everything to see where change is taking place. What that means is, they are usually having a hard time deciding where to place the label “end” and where in turn the new label “start” will inevitably have to go. Although most people are able to define the most candid changes, and why the situation will change the future they often disown personal responsibility in order to “cope” with the change/end. People subconsciously need change, and consciously can barley handle it, trying to except the end of something is generally hard, unless the end is the desired out come. The ending of something is what in most cases promotes change; as by the time something has started, the change would have already taken place.